Free Trial

Cranswick (CWK) Competitors

Cranswick logo
GBX 5,650 +10.00 (+0.18%)
As of 07:17 AM Eastern

CWK vs. FSV, AEI, CWD, GOOD, and DNK

Should you buy Cranswick stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cranswick with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cranswick include Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (FSV), abrdn Equity Income Trust (AEI), Countrywide (CWD), Good Energy Group (GOOD), and Danakali (DNK). These companies are all part of the "real estate" industry.

How does Cranswick compare to Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values?

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values (LON:FSV) and Cranswick (LON:CWK) are both real estate companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a beta of 1.2719399, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cranswick has a beta of 0.554, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

12.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Cranswick shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Cranswick shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Cranswick pays an annual dividend of GBX 103 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values pays out 9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cranswick pays out 35.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has a net margin of 95.92% compared to Cranswick's net margin of 5.31%. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' return on equity of 25.87% beat Cranswick's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values95.92% 25.87% 0.33%
Cranswick 5.31%14.99%8.26%

Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cranswick. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cranswick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values£354.63M3.99£223.72M£109.343.99
Cranswick£2.98B1.01£113.74M£290.2019.47

Cranswick has a consensus price target of GBX 4,706.40, indicating a potential downside of 16.70%. Given Cranswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cranswick is more favorable than Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cranswick
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

In the previous week, Cranswick had 1 more articles in the media than Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cranswick and 0 mentions for Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values. Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cranswick'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values Neutral
Cranswick Neutral

Summary

Cranswick beats Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cranswick compare to abrdn Equity Income Trust?

abrdn Equity Income Trust (LON:AEI) and Cranswick (LON:CWK) are both real estate companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

abrdn Equity Income Trust has a net margin of 157.91% compared to Cranswick's net margin of 5.31%. abrdn Equity Income Trust's return on equity of 18.96% beat Cranswick's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn Equity Income Trust157.91% 18.96% 0.71%
Cranswick 5.31%14.99%8.26%

3.4% of abrdn Equity Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Cranswick shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of abrdn Equity Income Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Cranswick shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cranswick had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn Equity Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cranswick and 0 mentions for abrdn Equity Income Trust. abrdn Equity Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cranswick'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn Equity Income Trust Neutral
Cranswick Neutral

Cranswick has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn Equity Income Trust. abrdn Equity Income Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cranswick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Equity Income Trust£47.57M7.16-£220.80K£96.934.43
Cranswick£2.98B1.01£113.74M£290.2019.47

abrdn Equity Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 23 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Cranswick pays an annual dividend of GBX 103 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. abrdn Equity Income Trust pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cranswick pays out 35.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. abrdn Equity Income Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cranswick has a consensus price target of GBX 4,706.40, suggesting a potential downside of 16.70%. Given Cranswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cranswick is more favorable than abrdn Equity Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
abrdn Equity Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cranswick
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

abrdn Equity Income Trust has a beta of 0.88522565, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cranswick has a beta of 0.554, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cranswick beats abrdn Equity Income Trust on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cranswick compare to Countrywide?

Countrywide (LON:CWD) and Cranswick (LON:CWK) are both real estate companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

Cranswick has a consensus target price of GBX 4,706.40, suggesting a potential downside of 16.70%. Given Countrywide's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Countrywide is more favorable than Cranswick.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Countrywide
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cranswick
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Cranswick has higher revenue and earnings than Countrywide. Countrywide is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cranswick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Countrywide£427.28M0.00N/A-£143.90N/A
Cranswick£2.98B1.01£113.74M£290.2019.47

In the previous week, Cranswick had 1 more articles in the media than Countrywide. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cranswick and 0 mentions for Countrywide. Countrywide's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cranswick'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Countrywide Neutral
Cranswick Neutral

71.2% of Cranswick shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Cranswick shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cranswick has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Countrywide's net margin of 0.00%. Cranswick's return on equity of 14.99% beat Countrywide's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CountrywideN/A N/A N/A
Cranswick 5.31%14.99%8.26%

Summary

Cranswick beats Countrywide on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cranswick compare to Good Energy Group?

Good Energy Group (LON:GOOD) and Cranswick (LON:CWK) are both real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Cranswick had 1 more articles in the media than Good Energy Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cranswick and 0 mentions for Good Energy Group. Good Energy Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cranswick'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Good Energy Group Neutral
Cranswick Neutral

Cranswick has higher revenue and earnings than Good Energy Group. Good Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cranswick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Good Energy Group£215.83M0.00-£7.12M-£38.65N/A
Cranswick£2.98B1.01£113.74M£290.2019.47

Good Energy Group has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cranswick has a beta of 0.554, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Cranswick has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Good Energy Group's net margin of 1.13%. Cranswick's return on equity of 14.99% beat Good Energy Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Good Energy Group1.13% 7.10% -0.95%
Cranswick 5.31%14.99%8.26%

Cranswick has a consensus price target of GBX 4,706.40, indicating a potential downside of 16.70%. Given Good Energy Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Good Energy Group is more favorable than Cranswick.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Good Energy Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cranswick
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Good Energy Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Cranswick pays an annual dividend of GBX 103 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Good Energy Group pays out -7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cranswick pays out 35.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

9.3% of Good Energy Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Cranswick shares are owned by institutional investors. 51.1% of Good Energy Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Cranswick shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Cranswick beats Good Energy Group on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cranswick compare to Danakali?

Danakali (LON:DNK) and Cranswick (LON:CWK) are both real estate companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Cranswick had 1 more articles in the media than Danakali. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cranswick and 0 mentions for Danakali. Danakali's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cranswick'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Danakali Neutral
Cranswick Neutral

Cranswick has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Danakali's net margin of 0.00%. Cranswick's return on equity of 14.99% beat Danakali's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DanakaliN/A N/A N/A
Cranswick 5.31%14.99%8.26%

71.2% of Cranswick shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Cranswick shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cranswick has higher revenue and earnings than Danakali. Danakali is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cranswick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Danakali£67.50K0.00N/A-£1.10N/A
Cranswick£2.98B1.01£113.74M£290.2019.47

Cranswick has a consensus target price of GBX 4,706.40, indicating a potential downside of 16.70%. Given Danakali's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Danakali is more favorable than Cranswick.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Danakali
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cranswick
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Summary

Cranswick beats Danakali on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cranswick News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CWK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CWK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CWK vs. The Competition

MetricCranswickPackaged Foods IndustryDefensive SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.02B£4.67B£8.46B£2.82B
Dividend Yield1.99%2.54%3.19%6.18%
P/E Ratio19.472,882.05891.59367.09
Price / Sales1.013,430.90992,149.8386,559.92
Price / Cash146.39119.32140.9227.87
Price / Book3.3222.509.187.82
Net Income£113.74M£2.71B£1.03B£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.36%1.75%0.74%0.94%
1 Month Performance8.45%2.61%1.02%2.05%
1 Year Performance8.24%729.24%268.69%73.94%

Cranswick Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CWK
Cranswick
2.0231 of 5 stars
GBX 5,650
+0.2%
GBX 4,706.40
-16.7%
+8.0%£3.02B£2.98B19.4752,000
FSV
Fidelity Investment Trust - Fidelity Special Values
N/AGBX 423.50
-0.2%
N/A+20.0%£1.37B£354.63M3.8725,000
AEI
abrdn Equity Income Trust
N/AGBX 428
+1.7%
N/A+21.9%£339.59M£47.57M4.4230
CWD
Countrywide
N/AN/AN/AN/A£129.60M£427.28MN/A7,000
GOOD
Good Energy Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£90.31M£215.83MN/A70

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CWK) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners