Go Pro

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (BGS) Competitors

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon logo
GBX 178 +1.40 (+0.79%)
As of 10/2/2026 12:00 PM Eastern

BGS vs. TMPL, IHP, JFJ, GROW, and FCSS

Should you buy Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon stock or one of its competitors? Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's main competitors and comparable companies include Temple Bar (TMPL), IntegraFin (IHP), JPMorgan Japanese (JFJ), Molten Ventures (GROW), and Fidelity China Special (FCSS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon compare to Temple Bar?

Temple Bar (LON:TMPL) and Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

10.7% of Temple Bar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.5% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Temple Bar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Temple Bar has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Temple Bar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Temple Bar£222.42M5.68£154.90M£75.205.47
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M23.62-£55.32M£4.9935.67

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 251.87% compared to Temple Bar's net margin of 74.06%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity of 21.47% beat Temple Bar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Temple Bar74.06% 19.52% 7.08%
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon 251.87%21.47%-7.19%

In the previous week, Temple Bar had 1 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Temple Bar and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Temple Bar's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's score of 0.00 indicating that Temple Bar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Temple Bar Positive
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral

Temple Bar has a beta of 1.151, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a beta of 0.832, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Temple Bar pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Temple Bar pays out 20.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays out 12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Temple Bar beats Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon compare to IntegraFin?

IntegraFin (LON:IHP) and Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

IntegraFin has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. IntegraFin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IntegraFin£165.40M7.23£52.54M£19.1018.95
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M23.62-£55.32M£4.9935.67

IntegraFin presently has a consensus price target of GBX 435, suggesting a potential upside of 20.17%. Given IntegraFin's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe IntegraFin is more favorable than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
IntegraFin
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 251.87% compared to IntegraFin's net margin of 28.60%. IntegraFin's return on equity of 27.60% beat Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IntegraFin28.60% 27.60% 20.29%
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon 251.87%21.47%-7.19%

44.0% of IntegraFin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.5% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.5% of IntegraFin shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, IntegraFin's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
IntegraFin Neutral
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral

IntegraFin has a beta of 1.276, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a beta of 0.832, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

IntegraFin pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. IntegraFin pays out 59.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays out 12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

IntegraFin beats Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon compare to JPMorgan Japanese?

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) and JPMorgan Japanese (LON:JFJ) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

JPMorgan Japanese has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. JPMorgan Japanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M23.62-£55.32M£4.9935.67
JPMorgan Japanese£245.55M5.14£194.81M£149.065.65

8.5% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.9% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of JPMorgan Japanese shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 251.87% compared to JPMorgan Japanese's net margin of 96.52%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity of 21.47% beat JPMorgan Japanese's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon251.87% 21.47% -7.19%
JPMorgan Japanese 96.52%20.00%8.06%

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Japanese'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral
JPMorgan Japanese Neutral

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. JPMorgan Japanese pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays out 12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan Japanese pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. JPMorgan Japanese is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a beta of 0.832, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Japanese has a beta of 1.026, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

JPMorgan Japanese beats Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon compare to Molten Ventures?

Molten Ventures (LON:GROW) and Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and risk.

Molten Ventures has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Molten Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Molten Ventures£148M7.87-£33.58M£69.009.78
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M23.62-£55.32M£4.9935.67

Molten Ventures currently has a consensus price target of GBX 638.67, suggesting a potential downside of 5.31%. Given Molten Ventures' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Molten Ventures is more favorable than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Molten Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

40.5% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.5% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Molten Ventures shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 251.87% compared to Molten Ventures' net margin of 75.09%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity of 21.47% beat Molten Ventures' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Molten Ventures75.09% 9.21% -3.46%
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon 251.87%21.47%-7.19%

In the previous week, Molten Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Molten Ventures Neutral
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral

Molten Ventures has a beta of 1.9564402, suggesting that its share price is 96% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a beta of 0.832, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Molten Ventures beats Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon compare to Fidelity China Special?

Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) and Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability and valuation.

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 251.87% compared to Fidelity China Special's net margin of 81.41%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity of 21.47% beat Fidelity China Special's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity China Special81.41% 9.12% N/A
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon 251.87%21.47%-7.19%

In the previous week, Fidelity China Special had 1 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fidelity China Special and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Fidelity China Special's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity China Special is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity China Special Positive
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral

Fidelity China Special has a beta of 0.919, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a beta of 0.832, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.5% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Fidelity China Special shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelity China Special pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Fidelity China Special pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays out 12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Fidelity China Special has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Fidelity China Special is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity China Special£146.54M7.68£997.06M£29.758.32
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M23.62-£55.32M£4.9935.67

Summary

Fidelity China Special beats Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BGS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BGS vs. The Competition

MetricBaillie Gifford Shin NipponCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£341.99M£5.16B£13.12B£2.45B
Dividend Yield0.40%7.57%6.03%6.18%
P/E Ratio35.6729.3824.51366.16
Price / Sales23.621,215.22501.3489,427.16
Price / Cash141.2147.6745.5127.89
Price / Book1.313.482.706.83
Net Income-£55.32M£416.56M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.06%-0.74%-1.04%-0.72%
1 Month Performance2.89%-2.71%-3.20%-1.01%
1 Year Performance33.83%9.00%10.47%22.82%

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BGS
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon
N/AGBX 178
+0.8%
N/A+33.8%£341.99M£14.48M35.673,080
TMPL
Temple Bar
N/AGBX 417.50
+0.8%
N/A+14.2%£1.28B£222.42M5.55N/A
IHP
IntegraFin
N/AGBX 382.09
+3.0%
GBX 435
+13.8%
+2.7%£1.26B£165.40M20.003,520
JFJ
JPMorgan Japanese
N/AGBX 816
+1.6%
N/A+22.0%£1.22B£245.55M5.47N/A
GROW
Molten Ventures
0.6196 of 5 stars
GBX 679.50
+1.6%
GBX 638.67
-6.0%
+69.5%£1.17B£148M9.8520

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:BGS) was last updated on 10/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners