NYSE:TRQ

Turquoise Hill Resources Competitors

$19.25
-0.20 (-1.03 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$19.15
Now: $19.25
$19.64
50-Day Range
$13.94
MA: $16.43
$19.45
52-Week Range
$4.40
Now: $19.25
$19.62
Volume1.03 million shs
Average Volume1.08 million shs
Market Capitalization$3.87 billion
P/E Ratio9.92
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.12

Competitors

Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) Vs. CLF, MP, BVN, PVG, HBM, and LAC

Should you be buying TRQ stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "metal mining" are considered alternatives and competitors to Turquoise Hill Resources, including Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF), MP Materials (MP), Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (BVN), Pretium Resources (PVG), Hudbay Minerals (HBM), and Lithium Americas (LAC).

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Cleveland-Cliffs and Turquoise Hill Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cleveland-Cliffs02402.67
Turquoise Hill Resources03402.57

Cleveland-Cliffs presently has a consensus price target of $17.91, suggesting a potential downside of 0.44%. Turquoise Hill Resources has a consensus price target of $21.2143, suggesting a potential upside of 10.20%. Given Turquoise Hill Resources' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Turquoise Hill Resources is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Cleveland-Cliffs and Turquoise Hill Resources' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cleveland-Cliffs$1.99 billion4.51$292.80 million$1.1216.06
Turquoise Hill Resources$1.17 billion3.32$-150,460,000.00N/AN/A

Cleveland-Cliffs has higher revenue and earnings than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Volatility & Risk

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.24, suggesting that its share price is 124% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Turquoise Hill Resources has a beta of 2.12, suggesting that its share price is 112% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Cleveland-Cliffs and Turquoise Hill Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cleveland-Cliffs-3.38%-2.69%-0.35%
Turquoise Hill Resources42.70%4.76%2.95%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

67.6% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Cleveland-Cliffs beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

MP Materials (NYSE:MP) and Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

45.3% of MP Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for MP Materials and Turquoise Hill Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
MP Materials02302.60
Turquoise Hill Resources03402.57

MP Materials currently has a consensus target price of $41.40, suggesting a potential upside of 35.12%. Turquoise Hill Resources has a consensus target price of $21.2143, suggesting a potential upside of 10.20%. Given MP Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MP Materials is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares MP Materials and Turquoise Hill Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MP MaterialsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Turquoise Hill Resources$1.17 billion3.32$-150,460,000.00N/AN/A

MP Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Profitability

This table compares MP Materials and Turquoise Hill Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
MP MaterialsN/AN/AN/A
Turquoise Hill Resources42.70%4.76%2.95%

Summary

Turquoise Hill Resources beats MP Materials on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (NYSE:BVN) and Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and Turquoise Hill Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.$867.89 million3.13$-12,210,000.00($0.01)-1,069.00
Turquoise Hill Resources$1.17 billion3.32$-150,460,000.00N/AN/A

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Risk & Volatility

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Turquoise Hill Resources has a beta of 2.12, meaning that its stock price is 112% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and Turquoise Hill Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.01002.00
Turquoise Hill Resources03402.57

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. currently has a consensus target price of $11.75, indicating a potential upside of 9.92%. Turquoise Hill Resources has a consensus target price of $21.2143, indicating a potential upside of 10.20%. Given Turquoise Hill Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Turquoise Hill Resources is more favorable than Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A..

Profitability

This table compares Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and Turquoise Hill Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.-19.14%-4.24%-3.08%
Turquoise Hill Resources42.70%4.76%2.95%

Summary

Turquoise Hill Resources beats Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) and Pretium Resources (NYSE:PVG) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Pretium Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Turquoise Hill Resources$1.17 billion3.32$-150,460,000.00N/AN/A
Pretium Resources$484.54 million4.44$40.92 million$0.5520.84

Pretium Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Risk & Volatility

Turquoise Hill Resources has a beta of 2.12, indicating that its share price is 112% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pretium Resources has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its share price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Turquoise Hill Resources and Pretium Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Turquoise Hill Resources03402.57
Pretium Resources06402.40

Turquoise Hill Resources presently has a consensus price target of $21.2143, indicating a potential upside of 10.20%. Pretium Resources has a consensus price target of $16.9722, indicating a potential upside of 48.10%. Given Pretium Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pretium Resources is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Pretium Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Turquoise Hill Resources42.70%4.76%2.95%
Pretium Resources15.38%16.09%9.83%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

58.2% of Pretium Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Pretium Resources beats Turquoise Hill Resources on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) and Hudbay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Hudbay Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Turquoise Hill Resources$1.17 billion3.32$-150,460,000.00N/AN/A
Hudbay Minerals$1.24 billion1.67$-343,810,000.00($0.19)-41.58

Turquoise Hill Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hudbay Minerals.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

67.4% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Turquoise Hill Resources has a beta of 2.12, indicating that its share price is 112% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 2.57, indicating that its share price is 157% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Turquoise Hill Resources and Hudbay Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Turquoise Hill Resources03402.57
Hudbay Minerals011002.91

Turquoise Hill Resources presently has a consensus price target of $21.2143, indicating a potential upside of 10.20%. Hudbay Minerals has a consensus price target of $11.3364, indicating a potential upside of 43.50%. Given Hudbay Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hudbay Minerals is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Hudbay Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Turquoise Hill Resources42.70%4.76%2.95%
Hudbay Minerals-14.02%-7.32%-2.87%

Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) and Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Lithium Americas' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Turquoise Hill Resources$1.17 billion3.32$-150,460,000.00N/AN/A
Lithium Americas$4.84 million356.30$51.67 million($0.22)-65.64

Lithium Americas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

8.1% of Lithium Americas shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Turquoise Hill Resources has a beta of 2.12, indicating that its share price is 112% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lithium Americas has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Turquoise Hill Resources and Lithium Americas, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Turquoise Hill Resources03402.57
Lithium Americas03402.57

Turquoise Hill Resources currently has a consensus price target of $21.2143, indicating a potential upside of 10.20%. Lithium Americas has a consensus price target of $20.3214, indicating a potential upside of 40.73%. Given Lithium Americas' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and Lithium Americas' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Turquoise Hill Resources42.70%4.76%2.95%
Lithium AmericasN/A-22.88%-10.85%

Summary

Turquoise Hill Resources beats Lithium Americas on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.


Turquoise Hill Resources Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Cleveland-Cliffs logo
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs
1.5$17.99-0.1%$8.97 billion$1.99 billion-64.25Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
MP Materials logo
MP
MP Materials
1.8$30.64-3.3%$5.23 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. logo
BVN
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.
0.9$10.69-0.4%$2.72 billion$867.89 million-20.96News Coverage
Pretium Resources logo
PVG
Pretium Resources
2.0$11.46-0.1%$2.15 billion$484.54 million23.39Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Hudbay Minerals logo
HBM
Hudbay Minerals
1.8$7.90-6.6%$2.06 billion$1.24 billion-13.39Increase in Short Interest
Lithium Americas logo
LAC
Lithium Americas
1.3$14.44-3.5%$1.72 billion$4.84 million-39.03Increase in Short Interest
Nexa Resources logo
NEXA
Nexa Resources
1.4$11.40-4.9%$1.51 billion$2.33 billion-2.47Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
EMX Royalty logo
EMX
EMX Royalty
0.0$3.16-2.2%$268.51 million$3.83 million-63.20
Westwater Resources logo
WWR
Westwater Resources
0.6$4.32-6.3%$139.69 millionN/A-1.51Gap Up
U.S. Gold logo
USAU
U.S. Gold
1.4$10.26-0.7%$72.43 millionN/A-3.24Increase in Short Interest
Opiant Pharmaceuticals logo
OPNT
Opiant Pharmaceuticals
1.2$10.84-0.4%$46.95 million$40.52 million-108.39Increase in Short Interest
LEXX
Lexaria Bioscience
0.0$4.96-2.2%$25.32 million$380,000.000.00News Coverage
Gap Up
This page was last updated on 4/17/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.