Go Pro

abrdn Asia Focus (AAS) Competitors

abrdn Asia Focus logo
GBX 450 +6.00 (+1.35%)
As of 11:57 AM Eastern

AAS vs. AJB, HVPE, ATT, JTC, and MYI

Should you buy abrdn Asia Focus stock or one of its competitors? abrdn Asia Focus's main competitors and comparable companies include AJ Bell (AJB), HarbourVest Global Private Equity (HVPE), Allianz Technology Trust (ATT), JTC (JTC), and Murray International (MYI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does abrdn Asia Focus compare to AJ Bell?

abrdn Asia Focus (LON:AAS) and AJ Bell (LON:AJB) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

abrdn Asia Focus pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. AJ Bell pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. abrdn Asia Focus pays out 8.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AJ Bell pays out 47.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

2.9% of abrdn Asia Focus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.5% of AJ Bell shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of abrdn Asia Focus shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.4% of AJ Bell shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, AJ Bell had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn Asia Focus. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for AJ Bell and 1 mentions for abrdn Asia Focus. AJ Bell's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat abrdn Asia Focus' score of 0.00 indicating that AJ Bell is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
abrdn Asia Focus
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
AJ Bell
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

AJ Bell has a consensus price target of GBX 1,265, indicating a potential upside of 105.86%. Given AJ Bell's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe AJ Bell is more favorable than abrdn Asia Focus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
abrdn Asia Focus
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
AJ Bell
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

abrdn Asia Focus has a beta of 0.708, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AJ Bell has a beta of 0.866, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

abrdn Asia Focus has a net margin of 102.94% compared to AJ Bell's net margin of 35.42%. AJ Bell's return on equity of 57.35% beat abrdn Asia Focus' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn Asia Focus102.94% 19.85% 2.79%
AJ Bell 35.42%57.35%36.07%

AJ Bell has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn Asia Focus. abrdn Asia Focus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AJ Bell, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Asia Focus£115.75M5.34£36.71M£77.495.81
AJ Bell£347.57M6.97£81.11M£30.3320.26

Summary

AJ Bell beats abrdn Asia Focus on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia Focus compare to HarbourVest Global Private Equity?

HarbourVest Global Private Equity (LON:HVPE) and abrdn Asia Focus (LON:AAS) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and valuation.

HarbourVest Global Private Equity has a beta of 0.428, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Asia Focus has a beta of 0.708, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

HarbourVest Global Private Equity has a net margin of 168.07% compared to abrdn Asia Focus' net margin of 102.94%. abrdn Asia Focus' return on equity of 19.85% beat HarbourVest Global Private Equity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HarbourVest Global Private Equity168.07% 7.85% 2.14%
abrdn Asia Focus 102.94%19.85%2.79%

In the previous week, abrdn Asia Focus had 1 more articles in the media than HarbourVest Global Private Equity. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for abrdn Asia Focus and 0 mentions for HarbourVest Global Private Equity. HarbourVest Global Private Equity's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled abrdn Asia Focus'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
HarbourVest Global Private Equity Neutral
abrdn Asia Focus Neutral

abrdn Asia Focus has lower revenue, but higher earnings than HarbourVest Global Private Equity. abrdn Asia Focus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HarbourVest Global Private Equity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HarbourVest Global Private Equity£344.77M6.72£12.26M£457.007.29
abrdn Asia Focus£115.75M5.34£36.71M£77.495.81

20.3% of HarbourVest Global Private Equity shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.9% of abrdn Asia Focus shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of HarbourVest Global Private Equity shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of abrdn Asia Focus shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HarbourVest Global Private Equity
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
abrdn Asia Focus
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

HarbourVest Global Private Equity beats abrdn Asia Focus on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia Focus compare to Allianz Technology Trust?

Allianz Technology Trust (LON:ATT) and abrdn Asia Focus (LON:AAS) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

6.4% of Allianz Technology Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.9% of abrdn Asia Focus shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Allianz Technology Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of abrdn Asia Focus shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, abrdn Asia Focus had 1 more articles in the media than Allianz Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for abrdn Asia Focus and 0 mentions for Allianz Technology Trust. Allianz Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled abrdn Asia Focus'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Allianz Technology Trust Neutral
abrdn Asia Focus Neutral

Allianz Technology Trust has a beta of 0.595, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Asia Focus has a beta of 0.708, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Allianz Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn Asia Focus. Allianz Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asia Focus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Allianz Technology Trust£409.28M5.66£502.74M£347.352.03
abrdn Asia Focus£115.75M5.34£36.71M£77.495.81

abrdn Asia Focus has a net margin of 102.94% compared to Allianz Technology Trust's net margin of 97.63%. Allianz Technology Trust's return on equity of 50.98% beat abrdn Asia Focus' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Allianz Technology Trust97.63% 50.98% 22.44%
abrdn Asia Focus 102.94%19.85%2.79%

Summary

Allianz Technology Trust beats abrdn Asia Focus on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia Focus compare to JTC?

JTC (LON:JTC) and abrdn Asia Focus (LON:AAS) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and media sentiment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
JTC
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
abrdn Asia Focus
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

JTC has a beta of 0.911, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Asia Focus has a beta of 0.708, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

29.1% of JTC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.9% of abrdn Asia Focus shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of JTC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of abrdn Asia Focus shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

JTC pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. abrdn Asia Focus pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. JTC pays out 2,407.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. abrdn Asia Focus pays out 8.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. abrdn Asia Focus is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, abrdn Asia Focus had 1 more articles in the media than JTC. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for abrdn Asia Focus and 0 mentions for JTC. JTC's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat abrdn Asia Focus' score of 0.00 indicating that JTC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
JTC Neutral
abrdn Asia Focus Neutral

abrdn Asia Focus has a net margin of 102.94% compared to JTC's net margin of 0.24%. abrdn Asia Focus' return on equity of 19.85% beat JTC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JTC0.24% 0.18% 4.96%
abrdn Asia Focus 102.94%19.85%2.79%

abrdn Asia Focus has lower revenue, but higher earnings than JTC. abrdn Asia Focus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JTC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JTC£381.95M6.04£29.99M£0.552,434.55
abrdn Asia Focus£115.75M5.34£36.71M£77.495.81

Summary

JTC beats abrdn Asia Focus on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does abrdn Asia Focus compare to Murray International?

abrdn Asia Focus (LON:AAS) and Murray International (LON:MYI) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Murray International has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn Asia Focus. abrdn Asia Focus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murray International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Asia Focus£115.75M5.34£36.71M£77.495.81
Murray International£358.82M6.17£178.39M£58.706.33

In the previous week, abrdn Asia Focus and abrdn Asia Focus both had 1 articles in the media. Murray International's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat abrdn Asia Focus' score of 0.00 indicating that Murray International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
abrdn Asia Focus
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Murray International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

2.9% of abrdn Asia Focus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.6% of Murray International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of abrdn Asia Focus shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Murray International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

abrdn Asia Focus pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Murray International pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. abrdn Asia Focus pays out 8.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Murray International pays out 20.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

abrdn Asia Focus has a net margin of 102.94% compared to Murray International's net margin of 95.58%. Murray International's return on equity of 22.48% beat abrdn Asia Focus' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn Asia Focus102.94% 19.85% 2.79%
Murray International 95.58%22.48%6.89%

abrdn Asia Focus has a beta of 0.708, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Murray International has a beta of 0.865, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Murray International beats abrdn Asia Focus on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get abrdn Asia Focus News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AAS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

AAS vs. The Competition

Metricabrdn Asia FocusCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£617.70M£5.72B£14.28B£2.91B
Dividend Yield1.47%7.39%5.88%6.18%
P/E Ratio5.8131.6526.17367.42
Price / Sales5.341,290.27526.9383,891.79
Price / Cash41.9248.2139.5927.89
Price / Book1.381.982.136.75
Net Income£36.71M£419.47M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.66%-0.53%0.24%5.57%
1 Month Performance1.81%0.61%1.56%2.30%
1 Year Performance30.43%7.62%12.05%21.81%

abrdn Asia Focus Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
AAS
abrdn Asia Focus
N/AGBX 450
+1.4%
N/A+28.0%£617.70M£115.75M5.81N/A
AJB
AJ Bell
3.4763 of 5 stars
GBX 614
+0.3%
GBX 1,265
+106.0%
+21.3%£2.42B£347.57M20.241,373
HVPE
HarbourVest Global Private Equity
N/AGBX 3,400.92
-0.4%
N/A+19.9%£2.37B£344.77M7.44N/A
ATT
Allianz Technology Trust
N/AGBX 711.68
+1.8%
N/A+51.6%£2.35B£409.28M2.05N/A
JTC
JTC
0.1153 of 5 stars
GBX 1,339
flat
GBX 1,112.50
-16.9%
N/A£2.31B£381.95M2,434.551,603

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:AAS) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners