NYSEAMERICAN:GBR

New Concept Energy Competitors

$5.18
-0.05 (-0.96 %)
(As of 04/9/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$5.10
Now: $5.18
$5.48
50-Day Range
$1.66
MA: $1.79
$2.44
52-Week Range
$0.72
Now: $5.18
$30.99
Volume439,305 shs
Average Volume2.81 million shs
Market Capitalization$26.58 million
P/E Ratio12.95
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.1

Competitors

New Concept Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:GBR) Vs. EPM, OBELF, AMPY, PNRG, SBOW, and EPSN

Should you be buying GBR stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "crude petroleum & natural gas" are considered alternatives and competitors to New Concept Energy, including Evolution Petroleum (EPM), Obsidian Energy (OBELF), Amplify Energy (AMPY), PrimeEnergy Resources (PNRG), SilverBow Resources (SBOW), and Epsilon Energy (EPSN).

New Concept Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:GBR) and Evolution Petroleum (NYSEAMERICAN:EPM) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

New Concept Energy has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 1.56, suggesting that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares New Concept Energy and Evolution Petroleum's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
New Concept Energy533.42%-6.01%-3.15%
Evolution Petroleum-15.32%2.57%2.09%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares New Concept Energy and Evolution Petroleum's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Concept Energy$590,000.0045.06$-2,350,000.00N/AN/A
Evolution Petroleum$29.60 million3.54$5.94 million$0.1422.36

Evolution Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than New Concept Energy.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for New Concept Energy and Evolution Petroleum, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
New Concept Energy0000N/A
Evolution Petroleum00203.00

Evolution Petroleum has a consensus price target of $4.50, indicating a potential upside of 43.77%. Given Evolution Petroleum's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Evolution Petroleum is more favorable than New Concept Energy.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

1.6% of New Concept Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Evolution Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of New Concept Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Evolution Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Evolution Petroleum beats New Concept Energy on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

New Concept Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:GBR) and Obsidian Energy (OTCMKTS:OBELF) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares New Concept Energy and Obsidian Energy's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Concept Energy$590,000.0045.06$-2,350,000.00N/AN/A
Obsidian Energy$315 million0.32$-593,840,000.00N/AN/A

New Concept Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Obsidian Energy.

Profitability

This table compares New Concept Energy and Obsidian Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
New Concept Energy533.42%-6.01%-3.15%
Obsidian Energy-406.63%-253.61%-108.35%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

1.6% of New Concept Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Obsidian Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of New Concept Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for New Concept Energy and Obsidian Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
New Concept Energy0000N/A
Obsidian Energy0000N/A

Risk and Volatility

New Concept Energy has a beta of 2.1, meaning that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Obsidian Energy has a beta of 2.42, meaning that its stock price is 142% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

New Concept Energy beats Obsidian Energy on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

New Concept Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:GBR) and Amplify Energy (NYSE:AMPY) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

1.6% of New Concept Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.0% of Amplify Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of New Concept Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Amplify Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares New Concept Energy and Amplify Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
New Concept Energy533.42%-6.01%-3.15%
Amplify Energy-202.58%-20.98%-4.84%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for New Concept Energy and Amplify Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
New Concept Energy0000N/A
Amplify Energy01102.50

Amplify Energy has a consensus price target of $2.20, suggesting a potential downside of 14.06%. Given Amplify Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Amplify Energy is more favorable than New Concept Energy.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares New Concept Energy and Amplify Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Concept Energy$590,000.0045.06$-2,350,000.00N/AN/A
Amplify Energy$275.58 million0.35$-35,200,000.00($0.34)-7.53

New Concept Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Amplify Energy.

Risk & Volatility

New Concept Energy has a beta of 2.1, meaning that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Amplify Energy has a beta of 4.31, meaning that its stock price is 331% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

New Concept Energy beats Amplify Energy on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

New Concept Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:GBR) and PrimeEnergy Resources (NASDAQ:PNRG) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares New Concept Energy and PrimeEnergy Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
New Concept Energy533.42%-6.01%-3.15%
PrimeEnergy Resources-2.59%-1.58%-0.72%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

1.6% of New Concept Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.5% of PrimeEnergy Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of New Concept Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 58.6% of PrimeEnergy Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares New Concept Energy and PrimeEnergy Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Concept Energy$590,000.0045.06$-2,350,000.00N/AN/A
PrimeEnergy Resources$104.82 million0.91$3.48 millionN/AN/A

PrimeEnergy Resources has higher revenue and earnings than New Concept Energy.

Risk and Volatility

New Concept Energy has a beta of 2.1, meaning that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PrimeEnergy Resources has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for New Concept Energy and PrimeEnergy Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
New Concept Energy0000N/A
PrimeEnergy Resources0000N/A

Summary

PrimeEnergy Resources beats New Concept Energy on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

New Concept Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:GBR) and SilverBow Resources (NYSE:SBOW) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability and risk.

Profitability

This table compares New Concept Energy and SilverBow Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
New Concept Energy533.42%-6.01%-3.15%
SilverBow Resources-161.26%-17.94%-5.52%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

1.6% of New Concept Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.7% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of New Concept Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of SilverBow Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares New Concept Energy and SilverBow Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Concept Energy$590,000.0045.06$-2,350,000.00N/AN/A
SilverBow Resources$288.63 million0.33$114.66 million$9.740.80

SilverBow Resources has higher revenue and earnings than New Concept Energy.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for New Concept Energy and SilverBow Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
New Concept Energy0000N/A
SilverBow Resources00203.00

SilverBow Resources has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential downside of 10.03%. Given SilverBow Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SilverBow Resources is more favorable than New Concept Energy.

Risk & Volatility

New Concept Energy has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SilverBow Resources has a beta of 2.64, suggesting that its stock price is 164% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

SilverBow Resources beats New Concept Energy on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

New Concept Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:GBR) and Epsilon Energy (NASDAQ:EPSN) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.6% of New Concept Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.9% of Epsilon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of New Concept Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.7% of Epsilon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for New Concept Energy and Epsilon Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
New Concept Energy0000N/A
Epsilon Energy0000N/A

Volatility & Risk

New Concept Energy has a beta of 2.1, meaning that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Epsilon Energy has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares New Concept Energy and Epsilon Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
New Concept Energy533.42%-6.01%-3.15%
Epsilon Energy5.87%2.02%1.59%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares New Concept Energy and Epsilon Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Concept Energy$590,000.0045.06$-2,350,000.00N/AN/A
Epsilon Energy$26.69 million3.42$8.70 millionN/AN/A

Epsilon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than New Concept Energy.

Summary

Epsilon Energy beats New Concept Energy on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.


New Concept Energy Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Evolution Petroleum logo
EPM
Evolution Petroleum
1.7$3.13-0.6%$104.83 million$29.60 million-24.08
Obsidian Energy logo
OBELF
Obsidian Energy
0.1$1.38-2.9%$101.56 million$315 million-0.10Gap Down
AMPY
Amplify Energy
0.9$2.56-4.3%$96.40 million$275.58 million-0.21
PNRG
PrimeEnergy Resources
0.8$47.85-3.2%$95.41 million$104.82 million0.00
SilverBow Resources logo
SBOW
SilverBow Resources
1.5$7.78-2.4%$94.48 million$288.63 million-0.30News Coverage
EPSN
Epsilon Energy
0.6$3.81-0.3%$91.39 million$26.69 million63.51
PDPYF
Painted Pony Energy
1.2$0.52-0.5%$83.32 million$228.15 million-0.21News Coverage
TENG
Trans Energy
0.7$5.01-0.0%$80.81 millionN/A0.00News Coverage
PermRock Royalty Trust logo
PRT
PermRock Royalty Trust
1.3$5.43-1.1%$66.02 million$10.44 million0.00
MV Oil Trust logo
MVO
MV Oil Trust
1.0$5.44-3.3%$62.56 million$12.99 million5.85Dividend Increase
High Trading Volume
VOC Energy Trust logo
VOC
VOC Energy Trust
0.9$3.46-1.4%$58.82 million$9.21 million6.41
PHX Minerals logo
PHX
PHX Minerals
1.7$2.62-8.8%$58.78 million$28.97 million-1.90Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Gap Down
VKIN
Viking Energy Group
0.4$0.86-4.7%$58.49 million$34.59 million-5.73
Evolve Transition Infrastructure logo
SNMP
Evolve Transition Infrastructure
0.5$1.00-6.0%$54.53 million$76.65 million-0.13Gap Up
PVL
Permianville Royalty Trust
0.8$1.43-0.0%$47.13 million$44.96 million6.49
OASPQ
Oasis Petroleum
0.3$0.12-0.0%$38.97 million$2.07 billion-0.01
TCFF
Trillion Energy International
0.0$0.30-2.4%$35.10 millionN/A0.00Gap Up
Chesapeake Energy logo
CHKAQ
Chesapeake Energy
0.5$3.05-0.0%$29.83 million$8.49 billion0.00News Coverage
Victory Oilfield Tech logo
VYEY
Victory Oilfield Tech
0.8$0.99-4.0%$26.64 million$1.03 million0.00High Trading Volume
Gap Down
CKX
CKX Lands
0.5$13.16-5.0%$25.53 million$810,000.0065.80
Abraxas Petroleum logo
AXAS
Abraxas Petroleum
0.8$2.97-1.7%$24.96 million$129.15 million0.00
Pengrowth Energy logo
PGHEF
Pengrowth Energy
0.6$0.04-0.0%$24.93 million$408.45 million0.00Gap Down
PERS
SandRidge Permian Trust
0.7$0.46-4.1%$23.15 million$22.44 million2.88Gap Down
BRN
Barnwell Industries
0.8$2.72-6.3%$22.97 million$18.35 million-4.77Gap Down
BDGR
Black Dragon Resource Companies
0.0$0.00-0.0%$22.94 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
Camber Energy logo
CEI
Camber Energy
0.5$0.90-2.2%$22.50 million$400,000.000.00
HPST
Hempstract
0.0$0.28-7.2%$22.24 millionN/A0.00Gap Up
HENC
Hero Technologies
0.0$0.13-0.0%$20.51 millionN/A0.00
HighPoint Resources logo
HPR
HighPoint Resources
1.5$4.73-15.6%$20.36 million$452.66 million-0.02Gap Down
Gulfport Energy logo
GPORQ
Gulfport Energy
0.6$0.05-5.0%$19.77 million$1.35 billion0.00Gap Up
U.S. Energy logo
USEG
U.S. Energy
0.8$4.20-0.5%$19.64 million$6.57 million0.00
GSPE
GulfSlope Energy
0.6$0.01-0.0%$17.88 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
MXC
Mexco Energy
0.6$8.09-1.9%$16.76 million$2.74 million-53.93
Sow Good logo
ANFC
Sow Good
0.7$5.75-11.3%$15.78 million$470,000.000.00Gap Down
EPEGQ
EP Energy
0.5$0.06-0.0%$15.29 million$820 million-0.02
Houston American Energy logo
HUSA
Houston American Energy
0.5$1.82-1.6%$12.70 million$1 million0.00News Coverage
HKRSQ
Halcon Resources
0.6$0.07-2.0%$12.14 million$224.68 million0.00Gap Down
BXEFF
Bellatrix Exploration
0.4N/AN/A$11.64 million$148.67 million-0.01Gap Up
BXEFD
Bellatrix Exploration
0.4N/AN/A$11.64 million$176.47 million-0.02
Sundance Energy Australia logo
SDCJF
Sundance Energy Australia
0.6$0.15-66.7%$11.34 million$164.93 million0.00High Trading Volume
Gap Up
GrowMax Resources logo
APEOF
GrowMax Resources
0.9$0.05-0.0%$10.70 millionN/A5.01
Gulfport Energy logo
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
2.2$0.05-0.0%$8.38 million$1.35 billion0.00News Coverage
XOGAQ
Extraction Oil & Gas
0.9$0.06-0.0%$8.30 million$906.64 million-0.01
XOGAQ
Extraction Oil & Gas
0.9$0.06-0.0%$8.30 million$906.64 million-0.01
RVDO
Riverdale Oil and Gas
0.0$0.28-7.2%$7.59 millionN/A0.00Gap Up
ECA Marcellus Trust I logo
ECT
ECA Marcellus Trust I
0.8$0.40-2.9%$7.05 million$4.15 million5.00Gap Up
DWOG
Deep Well Oil & Gas
0.8$0.03-0.0%$6.92 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
SDTTU
SandRidge Mississippian Trust I
0.7$0.24-0.0%$6.72 million$6.39 million6.00
SDRMU
SandRidge Mississippian Trust II
0.7$0.13-2.2%$6.37 million$10.15 million1.83
Royale Energy logo
ROYL
Royale Energy
0.7$0.11-0.0%$6.07 millionN/A0.00Gap Up
This page was last updated on 4/10/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.