Go Pro
→ Urgent exposé on the 'Mar-a-Lago Trade' (From Stansberry Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free GOT Stock Alerts

Global Opportunities Trust (GOT) Competitors

Global Opportunities Trust logo
GBX 329 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/1/2026 11:53 AM Eastern
Compare

GOT vs. JAI, LWI, PCFT, CHRY, and EAT

Should you buy Global Opportunities Trust stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Global Opportunities Trust with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Global Opportunities Trust include JP Morgan Asian Investment Trust (JAI), Lowland (LWI), Polar Capital Global Financials (PCFT), Chrysalis Investments (CHRY), and European Assets Trust (EAT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Global Opportunities Trust compare to JP Morgan Asian Investment Trust?

JP Morgan Asian Investment Trust (LON:JAI) and Global Opportunities Trust (LON:GOT) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Global Opportunities Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than JP Morgan Asian Investment Trust. JP Morgan Asian Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Opportunities Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JP Morgan Asian Investment Trust£25.05M0.00N/A£22.90N/A
Global Opportunities Trust£12.11M7.94£5.48M£37.908.68

In the previous week, Global Opportunities Trust had 1 more articles in the media than JP Morgan Asian Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Global Opportunities Trust and 0 mentions for JP Morgan Asian Investment Trust. Global Opportunities Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat JP Morgan Asian Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Global Opportunities Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
JP Morgan Asian Investment Trust Neutral
Global Opportunities Trust Very Positive

4.2% of Global Opportunities Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 21.8% of Global Opportunities Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

JP Morgan Asian Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.16 per share. Global Opportunities Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. JP Morgan Asian Investment Trust pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Opportunities Trust pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Global Opportunities Trust has a net margin of 83.86% compared to JP Morgan Asian Investment Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Global Opportunities Trust's return on equity of 5.17% beat JP Morgan Asian Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JP Morgan Asian Investment TrustN/A N/A N/A
Global Opportunities Trust 83.86%5.17%3.41%

Summary

Global Opportunities Trust beats JP Morgan Asian Investment Trust on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Opportunities Trust compare to Lowland?

Lowland (LON:LWI) and Global Opportunities Trust (LON:GOT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Lowland has a net margin of 165.59% compared to Global Opportunities Trust's net margin of 83.86%. Lowland's return on equity of 25.86% beat Global Opportunities Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lowland165.59% 25.86% 4.63%
Global Opportunities Trust 83.86%5.17%3.41%

Lowland has higher revenue and earnings than Global Opportunities Trust. Lowland is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Opportunities Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lowland£97.68M3.82£54.35M£40.444.21
Global Opportunities Trust£12.11M7.94£5.48M£37.908.68

3.8% of Lowland shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.2% of Global Opportunities Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Lowland shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 21.8% of Global Opportunities Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Global Opportunities Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Lowland. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Global Opportunities Trust and 0 mentions for Lowland. Global Opportunities Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat Lowland's score of 0.00 indicating that Global Opportunities Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lowland Neutral
Global Opportunities Trust Very Positive

Lowland pays an annual dividend of GBX 5 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Global Opportunities Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Lowland pays out 12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Opportunities Trust pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Lowland has a beta of 1.4011285, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Opportunities Trust has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lowland beats Global Opportunities Trust on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Opportunities Trust compare to Polar Capital Global Financials?

Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) and Global Opportunities Trust (LON:GOT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Polar Capital Global Financials has a beta of 1.0490752, suggesting that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Opportunities Trust has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Global Opportunities Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Global Financials. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Global Opportunities Trust and 0 mentions for Polar Capital Global Financials. Global Opportunities Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat Polar Capital Global Financials' score of 0.00 indicating that Global Opportunities Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Global Financials Neutral
Global Opportunities Trust Very Positive

5.8% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.2% of Global Opportunities Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 21.8% of Global Opportunities Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Polar Capital Global Financials has a net margin of 310.16% compared to Global Opportunities Trust's net margin of 83.86%. Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity of 10.69% beat Global Opportunities Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Global Financials310.16% 10.69% 12.59%
Global Opportunities Trust 83.86%5.17%3.41%

Polar Capital Global Financials pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Global Opportunities Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Polar Capital Global Financials pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Opportunities Trust pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Polar Capital Global Financials has higher revenue and earnings than Global Opportunities Trust. Global Opportunities Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital Global Financials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Global Financials£57.31M6.55£115.21M£22.5110.57
Global Opportunities Trust£12.11M7.94£5.48M£37.908.68

Summary

Polar Capital Global Financials beats Global Opportunities Trust on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Opportunities Trust compare to Chrysalis Investments?

Global Opportunities Trust (LON:GOT) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to Global Opportunities Trust's net margin of 83.86%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 14.16% beat Global Opportunities Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Opportunities Trust83.86% 5.17% 3.41%
Chrysalis Investments 184.47%14.16%N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global Opportunities Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Chrysalis Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

4.2% of Global Opportunities Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.8% of Global Opportunities Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Opportunities Trust has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.3067211, suggesting that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Chrysalis Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Global Opportunities Trust. Chrysalis Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Opportunities Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Opportunities Trust£12.11M7.94£5.48M£37.908.68
Chrysalis Investments£123.58M3.02£97.18M£22.093.52

In the previous week, Global Opportunities Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Chrysalis Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Global Opportunities Trust and 0 mentions for Chrysalis Investments. Global Opportunities Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat Chrysalis Investments' score of 0.00 indicating that Global Opportunities Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Global Opportunities Trust Very Positive
Chrysalis Investments Neutral

Summary

Chrysalis Investments beats Global Opportunities Trust on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Opportunities Trust compare to European Assets Trust?

Global Opportunities Trust (LON:GOT) and European Assets Trust (LON:EAT) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

Global Opportunities Trust has a net margin of 83.86% compared to European Assets Trust's net margin of 80.59%. European Assets Trust's return on equity of 6.99% beat Global Opportunities Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Opportunities Trust83.86% 5.17% 3.41%
European Assets Trust 80.59%6.99%6.15%

4.2% of Global Opportunities Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of European Assets Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.8% of Global Opportunities Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of European Assets Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Global Opportunities Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. European Assets Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Global Opportunities Trust pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. European Assets Trust pays out 0.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

European Assets Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Global Opportunities Trust. Global Opportunities Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than European Assets Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Opportunities Trust£12.11M7.94£5.48M£37.908.68
European Assets Trust£25.97M13.85£27.91M£6.7214.86

Global Opportunities Trust has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, European Assets Trust has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Global Opportunities Trust had 1 more articles in the media than European Assets Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Global Opportunities Trust and 0 mentions for European Assets Trust. Global Opportunities Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat European Assets Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Global Opportunities Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Global Opportunities Trust Very Positive
European Assets Trust Neutral

Summary

European Assets Trust beats Global Opportunities Trust on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Global Opportunities Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GOT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GOT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricGlobal Opportunities TrustAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£96.14M£2.38B£6.12B£2.94B
Dividend Yield3.09%6.00%5.24%6.15%
P/E Ratio8.6862.0729.90366.77
Price / Sales7.942,034.711,105.7286,365.18
Price / Cash2.8360.3394.2727.87
Price / Book0.891.396.617.69
Net Income£5.48M£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.68%0.72%0.79%0.42%
1 Month Performance-6.40%-0.49%0.45%-1.43%
1 Year Performance4.78%8.86%17.30%65.59%

Global Opportunities Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GOT
Global Opportunities Trust
N/AGBX 329
flat		N/A+4.8%£96.14M£12.11M8.681
JAI
JP Morgan Asian Investment Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£377.27M£25.05M17.51N/A
LWI
Lowland
N/AGBX 171
-0.9%		N/A+17.4%£375.31M£97.68M4.23N/A
PCFT
Polar Capital Global Financials
N/AGBX 236
-0.6%		N/A+14.7%£370.76M£57.31M10.48N/A
CHRY
Chrysalis Investments
N/AGBX 75.40
-0.1%		N/A-27.7%£361.69M£123.58M3.41N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GOT) was last updated on 7/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Urgent exposé on the "Mar-a-Lago Trade"
Dr. David Eifrig, former Goldman Sachs VP and Senior Partner at Stansberry Research, has released an urgent ex...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX IPO hides a much bigger story
The SpaceX IPO could be the biggest in history at $1.75 trillion - but the real story isn't the IPO itself. ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
What Happens to Your Assets If You Die Without a Will?
Without a will, your state's intestacy laws decide how your assets are divided — a rigid formula that ignores ...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon Is Quietly Doubling Down on This Bizarre Asset
Yahoo Finance reports this technology 'May Unlock $400 Trillion' - and Bloomberg calls it 'unavoidable.' Elon ...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
I paid $5,000 to hear Elon say this
One investor paid $5,000 to be in a private room with Elon Musk in Los Angeles - and what he heard confirmed a...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Sell Tesla, Buy the New King of FSD Cars
In 2023, Marc Chaikin's system flagged an automotive stock as bearish - and it fell 35% shortly after. Today, ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel