Which has better earnings & valuation, PPL or TRP?

TC Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pembina Pipeline. Pembina Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Pembina Pipeline C$7.60B 5.11 C$1.98B C$2.66 25.13 TC Energy C$15.48B 6.37 C$5.15B C$3.19 29.69

Does the media prefer PPL or TRP?

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 7 more articles in the media than TC Energy. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 1 mentions for TC Energy. TC Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.58 indicating that TC Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pembina Pipeline 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive TC Energy 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, PPL or EMA?

Pembina Pipeline has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Emera. Emera is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembina Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Pembina Pipeline C$7.60B 5.11 C$1.98B C$2.66 25.13 Emera C$8.91B 2.59 C$757.30M C$3.27 23.05

Do analysts recommend PPL or BEPC?

Pembina Pipeline presently has a consensus price target of C$66.57, indicating a potential downside of 0.42%. Given Pembina Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than Brookfield Renewable. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pembina Pipeline 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 8 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.69 Brookfield Renewable 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts prefer PPL or BIPC?

Pembina Pipeline currently has a consensus price target of C$66.57, suggesting a potential downside of 0.42%. Given Pembina Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than Brookfield Infrastructure. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pembina Pipeline 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 8 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.69 Brookfield Infrastructure 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media refer more to PPL or BIPC?

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 7 more articles in the media than Brookfield Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 1 mentions for Brookfield Infrastructure. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Brookfield Infrastructure's score of 0.40 indicating that Pembina Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pembina Pipeline 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Brookfield Infrastructure 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor PPL or AQN?

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 7 more articles in the media than Algonquin Power & Utilities. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 1 mentions for Algonquin Power & Utilities. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Algonquin Power & Utilities' score of 0.00 indicating that Pembina Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pembina Pipeline 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Algonquin Power & Utilities 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Pembina Pipeline (PPL) Competitors

C$66.85 +1.03 (+1.56%)

As of 07/3/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

PPL vs. TRP, EMA, BEPC, BIPC, and AQN

Should you buy Pembina Pipeline stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pembina Pipeline with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pembina Pipeline include TC Energy (TRP), Emera (EMA), Brookfield Renewable (BEPC), Brookfield Infrastructure (BIPC), and Algonquin Power & Utilities (AQN). These companies are all part of the "utilities" industry.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to TC Energy?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and TC Energy (TSE:TRP) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

TC Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pembina Pipeline. Pembina Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pembina Pipeline	C$7.60B	5.11	C$1.98B	C$2.66	25.13
TC Energy	C$15.48B	6.37	C$5.15B	C$3.19	29.69

Pembina Pipeline presently has a consensus price target of C$66.57, suggesting a potential downside of 0.42%. TC Energy has a consensus price target of C$89.86, suggesting a potential downside of 5.12%. Given Pembina Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than TC Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69
TC Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 7 more articles in the media than TC Energy. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 1 mentions for TC Energy. TC Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.58 indicating that TC Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TC Energy	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

60.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.0% of TC Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of TC Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.22% compared to TC Energy's net margin of 21.83%. TC Energy's return on equity of 12.53% beat Pembina Pipeline's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline	22.22%	9.98%	4.31%
TC Energy	21.83%	12.53%	3.51%

Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.272088, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TC Energy has a beta of 0.690453, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. TC Energy pays an annual dividend of C$3.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TC Energy pays out 107.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats TC Energy on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Emera?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and Emera (TSE:EMA) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

Pembina Pipeline has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Emera. Emera is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembina Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pembina Pipeline	C$7.60B	5.11	C$1.98B	C$2.66	25.13
Emera	C$8.91B	2.59	C$757.30M	C$3.27	23.05

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 8 more articles in the media than Emera. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 0 mentions for Emera. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Emera's score of 0.00 indicating that Pembina Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline	Positive
Emera	Neutral

Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.272088, suggesting that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Emera has a beta of 0.567233, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Pembina Pipeline currently has a consensus price target of C$66.57, indicating a potential downside of 0.42%. Emera has a consensus price target of C$74.39, indicating a potential downside of 1.31%. Given Pembina Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than Emera.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69
Emera	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.22% compared to Emera's net margin of 13.20%. Pembina Pipeline's return on equity of 9.98% beat Emera's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline	22.22%	9.98%	4.31%
Emera	13.20%	7.90%	2.30%

Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Emera pays an annual dividend of C$2.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Emera pays out 89.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

60.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.2% of Emera shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Emera shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Emera on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Renewable?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and Brookfield Renewable (TSE:BEPC) are both utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

Pembina Pipeline presently has a consensus price target of C$66.57, indicating a potential downside of 0.42%. Given Pembina Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than Brookfield Renewable.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69
Brookfield Renewable	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.22% compared to Brookfield Renewable's net margin of -127.72%. Brookfield Renewable's return on equity of 520.67% beat Pembina Pipeline's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline	22.22%	9.98%	4.31%
Brookfield Renewable	-127.72%	520.67%	2.20%

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 8 more articles in the media than Brookfield Renewable. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 0 mentions for Brookfield Renewable. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Brookfield Renewable's score of 0.00 indicating that Pembina Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline	Positive
Brookfield Renewable	Neutral

Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.272088, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield Renewable has a beta of 1.126739, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Pembina Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Renewable. Brookfield Renewable is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembina Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pembina Pipeline	C$7.60B	5.11	C$1.98B	C$2.66	25.13
Brookfield Renewable	C$3.70B	2.54	-C$144.17M	-C$25.06	N/A

60.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.5% of Brookfield Renewable shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Brookfield Renewable shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Brookfield Renewable pays an annual dividend of C$1.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brookfield Renewable pays out -6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Brookfield Renewable on 16 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Infrastructure?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and Brookfield Infrastructure (TSE:BIPC) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and dividends.

Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Brookfield Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of C$1.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brookfield Infrastructure pays out -28.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Pembina Pipeline currently has a consensus price target of C$66.57, suggesting a potential downside of 0.42%. Given Pembina Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than Brookfield Infrastructure.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69
Brookfield Infrastructure	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Pembina Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Infrastructure. Brookfield Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembina Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pembina Pipeline	C$7.60B	5.11	C$1.98B	C$2.66	25.13
Brookfield Infrastructure	C$3.62B	1.89	-C$400.51M	-C$6.19	N/A

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.22% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure's net margin of -20.50%. Brookfield Infrastructure's return on equity of 57.40% beat Pembina Pipeline's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline	22.22%	9.98%	4.31%
Brookfield Infrastructure	-20.50%	57.40%	7.43%

Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.272088, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield Infrastructure has a beta of 2.411469, suggesting that its share price is 141% more volatile than the broader market.

60.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.6% of Brookfield Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Brookfield Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 7 more articles in the media than Brookfield Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 1 mentions for Brookfield Infrastructure. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Brookfield Infrastructure's score of 0.40 indicating that Pembina Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Brookfield Infrastructure	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Brookfield Infrastructure on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Algonquin Power & Utilities?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and Algonquin Power & Utilities (TSE:AQN) are both utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 7 more articles in the media than Algonquin Power & Utilities. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 1 mentions for Algonquin Power & Utilities. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Algonquin Power & Utilities' score of 0.00 indicating that Pembina Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Algonquin Power & Utilities	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.272088, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Algonquin Power & Utilities has a beta of 1.459737, suggesting that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Algonquin Power & Utilities pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Pembina Pipeline pays out 106.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Algonquin Power & Utilities pays out 124.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Pembina Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Algonquin Power & Utilities. Pembina Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Algonquin Power & Utilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pembina Pipeline	C$7.60B	5.11	C$1.98B	C$2.66	25.13
Algonquin Power & Utilities	C$2.53B	2.39	-C$763.91M	C$0.21	37.43

60.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.5% of Algonquin Power & Utilities shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Algonquin Power & Utilities shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pembina Pipeline presently has a consensus price target of C$66.57, indicating a potential downside of 0.42%. Algonquin Power & Utilities has a consensus price target of C$8.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.78%. Given Algonquin Power & Utilities' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Algonquin Power & Utilities is more favorable than Pembina Pipeline.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69
Algonquin Power & Utilities	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.13

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.22% compared to Algonquin Power & Utilities' net margin of 6.71%. Pembina Pipeline's return on equity of 9.98% beat Algonquin Power & Utilities' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline	22.22%	9.98%	4.31%
Algonquin Power & Utilities	6.71%	3.63%	1.59%

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Algonquin Power & Utilities on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pembina Pipeline News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PPL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PPL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Pembina Pipeline	Oil & Gas Midstream Industry	Energy Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$38.27B	C$43.36B	C$9.73B	C$13.07B
Dividend Yield	4.35%	5.45%	10.67%	6.18%
P/E Ratio	25.13	17.90	18.37	36.51
Price / Sales	5.11	4.10	688.83	10.34
Price / Cash	84.34	109.09	37.98	82.29
Price / Book	2.30	2.93	4.09	4.52
Net Income	C$1.98B	C$1.83B	C$4.25B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-0.13%	-1.21%	-0.16%	1.85%
1 Month Performance	-1.79%	-3.13%	-6.48%	1.71%
1 Year Performance	31.78%	53.34%	26.94%	36.40%

Pembina Pipeline Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PPL Pembina Pipeline	1.7259 of 5 stars	C$66.85 +1.6%	C$66.57 -0.4%	+31.8%	C$38.27B	C$7.60B	25.13	6,530	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Forecast
TRP TC Energy	2.049 of 5 stars	C$96.91 +0.6%	C$89.86 -7.3%	+44.8%	C$100.96B	C$15.48B	30.38	7,480	News Coverage Positive News
EMA Emera	1.4206 of 5 stars	C$73.45 +0.3%	C$74.39 +1.3%	+21.4%	C$22.47B	C$8.91B	22.46	7,120
BEPC Brookfield Renewable	N/A	C$53.71 +1.4%	N/A	+12.1%	C$9.80B	C$3.70B	N/A	1,890
BIPC Brookfield Infrastructure	N/A	C$53.60 -2.1%	N/A	-4.3%	C$6.59B	C$3.62B	N/A	1,700	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:PPL) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Pembina Pipeline (PPL) Competitors

PPL vs. TRP, EMA, BEPC, BIPC, and AQN

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to TC Energy?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Emera?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Renewable?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Infrastructure?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Algonquin Power & Utilities?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PPL vs. The Competition

Pembina Pipeline Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Pembina Pipeline (PPL) Competitors

PPL vs. TRP, EMA, BEPC, BIPC, and AQN

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to TC Energy?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PPL or TRP?

Do analysts rate PPL or TRP?

Does the media prefer PPL or TRP?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PPL or TRP?

Is PPL or TRP more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, PPL or TRP?

Is PPL or TRP a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Emera?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PPL or EMA?

Does the media favor PPL or EMA?

Which has more volatility and risk, PPL or EMA?

Do analysts rate PPL or EMA?

Is PPL or EMA more profitable?

Is PPL or EMA a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PPL or EMA?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Renewable?

Do analysts recommend PPL or BEPC?

Is PPL or BEPC more profitable?

Does the media favor PPL or BEPC?

Which has more volatility & risk, PPL or BEPC?

Which has better valuation & earnings, PPL or BEPC?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in PPL or BEPC?

Is PPL or BEPC a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Brookfield Infrastructure?

Is PPL or BIPC a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer PPL or BIPC?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, PPL or BIPC?

Is PPL or BIPC more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, PPL or BIPC?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PPL or BIPC?

Does the media refer more to PPL or BIPC?

Summary

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Algonquin Power & Utilities?

Does the media favor PPL or AQN?

Which has more volatility and risk, PPL or AQN?

Is PPL or AQN a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, PPL or AQN?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in PPL or AQN?

Do analysts rate PPL or AQN?

Is PPL or AQN more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PPL vs. The Competition

Pembina Pipeline Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools