Do analysts rate SDR or CTY?

Schroders currently has a consensus price target of GBX 453.33, indicating a potential downside of 22.37%. Given Schroders' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Schroders is more favorable than City of London. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Schroders 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 City of London 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, SDR or CTY?

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than City of London. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Schroders £3.51B 2.59 £355.50M £43.50 13.43 City of London £568.96M 5.32 £294.08M £113.99 5.15

Is SDR or CTY more profitable?

City of London has a net margin of 97.40% compared to Schroders' net margin of 19.22%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Schroders' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Schroders 19.22% 15.55% 1.86% City of London 97.40% 22.92% 4.00%

Does the media favor SDR or CTY?

In the previous week, Schroders had 4 more articles in the media than City of London. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Schroders and 1 mentions for City of London. Schroders' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat City of London's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroders is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Schroders 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive City of London 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer CTY or MNG?

M&G has a consensus target price of GBX 677.86, suggesting a potential upside of 95.63%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe M&G is more favorable than City of London. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score City of London 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 M&G 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.43

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, CTY or MNG?

City of London has higher earnings, but lower revenue than M&G. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio City of London £568.96M 5.32 £294.08M £113.99 5.15 M&G £21.71B 0.38 £166.98M £12.30 28.17

Is CTY or MNG more profitable?

City of London has a net margin of 97.40% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat M&G's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets City of London 97.40% 22.92% 4.00% M&G 1.73% 9.49% 0.40%

Does the media refer more to CTY or MNG?

In the previous week, City of London and City of London both had 1 articles in the media. M&G's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat City of London's score of 0.00 indicating that M&G is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment City of London 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral M&G 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor PCT or CTY?

In the previous week, Polar Capital Technology Trust and Polar Capital Technology Trust both had 1 articles in the media. Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat City of London's score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Capital Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Polar Capital Technology Trust 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive City of London 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better earnings and valuation, PSH or CTY?

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than City of London. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Pershing Square £2.57B 2.66 £2.71B £1.41 thousand 2.78 City of London £568.96M 5.32 £294.08M £113.99 5.15

Does the media refer more to PSH or CTY?

In the previous week, Pershing Square had 1 more articles in the media than City of London. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pershing Square and 1 mentions for City of London. Pershing Square's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat City of London's score of 0.00 indicating that Pershing Square is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pershing Square 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive City of London 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, FCIT or CTY?

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than City of London. F&C Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio F&C Investment Trust £683.36M 9.40 £935.32M £75.80 4.50 City of London £568.96M 5.32 £294.08M £113.99 5.15

City of London (CTY) Competitors

GBX 587 +1.00 (+0.17%)

As of 08/21/2026 12:30 PM Eastern

Compare

CTY vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, PSH, and FCIT

Should you buy City of London stock or one of its competitors? City of London's main competitors and comparable companies include Schroders (SDR), M&G (MNG), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), Pershing Square (PSH), and F&C Investment Trust (FCIT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does City of London compare to Schroders?

Schroders (LON:SDR) and City of London (LON:CTY) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation and earnings.

Schroders has a beta of 1.081, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, City of London has a beta of 0.869, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

16.9% of Schroders shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.7% of City of London shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Schroders shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of City of London shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Schroders currently has a consensus price target of GBX 453.33, indicating a potential downside of 22.37%. Given Schroders' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Schroders is more favorable than City of London.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Schroders	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
City of London	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Schroders pays out 49.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Schroders had 4 more articles in the media than City of London. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Schroders and 1 mentions for City of London. Schroders' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat City of London's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroders is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Schroders	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
City of London	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

City of London has a net margin of 97.40% compared to Schroders' net margin of 19.22%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Schroders' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Schroders	19.22%	15.55%	1.86%
City of London	97.40%	22.92%	4.00%

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than City of London. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Schroders	£3.51B	2.59	£355.50M	£43.50	13.43
City of London	£568.96M	5.32	£294.08M	£113.99	5.15

Summary

Schroders beats City of London on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does City of London compare to M&G?

City of London (LON:CTY) and M&G (LON:MNG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation and dividends.

8.7% of City of London shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.1% of M&G shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of City of London shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of M&G shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

City of London has a net margin of 97.40% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat M&G's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
City of London	97.40%	22.92%	4.00%
M&G	1.73%	9.49%	0.40%

City of London has a beta of 0.869, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, M&G has a beta of 0.953, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. M&G pays out 164.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

M&G has a consensus target price of GBX 677.86, suggesting a potential upside of 95.63%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe M&G is more favorable than City of London.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
City of London	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
M&G	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43

City of London has higher earnings, but lower revenue than M&G. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
City of London	£568.96M	5.32	£294.08M	£113.99	5.15
M&G	£21.71B	0.38	£166.98M	£12.30	28.17

In the previous week, City of London and City of London both had 1 articles in the media. M&G's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat City of London's score of 0.00 indicating that M&G is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
City of London	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
M&G	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

M&G beats City of London on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does City of London compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) and City of London (LON:CTY) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 249.53% compared to City of London's net margin of 97.40%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 55.87% beat City of London's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Polar Capital Technology Trust	249.53%	55.87%	20.70%
City of London	97.40%	22.92%	4.00%

In the previous week, Polar Capital Technology Trust and Polar Capital Technology Trust both had 1 articles in the media. Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat City of London's score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Capital Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Technology Trust	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
City of London	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than City of London. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Technology Trust	£3.76B	1.89	£1.20B	£330.42	1.94
City of London	£568.96M	5.32	£294.08M	£113.99	5.15

87.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.7% of City of London shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of City of London shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.737, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, City of London has a beta of 0.869, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Polar Capital Technology Trust beats City of London on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does City of London compare to Pershing Square?

Pershing Square (LON:PSH) and City of London (LON:CTY) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than City of London. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pershing Square	£2.57B	2.66	£2.71B	£1.41 thousand	2.78
City of London	£568.96M	5.32	£294.08M	£113.99	5.15

Pershing Square has a beta of 0.849, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, City of London has a beta of 0.869, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

5.8% of Pershing Square shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.7% of City of London shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of City of London shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

City of London has a net margin of 97.40% compared to Pershing Square's net margin of 97.16%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pershing Square	97.16%	-2.59%	11.83%
City of London	97.40%	22.92%	4.00%

In the previous week, Pershing Square had 1 more articles in the media than City of London. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pershing Square and 1 mentions for City of London. Pershing Square's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat City of London's score of 0.00 indicating that Pershing Square is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pershing Square	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
City of London	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Pershing Square beats City of London on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does City of London compare to F&C Investment Trust?

F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) and City of London (LON:CTY) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, City of London had 1 more articles in the media than F&C Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for City of London and 0 mentions for F&C Investment Trust. F&C Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled City of London'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
F&C Investment Trust	Neutral
City of London	Neutral

F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.749, indicating that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, City of London has a beta of 0.869, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

F&C Investment Trust has a net margin of 103.67% compared to City of London's net margin of 97.40%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat F&C Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
F&C Investment Trust	103.67%	22.14%	10.80%
City of London	97.40%	22.92%	4.00%

F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. City of London pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. F&C Investment Trust pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. City of London pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than City of London. F&C Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than City of London, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
F&C Investment Trust	£683.36M	9.40	£935.32M	£75.80	4.50
City of London	£568.96M	5.32	£294.08M	£113.99	5.15

7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.7% of City of London shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of City of London shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

City of London beats F&C Investment Trust on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get City of London News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CTY and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CTY vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	City of London	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£3.02B	£5.66B	£13.63B	£2.54B
Dividend Yield	3.89%	7.38%	5.89%	6.17%
P/E Ratio	5.15	39.10	29.61	367.57
Price / Sales	5.32	1,262.42	521.30	83,481.74
Price / Cash	N/A	48.31	38.19	27.89
Price / Book	1.40	2.13	2.18	7.19
Net Income	£294.08M	£416.48M	£1.31B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-0.68%	-0.25%	-0.30%	0.30%
1 Month Performance	1.56%	2.06%	2.37%	3.31%
1 Year Performance	15.10%	5.71%	9.68%	22.13%

City of London Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CTY City of London	N/A	GBX 587 +0.2%	N/A	+15.1%	£3.02B	£568.96M	5.15	N/A
SDR Schroders	1.9743 of 5 stars	GBX 584 +0.2%	GBX 453.33 -22.4%	+47.3%	£9.08B	£3.51B	13.43	6,438	News Coverage
MNG M&G	3.7888 of 5 stars	GBX 353.40 +0.6%	GBX 677.86 +91.8%	+29.2%	£8.44B	£21.71B	28.73	6,101	Positive News
PCT Polar Capital Technology Trust	N/A	GBX 685 +1.2%	N/A	+61.8%	£7.34B	£3.76B	2.07	120
PSH Pershing Square	N/A	GBX 3,868 -0.7%	N/A	-8.8%	£6.77B	£2.57B	2.75	N/A	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CTY) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

City of London (CTY) Competitors

CTY vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, PSH, and FCIT

How does City of London compare to Schroders?

Summary

How does City of London compare to M&G?

Summary

How does City of London compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Summary

How does City of London compare to Pershing Square?

Summary

How does City of London compare to F&C Investment Trust?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CTY vs. The Competition

City of London Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

City of London (CTY) Competitors

CTY vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, PSH, and FCIT

How does City of London compare to Schroders?

Which has more risk and volatility, SDR or CTY?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in SDR or CTY?

Do analysts rate SDR or CTY?

Is SDR or CTY a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor SDR or CTY?

Is SDR or CTY more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, SDR or CTY?

Summary

How does City of London compare to M&G?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CTY or MNG?

Is CTY or MNG more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, CTY or MNG?

Is CTY or MNG a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer CTY or MNG?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, CTY or MNG?

Does the media refer more to CTY or MNG?

Summary

How does City of London compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Is PCT or CTY more profitable?

Does the media favor PCT or CTY?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, PCT or CTY?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of PCT or CTY?

Which has more volatility & risk, PCT or CTY?

Summary

How does City of London compare to Pershing Square?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PSH or CTY?

Which has more volatility and risk, PSH or CTY?

Is PSH or CTY a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PSH or CTY?

Is PSH or CTY more profitable?

Does the media refer more to PSH or CTY?

Summary

How does City of London compare to F&C Investment Trust?

Does the media favor FCIT or CTY?

Which has more volatility & risk, FCIT or CTY?

Is FCIT or CTY more profitable?

Is FCIT or CTY a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, FCIT or CTY?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in FCIT or CTY?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CTY vs. The Competition

City of London Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools