Turquoise Hill Resources Competitors

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Cleveland-Cliffs and Turquoise Hill Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

Cleveland-Cliffs presently has a consensus price target of $17.91, suggesting a potential downside of 0.44%. Turquoise Hill Resources has a consensus price target of $21.2143, suggesting a potential upside of 10.20%. Given Turquoise Hill Resources' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Turquoise Hill Resources is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Cleveland-Cliffs and Turquoise Hill Resources' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Cleveland-Cliffs has higher revenue and earnings than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Volatility & Risk

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.24, suggesting that its share price is 124% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Turquoise Hill Resources has a beta of 2.12, suggesting that its share price is 112% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Cleveland-Cliffs and Turquoise Hill Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

67.6% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Cleveland-Cliffs beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

MP Materials (NYSE:MP) and Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

45.3% of MP Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for MP Materials and Turquoise Hill Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

MP Materials currently has a consensus target price of $41.40, suggesting a potential upside of 35.12%. Turquoise Hill Resources has a consensus target price of $21.2143, suggesting a potential upside of 10.20%. Given MP Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MP Materials is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares MP Materials and Turquoise Hill Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

MP Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Profitability

This table compares MP Materials and Turquoise Hill Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Turquoise Hill Resources beats MP Materials on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (NYSE:BVN) and Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and Turquoise Hill Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Risk & Volatility

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Turquoise Hill Resources has a beta of 2.12, meaning that its stock price is 112% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and Turquoise Hill Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. currently has a consensus target price of $11.75, indicating a potential upside of 9.92%. Turquoise Hill Resources has a consensus target price of $21.2143, indicating a potential upside of 10.20%. Given Turquoise Hill Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Turquoise Hill Resources is more favorable than Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A..

Profitability

This table compares Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and Turquoise Hill Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Turquoise Hill Resources beats Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) and Pretium Resources (NYSE:PVG) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Pretium Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Pretium Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Risk & Volatility

Turquoise Hill Resources has a beta of 2.12, indicating that its share price is 112% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pretium Resources has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its share price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Turquoise Hill Resources and Pretium Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Turquoise Hill Resources presently has a consensus price target of $21.2143, indicating a potential upside of 10.20%. Pretium Resources has a consensus price target of $16.9722, indicating a potential upside of 48.10%. Given Pretium Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pretium Resources is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Pretium Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

58.2% of Pretium Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Pretium Resources beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) and Hudbay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Hudbay Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Turquoise Hill Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hudbay Minerals.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

67.4% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Turquoise Hill Resources has a beta of 2.12, indicating that its share price is 112% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 2.57, indicating that its share price is 157% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Turquoise Hill Resources and Hudbay Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Turquoise Hill Resources presently has a consensus price target of $21.2143, indicating a potential upside of 10.20%. Hudbay Minerals has a consensus price target of $11.3364, indicating a potential upside of 43.50%. Given Hudbay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hudbay Minerals is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Hudbay Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) and Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Lithium Americas' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lithium Americas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

8.1% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Turquoise Hill Resources has a beta of 2.12, indicating that its share price is 112% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lithium Americas has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Turquoise Hill Resources and Lithium Americas, as provided by MarketBeat.

Turquoise Hill Resources currently has a consensus price target of $21.2143, indicating a potential upside of 10.20%. Lithium Americas has a consensus price target of $20.3214, indicating a potential upside of 40.73%. Given Lithium Americas' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Lithium Americas' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Turquoise Hill Resources beats Lithium Americas on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.