Which has better earnings and valuation, TRP or PPL?

TC Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pembina Pipeline. Pembina Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TC Energy C$15.48B 6.70 C$5.15B C$3.19 31.22 Pembina Pipeline C$7.60B 5.54 C$1.98B C$2.66 27.23

Does the media favor TRP or PPL?

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 2 more articles in the media than TC Energy. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 7 mentions for TC Energy. TC Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.13 indicating that TC Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TC Energy 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Pembina Pipeline 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings & valuation, EMA or PPL?

Pembina Pipeline has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Emera. Emera is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembina Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Emera C$8.91B 2.66 C$757.30M C$3.27 23.71 Pembina Pipeline C$7.60B 5.54 C$1.98B C$2.66 27.23

Does the media favor EMA or PPL?

In the previous week, Emera had 8 more articles in the media than Pembina Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Emera and 9 mentions for Pembina Pipeline. Emera's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.13 indicating that Emera is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Emera 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Pembina Pipeline 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to PPL or BEPC?

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 3 more articles in the media than Brookfield Renewable. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 6 mentions for Brookfield Renewable. Brookfield Renewable's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.13 indicating that Brookfield Renewable is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pembina Pipeline 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Brookfield Renewable 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer PPL or BIPC?

Pembina Pipeline currently has a consensus target price of C$67.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.51%. Given Pembina Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than Brookfield Infrastructure. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pembina Pipeline 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 8 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.86 Brookfield Infrastructure 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media favor PPL or BIPC?

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 5 more articles in the media than Brookfield Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 4 mentions for Brookfield Infrastructure. Brookfield Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.13 indicating that Brookfield Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pembina Pipeline 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Brookfield Infrastructure 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to PPL or AQN?

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 8 more articles in the media than Algonquin Power & Utilities. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 1 mentions for Algonquin Power & Utilities. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat Algonquin Power & Utilities' score of 0.00 indicating that Pembina Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pembina Pipeline 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Algonquin Power & Utilities 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Pembina Pipeline (PPL) Competitors

C$72.44 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 07/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

PPL vs. TRP, EMA, BEPC, BIPC, and AQN

Should you buy Pembina Pipeline stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pembina Pipeline with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pembina Pipeline include TC Energy (TRP), Emera (EMA), Brookfield Renewable (BEPC), Brookfield Infrastructure (BIPC), and Algonquin Power & Utilities (AQN). These companies are all part of the "utilities" industry.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to TC Energy?

TC Energy (TSE:TRP) and Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.22% compared to TC Energy's net margin of 21.83%. TC Energy's return on equity of 12.53% beat Pembina Pipeline's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TC Energy	21.83%	12.53%	3.51%
Pembina Pipeline	22.22%	9.98%	4.31%

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 2 more articles in the media than TC Energy. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 7 mentions for TC Energy. TC Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.13 indicating that TC Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TC Energy	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Pembina Pipeline	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

TC Energy presently has a consensus target price of C$91.64, indicating a potential downside of 7.98%. Pembina Pipeline has a consensus target price of C$67.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.51%. Given Pembina Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than TC Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TC Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Pembina Pipeline	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

TC Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pembina Pipeline. Pembina Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TC Energy	C$15.48B	6.70	C$5.15B	C$3.19	31.22
Pembina Pipeline	C$7.60B	5.54	C$1.98B	C$2.66	27.23

TC Energy pays an annual dividend of C$3.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. TC Energy pays out 107.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

59.8% of TC Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.5% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of TC Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TC Energy has a beta of 0.690453, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.272088, indicating that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats TC Energy on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Emera?

Emera (TSE:EMA) and Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and risk.

Emera currently has a consensus price target of C$75.77, suggesting a potential downside of 2.26%. Pembina Pipeline has a consensus price target of C$67.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.51%. Given Emera's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Emera is more favorable than Pembina Pipeline.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Emera	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Pembina Pipeline	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

Emera pays an annual dividend of C$2.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Emera pays out 89.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.22% compared to Emera's net margin of 13.20%. Pembina Pipeline's return on equity of 9.98% beat Emera's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Emera	13.20%	7.90%	2.30%
Pembina Pipeline	22.22%	9.98%	4.31%

In the previous week, Emera had 8 more articles in the media than Pembina Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Emera and 9 mentions for Pembina Pipeline. Emera's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.13 indicating that Emera is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Emera	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Pembina Pipeline	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Pembina Pipeline has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Emera. Emera is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembina Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Emera	C$8.91B	2.66	C$757.30M	C$3.27	23.71
Pembina Pipeline	C$7.60B	5.54	C$1.98B	C$2.66	27.23

36.8% of Emera shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.5% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Emera shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Emera has a beta of 0.566528, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.272088, indicating that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Emera on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Renewable?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and Brookfield Renewable (TSE:BEPC) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and earnings.

60.5% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.8% of Brookfield Renewable shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Brookfield Renewable shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.22% compared to Brookfield Renewable's net margin of -127.72%. Brookfield Renewable's return on equity of 520.67% beat Pembina Pipeline's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline	22.22%	9.98%	4.31%
Brookfield Renewable	-127.72%	520.67%	2.20%

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 3 more articles in the media than Brookfield Renewable. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 6 mentions for Brookfield Renewable. Brookfield Renewable's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.13 indicating that Brookfield Renewable is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Brookfield Renewable	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Pembina Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Renewable. Brookfield Renewable is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembina Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pembina Pipeline	C$7.60B	5.54	C$1.98B	C$2.66	27.23
Brookfield Renewable	C$3.70B	2.33	-C$144.17M	-C$25.06	N/A

Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Brookfield Renewable pays an annual dividend of C$1.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brookfield Renewable pays out -6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.272088, meaning that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield Renewable has a beta of 1.213816, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Pembina Pipeline currently has a consensus price target of C$67.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.51%. Brookfield Renewable has a consensus price target of C$49.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.51%. Given Brookfield Renewable's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brookfield Renewable is more favorable than Pembina Pipeline.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
Brookfield Renewable	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Brookfield Renewable on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Infrastructure?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and Brookfield Infrastructure (TSE:BIPC) are both utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.22% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure's net margin of -20.50%. Brookfield Infrastructure's return on equity of 57.40% beat Pembina Pipeline's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline	22.22%	9.98%	4.31%
Brookfield Infrastructure	-20.50%	57.40%	7.43%

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 5 more articles in the media than Brookfield Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 4 mentions for Brookfield Infrastructure. Brookfield Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.13 indicating that Brookfield Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Brookfield Infrastructure	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Brookfield Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of C$1.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brookfield Infrastructure pays out -28.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Pembina Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Infrastructure. Brookfield Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembina Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pembina Pipeline	C$7.60B	5.54	C$1.98B	C$2.66	27.23
Brookfield Infrastructure	C$3.62B	1.99	-C$400.51M	-C$6.19	N/A

Pembina Pipeline currently has a consensus target price of C$67.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.51%. Given Pembina Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than Brookfield Infrastructure.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
Brookfield Infrastructure	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.272088, meaning that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield Infrastructure has a beta of 2.475716, meaning that its stock price is 148% more volatile than the broader market.

60.5% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.8% of Brookfield Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Brookfield Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Brookfield Infrastructure on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Algonquin Power & Utilities?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and Algonquin Power & Utilities (TSE:AQN) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.272088, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Algonquin Power & Utilities has a beta of 1.446191, meaning that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

60.5% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.6% of Algonquin Power & Utilities shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Algonquin Power & Utilities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pembina Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Algonquin Power & Utilities. Pembina Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Algonquin Power & Utilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pembina Pipeline	C$7.60B	5.54	C$1.98B	C$2.66	27.23
Algonquin Power & Utilities	C$2.53B	2.61	-C$763.91M	C$0.21	40.90

Pembina Pipeline currently has a consensus target price of C$67.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.51%. Algonquin Power & Utilities has a consensus target price of C$8.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.87%. Given Algonquin Power & Utilities' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Algonquin Power & Utilities is more favorable than Pembina Pipeline.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
Algonquin Power & Utilities	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.13

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.22% compared to Algonquin Power & Utilities' net margin of 6.71%. Pembina Pipeline's return on equity of 9.98% beat Algonquin Power & Utilities' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline	22.22%	9.98%	4.31%
Algonquin Power & Utilities	6.71%	3.63%	1.59%

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 8 more articles in the media than Algonquin Power & Utilities. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 1 mentions for Algonquin Power & Utilities. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat Algonquin Power & Utilities' score of 0.00 indicating that Pembina Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Algonquin Power & Utilities	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Algonquin Power & Utilities pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Algonquin Power & Utilities pays out 124.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Algonquin Power & Utilities on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pembina Pipeline News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PPL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PPL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Pembina Pipeline	Oil & Gas Midstream Industry	Energy Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$42.12B	C$45.94B	C$10.35B	C$12.23B
Dividend Yield	3.95%	5.28%	11.41%	6.19%
P/E Ratio	27.23	19.24	19.76	36.92
Price / Sales	5.54	4.40	379.60	9.42
Price / Cash	84.34	109.09	36.61	82.29
Price / Book	2.49	3.18	4.14	4.39
Net Income	C$1.98B	C$1.83B	C$4.25B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	1.58%	2.38%	1.46%	0.84%
1 Month Performance	8.22%	6.66%	3.19%	0.37%
1 Year Performance	43.73%	67.04%	29.24%	30.55%

Pembina Pipeline Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PPL Pembina Pipeline	1.9044 of 5 stars	C$72.44 flat	C$67.00 -7.5%	+43.7%	C$42.12B	C$7.60B	27.23	6,530	News Coverage Analyst Revision
TRP TC Energy	2.0658 of 5 stars	C$96.35 -1.5%	C$90.79 -5.8%	+53.8%	C$100.37B	C$15.48B	30.20	7,480	News Coverage Analyst Revision
EMA Emera	1.6559 of 5 stars	C$76.38 -1.0%	C$74.75 -2.1%	+21.0%	C$23.36B	C$8.91B	23.36	7,120	Dividend Announcement Analyst Revision
BEPC Brookfield Renewable	1.6268 of 5 stars	C$48.13 +1.4%	N/A	-5.2%	C$8.78B	C$3.70B	N/A	1,890
BIPC Brookfield Infrastructure	N/A	C$57.03 +0.3%	N/A	+2.4%	C$7.01B	C$3.62B	N/A	1,700

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:PPL) was last updated on 7/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Pembina Pipeline (PPL) Competitors

PPL vs. TRP, EMA, BEPC, BIPC, and AQN

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to TC Energy?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Emera?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Renewable?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Infrastructure?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Algonquin Power & Utilities?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PPL vs. The Competition

Pembina Pipeline Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Pembina Pipeline (PPL) Competitors

PPL vs. TRP, EMA, BEPC, BIPC, and AQN

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to TC Energy?

Is TRP or PPL more profitable?

Does the media favor TRP or PPL?

Do analysts rate TRP or PPL?

Which has better earnings and valuation, TRP or PPL?

Is TRP or PPL a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in TRP or PPL?

Which has more risk and volatility, TRP or PPL?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Emera?

Do analysts rate EMA or PPL?

Is EMA or PPL a better dividend stock?

Is EMA or PPL more profitable?

Does the media favor EMA or PPL?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, EMA or PPL?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in EMA or PPL?

Which has more volatility & risk, EMA or PPL?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Renewable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PPL or BEPC?

Is PPL or BEPC more profitable?

Does the media refer more to PPL or BEPC?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PPL or BEPC?

Is PPL or BEPC a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, PPL or BEPC?

Do analysts rate PPL or BEPC?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Infrastructure?

Is PPL or BIPC more profitable?

Does the media favor PPL or BIPC?

Is PPL or BIPC a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PPL or BIPC?

Do analysts prefer PPL or BIPC?

Which has more risk and volatility, PPL or BIPC?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in PPL or BIPC?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Algonquin Power & Utilities?

Which has more volatility and risk, PPL or AQN?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PPL or AQN?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PPL or AQN?

Do analysts prefer PPL or AQN?

Is PPL or AQN more profitable?

Does the media refer more to PPL or AQN?

Is PPL or AQN a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PPL vs. The Competition

Pembina Pipeline Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools