NYSE:SUM

Summit Materials Competitors

$29.44
+0.07 (+0.24 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$29.37
Now: $29.44
$30.21
50-Day Range
$26.09
MA: $28.58
$30.49
52-Week Range
$10.37
Now: $29.44
$31.00
Volume1.00 million shs
Average Volume1.43 million shs
Market Capitalization$3.38 billion
P/E Ratio24.53
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.37

Competitors

Summit Materials (NYSE:SUM) Vs. TECK, MDU, HL, CMP, PLL, and SLCA

Should you be buying SUM stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals, except fuels" are considered alternatives and competitors to Summit Materials, including Teck Resources (TECK), MDU Resources Group (MDU), Hecla Mining (HL), Compass Minerals International (CMP), Piedmont Lithium (PLL), and U.S. Silica (SLCA).

Teck Resources (NYSE:TECK) and Summit Materials (NYSE:SUM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

47.1% of Teck Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Summit Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Teck Resources and Summit Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Teck Resources-14.37%2.49%1.38%
Summit Materials6.12%9.41%3.36%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Teck Resources and Summit Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Teck Resources$8.99 billion1.29$-455,930,000.00$2.2210.01
Summit Materials$2.22 billion1.52$61.12 million$0.9431.32

Summit Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Teck Resources. Teck Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Summit Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Teck Resources and Summit Materials, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Teck Resources071002.59
Summit Materials12712.73

Teck Resources presently has a consensus price target of $25.60, indicating a potential upside of 15.16%. Summit Materials has a consensus price target of $22.20, indicating a potential downside of 24.59%. Given Teck Resources' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Teck Resources is more favorable than Summit Materials.

Risk & Volatility

Teck Resources has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Summit Materials has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Summit Materials beats Teck Resources on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

MDU Resources Group (NYSE:MDU) and Summit Materials (NYSE:SUM) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Risk & Volatility

MDU Resources Group has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Summit Materials has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares MDU Resources Group and Summit Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MDU Resources Group$5.34 billion1.24$335.45 million$1.6919.44
Summit Materials$2.22 billion1.52$61.12 million$0.9431.32

MDU Resources Group has higher revenue and earnings than Summit Materials. MDU Resources Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Summit Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares MDU Resources Group and Summit Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
MDU Resources Group6.75%12.87%4.73%
Summit Materials6.12%9.41%3.36%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

67.4% of MDU Resources Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of MDU Resources Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Summit Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for MDU Resources Group and Summit Materials, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
MDU Resources Group02102.33
Summit Materials12712.73

MDU Resources Group presently has a consensus price target of $28.3333, indicating a potential downside of 13.75%. Summit Materials has a consensus price target of $22.20, indicating a potential downside of 24.59%. Given MDU Resources Group's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe MDU Resources Group is more favorable than Summit Materials.

Summary

MDU Resources Group beats Summit Materials on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Summit Materials (NYSE:SUM) and Hecla Mining (NYSE:HL) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Summit Materials has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hecla Mining has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Summit Materials and Hecla Mining's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Summit Materials$2.22 billion1.52$61.12 million$0.9431.32
Hecla Mining$673.27 million5.07$-99,560,000.00($0.13)-49.08

Summit Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Hecla Mining. Hecla Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Summit Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Summit Materials and Hecla Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Summit Materials6.12%9.41%3.36%
Hecla Mining-3.51%0.95%0.60%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

57.0% of Hecla Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Summit Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Hecla Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Summit Materials and Hecla Mining, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Summit Materials12712.73
Hecla Mining04302.43

Summit Materials presently has a consensus target price of $22.20, indicating a potential downside of 24.59%. Hecla Mining has a consensus target price of $6.2417, indicating a potential downside of 2.17%. Given Hecla Mining's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hecla Mining is more favorable than Summit Materials.

Summary

Summit Materials beats Hecla Mining on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Summit Materials (NYSE:SUM) and Compass Minerals International (NYSE:CMP) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Summit Materials has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Compass Minerals International has a beta of 1.55, indicating that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Summit Materials and Compass Minerals International's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Summit Materials$2.22 billion1.52$61.12 million$0.9431.32
Compass Minerals International$1.49 billion1.53$62.50 million$1.9235.05

Compass Minerals International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Summit Materials. Summit Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Compass Minerals International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Summit Materials and Compass Minerals International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Summit Materials6.12%9.41%3.36%
Compass Minerals International5.73%21.38%3.79%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

90.1% of Compass Minerals International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Summit Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Compass Minerals International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Summit Materials and Compass Minerals International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Summit Materials12712.73
Compass Minerals International14102.00

Summit Materials presently has a consensus target price of $22.20, indicating a potential downside of 24.59%. Compass Minerals International has a consensus target price of $57.80, indicating a potential downside of 14.12%. Given Compass Minerals International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Compass Minerals International is more favorable than Summit Materials.

Summary

Compass Minerals International beats Summit Materials on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Summit Materials (NYSE:SUM) and Piedmont Lithium (NASDAQ:PLL) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Summit Materials has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Summit Materials and Piedmont Lithium's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Summit Materials$2.22 billion1.52$61.12 million$0.9431.32
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/A$-5,670,000.00($0.68)-95.69

Summit Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Piedmont Lithium. Piedmont Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Summit Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Summit Materials and Piedmont Lithium's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Summit Materials6.12%9.41%3.36%
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/AN/A

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.3% of Piedmont Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Summit Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Piedmont Lithium shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Summit Materials and Piedmont Lithium, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Summit Materials12712.73
Piedmont Lithium00403.00

Summit Materials presently has a consensus target price of $22.20, indicating a potential downside of 24.59%. Piedmont Lithium has a consensus target price of $80.00, indicating a potential upside of 22.94%. Given Piedmont Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Piedmont Lithium is more favorable than Summit Materials.

Summary

Summit Materials beats Piedmont Lithium on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Summit Materials (NYSE:SUM) and U.S. Silica (NYSE:SLCA) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Summit Materials has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, U.S. Silica has a beta of 3.22, indicating that its stock price is 222% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Summit Materials and U.S. Silica's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Summit Materials$2.22 billion1.52$61.12 million$0.9431.32
U.S. Silica$1.47 billion0.60$-329,080,000.00($0.64)-18.69

Summit Materials has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. Silica. U.S. Silica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Summit Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Summit Materials and U.S. Silica's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Summit Materials6.12%9.41%3.36%
U.S. Silica-42.97%-0.69%-0.19%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

75.7% of U.S. Silica shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Summit Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of U.S. Silica shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Summit Materials and U.S. Silica, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Summit Materials12712.73
U.S. Silica13302.29

Summit Materials presently has a consensus target price of $22.20, indicating a potential downside of 24.59%. U.S. Silica has a consensus target price of $7.50, indicating a potential downside of 37.29%. Given Summit Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Summit Materials is more favorable than U.S. Silica.

Summary

Summit Materials beats U.S. Silica on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.


Summit Materials Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Teck Resources logo
TECK
Teck Resources
2.1$22.23+0.3%$11.64 billion$8.99 billion-12.49Increase in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
MDU Resources Group logo
MDU
MDU Resources Group
1.9$32.85+0.9%$6.61 billion$5.34 billion17.66
Hecla Mining logo
HL
Hecla Mining
1.4$6.38+2.2%$3.42 billion$673.27 million-127.60Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
Compass Minerals International logo
CMP
Compass Minerals International
1.5$67.30+1.0%$2.29 billion$1.49 billion28.04
Piedmont Lithium logo
PLL
Piedmont Lithium
0.9$65.07+3.3%$1.02 billionN/A-95.69Analyst Downgrade
U.S. Silica logo
SLCA
U.S. Silica
1.2$11.96+2.1%$888.70 million$1.47 billion-2.14News Coverage
Gap Down
United States Lime & Minerals logo
USLM
United States Lime & Minerals
1.0$146.00+0.9%$825.34 million$158.28 million31.74
Intrepid Potash logo
IPI
Intrepid Potash
0.8$30.43+1.8%$409.34 million$220.07 million-16.19Analyst Downgrade
Gap Down
Ciner Resources logo
CINR
Ciner Resources
0.9$13.09+1.2%$258.74 million$522.80 million15.77Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Smart Sand logo
SND
Smart Sand
1.0$2.49+1.2%$108.09 million$233.07 million2.28Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
This page was last updated on 4/18/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.