NYSE:TRQTurquoise Hill Resources Competitors & Alternatives

Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) and BHP Group (NYSE:BHP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and BHP Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and BHP Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

BHP Group has higher revenue and earnings than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Turquoise Hill Resources and BHP Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Turquoise Hill Resources currently has a consensus price target of $1.6167, suggesting a potential upside of 94.78%. BHP Group has a consensus price target of $60.00, suggesting a potential upside of 18.81%. Given Turquoise Hill Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Turquoise Hill Resources is more favorable than BHP Group.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

39.5% of Turquoise Hill Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.2% of BHP Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of BHP Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Turquoise Hill Resources has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BHP Group has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) and Rio Tinto (NYSE:RIO) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

39.5% of Turquoise Hill Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of Rio Tinto shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Turquoise Hill Resources and Rio Tinto, as provided by MarketBeat.

Turquoise Hill Resources presently has a consensus target price of $1.6167, indicating a potential upside of 94.78%. Rio Tinto has a consensus target price of $57.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.23%. Given Turquoise Hill Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Turquoise Hill Resources is more favorable than Rio Tinto.

Profitability

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Rio Tinto's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Rio Tinto's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Rio Tinto has higher revenue and earnings than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Risk and Volatility

Turquoise Hill Resources has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its share price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Rio Tinto has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) and Vale (NYSE:VALE) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

39.5% of Turquoise Hill Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.4% of Vale shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Vale's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Vale's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Turquoise Hill Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vale.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Turquoise Hill Resources and Vale, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Turquoise Hill Resources presently has a consensus price target of $1.6167, suggesting a potential upside of 94.78%. Vale has a consensus price target of $13.3125, suggesting a potential upside of 23.38%. Given Turquoise Hill Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Turquoise Hill Resources is more favorable than Vale.

Risk & Volatility

Turquoise Hill Resources has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its share price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vale has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Vale beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Southern Copper (NYSE:SCCO) and Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Southern Copper and Turquoise Hill Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Southern Copper presently has a consensus target price of $36.5714, suggesting a potential downside of 12.21%. Turquoise Hill Resources has a consensus target price of $1.6167, suggesting a potential upside of 94.78%. Given Turquoise Hill Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Turquoise Hill Resources is more favorable than Southern Copper.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Southern Copper and Turquoise Hill Resources' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Southern Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Southern Copper and Turquoise Hill Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

6.9% of Southern Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.5% of Turquoise Hill Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Southern Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Southern Copper has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Turquoise Hill Resources has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its share price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Southern Copper beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) and Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

71.2% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.5% of Turquoise Hill Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Freeport-McMoRan shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Freeport-McMoRan and Turquoise Hill Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Turquoise Hill Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Freeport-McMoRan.

Profitability

This table compares Freeport-McMoRan and Turquoise Hill Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Freeport-McMoRan has a beta of 2.27, suggesting that its share price is 127% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Turquoise Hill Resources has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its share price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Freeport-McMoRan and Turquoise Hill Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Freeport-McMoRan presently has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.23%. Turquoise Hill Resources has a consensus target price of $1.6167, suggesting a potential upside of 94.78%. Given Turquoise Hill Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Turquoise Hill Resources is more favorable than Freeport-McMoRan.

Summary

Freeport-McMoRan beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Compania de Minas Buenaventura SAA (NYSE:BVN) and Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Compania de Minas Buenaventura SAA and Turquoise Hill Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Compania de Minas Buenaventura SAA has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Volatility & Risk

Compania de Minas Buenaventura SAA has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Turquoise Hill Resources has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its share price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Compania de Minas Buenaventura SAA and Turquoise Hill Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Compania de Minas Buenaventura SAA and Turquoise Hill Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Compania de Minas Buenaventura SAA presently has a consensus price target of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 21.18%. Turquoise Hill Resources has a consensus price target of $1.6167, indicating a potential upside of 94.78%. Given Turquoise Hill Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Turquoise Hill Resources is more favorable than Compania de Minas Buenaventura SAA.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

56.3% of Compania de Minas Buenaventura SAA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.5% of Turquoise Hill Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.3% of Compania de Minas Buenaventura SAA shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Turquoise Hill Resources beats Compania de Minas Buenaventura SAA on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.