Osisko Development (ODV) Competitors

Osisko Development logo
$2.47 -0.08 (-3.14%)
As of 06/23/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

ODV vs. SA, PPTA, FSM, EXK, and HYMC

Should you buy Osisko Development stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Osisko Development with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Osisko Development include Seabridge Gold (SA), Perpetua Resources (PPTA), Fortuna Mining (FSM), Endeavour Silver (EXK), and Hycroft Mining (HYMC). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does Osisko Development compare to Seabridge Gold?

Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA) and Osisko Development (NYSE:ODV) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Osisko Development's net margin of -192.13%. Seabridge Gold's return on equity of -6.38% beat Osisko Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seabridge GoldN/A -6.38% -4.06%
Osisko Development -192.13%-10.46%-5.99%

Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Osisko Development has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Seabridge Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Osisko Development. Seabridge Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seabridge GoldN/AN/A-$38.06M-$0.48N/A
Osisko Development$37.69M20.04-$120.96M-$0.52N/A

In the previous week, Seabridge Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Osisko Development's score of 0.00 indicating that Seabridge Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seabridge Gold Neutral
Osisko Development Neutral

34.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.2% of Osisko Development shares are held by institutional investors. 12.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Osisko Development shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Seabridge Gold currently has a consensus price target of $65.00, suggesting a potential upside of 139.94%. Given Seabridge Gold's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Seabridge Gold is more favorable than Osisko Development.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seabridge Gold
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Osisko Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Summary

Seabridge Gold beats Osisko Development on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Osisko Development compare to Perpetua Resources?

Osisko Development (NYSE:ODV) and Perpetua Resources (NASDAQ:PPTA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

In the previous week, Perpetua Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Osisko Development. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Perpetua Resources and 0 mentions for Osisko Development. Perpetua Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Osisko Development's score of 0.00 indicating that Perpetua Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development Neutral
Perpetua Resources Positive

Perpetua Resources has a consensus price target of $35.42, indicating a potential upside of 58.61%. Given Perpetua Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Perpetua Resources is more favorable than Osisko Development.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Osisko Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Perpetua Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Perpetua Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Osisko Development. Perpetua Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Osisko Development$37.69M20.04-$120.96M-$0.52N/A
Perpetua ResourcesN/AN/A-$100.39M-$1.32N/A

Perpetua Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Osisko Development's net margin of -192.13%. Osisko Development's return on equity of -10.46% beat Perpetua Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Osisko Development-192.13% -10.46% -5.99%
Perpetua Resources N/A -20.71%-20.15%

15.2% of Osisko Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.1% of Perpetua Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Osisko Development shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Perpetua Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Osisko Development beats Perpetua Resources on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Osisko Development compare to Fortuna Mining?

Osisko Development (NYSE:ODV) and Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and valuation.

Osisko Development has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Osisko Development. Osisko Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortuna Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Osisko Development$37.69M20.04-$120.96M-$0.52N/A
Fortuna Mining$947.06M2.75$287.47M$1.068.11

Fortuna Mining has a net margin of 31.07% compared to Osisko Development's net margin of -192.13%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 16.26% beat Osisko Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Osisko Development-192.13% -10.46% -5.99%
Fortuna Mining 31.07%16.26%11.95%

Fortuna Mining has a consensus target price of $11.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.91%. Given Fortuna Mining's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fortuna Mining is more favorable than Osisko Development.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Osisko Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Fortuna Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

15.2% of Osisko Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Osisko Development shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Osisko Development. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortuna Mining and 0 mentions for Osisko Development. Fortuna Mining's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Osisko Development's score of 0.00 indicating that Fortuna Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development Neutral
Fortuna Mining Positive

Summary

Fortuna Mining beats Osisko Development on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Osisko Development compare to Endeavour Silver?

Endeavour Silver (NYSE:EXK) and Osisko Development (NYSE:ODV) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Endeavour Silver presently has a consensus price target of $14.50, suggesting a potential upside of 81.25%. Given Endeavour Silver's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Endeavour Silver is more favorable than Osisko Development.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Endeavour Silver
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
Osisko Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Endeavour Silver has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Osisko Development's net margin of -192.13%. Endeavour Silver's return on equity of 9.33% beat Osisko Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Endeavour Silver-3.68% 9.33% 4.69%
Osisko Development -192.13%-10.46%-5.99%

Endeavour Silver has higher revenue and earnings than Osisko Development. Endeavour Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Endeavour Silver$432.80M5.47-$119.10M-$0.08N/A
Osisko Development$37.69M20.04-$120.96M-$0.52N/A

20.1% of Endeavour Silver shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.2% of Osisko Development shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Endeavour Silver shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Osisko Development shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Endeavour Silver had 1 more articles in the media than Osisko Development. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Endeavour Silver and 0 mentions for Osisko Development. Endeavour Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Osisko Development'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Endeavour Silver Neutral
Osisko Development Neutral

Endeavour Silver has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Osisko Development has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Endeavour Silver beats Osisko Development on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Osisko Development compare to Hycroft Mining?

Osisko Development (NYSE:ODV) and Hycroft Mining (NASDAQ:HYMC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Osisko Development has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hycroft Mining has a beta of 2.62, suggesting that its share price is 162% more volatile than the broader market.

Hycroft Mining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Osisko Development's net margin of -192.13%. Osisko Development's return on equity of -10.46% beat Hycroft Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Osisko Development-192.13% -10.46% -5.99%
Hycroft Mining N/A -65.73%-33.36%

15.2% of Osisko Development shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of Hycroft Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Osisko Development shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Hycroft Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Osisko Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Hycroft Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Hycroft Mining had 5 more articles in the media than Osisko Development. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Hycroft Mining and 0 mentions for Osisko Development. Hycroft Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Osisko Development's score of 0.00 indicating that Hycroft Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development Neutral
Hycroft Mining Positive

Hycroft Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Osisko Development. Hycroft Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Osisko Development$37.69M20.04-$120.96M-$0.52N/A
Hycroft MiningN/AN/A-$40.66M-$1.19N/A

Summary

Osisko Development beats Hycroft Mining on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Osisko Development News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ODV and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ODV and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ODV vs. The Competition

MetricOsisko DevelopmentMINING IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$779.82M$12.28B$4.72B$23.26B
Dividend YieldN/A1.59%5.00%4.07%
P/E Ratio-4.7511.0622.9431.08
Price / Sales20.0414.975,908.3616.06
Price / CashN/A35.8827.0524.45
Price / Book1.296.518.844.64
Net Income-$120.96M$719.98M$157.26M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-9.36%-6.99%-3.08%0.15%
1 Month Performance-8.01%-8.36%-4.13%0.18%
1 Year Performance19.61%54.30%51.83%23.21%

Osisko Development Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ODV
Osisko Development
0.2827 of 5 stars
$2.47
-3.1%
N/A+18.5%$779.82M$37.69MN/A310
SA
Seabridge Gold
2.3232 of 5 stars
$30.69
-1.7%
$65.00
+111.8%
+85.9%$3.30BN/AN/A40
PPTA
Perpetua Resources
2.7833 of 5 stars
$24.90
-3.4%
$35.42
+42.2%
+71.5%$3.11BN/AN/A30
FSM
Fortuna Mining
3.2092 of 5 stars
$9.43
-2.7%
$11.00
+16.7%
+30.1%$2.86B$947.06M8.894,294
EXK
Endeavour Silver
2.9148 of 5 stars
$8.82
-5.1%
$14.50
+64.4%
+67.4%$2.61B$432.80MN/A2,411

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:ODV) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners