Fang Competitors

Fang (NYSE:SFUN) and ZIX (NASDAQ:ZIXI) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

Fang has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ZIX has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fang and ZIX's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Fang has higher revenue and earnings than ZIX.

Profitability

This table compares Fang and ZIX's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

29.4% of Fang shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.2% of ZIX shares are held by institutional investors. 20.2% of ZIX shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Fang and ZIX, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

ZIX has a consensus target price of $10.25, indicating a potential upside of 35.40%. Given ZIX's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ZIX is more favorable than Fang.

Summary

ZIX beats Fang on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fang (NYSE:SFUN) and IBEX (NASDAQ:IBEX) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fang and IBEX's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

IBEX has higher revenue and earnings than Fang.

Profitability

This table compares Fang and IBEX's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

29.4% of Fang shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.2% of IBEX shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Fang and IBEX, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

IBEX has a consensus target price of $21.4286, indicating a potential downside of 5.60%. Given IBEX's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe IBEX is more favorable than Fang.

Summary

IBEX beats Fang on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fang (NYSE:SFUN) and Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

Fang has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ooma has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fang and Ooma's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Fang has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma.

Profitability

This table compares Fang and Ooma's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

29.4% of Fang shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.8% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Ooma shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Fang and Ooma, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Ooma has a consensus target price of $22.8750, indicating a potential upside of 39.23%. Given Ooma's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ooma is more favorable than Fang.

Fang (NYSE:SFUN) and NantHealth (NASDAQ:NH) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

Fang has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NantHealth has a beta of 1.83, meaning that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fang and NantHealth's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Fang has higher revenue and earnings than NantHealth.

Profitability

This table compares Fang and NantHealth's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

29.4% of Fang shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.5% of NantHealth shares are held by institutional investors. 59.6% of NantHealth shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Fang and NantHealth, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Summary

Fang beats NantHealth on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fang (NYSE:SFUN) and GTY Technology (NASDAQ:GTYH) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

Fang has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, GTY Technology has a beta of 0.37, meaning that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fang and GTY Technology's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Fang has higher revenue and earnings than GTY Technology.

Profitability

This table compares Fang and GTY Technology's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

29.4% of Fang shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.2% of GTY Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 17.2% of GTY Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Fang and GTY Technology, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

GTY Technology has a consensus target price of $8.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.24%. Given GTY Technology's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe GTY Technology is more favorable than Fang.

Summary

GTY Technology beats Fang on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Leaf Group (NYSE:LEAF) and Fang (NYSE:SFUN) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Leaf Group and Fang's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Leaf Group has a beta of 1.9, indicating that its share price is 90% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fang has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

68.4% of Leaf Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.4% of Fang shares are held by institutional investors. 11.4% of Leaf Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Leaf Group and Fang's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Fang has higher revenue and earnings than Leaf Group.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Leaf Group and Fang, as reported by MarketBeat.

Leaf Group presently has a consensus price target of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.11%. Given Leaf Group's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Leaf Group is more favorable than Fang.

Summary

Leaf Group beats Fang on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.