BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund Competitors

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (NYSE:MUJ) and Tri-Continental (NYSE:TY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund and Tri-Continental's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

8.8% of Tri-Continental shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.7% of Tri-Continental shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund has a beta of 0.18, indicating that its share price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tri-Continental has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Tri-Continental pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund and Tri-Continental, as reported by MarketBeat.

Profitability

This table compares BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund and Tri-Continental's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Tri-Continental beats BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (NYSE:MUJ) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (NYSE:TYG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

5.7% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund has a beta of 0.18, meaning that its share price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 2.87, meaning that its share price is 187% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure, as provided by MarketBeat.

Profitability

This table compares BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund beats Tortoise Energy Infrastructure on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (NYSE:MUJ) and Boulder Growth & Income Fund (NYSE:BIF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund and Boulder Growth & Income Fund's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

12.1% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund has a beta of 0.18, meaning that its share price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boulder Growth & Income Fund has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Boulder Growth & Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Boulder Growth & Income Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund and Boulder Growth & Income Fund, as provided by MarketBeat.

Profitability

This table compares BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund and Boulder Growth & Income Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (NYSE:MUJ) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (NASDAQ:QQQX) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

19.7% of Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund has a beta of 0.18, meaning that its share price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund, as provided by MarketBeat.

Profitability

This table compares BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund beats BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (NYSE:MUJ) and Tekla Healthcare Investors (NYSE:HQH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund and Tekla Healthcare Investors' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Tekla Healthcare Investors pays an annual dividend of $1.89 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.6%. BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Tekla Healthcare Investors has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund and Tekla Healthcare Investors, as provided by MarketBeat.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund and Tekla Healthcare Investors' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund has a beta of 0.18, meaning that its share price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tekla Healthcare Investors has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

22.2% of Tekla Healthcare Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of Tekla Healthcare Investors shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Tekla Healthcare Investors beats BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund on 4 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund (NYSE:AWF) and BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (NYSE:MUJ) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund and BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund and BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund, as provided by MarketBeat.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund and BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund has a beta of 0.18, meaning that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund beats BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund on 2 of the 2 factors compared between the two stocks.