Go Pro

Pembina Pipeline (PPL) Competitors

Pembina Pipeline logo
C$66.95 -0.11 (-0.16%)
As of 09/4/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

PPL vs. ENB, TRP, KEY, VSN, and GEI

Should you buy Pembina Pipeline stock or one of its competitors? Pembina Pipeline's main competitors and comparable companies include Enbridge (ENB), TC Energy (TRP), Keyera (KEY), Veresen (VSN), and Gibson Energy (GEI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas storage & transportation" industry.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Enbridge?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and Enbridge (TSE:ENB) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Pembina Pipeline presently has a consensus price target of C$68.86, indicating a potential upside of 2.85%. Enbridge has a consensus price target of C$76.25, indicating a potential upside of 10.00%. Given Enbridge's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Enbridge is more favorable than Pembina Pipeline.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Enbridge
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42

Enbridge has higher revenue and earnings than Pembina Pipeline. Pembina Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enbridge, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pembina PipelineC$7.96B4.89C$1.98BC$2.8423.57
EnbridgeC$83.49B1.81C$6.63BC$2.5926.76

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.64% compared to Enbridge's net margin of 7.28%. Pembina Pipeline's return on equity of 10.54% beat Enbridge's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline22.64% 10.54% 4.31%
Enbridge 7.28%10.01%3.07%

Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.244354, suggesting that its share price is 76% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enbridge has a beta of 0.685348, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

60.8% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.3% of Enbridge shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Enbridge shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Enbridge had 9 more articles in the media than Pembina Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Enbridge and 1 mentions for Pembina Pipeline. Enbridge's average media sentiment score of 0.16 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.00 indicating that Enbridge is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Enbridge
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.87 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Enbridge pays an annual dividend of C$3.83 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Pembina Pipeline pays out 100.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enbridge pays out 147.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Enbridge on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to TC Energy?

TC Energy (TSE:TRP) and Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.64% compared to TC Energy's net margin of 22.46%. TC Energy's return on equity of 13.07% beat Pembina Pipeline's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TC Energy22.46% 13.07% 3.51%
Pembina Pipeline 22.64%10.54%4.31%

TC Energy has a beta of 0.678285, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.244354, meaning that its stock price is 76% less volatile than the broader market.

TC Energy pays an annual dividend of C$3.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.87 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. TC Energy pays out 103.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline pays out 100.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

TC Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Pembina Pipeline. Pembina Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TC EnergyC$15.69B5.75C$5.15BC$3.3425.91
Pembina PipelineC$7.96B4.89C$1.98BC$2.8423.57

60.2% of TC Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.8% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of TC Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TC Energy currently has a consensus price target of C$95.64, suggesting a potential upside of 10.53%. Pembina Pipeline has a consensus price target of C$68.86, suggesting a potential upside of 2.85%. Given TC Energy's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe TC Energy is more favorable than Pembina Pipeline.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TC Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53
Pembina Pipeline
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

In the previous week, TC Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Pembina Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for TC Energy and 1 mentions for Pembina Pipeline. TC Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.00 indicating that TC Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TC Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Pembina Pipeline
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

TC Energy beats Pembina Pipeline on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Keyera?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and Keyera (TSE:KEY) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.64% compared to Keyera's net margin of 5.02%. Keyera's return on equity of 10.81% beat Pembina Pipeline's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline22.64% 10.54% 4.31%
Keyera 5.02%10.81%6.15%

60.8% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.0% of Keyera shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Keyera shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.244354, indicating that its share price is 76% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Keyera has a beta of 0.46038, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Pembina Pipeline currently has a consensus price target of C$68.86, suggesting a potential upside of 2.85%. Keyera has a consensus price target of C$73.00, suggesting a potential upside of 29.59%. Given Keyera's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Keyera is more favorable than Pembina Pipeline.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Keyera
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

Pembina Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Keyera. Pembina Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Keyera, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pembina PipelineC$7.96B4.89C$1.98BC$2.8423.57
KeyeraC$7.19B2.30C$449.23MC$1.5336.82

Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.87 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Keyera pays an annual dividend of C$2.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Pembina Pipeline pays out 100.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Keyera pays out 141.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pembina Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Keyera had 25 more articles in the media than Pembina Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Keyera and 1 mentions for Pembina Pipeline. Keyera's average media sentiment score of 0.19 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.00 indicating that Keyera is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Keyera
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Keyera on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Veresen?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and Veresen (TSE:VSN) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.87 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Veresen pays an annual dividend of C$1.00 per share. Pembina Pipeline pays out 100.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.64% compared to Veresen's net margin of 0.00%. Pembina Pipeline's return on equity of 10.54% beat Veresen's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline22.64% 10.54% 4.31%
Veresen N/A N/A N/A

Pembina Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Veresen.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pembina PipelineC$7.96B4.89C$1.98BC$2.8423.57
VeresenN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Pembina Pipeline presently has a consensus price target of C$68.86, indicating a potential upside of 2.85%. Given Pembina Pipeline's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than Veresen.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Veresen
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 1 more articles in the media than Veresen. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 0 mentions for Veresen. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Veresen'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline Neutral
Veresen Neutral

60.8% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Veresen on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pembina Pipeline compare to Gibson Energy?

Pembina Pipeline (TSE:PPL) and Gibson Energy (TSE:GEI) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 22.64% compared to Gibson Energy's net margin of 1.32%. Gibson Energy's return on equity of 18.23% beat Pembina Pipeline's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pembina Pipeline22.64% 10.54% 4.31%
Gibson Energy 1.32%18.23%5.24%

Pembina Pipeline has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gibson Energy. Pembina Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gibson Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pembina PipelineC$7.96B4.89C$1.98BC$2.8423.57
Gibson EnergyC$12.77B0.42C$211.66MC$1.0031.24

Pembina Pipeline currently has a consensus target price of C$68.86, indicating a potential upside of 2.85%. Gibson Energy has a consensus target price of C$32.80, indicating a potential upside of 4.99%. Given Gibson Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gibson Energy is more favorable than Pembina Pipeline.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pembina Pipeline
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Gibson Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

60.8% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.8% of Gibson Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Gibson Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pembina Pipeline pays an annual dividend of C$2.87 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Gibson Energy pays an annual dividend of C$1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Pembina Pipeline pays out 100.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gibson Energy pays out 176.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Gibson Energy had 3 more articles in the media than Pembina Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gibson Energy and 1 mentions for Pembina Pipeline. Gibson Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Pembina Pipeline's score of 0.00 indicating that Gibson Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pembina Pipeline
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Gibson Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 0.244354, indicating that its share price is 76% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gibson Energy has a beta of -0.000589, indicating that its share price is 100% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pembina Pipeline beats Gibson Energy on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pembina Pipeline News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PPL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PPL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PPL vs. The Competition

MetricPembina PipelineOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$38.94BC$11.46BC$10.03BC$12.64B
Dividend Yield4.37%11.21%11.47%6.25%
P/E Ratio23.5718.6921.8439.38
Price / Sales4.89660.78540.199.93
Price / Cash84.3439.8936.2782.29
Price / Book2.283.333.124.73
Net IncomeC$1.98BC$5.27BC$4.33BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance0.31%2.46%2.18%-0.25%
1 Month Performance-0.62%7.25%6.43%2.14%
1 Year Performance27.35%38.16%39.17%27.60%

Pembina Pipeline Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PPL
Pembina Pipeline
1.3164 of 5 stars
C$66.95
-0.2%
C$68.86
+2.8%
+27.4%C$38.94BC$7.96B23.576,530
ENB
Enbridge
2.2941 of 5 stars
C$70.22
+0.7%
C$76.75
+9.3%
+3.7%C$153.37BC$83.49B27.1111,500
TRP
TC Energy
2.5372 of 5 stars
C$86.78
+0.9%
C$94.64
+9.1%
+20.5%C$89.61BC$15.69B25.987,480
KEY
Keyera
3.2978 of 5 stars
C$60.11
+1.7%
C$62.69
+4.3%
+27.1%C$17.64BC$7.19B39.2917,500
VSN
Veresen
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$5.81BN/AN/A147,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:PPL) was last updated on 9/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners