Go Pro
→ They told you not to miss this one (From Thor Metals) (Ad)tc pixel Free BGS Stock Alerts

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (BGS) Competitors

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon logo
GBX 163 +0.00 (+0.00%)
As of 07/13/2026 12:37 PM Eastern
Compare

BGS vs. THS, FLO, MED, PPC, and DAR

Should you buy Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon include Tharisa (THS), Flowtech Fluidpower (FLO), Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) (MED), President Energy (PPC), and Dar Global (DAR). These companies are all part of the "food products" industry.

How does Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon compare to Tharisa?

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) and Tharisa (LON:THS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a beta of 0.9284452, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tharisa has a beta of 0.693, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

8.5% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.7% of Tharisa shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Tharisa shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Tharisa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M22.40-£55.32M£4.9932.67
Tharisa£748.73M0.46£96.84M£39.302.93

Tharisa has a consensus target price of GBX 177.50, suggesting a potential upside of 54.35%. Given Tharisa's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Tharisa is more favorable than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tharisa'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral
Tharisa Neutral

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 101.98% compared to Tharisa's net margin of 16.17%. Tharisa's return on equity of 14.75% beat Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon101.98% 3.55% -7.19%
Tharisa 16.17%14.75%5.09%

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Tharisa pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays out 12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tharisa pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tharisa is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Tharisa beats Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon compare to Flowtech Fluidpower?

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) and Flowtech Fluidpower (LON:FLO) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 101.98% compared to Flowtech Fluidpower's net margin of -2.84%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity of 3.55% beat Flowtech Fluidpower's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon101.98% 3.55% -7.19%
Flowtech Fluidpower -2.84%-8.17%1.96%

8.5% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of Flowtech Fluidpower shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Flowtech Fluidpower shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a beta of 0.9284452, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flowtech Fluidpower has a beta of 0.555, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Flowtech Fluidpower has a consensus target price of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 63.93%. Given Flowtech Fluidpower's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Flowtech Fluidpower is more favorable than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Flowtech Fluidpower
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Flowtech Fluidpower has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Flowtech Fluidpower is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M22.40-£55.32M£4.9932.67
Flowtech Fluidpower£116.92M0.42-£14.47M-£5.24N/A

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Flowtech Fluidpower'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral
Flowtech Fluidpower Neutral

Summary

Flowtech Fluidpower beats Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon compare to Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)?

Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) (LON:MED) and Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

8.5% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 101.98% compared to Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity of 3.55% beat Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)N/A N/A N/A
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon 101.98%3.55%-7.19%

Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)£5.28M0.00N/A-£1.90N/A
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M22.40-£55.32M£4.9932.67

In the previous week, Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) Neutral
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral

Summary

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon beats Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon compare to President Energy?

President Energy (LON:PPC) and Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

President Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. President Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
President Energy£34.68M0.00N/A£0.99N/A
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M22.40-£55.32M£4.9932.67

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 101.98% compared to President Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity of 3.55% beat President Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
President EnergyN/A N/A N/A
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon 101.98%3.55%-7.19%

8.5% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, President Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
President Energy Neutral
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral

Summary

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon beats President Energy on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon compare to Dar Global?

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) and Dar Global (LON:DAR) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Dar Global has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Dar Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M22.40-£55.32M£4.9932.67
Dar Global£538.62M0.03£49.60M£56.000.14

In the previous week, Dar Global had 1 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Dar Global and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Dar Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral
Dar Global Neutral

8.5% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 88.0% of Dar Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 101.98% compared to Dar Global's net margin of 16.72%. Dar Global's return on equity of 11.65% beat Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon101.98% 3.55% -7.19%
Dar Global 16.72%11.65%3.68%

Summary

Dar Global beats Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BGS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BGS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricBaillie Gifford Shin NipponAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£324.34M£2.43B£6.20B£2.85B
Dividend Yield0.42%6.01%5.23%6.16%
P/E Ratio32.6761.8429.75368.21
Price / Sales22.401,858.151,187.1584,612.73
Price / Cash141.2160.3388.6427.87
Price / Book1.201.396.477.49
Net Income-£55.32M£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.25%-0.06%-0.12%-0.19%
1 Month Performance3.43%0.23%0.31%-0.99%
1 Year Performance31.03%7.68%15.08%61.68%

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BGS
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon
N/AGBX 163
+0.0%		N/A+30.8%£324.34M£14.48M32.673,080
THS
Tharisa
2.9514 of 5 stars		GBX 119
+2.1%		GBX 177.50
+49.2%		+30.7%£352.59M£748.73M3.037,500
FLO
Flowtech Fluidpower
1.6334 of 5 stars		GBX 58
-3.3%		GBX 100
+72.4%		-4.7%£47.23M£116.92MN/A582
MED
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£39.06M£5.28MN/A870
PPC
President Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/A£15.95M£34.68M156.5761,500

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:BGS) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s $250 Bill – See Immediately
Former Goldman Sachs VP Dr. David Eifrig is warning that July 28 could trigger the biggest wealth reset in mod...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
When I found Rolls-Royce under $2, most people thought I was crazy
In 2022, Karim Rahemtulla recommended Rolls-Royce when it traded under $2. The stock climbed more than 1,100% ...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your money is changing
Porter Stansberry - who warned readers about Fannie Mae in 2006, called gold in 2008, and predicted COVID-era ...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $5 company SpaceX can’t survive without
The investors who got rich on AI didn't all buy Nvidia. Some bought ASML, the company that makes the machines ...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Set to Unleash 219-Year-Old “Super Weapon” on U.S. Soil
Four-time U.S. Presidential advisor Jim Rickards is warning of a political move he calls 'The Trump Supremacy'...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
60 years. Zero competitors.
One company has spent 60 years developing an energy source the International Energy Agency estimates at 140 ti...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel