Go Pro

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) Competitors

Brookfield Asset Management logo
C$73.77 +0.61 (+0.83%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

BAM vs. GS, BN, IGM, ONEX, and GLXY

Should you buy Brookfield Asset Management stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Brookfield Asset Management with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Brookfield Asset Management include Gluskin Sheff + Associates (GS), Brookfield (BN), IGM Financial (IGM), Onex (ONEX), and Galaxy Digital (GLXY). These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Brookfield Asset Management compare to Gluskin Sheff + Associates?

Brookfield Asset Management (TSE:BAM) and Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Brookfield Asset Management has a net margin of 50.79% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 30.18% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brookfield Asset Management50.79% 30.18% 0.88%
Gluskin Sheff + Associates N/A N/A N/A

Brookfield Asset Management pays an annual dividend of C$1.82 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Brookfield Asset Management pays out 116.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

13.5% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.1% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 1.321924, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.424429, meaning that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Asset Management. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Asset ManagementC$4.77B24.74C$2.42BC$1.5647.39
Gluskin Sheff + AssociatesC$66.20B6.22C$19.10BC$2.3621.56

In the previous week, Brookfield Asset Management had 6 more articles in the media than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Brookfield Asset Management and 0 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Brookfield Asset Management's score of 0.53 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Asset Management Positive
Gluskin Sheff + Associates Positive

Brookfield Asset Management presently has a consensus price target of C$75.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.45%. Given Brookfield Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Brookfield Asset Management is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brookfield Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Brookfield Asset Management beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brookfield Asset Management compare to Brookfield?

Brookfield (TSE:BN) and Brookfield Asset Management (TSE:BAM) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

Brookfield Asset Management has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brookfield. Brookfield Asset Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BrookfieldC$75.74B1.84C$630.07MC$0.51122.47
Brookfield Asset ManagementC$4.77B24.74C$2.42BC$1.5647.39

Brookfield has a beta of 1.601652, meaning that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 1.321924, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Brookfield Asset Management has a net margin of 50.79% compared to Brookfield's net margin of 1.72%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 30.18% beat Brookfield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brookfield1.72% 2.87% 2.31%
Brookfield Asset Management 50.79%30.18%0.88%

Brookfield currently has a consensus target price of C$58.50, suggesting a potential downside of 6.34%. Brookfield Asset Management has a consensus target price of C$75.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.45%. Given Brookfield Asset Management's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brookfield Asset Management is more favorable than Brookfield.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brookfield
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.50
Brookfield Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Brookfield pays an annual dividend of C$0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Brookfield Asset Management pays an annual dividend of C$1.82 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Brookfield pays out 49.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brookfield Asset Management pays out 116.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Brookfield Asset Management had 4 more articles in the media than Brookfield. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Brookfield Asset Management and 2 mentions for Brookfield. Brookfield's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Brookfield Asset Management's score of 0.53 indicating that Brookfield is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brookfield
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Brookfield Asset Management
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

34.5% of Brookfield shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.5% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by institutional investors. 19.1% of Brookfield shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.1% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Brookfield beats Brookfield Asset Management on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brookfield Asset Management compare to IGM Financial?

IGM Financial (TSE:IGM) and Brookfield Asset Management (TSE:BAM) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

IGM Financial has a beta of 1.031978, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 1.321924, indicating that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Brookfield Asset Management has a net margin of 50.79% compared to IGM Financial's net margin of 29.82%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 30.18% beat IGM Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IGM Financial29.82% 12.91% 4.51%
Brookfield Asset Management 50.79%30.18%0.88%

Brookfield Asset Management has higher revenue and earnings than IGM Financial. IGM Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IGM FinancialC$4.09B5.06C$934.91MC$4.9418.11
Brookfield Asset ManagementC$4.77B24.74C$2.42BC$1.5647.39

In the previous week, IGM Financial had 22 more articles in the media than Brookfield Asset Management. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for IGM Financial and 6 mentions for Brookfield Asset Management. Brookfield Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat IGM Financial's score of 0.21 indicating that Brookfield Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
IGM Financial
6 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Brookfield Asset Management
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

9.8% of IGM Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.5% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by institutional investors. 66.6% of IGM Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.1% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

IGM Financial pays an annual dividend of C$2.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Brookfield Asset Management pays an annual dividend of C$1.82 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. IGM Financial pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brookfield Asset Management pays out 116.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. IGM Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

IGM Financial presently has a consensus target price of C$82.00, indicating a potential downside of 8.33%. Brookfield Asset Management has a consensus target price of C$75.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.45%. Given Brookfield Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brookfield Asset Management is more favorable than IGM Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
IGM Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38
Brookfield Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Brookfield Asset Management beats IGM Financial on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brookfield Asset Management compare to Onex?

Onex (TSE:ONEX) and Brookfield Asset Management (TSE:BAM) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, Brookfield Asset Management had 6 more articles in the media than Onex. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Brookfield Asset Management and 0 mentions for Onex. Brookfield Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Onex's score of 0.00 indicating that Brookfield Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Onex Neutral
Brookfield Asset Management Positive

Onex pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Brookfield Asset Management pays an annual dividend of C$1.82 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Onex pays out 3.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brookfield Asset Management pays out 116.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Onex has a net margin of 96.42% compared to Brookfield Asset Management's net margin of 50.79%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 30.18% beat Onex's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Onex96.42% 6.52% 4.04%
Brookfield Asset Management 50.79%30.18%0.88%

Onex presently has a consensus target price of C$150.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.93%. Brookfield Asset Management has a consensus target price of C$75.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.45%. Given Onex's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Onex is more favorable than Brookfield Asset Management.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Onex
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Brookfield Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

39.3% of Onex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.5% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by institutional investors. 17.0% of Onex shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.1% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Brookfield Asset Management has higher revenue and earnings than Onex. Onex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OnexC$873M9.94C$441.34MC$8.2813.73
Brookfield Asset ManagementC$4.77B24.74C$2.42BC$1.5647.39

Onex has a beta of 0.734391, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 1.321924, meaning that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Brookfield Asset Management beats Onex on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brookfield Asset Management compare to Galaxy Digital?

Brookfield Asset Management (TSE:BAM) and Galaxy Digital (TSE:GLXY) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment and dividends.

Brookfield Asset Management has a net margin of 50.79% compared to Galaxy Digital's net margin of 0.57%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 30.18% beat Galaxy Digital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brookfield Asset Management50.79% 30.18% 0.88%
Galaxy Digital 0.57%18.71%N/A

Brookfield Asset Management presently has a consensus price target of C$75.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.45%. Given Brookfield Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Brookfield Asset Management is more favorable than Galaxy Digital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brookfield Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Galaxy Digital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

13.5% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.6% of Galaxy Digital shares are held by institutional investors. 14.1% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Galaxy Digital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 1.321924, indicating that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Galaxy Digital has a beta of 1.18511, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Brookfield Asset Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Galaxy Digital. Galaxy Digital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Asset ManagementC$4.77B24.74C$2.42BC$1.5647.39
Galaxy DigitalC$43.76B0.12C$1.97B-C$0.61N/A

In the previous week, Brookfield Asset Management had 6 more articles in the media than Galaxy Digital. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Brookfield Asset Management and 0 mentions for Galaxy Digital. Brookfield Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Galaxy Digital's score of 0.00 indicating that Brookfield Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Asset Management Positive
Galaxy Digital Neutral

Summary

Brookfield Asset Management beats Galaxy Digital on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Brookfield Asset Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BAM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BAM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BAM vs. The Competition

MetricBrookfield Asset ManagementCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$118.05BC$5.63BC$14.07BC$12.55B
Dividend Yield4.21%7.47%5.92%6.20%
P/E Ratio47.3938.0529.3434.19
Price / Sales24.741,211.60506.209.72
Price / Cash8.2348.2238.6182.29
Price / Book10.683.713.734.50
Net IncomeC$2.42BC$417.17MC$1.31BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance11.12%1.69%1.48%3.04%
1 Month Performance12.44%-0.11%1.30%0.47%
1 Year Performance-12.84%7.20%13.62%34.30%

Brookfield Asset Management Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management
1.6567 of 5 stars
C$73.77
+0.8%
C$75.00
+1.7%
-11.3%C$117.79BC$4.77B47.292,400
GS
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
N/AC$48.67
-0.5%
N/AN/AC$394.03BC$66.20B20.6248,500
BN
Brookfield
1.571 of 5 stars
C$60.02
+1.9%
C$58.50
-2.5%
-30.3%C$134.06BC$75.74B117.69180,000
IGM
IGM Financial
1.8041 of 5 stars
C$87.48
+1.2%
C$80.88
-7.6%
+102.4%C$20.34BC$4.09B18.003,300
ONEX
Onex
2.5196 of 5 stars
C$107.12
+0.2%
C$150.00
+40.0%
+2.3%C$8.17BC$873M12.94492

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:BAM) was last updated on 8/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners