Top 5 Stocks to Buy Now
→ Read this warning immediately (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free BGS Stock Alerts

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (BGS) Competitors

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon logo
GBX 160.40 -3.60 (-2.20%)
As of 11:53 AM Eastern
Compare

BGS vs. THS, FLO, MED, PPC, and DAR

Should you buy Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon include Tharisa (THS), Flowtech Fluidpower (FLO), Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) (MED), President Energy (PPC), and Dar Global (DAR). These companies are all part of the "food products" industry.

How does Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon compare to Tharisa?

Tharisa (LON:THS) and Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Tharisa has a beta of 0.684, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a beta of 0.92498237, suggesting that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

Tharisa pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Tharisa pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays out 12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tharisa is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Tharisa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tharisa£748.73M0.45£96.84M£39.302.88
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M22.13-£55.32M£4.9932.14

Tharisa presently has a consensus price target of GBX 177.50, indicating a potential upside of 57.08%. Given Tharisa's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Tharisa is more favorable than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Tharisa had 1 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tharisa and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Tharisa's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tharisa Neutral
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral

1.7% of Tharisa shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.5% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Tharisa shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 101.98% compared to Tharisa's net margin of 16.17%. Tharisa's return on equity of 14.75% beat Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tharisa16.17% 14.75% 5.09%
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon 101.98%3.55%-7.19%

Summary

Tharisa beats Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon compare to Flowtech Fluidpower?

Flowtech Fluidpower (LON:FLO) and Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Flowtech Fluidpower has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Flowtech Fluidpower is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flowtech Fluidpower£116.92M0.44-£14.47M-£5.24N/A
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M22.13-£55.32M£4.9932.14

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 101.98% compared to Flowtech Fluidpower's net margin of -2.84%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity of 3.55% beat Flowtech Fluidpower's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Flowtech Fluidpower-2.84% -8.17% 1.96%
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon 101.98%3.55%-7.19%

Flowtech Fluidpower has a beta of 0.559, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a beta of 0.92498237, indicating that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

17.2% of Flowtech Fluidpower shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.5% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Flowtech Fluidpower shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Flowtech Fluidpower currently has a consensus price target of GBX 100, indicating a potential upside of 58.73%. Given Flowtech Fluidpower's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Flowtech Fluidpower is more favorable than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Flowtech Fluidpower
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Flowtech Fluidpower had 1 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Flowtech Fluidpower and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Flowtech Fluidpower's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Flowtech Fluidpower Neutral
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral

Summary

Flowtech Fluidpower beats Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon compare to Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)?

Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) (LON:MED) and Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)£5.28M0.00N/A-£1.90N/A
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M22.13-£55.32M£4.9932.14

In the previous week, Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) Neutral
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral

8.5% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 101.98% compared to Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity of 3.55% beat Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)N/A N/A N/A
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon 101.98%3.55%-7.19%

Summary

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon beats Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon compare to President Energy?

President Energy (LON:PPC) and Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

President Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. President Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
President Energy£34.68M0.00N/A£0.99N/A
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M22.13-£55.32M£4.9932.14

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 101.98% compared to President Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity of 3.55% beat President Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
President EnergyN/A N/A N/A
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon 101.98%3.55%-7.19%

In the previous week, President Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
President Energy Neutral
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral

8.5% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon beats President Energy on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon compare to Dar Global?

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) and Dar Global (LON:DAR) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

8.5% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 88.0% of Dar Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Dar Global's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's score of 0.00 indicating that Dar Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral
Dar Global Positive

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 101.98% compared to Dar Global's net margin of 16.72%. Dar Global's return on equity of 11.65% beat Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon101.98% 3.55% -7.19%
Dar Global 16.72%11.65%3.68%

Dar Global has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Dar Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M22.13-£55.32M£4.9932.14
Dar Global£538.62M0.03£49.60M£56.000.15

Summary

Dar Global beats Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BGS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BGS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricBaillie Gifford Shin NipponAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£320.36M£2.45B£6.07B£2.78B
Dividend Yield0.42%6.03%5.27%6.16%
P/E Ratio32.1425.8716.31365.72
Price / Sales22.132,081.971,100.8686,253.69
Price / Cash141.2160.1684.9827.85
Price / Book1.181.376.637.92
Net Income-£55.32M£264.62M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.52%-0.64%-0.41%-0.87%
1 Month Performance-1.47%-0.17%1.00%-0.76%
1 Year Performance33.67%10.15%20.45%70.67%

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BGS
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon
N/AGBX 160.40
-2.2%		N/A+35.1%£320.36M£14.48M32.143,080
THS
Tharisa
3.1297 of 5 stars		GBX 119
+0.8%		GBX 177.50
+49.2%		+46.8%£352.59M£748.73M3.037,500
FLO
Flowtech Fluidpower
1.7005 of 5 stars		GBX 54.22
flat		GBX 100
+84.4%		-1.6%£44.16M£116.92MN/A582
MED
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£39.06M£5.28MN/A870
PPC
President Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/A£15.95M£34.68M156.5761,500

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:BGS) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
The roadshow starts Monday. This stock isn't ready.
The SpaceX roadshow kicks off June 8. Goldman Sachs, the lead underwriter, will present the full S-1 to the wo...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Do NOT Buy SpaceX – Do This Instead
SpaceX just went public - and Whitney Tilson, Harvard MBA and 30-year Wall Street veteran, says buying in coul...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump just signed it
A recent policy development is drawing attention from income-focused investors. According to one analyst, c...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX is chump change compared to Elon’s $20T ‘iPhone’
Early Apple investors saw peak gains as high as 7,537% after the iPhone launched. Now, multiple insider source...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel