Which has better valuation & earnings, CWK or TATE?

Tate & Lyle has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cranswick. Cranswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tate & Lyle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cranswick £2.98B 0.94 £113.74M £290.20 18.06 Tate & Lyle £2.01B 1.22 £206.63M £21.70 25.51

Is CWK or TATE more profitable?

Cranswick has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Tate & Lyle's net margin of 4.84%. Cranswick's return on equity of 14.99% beat Tate & Lyle's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cranswick 5.31% 14.99% 8.26% Tate & Lyle 4.84% 6.17% 6.03%

Does the media prefer CWK or TATE?

In the previous week, Cranswick had 3 more articles in the media than Tate & Lyle. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cranswick and 1 mentions for Tate & Lyle. Tate & Lyle's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Cranswick's score of 0.67 indicating that Tate & Lyle is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cranswick 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Tate & Lyle 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, GNC or CWK?

Cranswick has higher revenue and earnings than Greencore Group. Cranswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greencore Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Greencore Group £2.34B 0.90 £48.48M £2.80 94.50 Cranswick £2.98B 0.94 £113.74M £290.20 18.06

Does the media favor GNC or CWK?

In the previous week, Cranswick had 2 more articles in the media than Greencore Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cranswick and 2 mentions for Greencore Group. Cranswick's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Greencore Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Cranswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Greencore Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Cranswick 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PFD or CWK?

Cranswick has higher revenue and earnings than Premier Foods. Premier Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cranswick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Premier Foods £1.18B 1.44 £112.38M £15.50 12.66 Cranswick £2.98B 0.94 £113.74M £290.20 18.06

Does the media favor PFD or CWK?

In the previous week, Cranswick had 3 more articles in the media than Premier Foods. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cranswick and 1 mentions for Premier Foods. Premier Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Cranswick's score of 0.67 indicating that Premier Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Premier Foods 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cranswick 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer CWK or BAKK?

Cranswick currently has a consensus price target of GBX 5,974, indicating a potential upside of 14.01%. Given Cranswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Cranswick is more favorable than Bakkavor Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Cranswick 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80 Bakkavor Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CWK or BAKK?

Cranswick has higher revenue and earnings than Bakkavor Group. Cranswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bakkavor Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cranswick £2.98B 0.94 £113.74M £290.20 18.06 Bakkavor Group £2.30B 0.63 £64.74M £6.30 40.00

Do analysts rate DCG or CWK?

Cranswick has a consensus price target of GBX 5,974, indicating a potential upside of 14.01%. Given Cranswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cranswick is more favorable than Dairy Crest Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Dairy Crest Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Cranswick 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80

Cranswick (CWK) Competitors

GBX 5,240 +10.00 (+0.19%)

As of 10:51 AM Eastern

Compare

CWK vs. TATE, GNC, PFD, BAKK, and DCG

Should you buy Cranswick stock or one of its competitors? Cranswick's main competitors and comparable companies include Tate & Lyle (TATE), Greencore Group (GNC), Premier Foods (PFD), Bakkavor Group (BAKK), and Dairy Crest Group (DCG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "food products" industry.

How does Cranswick compare to Tate & Lyle?

Cranswick (LON:CWK) and Tate & Lyle (LON:TATE) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Tate & Lyle has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cranswick. Cranswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tate & Lyle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cranswick	£2.98B	0.94	£113.74M	£290.20	18.06
Tate & Lyle	£2.01B	1.22	£206.63M	£21.70	25.51

In the previous week, Cranswick had 3 more articles in the media than Tate & Lyle. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cranswick and 1 mentions for Tate & Lyle. Tate & Lyle's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Cranswick's score of 0.67 indicating that Tate & Lyle is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cranswick	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Tate & Lyle	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cranswick pays an annual dividend of GBX 103 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Tate & Lyle pays an annual dividend of GBX 20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Cranswick pays out 35.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tate & Lyle pays out 92.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Cranswick has a beta of 0.555, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tate & Lyle has a beta of 0.346, indicating that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Cranswick currently has a consensus target price of GBX 5,974, indicating a potential upside of 14.01%. Tate & Lyle has a consensus target price of GBX 516, indicating a potential downside of 6.78%. Given Cranswick's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cranswick is more favorable than Tate & Lyle.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cranswick	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Tate & Lyle	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

71.2% of Cranswick shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.5% of Tate & Lyle shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Cranswick shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Tate & Lyle shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cranswick has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Tate & Lyle's net margin of 4.84%. Cranswick's return on equity of 14.99% beat Tate & Lyle's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cranswick	5.31%	14.99%	8.26%
Tate & Lyle	4.84%	6.17%	6.03%

Summary

Cranswick beats Tate & Lyle on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cranswick compare to Greencore Group?

Greencore Group (LON:GNC) and Cranswick (LON:CWK) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

30.1% of Greencore Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Cranswick shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Greencore Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Cranswick shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Greencore Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Cranswick pays an annual dividend of GBX 103 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Greencore Group pays out 92.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cranswick pays out 35.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cranswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Greencore Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 301.50, suggesting a potential upside of 13.95%. Cranswick has a consensus target price of GBX 5,974, suggesting a potential upside of 14.01%. Given Cranswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cranswick is more favorable than Greencore Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Greencore Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Cranswick	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Cranswick has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Greencore Group's net margin of 0.30%. Cranswick's return on equity of 14.99% beat Greencore Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Greencore Group	0.30%	0.73%	4.43%
Cranswick	5.31%	14.99%	8.26%

Greencore Group has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cranswick has a beta of 0.555, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cranswick had 2 more articles in the media than Greencore Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cranswick and 2 mentions for Greencore Group. Cranswick's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Greencore Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Cranswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Greencore Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Cranswick	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cranswick has higher revenue and earnings than Greencore Group. Cranswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greencore Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Greencore Group	£2.34B	0.90	£48.48M	£2.80	94.50
Cranswick	£2.98B	0.94	£113.74M	£290.20	18.06

Summary

Cranswick beats Greencore Group on 16 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cranswick compare to Premier Foods?

Premier Foods (LON:PFD) and Cranswick (LON:CWK) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Premier Foods currently has a consensus target price of GBX 242, indicating a potential upside of 23.34%. Cranswick has a consensus target price of GBX 5,974, indicating a potential upside of 14.01%. Given Premier Foods' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Premier Foods is more favorable than Cranswick.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Premier Foods	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Cranswick	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Premier Foods has a beta of 0.591, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cranswick has a beta of 0.555, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Premier Foods pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Cranswick pays an annual dividend of GBX 103 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Premier Foods pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cranswick pays out 35.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

39.0% of Premier Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Cranswick shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Premier Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Cranswick shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cranswick has higher revenue and earnings than Premier Foods. Premier Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cranswick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Premier Foods	£1.18B	1.44	£112.38M	£15.50	12.66
Cranswick	£2.98B	0.94	£113.74M	£290.20	18.06

Premier Foods has a net margin of 11.62% compared to Cranswick's net margin of 5.31%. Cranswick's return on equity of 14.99% beat Premier Foods' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Premier Foods	11.62%	9.74%	4.78%
Cranswick	5.31%	14.99%	8.26%

In the previous week, Cranswick had 3 more articles in the media than Premier Foods. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cranswick and 1 mentions for Premier Foods. Premier Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Cranswick's score of 0.67 indicating that Premier Foods is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Premier Foods	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cranswick	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Cranswick beats Premier Foods on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cranswick compare to Bakkavor Group?

Cranswick (LON:CWK) and Bakkavor Group (LON:BAKK) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

71.2% of Cranswick shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Bakkavor Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Cranswick shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 48.9% of Bakkavor Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cranswick currently has a consensus price target of GBX 5,974, indicating a potential upside of 14.01%. Given Cranswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Cranswick is more favorable than Bakkavor Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cranswick	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Bakkavor Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Cranswick has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Bakkavor Group's net margin of 2.43%. Cranswick's return on equity of 14.99% beat Bakkavor Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cranswick	5.31%	14.99%	8.26%
Bakkavor Group	2.43%	9.10%	4.54%

In the previous week, Cranswick had 4 more articles in the media than Bakkavor Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cranswick and 0 mentions for Bakkavor Group. Cranswick's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Bakkavor Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Cranswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Cranswick	Positive
Bakkavor Group	Neutral

Cranswick has higher revenue and earnings than Bakkavor Group. Cranswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bakkavor Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cranswick	£2.98B	0.94	£113.74M	£290.20	18.06
Bakkavor Group	£2.30B	0.63	£64.74M	£6.30	40.00

Cranswick pays an annual dividend of GBX 103 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Bakkavor Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Cranswick pays out 35.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bakkavor Group pays out 127.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Cranswick has a beta of 0.555, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bakkavor Group has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cranswick beats Bakkavor Group on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cranswick compare to Dairy Crest Group?

Dairy Crest Group (LON:DCG) and Cranswick (LON:CWK) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Cranswick has higher revenue and earnings than Dairy Crest Group. Dairy Crest Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cranswick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dairy Crest Group	£461.60M	0.00	N/A	£28.10	N/A
Cranswick	£2.98B	0.94	£113.74M	£290.20	18.06

Cranswick has a consensus price target of GBX 5,974, indicating a potential upside of 14.01%. Given Cranswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cranswick is more favorable than Dairy Crest Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dairy Crest Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Cranswick	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

71.2% of Cranswick shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Cranswick shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cranswick had 4 more articles in the media than Dairy Crest Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cranswick and 0 mentions for Dairy Crest Group. Cranswick's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Dairy Crest Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Cranswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Dairy Crest Group	Neutral
Cranswick	Positive

Cranswick has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Dairy Crest Group's net margin of 0.00%. Cranswick's return on equity of 14.99% beat Dairy Crest Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dairy Crest Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
Cranswick	5.31%	14.99%	8.26%

Dairy Crest Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.23 per share. Cranswick pays an annual dividend of GBX 103 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Dairy Crest Group pays out 0.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cranswick pays out 35.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Cranswick beats Dairy Crest Group on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cranswick News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CWK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CWK vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Cranswick	Food Products Industry	Consumer Staples Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£2.80B	£5.86B	£16.15B	£2.89B
Dividend Yield	2.16%	3.16%	3.21%	6.11%
P/E Ratio	18.06	11.72	13.34	368.76
Price / Sales	0.94	84.25	262,280.45	83,316.97
Price / Cash	146.39	112.45	57.59	27.89
Price / Book	3.08	4.87	5.07	7.20
Net Income	£113.74M	£772.25M	£834.00M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-0.93%	1.74%	0.49%	0.84%
1 Month Performance	-5.42%	2.00%	1.38%	2.78%
1 Year Performance	N/A	40.86%	13.34%	69.42%

Cranswick Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CWK Cranswick	3.5973 of 5 stars	GBX 5,240 +0.2%	GBX 5,974 +14.0%	-0.2%	£2.80B	£2.98B	18.06	52,000	Analyst Forecast Gap Up
TATE Tate & Lyle	1.2481 of 5 stars	GBX 553 -0.2%	GBX 516 -6.7%	+3.1%	£2.45B	£2.01B	25.48	3,604
GNC Greencore Group	3.0445 of 5 stars	GBX 263.40 +1.1%	GBX 301.50 +14.5%	+5.2%	£2.07B	£2.34B	94.07	13,602	News Coverage
PFD Premier Foods	3.6762 of 5 stars	GBX 193.50 +1.3%	GBX 242 +25.1%	+3.0%	£1.65B	£1.18B	12.48	4,000	Gap Up
BAKK Bakkavor Group	N/A	GBX 252 flat	N/A	+8.2%	£1.46B	£2.30B	40.00	18,000	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CWK) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Cranswick (CWK) Competitors

CWK vs. TATE, GNC, PFD, BAKK, and DCG

How does Cranswick compare to Tate & Lyle?

Summary

How does Cranswick compare to Greencore Group?

Summary

How does Cranswick compare to Premier Foods?

Summary

How does Cranswick compare to Bakkavor Group?

Summary

How does Cranswick compare to Dairy Crest Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CWK vs. The Competition

Cranswick Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Cranswick (CWK) Competitors

CWK vs. TATE, GNC, PFD, BAKK, and DCG

How does Cranswick compare to Tate & Lyle?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CWK or TATE?

Does the media prefer CWK or TATE?

Is CWK or TATE a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, CWK or TATE?

Do analysts recommend CWK or TATE?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CWK or TATE?

Is CWK or TATE more profitable?

Summary

How does Cranswick compare to Greencore Group?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in GNC or CWK?

Is GNC or CWK a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate GNC or CWK?

Is GNC or CWK more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, GNC or CWK?

Does the media favor GNC or CWK?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, GNC or CWK?

Summary

How does Cranswick compare to Premier Foods?

Do analysts prefer PFD or CWK?

Which has more risk & volatility, PFD or CWK?

Is PFD or CWK a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PFD or CWK?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PFD or CWK?

Is PFD or CWK more profitable?

Does the media favor PFD or CWK?

Summary

How does Cranswick compare to Bakkavor Group?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CWK or BAKK?

Do analysts prefer CWK or BAKK?

Is CWK or BAKK more profitable?

Does the media refer more to CWK or BAKK?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CWK or BAKK?

Is CWK or BAKK a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, CWK or BAKK?

Summary

How does Cranswick compare to Dairy Crest Group?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, DCG or CWK?

Do analysts rate DCG or CWK?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in DCG or CWK?

Does the media favor DCG or CWK?

Is DCG or CWK more profitable?

Is DCG or CWK a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CWK vs. The Competition

Cranswick Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools