Go Pro

WELL Health Technologies (WELL) Competitors

WELL Health Technologies logo
C$3.96 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

WELL vs. PSA, GC, LB, AGF.B, and CBL

Should you buy WELL Health Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares WELL Health Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with WELL Health Technologies include Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA), Great Canadian Gaming (GC), Laurentian Bank of Canada (LB), AGF Management (AGF.B), and Callidus Capital (CBL). These companies are all part of the "trading" industry.

How does WELL Health Technologies compare to Purpose High Interest Savings Fund?

WELL Health Technologies (TSE:WELL) and Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (TSE:PSA) are both trading companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

5.4% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

WELL Health Technologies has a net margin of 1.82% compared to Purpose High Interest Savings Fund's net margin of 0.00%. WELL Health Technologies' return on equity of 3.15% beat Purpose High Interest Savings Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WELL Health Technologies1.82% 3.15% 2.07%
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund N/A N/A N/A

WELL Health Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Purpose High Interest Savings Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WELL Health TechnologiesC$1.47B0.69C$73.76MC$0.1136.00
Purpose High Interest Savings FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

WELL Health Technologies currently has a consensus target price of C$7.13, suggesting a potential upside of 79.92%. Given WELL Health Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe WELL Health Technologies is more favorable than Purpose High Interest Savings Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WELL Health Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Purpose High Interest Savings Fund had 1 more articles in the media than WELL Health Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Purpose High Interest Savings Fund and 0 mentions for WELL Health Technologies. Purpose High Interest Savings Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat WELL Health Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Purpose High Interest Savings Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
WELL Health Technologies Neutral
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund Positive

Summary

WELL Health Technologies beats Purpose High Interest Savings Fund on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WELL Health Technologies compare to Great Canadian Gaming?

Great Canadian Gaming (TSE:GC) and WELL Health Technologies (TSE:WELL) are both trading companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and valuation.

WELL Health Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Great Canadian Gaming. Great Canadian Gaming is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WELL Health Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Canadian GamingC$228.70M0.00-C$121.82M-C$2.11N/A
WELL Health TechnologiesC$1.47B0.69C$73.76MC$0.1136.00

WELL Health Technologies has a net margin of 1.82% compared to Great Canadian Gaming's net margin of 0.00%. WELL Health Technologies' return on equity of 3.15% beat Great Canadian Gaming's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Canadian GamingN/A N/A N/A
WELL Health Technologies 1.82%3.15%2.07%

5.4% of WELL Health Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.8% of WELL Health Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Great Canadian Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled WELL Health Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Great Canadian Gaming Neutral
WELL Health Technologies Neutral

WELL Health Technologies has a consensus target price of C$7.13, indicating a potential upside of 79.92%. Given WELL Health Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe WELL Health Technologies is more favorable than Great Canadian Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Canadian Gaming
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
WELL Health Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

WELL Health Technologies beats Great Canadian Gaming on 12 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WELL Health Technologies compare to Laurentian Bank of Canada?

Laurentian Bank of Canada (TSE:LB) and WELL Health Technologies (TSE:WELL) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

Laurentian Bank of Canada has a beta of 1.201953, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WELL Health Technologies has a beta of 0.900556, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Laurentian Bank of Canada had 1 more articles in the media than WELL Health Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Laurentian Bank of Canada and 0 mentions for WELL Health Technologies. Laurentian Bank of Canada's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled WELL Health Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Laurentian Bank of Canada Neutral
WELL Health Technologies Neutral

Laurentian Bank of Canada presently has a consensus price target of C$36.44, indicating a potential downside of 9.56%. WELL Health Technologies has a consensus price target of C$7.13, indicating a potential upside of 79.92%. Given WELL Health Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe WELL Health Technologies is more favorable than Laurentian Bank of Canada.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Laurentian Bank of Canada
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
WELL Health Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

WELL Health Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Laurentian Bank of Canada. WELL Health Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Laurentian Bank of Canada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Laurentian Bank of CanadaC$956.73M1.89-C$5.52MC$0.31129.97
WELL Health TechnologiesC$1.47B0.69C$73.76MC$0.1136.00

WELL Health Technologies has a net margin of 1.82% compared to Laurentian Bank of Canada's net margin of 1.36%. WELL Health Technologies' return on equity of 3.15% beat Laurentian Bank of Canada's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Laurentian Bank of Canada1.36% 1.01% -0.03%
WELL Health Technologies 1.82%3.15%2.07%

13.4% of Laurentian Bank of Canada shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.4% of WELL Health Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Laurentian Bank of Canada shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.8% of WELL Health Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

WELL Health Technologies beats Laurentian Bank of Canada on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WELL Health Technologies compare to AGF Management?

WELL Health Technologies (TSE:WELL) and AGF Management (TSE:AGF.B) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and valuation.

AGF Management has a net margin of 16.58% compared to WELL Health Technologies' net margin of 1.82%. AGF Management's return on equity of 7.64% beat WELL Health Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WELL Health Technologies1.82% 3.15% 2.07%
AGF Management 16.58%7.64%5.20%

In the previous week, AGF Management had 3 more articles in the media than WELL Health Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for AGF Management and 0 mentions for WELL Health Technologies. WELL Health Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat AGF Management's score of -0.54 indicating that WELL Health Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
WELL Health Technologies Neutral
AGF Management Negative

WELL Health Technologies has a beta of 0.900556, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AGF Management has a beta of 1.231088, indicating that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

AGF Management has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WELL Health Technologies. AGF Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WELL Health Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WELL Health TechnologiesC$1.47B0.69C$73.76MC$0.1136.00
AGF ManagementC$575.66M2.52C$85.73MC$2.0711.01

WELL Health Technologies presently has a consensus target price of C$7.13, indicating a potential upside of 79.92%. AGF Management has a consensus target price of C$20.28, indicating a potential downside of 11.05%. Given WELL Health Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe WELL Health Technologies is more favorable than AGF Management.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WELL Health Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
AGF Management
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

5.4% of WELL Health Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.1% of AGF Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.8% of WELL Health Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of AGF Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

AGF Management beats WELL Health Technologies on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WELL Health Technologies compare to Callidus Capital?

WELL Health Technologies (TSE:WELL) and Callidus Capital (TSE:CBL) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

5.4% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.8% of Callidus Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of WELL Health Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

WELL Health Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Callidus Capital. Callidus Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WELL Health Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WELL Health TechnologiesC$1.47B0.69C$73.76MC$0.1136.00
Callidus CapitalC$181.78M7.79-C$243.34M-C$4.26N/A

WELL Health Technologies presently has a consensus target price of C$7.13, suggesting a potential upside of 79.92%. Given WELL Health Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe WELL Health Technologies is more favorable than Callidus Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WELL Health Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Callidus Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Callidus Capital had 1 more articles in the media than WELL Health Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Callidus Capital and 0 mentions for WELL Health Technologies. WELL Health Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Callidus Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
WELL Health Technologies Neutral
Callidus Capital Neutral

WELL Health Technologies has a beta of 0.900556, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Callidus Capital has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

WELL Health Technologies has a net margin of 1.82% compared to Callidus Capital's net margin of 0.00%. WELL Health Technologies' return on equity of 3.15% beat Callidus Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WELL Health Technologies1.82% 3.15% 2.07%
Callidus Capital N/A N/A N/A

Summary

WELL Health Technologies beats Callidus Capital on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get WELL Health Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WELL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WELL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WELL vs. The Competition

MetricWELL Health TechnologiesMedical Care Facilities IndustryMedical SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$1.01BC$1.67BC$6.88BC$12.48B
Dividend YieldN/A3.85%2.67%6.19%
P/E Ratio36.0012.4727.0036.95
Price / Sales0.6917.77492.309.44
Price / Cash12.277.9050.5482.29
Price / Book0.961.8610.284.39
Net IncomeC$73.76MC$63.03MC$3.60BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-5.49%-0.06%-1.29%0.61%
1 Month Performance-3.41%0.04%-0.38%1.06%
1 Year Performance-15.38%17.00%18.32%30.89%

WELL Health Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WELL
WELL Health Technologies
2.3778 of 5 stars
C$3.96
flat
C$7.13
+79.9%
-15.7%C$1.01BC$1.47B36.00510
PSA
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund
N/AC$50.07
0.0%
N/A+0.0%C$3.09BN/AN/A5,900
GC
Great Canadian Gaming
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$2.59BC$228.70MN/A7,900
LB
Laurentian Bank of Canada
0.5834 of 5 stars
C$40.24
+0.0%
C$36.44
-9.4%
+29.8%C$1.80BC$956.73M129.813,000
AGF.B
AGF Management
1.3352 of 5 stars
C$22.83
+0.5%
C$20.28
-11.2%
+81.1%C$1.45BC$575.66M11.03652

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:WELL) was last updated on 7/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners