NYSEAMERICAN:UUUU

Energy Fuels Competitors

$5.27
-0.26 (-4.70 %)
(As of 04/22/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$5.23
Now: $5.27
$5.70
50-Day Range
$3.05
MA: $3.73
$4.45
52-Week Range
$1.38
Now: $5.27
$7.83
Volume3.05 million shs
Average Volume5.16 million shs
Market Capitalization$740.78 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.72

Competitors

Energy Fuels (NYSEAMERICAN:UUUU) Vs. CMP, PLL, SLCA, USLM, IPI, and LEU

Should you be buying UUUU stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals, except fuels" are considered alternatives and competitors to Energy Fuels, including Compass Minerals International (CMP), Piedmont Lithium (PLL), U.S. Silica (SLCA), United States Lime & Minerals (USLM), Intrepid Potash (IPI), and Centrus Energy (LEU).

Compass Minerals International (NYSE:CMP) and Energy Fuels (NYSEAMERICAN:UUUU) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Compass Minerals International has a beta of 1.55, indicating that its share price is 55% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Compass Minerals International and Energy Fuels' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Compass Minerals International$1.49 billion1.53$62.50 million$1.9235.04
Energy Fuels$5.86 million126.41$-37,980,000.00($0.40)-13.18

Compass Minerals International has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Compass Minerals International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Compass Minerals International and Energy Fuels' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Compass Minerals International5.73%21.38%3.79%
Energy Fuels-1,640.41%-22.51%-17.57%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

90.1% of Compass Minerals International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.3% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Compass Minerals International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Compass Minerals International and Energy Fuels, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Compass Minerals International14102.00
Energy Fuels01302.75

Compass Minerals International currently has a consensus price target of $57.80, indicating a potential downside of 14.09%. Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $6.8750, indicating a potential upside of 30.46%. Given Energy Fuels' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Fuels is more favorable than Compass Minerals International.

Summary

Compass Minerals International beats Energy Fuels on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Piedmont Lithium (NASDAQ:PLL) and Energy Fuels (NYSEAMERICAN:UUUU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Piedmont Lithium and Energy Fuels, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Piedmont Lithium00403.00
Energy Fuels01302.75

Piedmont Lithium currently has a consensus price target of $80.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.03%. Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $6.8750, indicating a potential upside of 30.46%. Given Energy Fuels' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Fuels is more favorable than Piedmont Lithium.

Volatility and Risk

Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Piedmont Lithium and Energy Fuels' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/A$-5,670,000.00($0.68)-98.84
Energy Fuels$5.86 million126.41$-37,980,000.00($0.40)-13.18

Piedmont Lithium has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energy Fuels. Piedmont Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Piedmont Lithium and Energy Fuels' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/AN/A
Energy Fuels-1,640.41%-22.51%-17.57%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.3% of Piedmont Lithium shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.3% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Piedmont Lithium shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Energy Fuels beats Piedmont Lithium on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Energy Fuels (NYSEAMERICAN:UUUU) and U.S. Silica (NYSE:SLCA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Energy Fuels and U.S. Silica, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Energy Fuels01302.75
U.S. Silica13302.29

Energy Fuels currently has a consensus price target of $6.8750, indicating a potential upside of 30.46%. U.S. Silica has a consensus price target of $7.50, indicating a potential downside of 31.44%. Given Energy Fuels' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Energy Fuels is more favorable than U.S. Silica.

Volatility and Risk

Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, U.S. Silica has a beta of 3.22, indicating that its stock price is 222% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Energy Fuels and U.S. Silica's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energy Fuels$5.86 million126.41$-37,980,000.00($0.40)-13.18
U.S. Silica$1.47 billion0.55$-329,080,000.00($0.64)-17.09

Energy Fuels has higher earnings, but lower revenue than U.S. Silica. U.S. Silica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Energy Fuels and U.S. Silica's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Energy Fuels-1,640.41%-22.51%-17.57%
U.S. Silica-42.97%-0.69%-0.19%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

22.3% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.7% of U.S. Silica shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of U.S. Silica shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

U.S. Silica beats Energy Fuels on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Energy Fuels (NYSEAMERICAN:UUUU) and United States Lime & Minerals (NASDAQ:USLM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

22.3% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Energy Fuels and United States Lime & Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Energy Fuels-1,640.41%-22.51%-17.57%
United States Lime & Minerals16.47%11.49%10.08%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Energy Fuels and United States Lime & Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Energy Fuels01302.75
United States Lime & Minerals0000N/A

Energy Fuels currently has a consensus price target of $6.8750, indicating a potential upside of 30.46%. Given Energy Fuels' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Energy Fuels is more favorable than United States Lime & Minerals.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Energy Fuels and United States Lime & Minerals' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energy Fuels$5.86 million126.41$-37,980,000.00($0.40)-13.18
United States Lime & Minerals$158.28 million5.07$26.06 millionN/AN/A

United States Lime & Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Fuels.

Summary

United States Lime & Minerals beats Energy Fuels on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Energy Fuels (NYSEAMERICAN:UUUU) and Intrepid Potash (NYSE:IPI) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Energy Fuels and Intrepid Potash's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Energy Fuels-1,640.41%-22.51%-17.57%
Intrepid Potash-12.34%-4.43%-3.27%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Energy Fuels and Intrepid Potash's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energy Fuels$5.86 million126.41$-37,980,000.00($0.40)-13.18
Intrepid Potash$220.07 million1.76$13.63 million$1.0028.87

Intrepid Potash has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrepid Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.72, suggesting that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrepid Potash has a beta of 2.26, suggesting that its share price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Energy Fuels and Intrepid Potash, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Energy Fuels01302.75
Intrepid Potash11102.00

Energy Fuels presently has a consensus target price of $6.8750, indicating a potential upside of 30.46%. Intrepid Potash has a consensus target price of $22.8667, indicating a potential downside of 20.79%. Given Energy Fuels' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Energy Fuels is more favorable than Intrepid Potash.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

22.3% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.8% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Intrepid Potash beats Energy Fuels on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Energy Fuels (NYSEAMERICAN:UUUU) and Centrus Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:LEU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Energy Fuels and Centrus Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Energy Fuels-1,640.41%-22.51%-17.57%
Centrus Energy15.81%-10.64%7.28%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Energy Fuels and Centrus Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energy Fuels$5.86 million126.41$-37,980,000.00($0.40)-13.18
Centrus Energy$209.70 million1.39$-16,500,000.00($2.54)-8.59

Centrus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centrus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Centrus Energy has a beta of 3.71, meaning that its stock price is 271% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Energy Fuels and Centrus Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Energy Fuels01302.75
Centrus Energy00203.00

Energy Fuels currently has a consensus price target of $6.8750, indicating a potential upside of 30.46%. Centrus Energy has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.57%. Given Energy Fuels' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Energy Fuels is more favorable than Centrus Energy.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

22.3% of Energy Fuels shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.3% of Centrus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Energy Fuels shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.2% of Centrus Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Centrus Energy beats Energy Fuels on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Energy Fuels Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Compass Minerals International logo
CMP
Compass Minerals International
1.5$67.28-1.0%$2.29 billion$1.49 billion28.03
Piedmont Lithium logo
PLL
Piedmont Lithium
0.9$67.21-0.5%$1.06 billionN/A-98.84
U.S. Silica logo
SLCA
U.S. Silica
1.2$10.94-1.9%$812.91 million$1.47 billion-1.95Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
United States Lime & Minerals logo
USLM
United States Lime & Minerals
1.0$142.00-0.7%$802.73 million$158.28 million30.87
Intrepid Potash logo
IPI
Intrepid Potash
0.8$28.87-1.4%$388.36 million$220.07 million-15.36Analyst Downgrade
Centrus Energy logo
LEU
Centrus Energy
1.3$21.82-1.5%$291.95 million$209.70 million7.74
Galiano Gold logo
GAU
Galiano Gold
1.4N/AN/A$260.11 million$161.92 million6.44
Ciner Resources logo
CINR
Ciner Resources
0.9$12.62-1.9%$249.46 million$522.80 million15.21
Gold Standard Ventures logo
GSV
Gold Standard Ventures
1.3$0.58-1.7%$208.30 millionN/A-14.57
ZEN Graphene Solutions logo
ZENYF
ZEN Graphene Solutions
0.4$1.58-1.3%$136.25 millionN/A-158.38
Smart Sand logo
SND
Smart Sand
1.0$2.36-3.0%$102.45 million$233.07 million2.17News Coverage
Gap Down
JETMF
Global Crossing Airlines Group
0.5$1.66-1.0%$47.46 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
SMPR
Standard Metals Processing
0.5$0.08-23.6%$11.35 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
AMNL
Applied Minerals
0.4$0.02-0.5%$3.61 million$490,000.00-0.61
Select Sands logo
SLSDF
Select Sands
0.8$0.04-0.0%$3.23 million$4.36 million-0.46Gap Up
EMESQ
Emerge Energy Services
0.0$0.01-6.9%$0.00$313.59 million0.00Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/23/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.