Free Trial
$100 Off Ends Tonight! MarketBeat All Access Returns to $249
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Save $100 Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Pembina Pipeline (PPL) Competitors

Pembina Pipeline logo
C$67.73 -0.72 (-1.05%)
As of 04:16 PM Eastern

PPL vs. TRP, EMA, BEPC, BIPC, and AQN

Should you buy Pembina Pipeline stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pembina Pipeline with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pembina Pipeline include TC Energy (TRP), Emera (EMA), Brookfield Renewable (BEPC), Brookfield Infrastructure (BIPC), and Algonquin Power & Utilities (AQN). These companies are all part of the "utilities" industry.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to TC Energy?

TC Energy (TSE:TRP) and Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

TC Energy pays an annual dividend of C$3.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. TC Energy pays out 107.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

TC Energy currently has a consensus price target of C$87.46, suggesting a potential downside of 9.90%. Pembina Pipeline has a consensus price target of C$63.92, suggesting a potential downside of 5.63%. Given Pembina Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than TC Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TC Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Pembina Pipeline
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45

TC Energy has a beta of 0.764534, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.419045, meaning that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 1 more articles in the media than TC Energy. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 4 mentions for TC Energy. TC Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.21 indicating that TC Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TC Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Pembina Pipeline
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.22% compared to TC Energy's net margin of 21.83%. TC Energy's return on equity of 12.53% beat Pembina Pipeline's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TC Energy21.83% 12.53% 3.51%
Pembina Pipeline 22.22%9.98%4.31%

56.8% of TC Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.2% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of TC Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

TC Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pembina Pipeline. Pembina Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TC EnergyC$15.48B6.53C$5.15BC$3.1930.43
Pembina PipelineC$7.60B5.18C$1.98BC$2.6625.46

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats TC Energy on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Emera?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and Emera (TSE:EMA) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 2 more articles in the media than Emera. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 3 mentions for Emera. Emera's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.21 indicating that Emera is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Emera
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Pembina Pipeline presently has a consensus target price of C$63.92, indicating a potential downside of 5.63%. Emera has a consensus target price of C$73.75, indicating a potential upside of 0.14%. Given Emera's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Emera is more favorable than Pembina Pipeline.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45
Emera
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Emera pays an annual dividend of C$2.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Emera pays out 89.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.22% compared to Emera's net margin of 13.20%. Pembina Pipeline's return on equity of 9.98% beat Emera's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline22.22% 9.98% 4.31%
Emera 13.20%7.90%2.30%

Pembina Pipeline has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Emera. Emera is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembina Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pembina PipelineC$7.60B5.18C$1.98BC$2.6625.46
EmeraC$8.91B2.53C$757.30MC$3.2722.52

61.2% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.1% of Emera shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Emera shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.419045, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Emera has a beta of 0.582151, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Emera on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Renewable?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and Brookfield Renewable (TSE:BEPC) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.419045, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield Renewable has a beta of 1.063349, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Pembina Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Renewable. Brookfield Renewable is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembina Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pembina PipelineC$7.60B5.18C$1.98BC$2.6625.46
Brookfield RenewableC$3.70B2.56-C$144.17M-C$25.06N/A

Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Brookfield Renewable pays an annual dividend of C$1.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brookfield Renewable pays out -6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 3 more articles in the media than Brookfield Renewable. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 2 mentions for Brookfield Renewable. Brookfield Renewable's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.21 indicating that Brookfield Renewable is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Brookfield Renewable
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Pembina Pipeline presently has a consensus price target of C$63.92, indicating a potential downside of 5.63%. Given Pembina Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than Brookfield Renewable.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45
Brookfield Renewable
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

61.2% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.2% of Brookfield Renewable shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Brookfield Renewable shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.22% compared to Brookfield Renewable's net margin of -127.72%. Brookfield Renewable's return on equity of 520.67% beat Pembina Pipeline's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline22.22% 9.98% 4.31%
Brookfield Renewable -127.72%520.67%2.20%

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Brookfield Renewable on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Infrastructure?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and Brookfield Infrastructure (TSE:BIPC) are both utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

61.2% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.1% of Brookfield Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Brookfield Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Brookfield Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of C$1.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brookfield Infrastructure pays out -28.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 4 more articles in the media than Brookfield Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 1 mentions for Brookfield Infrastructure. Brookfield Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.21 indicating that Brookfield Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Brookfield Infrastructure
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.419045, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield Infrastructure has a beta of 2.04918, indicating that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market.

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.22% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure's net margin of -20.53%. Brookfield Infrastructure's return on equity of 57.26% beat Pembina Pipeline's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline22.22% 9.98% 4.31%
Brookfield Infrastructure -20.53%57.26%7.43%

Pembina Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Infrastructure. Brookfield Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembina Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pembina PipelineC$7.60B5.18C$1.98BC$2.6625.46
Brookfield InfrastructureC$3.62B2.00-C$400.51M-C$6.19N/A

Pembina Pipeline presently has a consensus target price of C$63.92, indicating a potential downside of 5.63%. Given Pembina Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than Brookfield Infrastructure.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45
Brookfield Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Brookfield Infrastructure on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Algonquin Power & Utilities?

Algonquin Power & Utilities (TSE:AQN) and Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Algonquin Power & Utilities currently has a consensus target price of C$7.58, suggesting a potential downside of 8.52%. Pembina Pipeline has a consensus target price of C$63.92, suggesting a potential downside of 5.63%. Given Pembina Pipeline's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than Algonquin Power & Utilities.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Algonquin Power & Utilities
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.13
Pembina Pipeline
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.22% compared to Algonquin Power & Utilities' net margin of 6.71%. Pembina Pipeline's return on equity of 9.98% beat Algonquin Power & Utilities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Algonquin Power & Utilities6.71% 3.63% 1.59%
Pembina Pipeline 22.22%9.98%4.31%

Pembina Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Algonquin Power & Utilities. Pembina Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Algonquin Power & Utilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Algonquin Power & UtilitiesC$2.53B2.52-C$763.91MC$0.2139.48
Pembina PipelineC$7.60B5.18C$1.98BC$2.6625.46

Algonquin Power & Utilities has a beta of 1.318493, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.419045, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Algonquin Power & Utilities pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Algonquin Power & Utilities pays out 124.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

43.5% of Algonquin Power & Utilities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.2% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Algonquin Power & Utilities shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 3 more articles in the media than Algonquin Power & Utilities. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 2 mentions for Algonquin Power & Utilities. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Algonquin Power & Utilities' score of -0.40 indicating that Pembina Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Algonquin Power & Utilities
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Pembina Pipeline
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Algonquin Power & Utilities on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pembina Pipeline News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PPL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PPL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PPL vs. The Competition

MetricPembina PipelineOil & Gas Midstream IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$39.38BC$44.37BC$10.58BC$12.16B
Dividend Yield4.19%5.34%10.23%6.20%
P/E Ratio25.4618.5121.1137.64
Price / Sales5.184.211,036.9311.68
Price / Cash84.34109.0938.7482.29
Price / Book2.333.004.664.50
Net IncomeC$1.98BC$1.83BC$4.24BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance0.56%0.21%-0.26%1.38%
1 Month Performance14.24%10.82%2.28%1.46%
1 Year Performance31.57%68.21%54.41%55.45%

Pembina Pipeline Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PPL
Pembina Pipeline
1.6943 of 5 stars
C$67.73
-1.1%
C$63.92
-5.6%
+33.0%C$39.38BC$7.60B25.466,530
TRP
TC Energy
1.7265 of 5 stars
C$94.00
flat
C$87.46
-7.0%
+41.4%C$97.93BC$15.48B29.477,480
EMA
Emera
1.5675 of 5 stars
C$71.19
flat
C$73.75
+3.6%
+19.1%C$21.78BC$8.91B21.777,120
BEPC
Brookfield Renewable
N/AC$50.00
flat
N/A+30.7%C$9.01BC$3.70BN/A1,890
BIPC
Brookfield Infrastructure
N/AC$54.68
flat
N/A+7.2%C$6.73BC$3.62BN/A1,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:PPL) was last updated on 5/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners