Go Pro

Dar Global (DAR) Competitors

Dar Global logo
GBX 6.50 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 09/14/2026 11:58 AM Eastern

DAR vs. GLB, ZAM, DKL, UKR, and OHT

Should you buy Dar Global stock or one of its competitors? Dar Global's main competitors and comparable companies include Glanbia (GLB), Zambeef Products (ZAM), Dekel Agri-Vision (DKL), Ukrproduct Group (UKR), and Ocean Harvest Technology Group (OHT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "food products" industry.

How does Dar Global compare to Glanbia?

Glanbia (LON:GLB) and Dar Global (LON:DAR) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

29.7% of Glanbia shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Glanbia shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 88.0% of Dar Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Glanbia's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Dar Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Glanbia Neutral
Dar Global Neutral

Dar Global has a net margin of 16.72% compared to Glanbia's net margin of 5.78%. Glanbia's return on equity of 12.30% beat Dar Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Glanbia5.78% 12.30% 6.05%
Dar Global 16.72%11.65%3.68%

Glanbia has higher revenue and earnings than Dar Global. Dar Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Glanbia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Glanbia£3.95B0.01£12.80B£72.440.29
Dar Global£538.62M0.02£49.60M£56.000.12

Summary

Glanbia beats Dar Global on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Dar Global compare to Zambeef Products?

Zambeef Products (LON:ZAM) and Dar Global (LON:DAR) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Dar Global has a net margin of 16.72% compared to Zambeef Products' net margin of 3.29%. Dar Global's return on equity of 11.65% beat Zambeef Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zambeef Products3.29% 3.89% 1.75%
Dar Global 16.72%11.65%3.68%

Zambeef Products has higher revenue and earnings than Dar Global. Zambeef Products is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dar Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zambeef Products£8.15B0.00£3.93B£65.940.08
Dar Global£538.62M0.02£49.60M£56.000.12

1.5% of Zambeef Products shares are held by institutional investors. 8.6% of Zambeef Products shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 88.0% of Dar Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Zambeef Products' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Dar Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zambeef Products Neutral
Dar Global Neutral

Summary

Dar Global beats Zambeef Products on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Dar Global compare to Dekel Agri-Vision?

Dar Global (LON:DAR) and Dekel Agri-Vision (LON:DKL) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

5.0% of Dekel Agri-Vision shares are held by institutional investors. 88.0% of Dar Global shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 53.6% of Dekel Agri-Vision shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dar Global has higher revenue and earnings than Dekel Agri-Vision. Dekel Agri-Vision is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dar Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dar Global£538.62M0.02£49.60M£56.000.12
Dekel Agri-Vision£33.94M0.14-£6.41M-£1.00N/A

In the previous week, Dekel Agri-Vision had 2 more articles in the media than Dar Global. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Dekel Agri-Vision and 0 mentions for Dar Global. Dekel Agri-Vision's average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat Dar Global's score of 0.00 indicating that Dekel Agri-Vision is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Dar Global Neutral
Dekel Agri-Vision Neutral

Dar Global has a net margin of 16.72% compared to Dekel Agri-Vision's net margin of -13.26%. Dar Global's return on equity of 11.65% beat Dekel Agri-Vision's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dar Global16.72% 11.65% 3.68%
Dekel Agri-Vision -13.26%-63.17%-2.67%

Summary

Dar Global beats Dekel Agri-Vision on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Dar Global compare to Ukrproduct Group?

Dar Global (LON:DAR) and Ukrproduct Group (LON:UKR) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

Dar Global has higher revenue and earnings than Ukrproduct Group. Ukrproduct Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dar Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dar Global£538.62M0.02£49.60M£56.000.12
Ukrproduct Group£42.19M0.08N/A-£0.43N/A

0.0% of Ukrproduct Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 88.0% of Dar Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 76.0% of Ukrproduct Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Dar Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ukrproduct Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Dar Global Neutral
Ukrproduct Group Neutral

Dar Global has a net margin of 16.72% compared to Ukrproduct Group's net margin of 1.79%. Ukrproduct Group's return on equity of 12.82% beat Dar Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dar Global16.72% 11.65% 3.68%
Ukrproduct Group 1.79%12.82%7.33%

Summary

Dar Global beats Ukrproduct Group on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Dar Global compare to Ocean Harvest Technology Group?

Ocean Harvest Technology Group (LON:OHT) and Dar Global (LON:DAR) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Ocean Harvest Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Dar Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ocean Harvest Technology Group Neutral
Dar Global Neutral

6.8% of Ocean Harvest Technology Group shares are held by institutional investors. 77.9% of Ocean Harvest Technology Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 88.0% of Dar Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dar Global has a net margin of 16.72% compared to Ocean Harvest Technology Group's net margin of -101.14%. Dar Global's return on equity of 11.65% beat Ocean Harvest Technology Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ocean Harvest Technology Group-101.14% -107.80% -33.75%
Dar Global 16.72%11.65%3.68%

Dar Global has higher revenue and earnings than Ocean Harvest Technology Group. Ocean Harvest Technology Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dar Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ocean Harvest Technology Group£2.57M0.49-£3.35M-£0.02N/A
Dar Global£538.62M0.02£49.60M£56.000.12

Summary

Dar Global beats Ocean Harvest Technology Group on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Dar Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for DAR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding DAR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

DAR vs. The Competition

MetricDar GlobalFood Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£11.70M£5.53B£15.68B£2.86B
Dividend YieldN/A3.18%3.26%6.26%
P/E Ratio0.1213.5614.08367.04
Price / Sales0.0283.22262,279.4790,021.68
Price / CashN/A113.0855.9827.89
Price / Book0.033.824.806.37
Net Income£49.60M£765.60M£834.43M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-13.33%-1.64%-1.25%-0.78%
1 Month Performance-22.16%-1.99%-2.24%-0.68%
1 Year Performance-20.25%39.30%11.30%19.42%

Dar Global Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
DAR
Dar Global
N/AGBX 6.50
flat
N/A-20.2%£11.70M£538.62M0.1214,600
GLB
Glanbia
N/AGBX 22.59
+1.8%
N/A+55.3%£54.60M£3.95B0.315,534
ZAM
Zambeef Products
N/AGBX 5.15
+3.0%
N/A+32.5%£31.37M£8.15B0.087,000
DKL
Dekel Agri-Vision
N/AGBX 0.35
-10.9%
N/A-30.3%£4.24M£33.94MN/A2,020
UKR
Ukrproduct Group
N/AGBX 7.03
+0.4%
N/A+23.1%£2.79M£42.19MN/A836

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:DAR) was last updated on 9/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners