Go Pro

AGF Management (AGF.B) Competitors

AGF Management logo
C$23.29 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 01:59 PM Eastern

AGF.B vs. GLXY, CIX, SII, PSA, and FIH.U

Should you buy AGF Management stock or one of its competitors? AGF Management's main competitors and comparable companies include Galaxy Digital (GLXY), CI Financial (CIX), Sprott (SII), Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA), and Fairfax India (FIH.U). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does AGF Management compare to Galaxy Digital?

Galaxy Digital (TSE:GLXY) and AGF Management (TSE:AGF.B) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

AGF Management has a net margin of 16.58% compared to Galaxy Digital's net margin of 0.57%. Galaxy Digital's return on equity of 18.71% beat AGF Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Galaxy Digital0.57% 18.71% N/A
AGF Management 16.58%7.64%5.20%

In the previous week, AGF Management had 2 more articles in the media than Galaxy Digital. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for AGF Management and 0 mentions for Galaxy Digital. AGF Management's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Galaxy Digital's score of 0.00 indicating that AGF Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Galaxy Digital Neutral
AGF Management Neutral

56.6% of Galaxy Digital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.4% of AGF Management shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Galaxy Digital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of AGF Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

AGF Management has a consensus target price of C$20.28, indicating a potential downside of 12.92%. Given AGF Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe AGF Management is more favorable than Galaxy Digital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Galaxy Digital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
AGF Management
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Galaxy Digital has a beta of 1.18511, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AGF Management has a beta of 1.249998, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Galaxy Digital has higher revenue and earnings than AGF Management. Galaxy Digital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AGF Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Galaxy DigitalC$43.76B0.12C$1.97B-C$0.61N/A
AGF ManagementC$575.66M2.57C$85.73MC$2.0711.25

Summary

AGF Management beats Galaxy Digital on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does AGF Management compare to CI Financial?

CI Financial (TSE:CIX) and AGF Management (TSE:AGF.B) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

AGF Management has a consensus price target of C$20.28, suggesting a potential downside of 12.92%. Given AGF Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe AGF Management is more favorable than CI Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CI Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
AGF Management
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

AGF Management has a net margin of 16.58% compared to CI Financial's net margin of 7.44%. CI Financial's return on equity of 30.09% beat AGF Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CI Financial7.44% 30.09% 4.87%
AGF Management 16.58%7.64%5.20%

In the previous week, AGF Management had 2 more articles in the media than CI Financial. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for AGF Management and 0 mentions for CI Financial. AGF Management's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat CI Financial's score of 0.00 indicating that AGF Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CI Financial Neutral
AGF Management Neutral

AGF Management has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CI Financial. CI Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AGF Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CI FinancialC$3.57B1.29-C$69.09M-C$0.48N/A
AGF ManagementC$575.66M2.57C$85.73MC$2.0711.25

CI Financial has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its share price is 67% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AGF Management has a beta of 1.249998, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

CI Financial pays an annual dividend of C$0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. AGF Management pays an annual dividend of C$0.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. CI Financial pays out -166.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AGF Management pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CI Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CI Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

15.0% of CI Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.4% of AGF Management shares are held by institutional investors. 15.8% of CI Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of AGF Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

AGF Management beats CI Financial on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does AGF Management compare to Sprott?

Sprott (TSE:SII) and AGF Management (TSE:AGF.B) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk and valuation.

Sprott pays an annual dividend of C$1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. AGF Management pays an annual dividend of C$0.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Sprott pays out 36.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AGF Management pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. AGF Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Sprott has a net margin of 26.68% compared to AGF Management's net margin of 16.58%. Sprott's return on equity of 28.39% beat AGF Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sprott26.68% 28.39% 10.25%
AGF Management 16.58%7.64%5.20%

28.8% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.4% of AGF Management shares are held by institutional investors. 17.7% of Sprott shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of AGF Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sprott has a beta of 1.571441, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AGF Management has a beta of 1.249998, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

AGF Management has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. AGF Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SprottC$386.26M10.81C$32.26MC$4.0839.78
AGF ManagementC$575.66M2.57C$85.73MC$2.0711.25

In the previous week, Sprott had 1 more articles in the media than AGF Management. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Sprott and 2 mentions for AGF Management. AGF Management's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Sprott's score of 0.00 indicating that AGF Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sprott
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
AGF Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Sprott currently has a consensus price target of C$187.40, indicating a potential upside of 15.46%. AGF Management has a consensus price target of C$20.28, indicating a potential downside of 12.92%. Given Sprott's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than AGF Management.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sprott
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
AGF Management
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Summary

Sprott beats AGF Management on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does AGF Management compare to Purpose High Interest Savings Fund?

AGF Management (TSE:AGF.B) and Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (TSE:PSA) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

14.4% of AGF Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.7% of AGF Management shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

AGF Management has a net margin of 16.58% compared to Purpose High Interest Savings Fund's net margin of 0.00%. AGF Management's return on equity of 7.64% beat Purpose High Interest Savings Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AGF Management16.58% 7.64% 5.20%
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, AGF Management had 2 more articles in the media than Purpose High Interest Savings Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for AGF Management and 0 mentions for Purpose High Interest Savings Fund. AGF Management's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Purpose High Interest Savings Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that AGF Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
AGF Management Neutral
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund Neutral

AGF Management currently has a consensus target price of C$20.28, suggesting a potential downside of 12.92%. Given AGF Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe AGF Management is more favorable than Purpose High Interest Savings Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
AGF Management
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

AGF Management has higher revenue and earnings than Purpose High Interest Savings Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AGF ManagementC$575.66M2.57C$85.73MC$2.0711.25
Purpose High Interest Savings FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

AGF Management beats Purpose High Interest Savings Fund on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does AGF Management compare to Fairfax India?

AGF Management (TSE:AGF.B) and Fairfax India (TSE:FIH.U) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Fairfax India has a net margin of 56.53% compared to AGF Management's net margin of 16.58%. Fairfax India's return on equity of 7.81% beat AGF Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AGF Management16.58% 7.64% 5.20%
Fairfax India 56.53%7.81%5.34%

In the previous week, AGF Management had 2 more articles in the media than Fairfax India. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for AGF Management and 0 mentions for Fairfax India. AGF Management's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Fairfax India's score of 0.00 indicating that AGF Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
AGF Management Neutral
Fairfax India Neutral

AGF Management currently has a consensus price target of C$20.28, suggesting a potential downside of 12.92%. Given AGF Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe AGF Management is more favorable than Fairfax India.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
AGF Management
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Fairfax India
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

AGF Management has a beta of 1.249998, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fairfax India has a beta of 0.749882, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Fairfax India has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AGF Management. AGF Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fairfax India, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AGF ManagementC$575.66M2.57C$85.73MC$2.0711.25
Fairfax IndiaC$333.25M7.63C$228.56MC$1.4912.71

14.4% of AGF Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.8% of Fairfax India shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.7% of AGF Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.5% of Fairfax India shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

AGF Management beats Fairfax India on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get AGF Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AGF.B and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AGF.B and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

AGF.B vs. The Competition

MetricAGF ManagementCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$1.48BC$5.66BC$14.07BC$12.55B
Dividend Yield2.33%7.39%5.88%6.20%
P/E Ratio11.2538.6429.5530.72
Price / Sales2.571,225.47512.029.75
Price / Cash5.8948.3339.9782.29
Price / Book1.363.733.704.64
Net IncomeC$85.73MC$417.15MC$1.31BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-2.47%0.57%0.67%0.91%
1 Month Performance3.88%0.98%1.70%3.88%
1 Year Performance95.22%7.75%12.21%36.14%

AGF Management Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
AGF.B
AGF Management
1.759 of 5 stars
C$23.29
flat
C$20.28
-12.9%
+96.4%C$1.48BC$575.66M11.25652
GLXY
Galaxy Digital
N/AC$28.26
flat
N/AN/AC$5.39BC$43.76BN/A434
CIX
CI Financial
N/AC$31.99
flat
N/A+0.0%C$4.61BC$3.57BN/A610
SII
Sprott
2.0018 of 5 stars
C$161.91
+9.9%
C$202.80
+25.3%
+82.0%C$4.17BC$368.97M49.36170
PSA
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund
N/AC$50.02
flat
N/A0.0%C$3.15BN/AN/A5,900

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:AGF.B) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners