SilverBow Resources Competitors

SilverBow Resources (NYSE:SBOW) and ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for SilverBow Resources and ConocoPhillips, as provided by MarketBeat.

SilverBow Resources currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.11%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $51.5417, indicating a potential downside of 11.65%. Given ConocoPhillips' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than SilverBow Resources.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SilverBow Resources and ConocoPhillips' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than SilverBow Resources. SilverBow Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

SilverBow Resources has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.7% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.9% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares SilverBow Resources and ConocoPhillips' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats SilverBow Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

SilverBow Resources (NYSE:SBOW) and EOG Resources (NYSE:EOG) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for SilverBow Resources and EOG Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

SilverBow Resources currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.11%. EOG Resources has a consensus price target of $64.8696, indicating a potential downside of 13.02%. Given EOG Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe EOG Resources is more favorable than SilverBow Resources.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SilverBow Resources and EOG Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

EOG Resources has higher revenue and earnings than SilverBow Resources. SilverBow Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EOG Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

SilverBow Resources has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EOG Resources has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.7% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.7% of EOG Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of EOG Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares SilverBow Resources and EOG Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

EOG Resources beats SilverBow Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

SilverBow Resources (NYSE:SBOW) and Pioneer Natural Resources (NYSE:PXD) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for SilverBow Resources and Pioneer Natural Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

SilverBow Resources currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.11%. Pioneer Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $140.0435, indicating a potential downside of 14.39%. Given SilverBow Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SilverBow Resources is more favorable than Pioneer Natural Resources.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SilverBow Resources and Pioneer Natural Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Pioneer Natural Resources has higher revenue and earnings than SilverBow Resources. SilverBow Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pioneer Natural Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

SilverBow Resources has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pioneer Natural Resources has a beta of 1.92, suggesting that its stock price is 92% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.7% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.9% of Pioneer Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Pioneer Natural Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares SilverBow Resources and Pioneer Natural Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Pioneer Natural Resources beats SilverBow Resources on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

SilverBow Resources (NYSE:SBOW) and Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for SilverBow Resources and Devon Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

SilverBow Resources currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.11%. Devon Energy has a consensus price target of $18.2143, indicating a potential downside of 28.88%. Given SilverBow Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SilverBow Resources is more favorable than Devon Energy.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SilverBow Resources and Devon Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SilverBow Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Devon Energy. SilverBow Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

SilverBow Resources has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 3.46, suggesting that its stock price is 246% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.7% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.9% of Devon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Devon Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares SilverBow Resources and Devon Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Devon Energy beats SilverBow Resources on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

SilverBow Resources (NYSE:SBOW) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for SilverBow Resources and Diamondback Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

SilverBow Resources currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.11%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $66.0893, indicating a potential downside of 22.49%. Given SilverBow Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SilverBow Resources is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SilverBow Resources and Diamondback Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than SilverBow Resources. SilverBow Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

SilverBow Resources has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 2.59, suggesting that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.7% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares SilverBow Resources and Diamondback Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats SilverBow Resources on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

SilverBow Resources (NYSE:SBOW) and Continental Resources (NYSE:CLR) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for SilverBow Resources and Continental Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

SilverBow Resources currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.11%. Continental Resources has a consensus price target of $17.4250, indicating a potential downside of 45.10%. Given SilverBow Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SilverBow Resources is more favorable than Continental Resources.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SilverBow Resources and Continental Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Continental Resources has higher revenue and earnings than SilverBow Resources. SilverBow Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Continental Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

SilverBow Resources has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Continental Resources has a beta of 3.37, suggesting that its stock price is 237% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.7% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.8% of Continental Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 79.6% of Continental Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares SilverBow Resources and Continental Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Continental Resources beats SilverBow Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.