Go Pro
→ Do this before December or regret it (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free THS Stock Alerts

Tharisa (THS) Competitors

Tharisa logo
GBX 113 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/24/2026 11:54 AM Eastern
Compare

THS vs. BGS, FLO, MED, PPC, and DAR

Should you buy Tharisa stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Tharisa with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Tharisa include Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (BGS), Flowtech Fluidpower (FLO), Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) (MED), President Energy (PPC), and Dar Global (DAR). These companies are all part of the "food products" industry.

How does Tharisa compare to Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon?

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) and Tharisa (LON:THS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Tharisa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M21.74-£55.32M£4.9931.70
Tharisa£748.73M0.45£96.84M£39.302.88

Tharisa has a consensus target price of GBX 177.50, suggesting a potential upside of 57.08%. Given Tharisa's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Tharisa is more favorable than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Tharisa pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays out 12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tharisa pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tharisa is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 101.98% compared to Tharisa's net margin of 16.17%. Tharisa's return on equity of 14.75% beat Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon101.98% 3.55% -7.19%
Tharisa 16.17%14.75%5.09%

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon had 1 more articles in the media than Tharisa. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon and 0 mentions for Tharisa. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tharisa'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral
Tharisa Neutral

8.5% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.7% of Tharisa shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Tharisa shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a beta of 0.9284452, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tharisa has a beta of 0.693, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Tharisa beats Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tharisa compare to Flowtech Fluidpower?

Flowtech Fluidpower (LON:FLO) and Tharisa (LON:THS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, Flowtech Fluidpower's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tharisa'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Flowtech Fluidpower Neutral
Tharisa Neutral

Flowtech Fluidpower currently has a consensus price target of GBX 100, indicating a potential upside of 64.45%. Tharisa has a consensus price target of GBX 177.50, indicating a potential upside of 57.08%. Given Flowtech Fluidpower's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Flowtech Fluidpower is more favorable than Tharisa.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Flowtech Fluidpower
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

17.2% of Flowtech Fluidpower shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.7% of Tharisa shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Flowtech Fluidpower shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Tharisa shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than Flowtech Fluidpower. Flowtech Fluidpower is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tharisa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flowtech Fluidpower£116.92M0.42-£14.47M-£5.24N/A
Tharisa£748.73M0.45£96.84M£39.302.88

Tharisa has a net margin of 16.17% compared to Flowtech Fluidpower's net margin of -2.84%. Tharisa's return on equity of 14.75% beat Flowtech Fluidpower's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Flowtech Fluidpower-2.84% -8.17% 1.96%
Tharisa 16.17%14.75%5.09%

Flowtech Fluidpower has a beta of 0.555, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tharisa has a beta of 0.693, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Tharisa beats Flowtech Fluidpower on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tharisa compare to Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)?

Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) (LON:MED) and Tharisa (LON:THS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L). Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tharisa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)£5.28M0.00N/A-£1.90N/A
Tharisa£748.73M0.45£96.84M£39.302.88

Tharisa has a net margin of 16.17% compared to Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Tharisa's return on equity of 14.75% beat Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)N/A N/A N/A
Tharisa 16.17%14.75%5.09%

In the previous week, Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tharisa'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) Neutral
Tharisa Neutral

1.7% of Tharisa shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Tharisa shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tharisa has a consensus target price of GBX 177.50, suggesting a potential upside of 57.08%. Given Tharisa's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Tharisa is more favorable than Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Tharisa beats Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tharisa compare to President Energy?

President Energy (LON:PPC) and Tharisa (LON:THS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Tharisa has a net margin of 16.17% compared to President Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Tharisa's return on equity of 14.75% beat President Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
President EnergyN/A N/A N/A
Tharisa 16.17%14.75%5.09%

1.7% of Tharisa shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Tharisa shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, President Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tharisa'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
President Energy Neutral
Tharisa Neutral

Tharisa has a consensus target price of GBX 177.50, suggesting a potential upside of 57.08%. Given Tharisa's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Tharisa is more favorable than President Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
President Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than President Energy. President Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tharisa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
President Energy£34.68M0.00N/A£0.99N/A
Tharisa£748.73M0.45£96.84M£39.302.88

Summary

Tharisa beats President Energy on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tharisa compare to Dar Global?

Tharisa (LON:THS) and Dar Global (LON:DAR) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

1.7% of Tharisa shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Tharisa shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 88.0% of Dar Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tharisa presently has a consensus target price of GBX 177.50, indicating a potential upside of 57.08%. Given Tharisa's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Tharisa is more favorable than Dar Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Dar Global
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Dar Global has a net margin of 16.72% compared to Tharisa's net margin of 16.17%. Tharisa's return on equity of 14.75% beat Dar Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tharisa16.17% 14.75% 5.09%
Dar Global 16.72%11.65%3.68%

In the previous week, Tharisa's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Dar Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tharisa Neutral
Dar Global Neutral

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than Dar Global. Dar Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tharisa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tharisa£748.73M0.45£96.84M£39.302.88
Dar Global£538.62M0.03£49.60M£56.000.14

Summary

Tharisa beats Dar Global on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tharisa News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for THS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding THS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

THS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricTharisaOther Precious Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£324.16M£579.53M£4.58B£2.58B
Dividend Yield3.31%6.10%5.02%6.17%
P/E Ratio2.8812.4421.09368.39
Price / Sales0.453,595.105,743.8784,422.84
Price / Cash2.1013.0426.3027.89
Price / Book0.4556.158.577.41
Net Income£96.84M-£4.87M£157.08M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.88%3.54%1.19%0.39%
1 Month PerformanceN/A0.36%-1.61%0.27%
1 Year Performance22.83%43.65%35.52%68.12%

Tharisa Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
THS
Tharisa
2.7058 of 5 stars		GBX 113
flat		GBX 177.50
+57.1%		+22.8%£324.16M£748.73M2.887,500
BGS
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon
N/AGBX 159.40
-2.4%		N/A+24.2%£317.17M£14.48M31.943,080
FLO
Flowtech Fluidpower
1.751 of 5 stars		GBX 63
+1.6%		GBX 100
+58.7%		-0.3%£51.31M£116.92MN/A582
MED
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£39.06M£5.28MN/A870
PPC
President Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/A£15.95M£34.68M156.5761,500

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:THS) was last updated on 7/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran
For a moment… Forget about Trump’s ties to Israel. Forget about reports of Iran’s nuclear program. Be...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Oxford Club Analyst’s Urgent AI Warning
Alexander Green, Chief Investment Strategist at The Oxford Club, is sharing a private presentation with a warn...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The 90%-off options that empty accounts
A call that cost $3.00 last month now trades for $0.30 - a 90% discount that looks tempting. It's not a bar...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trade I’ve been waiting for since 2011
Ross Givens, Director of Research at Traders Agency, is calling for gold to reach $10,000 an ounce this superc...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Weekly Options Trick Wall Street Doesn't Advertise
The most profitable trading desks don't guess market direction, they collect income regardless of it. A 25-yea...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Have you seen Elon’s new “supercurrency”? (It affects you)
Elon Musk just became the world's first trillionaire following the biggest IPO in history, giving him access t...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel