Free Trial

TC Energy (TRP) Competitors

TC Energy logo
C$95.96 -0.46 (-0.48%)
As of 06/17/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

TRP vs. PPL, EMA, BEPC, BIPC, and AQN

Should you buy TC Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares TC Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with TC Energy include Pembina Pipeline (PPL), Emera (EMA), Brookfield Renewable (BEPC), Brookfield Infrastructure (BIPC), and Algonquin Power & Utilities (AQN). These companies are all part of the "utilities" industry.

How does TC Energy compare to Pembina Pipeline?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and TC Energy (TSE:TRP) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.22% compared to TC Energy's net margin of 21.83%. TC Energy's return on equity of 12.53% beat Pembina Pipeline's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline22.22% 9.98% 4.31%
TC Energy 21.83%12.53%3.51%

60.2% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.9% of TC Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of TC Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pembina Pipeline presently has a consensus target price of C$65.38, indicating a potential upside of 0.10%. TC Energy has a consensus target price of C$89.86, indicating a potential downside of 6.36%. Given Pembina Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than TC Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
TC Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 3 more articles in the media than TC Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 0 mentions for TC Energy. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat TC Energy's score of -1.00 indicating that Pembina Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline Neutral
TC Energy Negative

Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.283419, suggesting that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TC Energy has a beta of 0.701299, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

TC Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pembina Pipeline. Pembina Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pembina PipelineC$7.60B5.00C$1.98BC$2.6624.56
TC EnergyC$15.48B6.46C$5.15BC$3.1930.08

Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. TC Energy pays an annual dividend of C$3.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TC Energy pays out 107.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats TC Energy on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TC Energy compare to Emera?

TC Energy (TSE:TRP) and Emera (TSE:EMA) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

TC Energy presently has a consensus price target of C$89.86, suggesting a potential downside of 6.36%. Emera has a consensus price target of C$74.39, suggesting a potential upside of 1.75%. Given Emera's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Emera is more favorable than TC Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TC Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Emera
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

TC Energy has a beta of 0.701299, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Emera has a beta of 0.567233, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

TC Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Emera. Emera is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TC EnergyC$15.48B6.46C$5.15BC$3.1930.08
EmeraC$8.91B2.51C$757.30MC$3.2722.36

TC Energy pays an annual dividend of C$3.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Emera pays an annual dividend of C$2.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. TC Energy pays out 107.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Emera pays out 89.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Emera is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

TC Energy has a net margin of 21.83% compared to Emera's net margin of 13.20%. TC Energy's return on equity of 12.53% beat Emera's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TC Energy21.83% 12.53% 3.51%
Emera 13.20%7.90%2.30%

57.9% of TC Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.1% of Emera shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of TC Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Emera shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Emera had 4 more articles in the media than TC Energy. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Emera and 0 mentions for TC Energy. Emera's average media sentiment score of -0.50 beat TC Energy's score of -1.00 indicating that Emera is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TC Energy Negative
Emera Negative

Summary

TC Energy beats Emera on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TC Energy compare to Brookfield Renewable?

Brookfield Renewable (TSE:BEPC) and TC Energy (TSE:TRP) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Brookfield Renewable's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat TC Energy's score of -1.00 indicating that Brookfield Renewable is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Renewable Positive
TC Energy Negative

30.3% of Brookfield Renewable shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.9% of TC Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Brookfield Renewable shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of TC Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TC Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Renewable. Brookfield Renewable is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield RenewableC$3.70B2.50-C$144.17M-C$25.06N/A
TC EnergyC$15.48B6.46C$5.15BC$3.1930.08

Brookfield Renewable has a beta of 1.126739, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TC Energy has a beta of 0.701299, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Brookfield Renewable pays an annual dividend of C$1.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. TC Energy pays an annual dividend of C$3.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Brookfield Renewable pays out -6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TC Energy pays out 107.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

TC Energy has a consensus target price of C$89.86, indicating a potential downside of 6.36%. Given TC Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe TC Energy is more favorable than Brookfield Renewable.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brookfield Renewable
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
TC Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

TC Energy has a net margin of 21.83% compared to Brookfield Renewable's net margin of -127.72%. Brookfield Renewable's return on equity of 520.67% beat TC Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brookfield Renewable-127.72% 520.67% 2.20%
TC Energy 21.83%12.53%3.51%

Summary

TC Energy beats Brookfield Renewable on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TC Energy compare to Brookfield Infrastructure?

TC Energy (TSE:TRP) and Brookfield Infrastructure (TSE:BIPC) are both utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

TC Energy presently has a consensus price target of C$89.86, suggesting a potential downside of 6.36%. Given TC Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe TC Energy is more favorable than Brookfield Infrastructure.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TC Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Brookfield Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

TC Energy has a beta of 0.701299, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield Infrastructure has a beta of 2.411469, meaning that its share price is 141% more volatile than the broader market.

TC Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Infrastructure. Brookfield Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TC EnergyC$15.48B6.46C$5.15BC$3.1930.08
Brookfield InfrastructureC$3.62B1.89-C$400.51M-C$6.19N/A

TC Energy has a net margin of 21.83% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure's net margin of -20.50%. Brookfield Infrastructure's return on equity of 57.40% beat TC Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TC Energy21.83% 12.53% 3.51%
Brookfield Infrastructure -20.50%57.40%7.43%

57.9% of TC Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.8% of Brookfield Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of TC Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Brookfield Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Brookfield Infrastructure had 2 more articles in the media than TC Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Brookfield Infrastructure and 0 mentions for TC Energy. Brookfield Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat TC Energy's score of -1.00 indicating that Brookfield Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TC Energy Negative
Brookfield Infrastructure Positive

TC Energy pays an annual dividend of C$3.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Brookfield Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of C$1.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. TC Energy pays out 107.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brookfield Infrastructure pays out -28.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

TC Energy beats Brookfield Infrastructure on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TC Energy compare to Algonquin Power & Utilities?

TC Energy (TSE:TRP) and Algonquin Power & Utilities (TSE:AQN) are both utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

57.9% of TC Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.8% of Algonquin Power & Utilities shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of TC Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Algonquin Power & Utilities shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

TC Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Algonquin Power & Utilities. TC Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Algonquin Power & Utilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TC EnergyC$15.48B6.46C$5.15BC$3.1930.08
Algonquin Power & UtilitiesC$2.53B2.52-C$763.91MC$0.2139.48

TC Energy pays an annual dividend of C$3.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Algonquin Power & Utilities pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. TC Energy pays out 107.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Algonquin Power & Utilities pays out 124.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TC Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

TC Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$89.86, suggesting a potential downside of 6.36%. Algonquin Power & Utilities has a consensus target price of C$8.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.50%. Given Algonquin Power & Utilities' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Algonquin Power & Utilities is more favorable than TC Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TC Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Algonquin Power & Utilities
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.13

TC Energy has a net margin of 21.83% compared to Algonquin Power & Utilities' net margin of 6.71%. TC Energy's return on equity of 12.53% beat Algonquin Power & Utilities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TC Energy21.83% 12.53% 3.51%
Algonquin Power & Utilities 6.71%3.63%1.59%

TC Energy has a beta of 0.701299, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Algonquin Power & Utilities has a beta of 1.459737, meaning that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Algonquin Power & Utilities had 1 more articles in the media than TC Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Algonquin Power & Utilities and 0 mentions for TC Energy. Algonquin Power & Utilities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat TC Energy's score of -1.00 indicating that Algonquin Power & Utilities is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TC Energy Negative
Algonquin Power & Utilities Neutral

Summary

TC Energy beats Algonquin Power & Utilities on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TC Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TRP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TRP vs. The Competition

MetricTC EnergyOil & Gas Midstream IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$99.97BC$43.50BC$9.81BC$12.46B
Dividend Yield3.62%5.39%10.52%6.18%
P/E Ratio30.0818.0719.3136.26
Price / Sales6.464.06725.3310.80
Price / Cash20.28109.0937.0982.29
Price / Book2.692.934.094.51
Net IncomeC$5.15BC$1.83BC$4.24BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-0.92%-2.98%-2.99%1.28%
1 Month Performance2.09%-3.24%-6.41%0.23%
1 Year Performance46.68%54.60%31.27%41.50%

TC Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TRP
TC Energy
1.3567 of 5 stars
C$95.96
-0.5%
C$89.86
-6.4%
+45.6%C$99.97BC$15.48B30.087,480
PPL
Pembina Pipeline
1.6332 of 5 stars
C$66.86
-1.1%
C$65.38
-2.2%
+26.2%C$38.87BC$7.60B25.146,530
EMA
Emera
1.6421 of 5 stars
C$73.95
+0.6%
C$74.39
+0.6%
+19.0%C$22.62BC$8.91B22.617,120
BEPC
Brookfield Renewable
N/AC$51.20
+0.4%
N/A+17.0%C$9.34BC$3.70BN/A1,890
BIPC
Brookfield Infrastructure
N/AC$56.66
+0.3%
N/A-0.4%C$6.97BC$3.62BN/A1,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:TRP) was last updated on 6/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners