VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc (CYBG) Competitors

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc (LON:CYBG) and Charter Court Financial Services Grp (LON:CCFS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership and community ranking.

Do analysts rate CYBG or CCFS?

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	N/A
Charter Court Financial Services Grp	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	N/A

Does the media prefer CYBG or CCFS?

In the previous week, VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc and VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc both had 1 articles in the media. Charter Court Financial Services Grp's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc's score of 0.59 indicating that Charter Court Financial Services Grp is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Charter Court Financial Services Grp	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CYBG or CCFS?

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charter Court Financial Services Grp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc	£1.24B	0.19	N/A	-£7.10	-2.26
Charter Court Financial Services Grp	£221.10M	3.23	N/A	£46.30	6.37

Does the MarketBeat Community favor CYBG or CCFS?

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc received 104 more outperform votes than Charter Court Financial Services Grp when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 73.88% of users gave Charter Court Financial Services Grp an outperform vote while only 50.88% of users gave VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc	Outperform Votes 203 50.88%	Underperform Votes 196 49.12%
Charter Court Financial Services Grp	Outperform Votes 99 73.88%	Underperform Votes 35 26.12%

Is CYBG or CCFS a better dividend stock?

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Charter Court Financial Services Grp pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc pays out -0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Charter Court Financial Services Grp pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Is CYBG or CCFS more profitable?

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc	N/A	N/A	N/A
Charter Court Financial Services Grp	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Charter Court Financial Services Grp beats VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A Acc on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.