Free Trial

WELL Health Technologies (WELL) Competitors

WELL Health Technologies logo
C$4.31 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 02:12 PM Eastern

WELL vs. PSA, GC, LB, CBL, and AGF.B

Should you be buying WELL Health Technologies stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of WELL Health Technologies include Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA), Great Canadian Gaming (GC), Laurentian Bank of Canada (LB), Callidus Capital (CBL), and AGF Management (AGF.B). These companies are all part of the "trading" industry.

How does WELL Health Technologies compare to Purpose High Interest Savings Fund?

WELL Health Technologies (TSE:WELL) and Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (TSE:PSA) are both trading companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

WELL Health Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Purpose High Interest Savings Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WELL Health TechnologiesC$1.40B0.78C$73.76M-C$0.03N/A
Purpose High Interest Savings FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Purpose High Interest Savings Fund has a net margin of 0.00% compared to WELL Health Technologies' net margin of -0.53%. Purpose High Interest Savings Fund's return on equity of 0.00% beat WELL Health Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WELL Health Technologies-0.53% -0.87% 2.07%
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund N/A N/A N/A

WELL Health Technologies presently has a consensus price target of C$6.25, suggesting a potential upside of 45.35%. Given WELL Health Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe WELL Health Technologies is more favorable than Purpose High Interest Savings Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WELL Health Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

5.4% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, WELL Health Technologies and WELL Health Technologies both had 1 articles in the media. Purpose High Interest Savings Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat WELL Health Technologies' score of 1.32 indicating that Purpose High Interest Savings Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
WELL Health Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

WELL Health Technologies beats Purpose High Interest Savings Fund on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WELL Health Technologies compare to Great Canadian Gaming?

WELL Health Technologies (TSE:WELL) and Great Canadian Gaming (TSE:GC) are both trading companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

WELL Health Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Great Canadian Gaming. WELL Health Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Great Canadian Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WELL Health TechnologiesC$1.40B0.78C$73.76M-C$0.03N/A
Great Canadian GamingC$228.70M0.00-C$121.82M-C$2.11N/A

Great Canadian Gaming has a net margin of 0.00% compared to WELL Health Technologies' net margin of -0.53%. Great Canadian Gaming's return on equity of 0.00% beat WELL Health Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WELL Health Technologies-0.53% -0.87% 2.07%
Great Canadian Gaming N/A N/A N/A

WELL Health Technologies presently has a consensus price target of C$6.25, suggesting a potential upside of 45.35%. Given WELL Health Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe WELL Health Technologies is more favorable than Great Canadian Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WELL Health Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Great Canadian Gaming
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

5.4% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, WELL Health Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Great Canadian Gaming. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for WELL Health Technologies and 0 mentions for Great Canadian Gaming. WELL Health Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Great Canadian Gaming's score of 0.00 indicating that WELL Health Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
WELL Health Technologies Positive
Great Canadian Gaming Neutral

Summary

WELL Health Technologies beats Great Canadian Gaming on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WELL Health Technologies compare to Laurentian Bank of Canada?

WELL Health Technologies (TSE:WELL) and Laurentian Bank of Canada (TSE:LB) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Laurentian Bank of Canada had 2 more articles in the media than WELL Health Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Laurentian Bank of Canada and 1 mentions for WELL Health Technologies. WELL Health Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Laurentian Bank of Canada's score of 0.37 indicating that WELL Health Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
WELL Health Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Laurentian Bank of Canada
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

WELL Health Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Laurentian Bank of Canada. WELL Health Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Laurentian Bank of Canada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WELL Health TechnologiesC$1.40B0.78C$73.76M-C$0.03N/A
Laurentian Bank of CanadaC$985.59M1.83-C$5.52MC$1.5026.85

Laurentian Bank of Canada has a net margin of 3.72% compared to WELL Health Technologies' net margin of -0.53%. Laurentian Bank of Canada's return on equity of 2.86% beat WELL Health Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WELL Health Technologies-0.53% -0.87% 2.07%
Laurentian Bank of Canada 3.72%2.86%-0.03%

WELL Health Technologies presently has a consensus target price of C$6.25, suggesting a potential upside of 45.35%. Laurentian Bank of Canada has a consensus target price of C$36.44, suggesting a potential downside of 9.52%. Given WELL Health Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe WELL Health Technologies is more favorable than Laurentian Bank of Canada.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WELL Health Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Laurentian Bank of Canada
3 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.40

WELL Health Technologies has a beta of 0.933646, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Laurentian Bank of Canada has a beta of 1.127324, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500.

5.4% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.3% of Laurentian Bank of Canada shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Laurentian Bank of Canada shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

WELL Health Technologies and Laurentian Bank of Canada tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WELL Health Technologies compare to Callidus Capital?

WELL Health Technologies (TSE:WELL) and Callidus Capital (TSE:CBL) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, WELL Health Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Callidus Capital. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for WELL Health Technologies and 0 mentions for Callidus Capital. WELL Health Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Callidus Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that WELL Health Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
WELL Health Technologies Positive
Callidus Capital Neutral

WELL Health Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Callidus Capital. WELL Health Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Callidus Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WELL Health TechnologiesC$1.40B0.78C$73.76M-C$0.03N/A
Callidus CapitalC$181.78M7.56-C$243.34M-C$4.26N/A

Callidus Capital has a net margin of 0.00% compared to WELL Health Technologies' net margin of -0.53%. Callidus Capital's return on equity of 0.00% beat WELL Health Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WELL Health Technologies-0.53% -0.87% 2.07%
Callidus Capital N/A N/A N/A

WELL Health Technologies presently has a consensus target price of C$6.25, suggesting a potential upside of 45.35%. Given WELL Health Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe WELL Health Technologies is more favorable than Callidus Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WELL Health Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Callidus Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

WELL Health Technologies has a beta of 0.933646, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Callidus Capital has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its share price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500.

5.4% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.8% of Callidus Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

WELL Health Technologies beats Callidus Capital on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WELL Health Technologies compare to AGF Management?

WELL Health Technologies (TSE:WELL) and AGF Management (TSE:AGF.B) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

5.4% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.2% of AGF Management shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of AGF Management shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

AGF Management has a net margin of 16.58% compared to WELL Health Technologies' net margin of -0.53%. AGF Management's return on equity of 7.64% beat WELL Health Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WELL Health Technologies-0.53% -0.87% 2.07%
AGF Management 16.58%7.64%5.20%

WELL Health Technologies presently has a consensus target price of C$6.25, suggesting a potential upside of 45.35%. AGF Management has a consensus target price of C$19.18, suggesting a potential upside of 19.49%. Given WELL Health Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe WELL Health Technologies is more favorable than AGF Management.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WELL Health Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
AGF Management
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

In the previous week, WELL Health Technologies and WELL Health Technologies both had 1 articles in the media. WELL Health Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat AGF Management's score of 0.26 indicating that WELL Health Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
WELL Health Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
AGF Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

WELL Health Technologies has a beta of 0.933646, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AGF Management has a beta of 1.347114, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500.

AGF Management has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WELL Health Technologies. WELL Health Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AGF Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WELL Health TechnologiesC$1.40B0.78C$73.76M-C$0.03N/A
AGF ManagementC$559.84M1.83C$85.73MC$1.729.33

Summary

AGF Management beats WELL Health Technologies on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get WELL Health Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WELL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WELL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WELL vs. The Competition

MetricWELL Health TechnologiesMedical Care Facilities IndustryMedical SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$1.10BC$1.69BC$6.24BC$11.72B
Dividend YieldN/A3.67%2.73%6.22%
P/E Ratio-143.337.5729.0623.85
Price / Sales0.7818.55475.4313.38
Price / Cash12.277.9027.6282.69
Price / Book0.621.729.694.48
Net IncomeC$73.76MC$63.03MC$3.55BC$300.68M
7 Day Performance2.14%-0.13%1.46%0.12%
1 Month Performance10.26%0.75%5.35%2.90%
1 Year Performance9.97%18.91%33.88%58.06%

WELL Health Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WELL
WELL Health Technologies
2.6265 of 5 stars
C$4.31
flat
C$6.25
+45.0%
N/AC$1.10BC$1.40BN/A510
PSA
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund
N/AC$50.09
flat
N/AN/AC$3.03BN/AN/A5,900
GC
Great Canadian Gaming
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$2.59BC$228.70MN/A7,900
LB
Laurentian Bank of Canada
1.3609 of 5 stars
C$40.25
flat
C$36.44
-9.5%
N/AC$1.80BC$985.59M26.833,000
CBL
Callidus Capital
N/AC$24.08
-0.1%
N/AN/AC$1.38BC$181.78MN/A460

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:WELL) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners