Pembina Pipeline (PPL) Competitors

C$63.05 -0.35 (-0.55%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

PPL vs. TRP, EMA, BEPC, BIPC, and AQN

Should you be buying Pembina Pipeline stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Pembina Pipeline include TC Energy (TRP), Emera (EMA), Brookfield Renewable (BEPC), Brookfield Infrastructure (BIPC), and Algonquin Power & Utilities (AQN). These companies are all part of the "utilities" industry.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to TC Energy?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and TC Energy (TSE:TRP) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings and profitability.

: Pembina Pipeline presently has a consensus price target of C$62.55, indicating a potential downside of 0.80%. TC Energy has a consensus price target of C$87.46, indicating a potential downside of 3.18%. Given Pembina Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than TC Energy.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)

6 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
TC Energy
0 Sell rating(s)

8 Hold rating(s)

6 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
: Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.419045, meaning that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TC Energy has a beta of 0.764534, meaning that its share price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.
: 61.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.6% of TC Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of TC Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
: In the previous week, TC Energy had 33 more articles in the media than Pembina Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for TC Energy and 3 mentions for Pembina Pipeline. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat TC Energy's score of 0.57 indicating that Pembina Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TC Energy
12 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
: TC Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pembina Pipeline. Pembina Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Pembina Pipeline C$7.78B 4.71 C$1.98B C$2.66 23.70
TC Energy C$15.24B 6.18 C$5.15B C$3.27 27.62
: TC Energy has a net margin of 21.83% compared to Pembina Pipeline's net margin of 21.66%. TC Energy's return on equity of 12.53% beat Pembina Pipeline's return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline 21.66% 9.91% 4.31%
TC Energy 21.83% 12.53% 3.51%
: Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.82 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. TC Energy pays an annual dividend of C$3.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TC Energy pays out 104.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
TC Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TC Energy	12 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pembina Pipeline	C$7.78B	4.71	C$1.98B	C$2.66	23.70
TC Energy	C$15.24B	6.18	C$5.15B	C$3.27	27.62

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline	21.66%	9.91%	4.31%
TC Energy	21.83%	12.53%	3.51%

Summary

TC Energy beats Pembina Pipeline on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Emera?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and Emera (TSE:EMA) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

: 61.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.7% of Emera shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Emera shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
: Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 21.66% compared to Emera's net margin of 13.11%. Pembina Pipeline's return on equity of 9.91% beat Emera's return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline 21.66% 9.91% 4.31%
Emera 13.11% 8.11% 2.30%
: In the previous week, Emera had 5 more articles in the media than Pembina Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Emera and 3 mentions for Pembina Pipeline. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Emera's score of 0.47 indicating that Pembina Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Emera
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
: Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.82 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Emera pays an annual dividend of C$2.91 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Emera pays out 86.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.
: Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.419045, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Emera has a beta of 0.541929, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.
: Pembina Pipeline has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Emera. Emera is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembina Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Pembina Pipeline C$7.78B 4.71 C$1.98B C$2.66 23.70
Emera C$8.78B 2.50 C$757.30M C$3.38 21.20
: Pembina Pipeline presently has a consensus target price of C$62.55, indicating a potential downside of 0.80%. Emera has a consensus target price of C$73.43, indicating a potential upside of 2.45%. Given Emera's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Emera is more favorable than Pembina Pipeline.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)

6 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Emera
0 Sell rating(s)

4 Hold rating(s)

5 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline	21.66%	9.91%	4.31%
Emera	13.11%	8.11%	2.30%

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Emera	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pembina Pipeline	C$7.78B	4.71	C$1.98B	C$2.66	23.70
Emera	C$8.78B	2.50	C$757.30M	C$3.38	21.20

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Emera	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Emera on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Renewable?

Brookfield Renewable (TSE:BEPC) and Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

: Pembina Pipeline has a consensus target price of C$62.55, suggesting a potential downside of 0.80%. Given Pembina Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than Brookfield Renewable.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brookfield Renewable
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)

0 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Pembina Pipeline
1 Sell rating(s)

3 Hold rating(s)

6 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
: In the previous week, Brookfield Renewable and Brookfield Renewable both had 3 articles in the media. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Brookfield Renewable's score of 0.00 indicating that Pembina Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Renewable
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Pembina Pipeline
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
: Brookfield Renewable pays an annual dividend of C$1.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.82 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Brookfield Renewable pays out -11.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.
: 29.7% of Brookfield Renewable shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Brookfield Renewable shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
: Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 21.66% compared to Brookfield Renewable's net margin of -127.72%. Brookfield Renewable's return on equity of 520.67% beat Pembina Pipeline's return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brookfield Renewable -127.72% 520.67% 2.20%
Pembina Pipeline 21.66% 9.91% 4.31%
: Brookfield Renewable has a beta of 0.998343, suggesting that its stock price is 0% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.419045, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500.
: Pembina Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Renewable. Brookfield Renewable is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembina Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Renewable C$3.73B 2.42 -C$144.17M -C$13.05 N/A
Pembina Pipeline C$7.78B 4.71 C$1.98B C$2.66 23.70

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Brookfield Renewable	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Pembina Pipeline	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Renewable	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Pembina Pipeline	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Brookfield Renewable	-127.72%	520.67%	2.20%
Pembina Pipeline	21.66%	9.91%	4.31%

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Renewable	C$3.73B	2.42	-C$144.17M	-C$13.05	N/A
Pembina Pipeline	C$7.78B	4.71	C$1.98B	C$2.66	23.70

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Brookfield Renewable on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Infrastructure?

Brookfield Infrastructure (TSE:BIPC) and Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) are both utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and earnings.

: Pembina Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Infrastructure. Brookfield Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembina Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Infrastructure C$3.62B 1.75 -C$400.51M -C$6.19 N/A
Pembina Pipeline C$7.78B 4.71 C$1.98B C$2.66 23.70
: Pembina Pipeline has a consensus price target of C$62.55, indicating a potential downside of 0.80%. Given Pembina Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than Brookfield Infrastructure.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brookfield Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)

0 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Pembina Pipeline
1 Sell rating(s)

3 Hold rating(s)

6 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
: 30.5% of Brookfield Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Brookfield Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
: Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 21.66% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure's net margin of -20.53%. Brookfield Infrastructure's return on equity of 57.26% beat Pembina Pipeline's return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brookfield Infrastructure -20.53% 57.26% 7.43%
Pembina Pipeline 21.66% 9.91% 4.31%
: Brookfield Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of C$1.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.82 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Brookfield Infrastructure pays out -28.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.
: In the previous week, Brookfield Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Pembina Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Brookfield Infrastructure and 3 mentions for Pembina Pipeline. Brookfield Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.71 indicating that Brookfield Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Infrastructure
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Pembina Pipeline
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
: Brookfield Infrastructure has a beta of 1.96822, suggesting that its share price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.419045, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Infrastructure	C$3.62B	1.75	-C$400.51M	-C$6.19	N/A
Pembina Pipeline	C$7.78B	4.71	C$1.98B	C$2.66	23.70

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Brookfield Infrastructure	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Pembina Pipeline	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Brookfield Infrastructure	-20.53%	57.26%	7.43%
Pembina Pipeline	21.66%	9.91%	4.31%

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Infrastructure	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Pembina Pipeline	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Brookfield Infrastructure on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Algonquin Power & Utilities?

Algonquin Power & Utilities (TSE:AQN) and Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) are both utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

: In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 3 more articles in the media than Algonquin Power & Utilities. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 0 mentions for Algonquin Power & Utilities. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Algonquin Power & Utilities' score of 0.00 indicating that Pembina Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Company Overall Sentiment
Algonquin Power & Utilities Neutral
Pembina Pipeline Positive
: Algonquin Power & Utilities currently has a consensus target price of C$7.58, suggesting a potential downside of 12.23%. Pembina Pipeline has a consensus target price of C$62.55, suggesting a potential downside of 0.80%. Given Pembina Pipeline's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than Algonquin Power & Utilities.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Algonquin Power & Utilities
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)

3 Buy rating(s)

3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.13
Pembina Pipeline
1 Sell rating(s)

3 Hold rating(s)

6 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
: Algonquin Power & Utilities pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.82 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Algonquin Power & Utilities pays out 119.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
: Pembina Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Algonquin Power & Utilities. Pembina Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Algonquin Power & Utilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Algonquin Power & Utilities C$2.43B 2.73 -C$763.91M C$0.22 39.27
Pembina Pipeline C$7.78B 4.71 C$1.98B C$2.66 23.70
: Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 21.66% compared to Algonquin Power & Utilities' net margin of 7.42%. Pembina Pipeline's return on equity of 9.91% beat Algonquin Power & Utilities' return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Algonquin Power & Utilities 7.42% 3.88% 1.59%
Pembina Pipeline 21.66% 9.91% 4.31%
: Algonquin Power & Utilities has a beta of 1.26565, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.419045, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500.
: 43.9% of Algonquin Power & Utilities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Algonquin Power & Utilities shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Algonquin Power & Utilities	Neutral
Pembina Pipeline	Positive

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Algonquin Power & Utilities	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.13
Pembina Pipeline	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Algonquin Power & Utilities	C$2.43B	2.73	-C$763.91M	C$0.22	39.27
Pembina Pipeline	C$7.78B	4.71	C$1.98B	C$2.66	23.70

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Algonquin Power & Utilities	7.42%	3.88%	1.59%
Pembina Pipeline	21.66%	9.91%	4.31%

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Algonquin Power & Utilities on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pembina Pipeline News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PPL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PPL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Pembina Pipeline	Oil & Gas Midstream Industry	Energy Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$36.65B	C$41.47B	C$10.78B	C$11.72B
Dividend Yield	4.49%	5.46%	10.18%	6.22%
P/E Ratio	23.70	14.70	15.68	23.83
Price / Sales	4.71	4.02	1,019.79	13.46
Price / Cash	84.34	109.09	37.40	82.69
Price / Book	2.18	2.90	4.44	4.48
Net Income	C$1.98B	C$1.83B	C$4.24B	C$300.68M
7 Day Performance	4.01%	2.79%	1.70%	0.12%
1 Month Performance	1.58%	6.49%	5.31%	2.88%
1 Year Performance	17.13%	44.02%	66.02%	57.78%

Pembina Pipeline Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PPL Pembina Pipeline	1.457 of 5 stars	C$63.05 -0.6%	C$62.55 -0.8%	N/A	C$36.65B	C$7.78B	23.70	6,530
TRP TC Energy	1.7196 of 5 stars	C$84.48 -0.4%	C$84.67 +0.2%	N/A	C$88.01B	C$15.24B	25.83	7,480	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
EMA Emera	1.821 of 5 stars	C$71.81 -0.1%	C$73.39 +2.2%	N/A	C$21.96B	C$8.78B	21.25	7,120	Positive News Dividend Announcement Analyst Revision
BEPC Brookfield Renewable	N/A	C$55.89 -0.8%	N/A	N/A	C$10.07B	C$3.73B	N/A	1,890
BIPC Brookfield Infrastructure	N/A	C$55.23 -1.1%	N/A	N/A	C$6.76B	C$3.67B	N/A	1,700	Earnings Report

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:PPL) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Pembina Pipeline (PPL) Competitors

PPL vs. TRP, EMA, BEPC, BIPC, and AQN

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to TC Energy?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Emera?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Renewable?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Infrastructure?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Algonquin Power & Utilities?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PPL vs. The Competition

Pembina Pipeline Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Pembina Pipeline (PPL) Competitors

PPL vs. TRP, EMA, BEPC, BIPC, and AQN

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to TC Energy?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Emera?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Renewable?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Infrastructure?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Algonquin Power & Utilities?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PPL vs. The Competition

Pembina Pipeline Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools