Go Pro

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) Competitors

Brookfield Asset Management logo
C$63.93 -0.96 (-1.48%)
As of 03:11 PM Eastern

BAM vs. GS, BN, IGM, ONEX, and GLXY

Should you buy Brookfield Asset Management stock or one of its competitors? Brookfield Asset Management's main competitors and comparable companies include Gluskin Sheff + Associates (GS), Brookfield (BN), IGM Financial (IGM), Onex (ONEX), and Galaxy Digital (GLXY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Brookfield Asset Management compare to Gluskin Sheff + Associates?

Brookfield Asset Management (TSE:BAM) and Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Asset Management. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Asset ManagementC$4.82B21.19C$2.42BC$1.7436.74
Gluskin Sheff + AssociatesC$66.20B5.60C$18.86BC$2.3619.65

Brookfield Asset Management has a net margin of 50.40% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 34.28% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brookfield Asset Management50.40% 34.28% 0.88%
Gluskin Sheff + Associates N/A N/A N/A

Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 1.403214, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.321614, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Brookfield Asset Management presently has a consensus price target of C$75.00, suggesting a potential upside of 17.32%. Given Brookfield Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Brookfield Asset Management is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brookfield Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Brookfield Asset Management pays an annual dividend of C$1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Brookfield Asset Management pays out 108.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

13.4% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are held by institutional investors. 14.1% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Brookfield Asset Management had 1 more articles in the media than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Brookfield Asset Management and 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Brookfield Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' score of 0.00 indicating that Brookfield Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Asset Management
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Brookfield Asset Management beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brookfield Asset Management compare to Brookfield?

Brookfield Asset Management (TSE:BAM) and Brookfield (TSE:BN) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Brookfield Asset Management has a net margin of 50.40% compared to Brookfield's net margin of 1.80%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 34.28% beat Brookfield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brookfield Asset Management50.40% 34.28% 0.88%
Brookfield 1.80%3.05%2.31%

Brookfield Asset Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brookfield. Brookfield Asset Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Asset ManagementC$4.82B21.19C$2.42BC$1.7436.74
BrookfieldC$77.06B1.50C$630.07MC$0.5495.65

Brookfield Asset Management presently has a consensus target price of C$75.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.32%. Brookfield has a consensus target price of C$58.50, indicating a potential upside of 13.26%. Given Brookfield Asset Management's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Brookfield Asset Management is more favorable than Brookfield.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brookfield Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Brookfield
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33

13.4% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.7% of Brookfield shares are held by institutional investors. 14.1% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.1% of Brookfield shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Brookfield Asset Management pays an annual dividend of C$1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Brookfield pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Brookfield Asset Management pays out 108.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brookfield pays out 48.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Brookfield Asset Management and Brookfield Asset Management both had 2 articles in the media. Brookfield Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Brookfield's score of 0.00 indicating that Brookfield Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Asset Management
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Brookfield
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 1.403214, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield has a beta of 1.578071, indicating that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Brookfield Asset Management and Brookfield tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brookfield Asset Management compare to IGM Financial?

Brookfield Asset Management (TSE:BAM) and IGM Financial (TSE:IGM) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Brookfield Asset Management has higher revenue and earnings than IGM Financial. IGM Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Asset ManagementC$4.82B21.19C$2.42BC$1.7436.74
IGM FinancialC$4.09B4.92C$934.91MC$4.9417.62

Brookfield Asset Management pays an annual dividend of C$1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. IGM Financial pays an annual dividend of C$2.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Brookfield Asset Management pays out 108.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. IGM Financial pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, IGM Financial had 3 more articles in the media than Brookfield Asset Management. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for IGM Financial and 2 mentions for Brookfield Asset Management. Brookfield Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat IGM Financial's score of 0.37 indicating that Brookfield Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Asset Management
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
IGM Financial
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

13.4% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.0% of IGM Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.1% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 66.6% of IGM Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Brookfield Asset Management currently has a consensus target price of C$75.00, suggesting a potential upside of 17.32%. IGM Financial has a consensus target price of C$82.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.77%. Given Brookfield Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Brookfield Asset Management is more favorable than IGM Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brookfield Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
IGM Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 1.403214, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IGM Financial has a beta of 0.932682, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Brookfield Asset Management has a net margin of 50.40% compared to IGM Financial's net margin of 29.82%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 34.28% beat IGM Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brookfield Asset Management50.40% 34.28% 0.88%
IGM Financial 29.82%12.91%4.51%

Summary

Brookfield Asset Management beats IGM Financial on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brookfield Asset Management compare to Onex?

Onex (TSE:ONEX) and Brookfield Asset Management (TSE:BAM) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Onex pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Brookfield Asset Management pays an annual dividend of C$1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Onex pays out 4.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brookfield Asset Management pays out 108.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Onex has a net margin of 101.81% compared to Brookfield Asset Management's net margin of 50.40%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 34.28% beat Onex's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Onex101.81% 5.25% 4.04%
Brookfield Asset Management 50.40%34.28%0.88%

Onex has a beta of 0.770457, suggesting that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 1.403214, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

38.4% of Onex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by institutional investors. 17.0% of Onex shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.1% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Brookfield Asset Management has higher revenue and earnings than Onex. Onex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OnexC$750M11.10C$441.34MC$6.7216.25
Brookfield Asset ManagementC$4.82B21.19C$2.42BC$1.7436.74

Onex presently has a consensus price target of C$153.60, suggesting a potential upside of 40.70%. Brookfield Asset Management has a consensus price target of C$75.00, suggesting a potential upside of 17.32%. Given Onex's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Onex is more favorable than Brookfield Asset Management.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Onex
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Brookfield Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Brookfield Asset Management had 1 more articles in the media than Onex. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Brookfield Asset Management and 1 mentions for Onex. Brookfield Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Onex's score of 0.00 indicating that Brookfield Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Onex
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Brookfield Asset Management
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Brookfield Asset Management beats Onex on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brookfield Asset Management compare to Galaxy Digital?

Galaxy Digital (TSE:GLXY) and Brookfield Asset Management (TSE:BAM) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Brookfield Asset Management has a net margin of 50.40% compared to Galaxy Digital's net margin of 0.57%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 34.28% beat Galaxy Digital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Galaxy Digital0.57% 18.71% N/A
Brookfield Asset Management 50.40%34.28%0.88%

Brookfield Asset Management has a consensus target price of C$75.00, suggesting a potential upside of 17.32%. Given Brookfield Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Brookfield Asset Management is more favorable than Galaxy Digital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Galaxy Digital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Brookfield Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Galaxy Digital has a beta of 1.18511, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 1.403214, meaning that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Brookfield Asset Management had 1 more articles in the media than Galaxy Digital. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Brookfield Asset Management and 1 mentions for Galaxy Digital. Brookfield Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Galaxy Digital's score of 0.00 indicating that Brookfield Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Galaxy Digital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Brookfield Asset Management
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

56.6% of Galaxy Digital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Galaxy Digital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.1% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Brookfield Asset Management has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Galaxy Digital. Galaxy Digital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Galaxy DigitalC$43.76B0.12C$1.97B-C$0.61N/A
Brookfield Asset ManagementC$4.82B21.19C$2.42BC$1.7436.74

Summary

Brookfield Asset Management beats Galaxy Digital on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Brookfield Asset Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BAM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BAM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BAM vs. The Competition

MetricBrookfield Asset ManagementCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$102.11BC$5.36BC$13.86BC$12.54B
Dividend Yield4.25%7.50%5.95%6.28%
P/E Ratio36.7429.9225.3038.91
Price / Sales21.191,222.62507.539.15
Price / Cash8.2347.9230.3082.29
Price / Book8.713.512.744.58
Net IncomeC$2.42BC$417.39MC$1.31BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-5.18%-1.76%-1.14%-1.84%
1 Month Performance-15.16%-2.74%-0.87%-2.29%
1 Year Performance-19.75%3.77%9.63%21.74%

Brookfield Asset Management Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management
2.742 of 5 stars
C$63.93
-1.5%
C$75.00
+17.3%
-17.2%C$102.11BC$4.82B36.745,800
GS
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
N/AC$49.04
+1.1%
N/AN/AC$391.86BC$66.20B20.7847,400
BN
Brookfield
1.8479 of 5 stars
C$53.10
+0.9%
C$58.50
+10.2%
-44.3%C$118.54BC$77.06B98.33250,000
IGM
IGM Financial
2.0009 of 5 stars
C$89.33
+2.8%
C$82.00
-8.2%
+71.9%C$20.63BC$4.09B18.083,594
ONEX
Onex
2.6991 of 5 stars
C$110.19
+2.3%
C$153.60
+39.4%
-12.2%C$8.41BC$750M16.40492

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:BAM) was last updated on 9/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners