S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
Log in
NYSE:SBOW

SilverBow Resources Competitors

$8.15
+0.13 (+1.62 %)
(As of 03/5/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$7.77
Now: $8.15
$8.23
50-Day Range
$5.43
MA: $6.83
$8.46
52-Week Range
$1.50
Now: $8.15
$8.54
Volume44,047 shs
Average Volume66,299 shs
Market Capitalization$97.29 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.64

Competitors

SilverBow Resources (NYSE:SBOW) Vs. COP, EOG, PXD, DVN, FANG, and CLR

Should you be buying SBOW stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas exploration & production" are considered alternatives and competitors to SilverBow Resources, including ConocoPhillips (COP), EOG Resources (EOG), Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD), Devon Energy (DVN), Diamondback Energy (FANG), and Continental Resources (CLR).

SilverBow Resources (NYSE:SBOW) and ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for SilverBow Resources and ConocoPhillips, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SilverBow Resources00103.00
ConocoPhillips021902.90

SilverBow Resources currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.11%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $51.5417, indicating a potential downside of 11.65%. Given ConocoPhillips' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than SilverBow Resources.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SilverBow Resources and ConocoPhillips' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SilverBow Resources$288.63 million0.34$114.66 million$9.740.84
ConocoPhillips$36.67 billion2.16$7.19 billion$3.5916.25

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than SilverBow Resources. SilverBow Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

SilverBow Resources has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.7% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.9% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares SilverBow Resources and ConocoPhillips' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SilverBow Resources-161.26%-17.94%-5.52%
ConocoPhillips-5.66%-0.02%-0.01%

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats SilverBow Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

SilverBow Resources (NYSE:SBOW) and EOG Resources (NYSE:EOG) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for SilverBow Resources and EOG Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SilverBow Resources00103.00
EOG Resources091502.63

SilverBow Resources currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.11%. EOG Resources has a consensus price target of $64.8696, indicating a potential downside of 13.02%. Given EOG Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe EOG Resources is more favorable than SilverBow Resources.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SilverBow Resources and EOG Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SilverBow Resources$288.63 million0.34$114.66 million$9.740.84
EOG Resources$17.38 billion2.50$2.73 billion$4.9814.98

EOG Resources has higher revenue and earnings than SilverBow Resources. SilverBow Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EOG Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

SilverBow Resources has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EOG Resources has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.7% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.7% of EOG Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of EOG Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares SilverBow Resources and EOG Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SilverBow Resources-161.26%-17.94%-5.52%
EOG Resources-2.47%5.86%3.38%

Summary

EOG Resources beats SilverBow Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

SilverBow Resources (NYSE:SBOW) and Pioneer Natural Resources (NYSE:PXD) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for SilverBow Resources and Pioneer Natural Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SilverBow Resources00103.00
Pioneer Natural Resources022112.96

SilverBow Resources currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.11%. Pioneer Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $140.0435, indicating a potential downside of 14.39%. Given SilverBow Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SilverBow Resources is more favorable than Pioneer Natural Resources.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SilverBow Resources and Pioneer Natural Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SilverBow Resources$288.63 million0.34$114.66 million$9.740.84
Pioneer Natural Resources$9.30 billion2.89$756 million$8.1820.00

Pioneer Natural Resources has higher revenue and earnings than SilverBow Resources. SilverBow Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pioneer Natural Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

SilverBow Resources has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pioneer Natural Resources has a beta of 1.92, suggesting that its stock price is 92% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.7% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.9% of Pioneer Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Pioneer Natural Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares SilverBow Resources and Pioneer Natural Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SilverBow Resources-161.26%-17.94%-5.52%
Pioneer Natural Resources2.30%4.67%2.97%

Summary

Pioneer Natural Resources beats SilverBow Resources on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

SilverBow Resources (NYSE:SBOW) and Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for SilverBow Resources and Devon Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SilverBow Resources00103.00
Devon Energy021712.95

SilverBow Resources currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.11%. Devon Energy has a consensus price target of $18.2143, indicating a potential downside of 28.88%. Given SilverBow Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SilverBow Resources is more favorable than Devon Energy.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SilverBow Resources and Devon Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SilverBow Resources$288.63 million0.34$114.66 million$9.740.84
Devon Energy$6.22 billion2.77$-355,000,000.00$1.3818.56

SilverBow Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Devon Energy. SilverBow Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

SilverBow Resources has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 3.46, suggesting that its stock price is 246% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.7% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.9% of Devon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Devon Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares SilverBow Resources and Devon Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SilverBow Resources-161.26%-17.94%-5.52%
Devon Energy-62.68%2.38%0.86%

Summary

Devon Energy beats SilverBow Resources on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

SilverBow Resources (NYSE:SBOW) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for SilverBow Resources and Diamondback Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SilverBow Resources00103.00
Diamondback Energy032212.92

SilverBow Resources currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.11%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $66.0893, indicating a potential downside of 22.49%. Given SilverBow Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SilverBow Resources is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SilverBow Resources and Diamondback Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SilverBow Resources$288.63 million0.34$114.66 million$9.740.84
Diamondback Energy$3.96 billion3.40$240 million$6.9312.30

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than SilverBow Resources. SilverBow Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

SilverBow Resources has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 2.59, suggesting that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.7% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares SilverBow Resources and Diamondback Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SilverBow Resources-161.26%-17.94%-5.52%
Diamondback Energy-135.48%5.10%3.06%

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats SilverBow Resources on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

SilverBow Resources (NYSE:SBOW) and Continental Resources (NYSE:CLR) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for SilverBow Resources and Continental Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SilverBow Resources00103.00
Continental Resources318302.00

SilverBow Resources currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.11%. Continental Resources has a consensus price target of $17.4250, indicating a potential downside of 45.10%. Given SilverBow Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SilverBow Resources is more favorable than Continental Resources.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SilverBow Resources and Continental Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SilverBow Resources$288.63 million0.34$114.66 million$9.740.84
Continental Resources$4.63 billion2.50$775.64 million$2.2514.11

Continental Resources has higher revenue and earnings than SilverBow Resources. SilverBow Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Continental Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

SilverBow Resources has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Continental Resources has a beta of 3.37, suggesting that its stock price is 237% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.7% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.8% of Continental Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 79.6% of Continental Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares SilverBow Resources and Continental Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SilverBow Resources-161.26%-17.94%-5.52%
Continental Resources-10.54%-2.05%-0.91%

Summary

Continental Resources beats SilverBow Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


SilverBow Resources Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
ConocoPhillips logo
COP
ConocoPhillips
1.8$58.34+4.7%$79.04 billion$36.67 billion-51.63
EOG Resources logo
EOG
EOG Resources
2.3$74.58+4.2%$43.52 billion$17.38 billion-143.42Dividend Increase
Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
Pioneer Natural Resources logo
PXD
Pioneer Natural Resources
2.2$163.59+3.1%$26.91 billion$9.30 billion160.38Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Devon Energy logo
DVN
Devon Energy
2.1$25.61+7.8%$17.24 billion$6.22 billion-3.00Gap Up
Diamondback Energy logo
FANG
Diamondback Energy
2.8$85.27+4.7%$13.47 billion$3.96 billion-3.16High Trading Volume
Unusual Options Activity
Continental Resources logo
CLR
Continental Resources
1.6$31.74+9.3%$11.59 billion$4.63 billion-36.91Analyst Downgrade
Gap Up
Marathon Oil logo
MRO
Marathon Oil
1.7$12.98+4.8%$10.24 billion$5.19 billion-9.01Analyst Downgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Cabot Oil & Gas logo
COG
Cabot Oil & Gas
2.2$18.97+1.7%$7.58 billion$2.07 billion30.60Analyst Report
Cimarex Energy logo
XEC
Cimarex Energy
2.1$67.19+5.2%$6.91 billion$2.36 billion-3.27Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Up
EQT logo
EQT
EQT
1.6$17.98+1.8%$5.01 billion$4.42 billion-2.08Gap Down
PDC Energy logo
PDCE
PDC Energy
1.7$38.74+1.2%$3.87 billion$1.16 billion-4.95Analyst Downgrade
Insider Selling
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
Matador Resources logo
MTDR
Matador Resources
2.2$26.69+8.1%$3.12 billion$983.67 million-6.46Gap Up
Range Resources logo
RRC
Range Resources
1.3$10.56+2.1%$2.73 billion$2.83 billion-1.04Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Southwestern Energy logo
SWN
Southwestern Energy
1.5$3.96+3.0%$2.40 billion$3.04 billion-0.74Analyst Revision
Gap Down
SM Energy logo
SM
SM Energy
1.4$17.90+4.4%$2.05 billion$1.59 billion-2.89
Callon Petroleum logo
CPE
Callon Petroleum
1.7$38.23+11.8%$1.76 billion$671.57 million-0.74Analyst Downgrade
Gap Up
Comstock Resources logo
CRK
Comstock Resources
1.4$5.94+0.5%$1.38 billion$768.69 million-11.42Gap Down
Kosmos Energy logo
KOS
Kosmos Energy
1.2$3.38+1.5%$1.38 billion$1.51 billion-3.02Analyst Report
Gap Down
Whiting Petroleum logo
WLL
Whiting Petroleum
1.0$34.33+1.0%$1.34 billionN/A0.00Analyst Report
QEP Resources logo
QEP
QEP Resources
1.0$4.28+4.7%$1.04 billion$1.21 billion35.67High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Bonanza Creek Energy logo
BCEI
Bonanza Creek Energy
1.2$39.50+8.8%$823.14 million$313.22 million20.26Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
W&T Offshore logo
WTI
W&T Offshore
1.1$4.58+17.2%$649.34 million$534.90 million4.49Earnings Announcement
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Up
Berry logo
BRY
Berry
1.1$5.51+7.8%$440.43 million$559.41 million-2.13News Coverage
Gap Up
Laredo Petroleum logo
LPI
Laredo Petroleum
0.9$34.24+0.4%$411.53 million$837.28 million-0.51Gap Down
VAALCO Energy logo
EGY
VAALCO Energy
0.6$3.30+3.9%$189.61 million$84.52 million-4.40Upcoming Earnings
SandRidge Energy logo
SD
SandRidge Energy
0.5$4.06+2.2%$145.87 million$266.85 million-0.27News Coverage
Gap Down
PHX
PHX Minerals
1.4$3.29+1.8%$73.81 million$28.97 million-2.38
Abraxas Petroleum logo
AXAS
Abraxas Petroleum
0.8$4.25+1.4%$35.71 million$129.15 million0.00Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
Gulfport Energy logo
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
2.0$0.08+0.0%$12.86 million$1.35 billion0.00
This page was last updated on 3/7/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.