Free Trial

Tharisa (THS) Competitors

Tharisa logo
GBX 116 +4.00 (+3.57%)
As of 12:09 PM Eastern

THS vs. BGS, MED, FLO, PPC, and DAR

Should you be buying Tharisa stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Tharisa include Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (BGS), Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) (MED), Flowtech Fluidpower (FLO), President Energy (PPC), and Dar Global (DAR). These companies are all part of the "food products" industry.

How does Tharisa compare to Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon?

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) and Tharisa (LON:THS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Tharisa has a consensus price target of GBX 177.50, indicating a potential upside of 53.02%. Given Tharisa's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Tharisa is more favorable than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tharisa'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral
Tharisa Neutral

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a beta of 0.8860987, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tharisa has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Tharisa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M20.69-£55.32M£4.9929.18
Tharisa£670.22M0.51£96.84M£26.004.46

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Tharisa pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays out 12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tharisa pays out 17.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 101.98% compared to Tharisa's net margin of 12.17%. Tharisa's return on equity of 10.95% beat Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon101.98% 3.55% -7.19%
Tharisa 12.17%10.95%5.09%

16.0% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.7% of Tharisa shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Tharisa shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Tharisa beats Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tharisa compare to Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)?

Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) (LON:MED) and Tharisa (LON:THS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

1.7% of Tharisa shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Tharisa shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tharisa has a net margin of 12.17% compared to Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Tharisa's return on equity of 10.95% beat Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)N/A N/A N/A
Tharisa 12.17%10.95%5.09%

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L). Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tharisa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)£5.28M0.00N/A-£1.90N/A
Tharisa£670.22M0.51£96.84M£26.004.46

Tharisa has a consensus price target of GBX 177.50, indicating a potential upside of 53.02%. Given Tharisa's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Tharisa is more favorable than Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tharisa'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) Neutral
Tharisa Neutral

Summary

Tharisa beats Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tharisa compare to Flowtech Fluidpower?

Flowtech Fluidpower (LON:FLO) and Tharisa (LON:THS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

16.4% of Flowtech Fluidpower shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.7% of Tharisa shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Flowtech Fluidpower shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Tharisa shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Flowtech Fluidpower has a beta of 0.553, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tharisa has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Tharisa has a net margin of 12.17% compared to Flowtech Fluidpower's net margin of -2.84%. Tharisa's return on equity of 10.95% beat Flowtech Fluidpower's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Flowtech Fluidpower-2.84% -8.17% 1.96%
Tharisa 12.17%10.95%5.09%

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than Flowtech Fluidpower. Flowtech Fluidpower is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tharisa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flowtech Fluidpower£116.92M0.30-£14.47M-£5.24N/A
Tharisa£670.22M0.51£96.84M£26.004.46

Flowtech Fluidpower currently has a consensus price target of GBX 100, indicating a potential upside of 131.43%. Tharisa has a consensus price target of GBX 177.50, indicating a potential upside of 53.02%. Given Flowtech Fluidpower's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Flowtech Fluidpower is more favorable than Tharisa.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Flowtech Fluidpower
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Flowtech Fluidpower's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tharisa'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Flowtech Fluidpower Neutral
Tharisa Neutral

Summary

Tharisa beats Flowtech Fluidpower on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tharisa compare to President Energy?

President Energy (LON:PPC) and Tharisa (LON:THS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than President Energy. President Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tharisa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
President Energy£34.68M0.00N/A£0.99N/A
Tharisa£670.22M0.51£96.84M£26.004.46

In the previous week, President Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tharisa'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
President Energy Neutral
Tharisa Neutral

Tharisa has a consensus price target of GBX 177.50, indicating a potential upside of 53.02%. Given Tharisa's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Tharisa is more favorable than President Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
President Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

1.7% of Tharisa shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Tharisa shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tharisa has a net margin of 12.17% compared to President Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Tharisa's return on equity of 10.95% beat President Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
President EnergyN/A N/A N/A
Tharisa 12.17%10.95%5.09%

Summary

Tharisa beats President Energy on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tharisa compare to Dar Global?

Tharisa (LON:THS) and Dar Global (LON:DAR) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than Dar Global. Dar Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tharisa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tharisa£670.22M0.51£96.84M£26.004.46
Dar Global£538.62M0.03£49.60M£56.000.13

In the previous week, Tharisa's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Dar Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tharisa Neutral
Dar Global Neutral

Tharisa currently has a consensus price target of GBX 177.50, indicating a potential upside of 53.02%. Given Tharisa's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Tharisa is more favorable than Dar Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Dar Global
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

1.7% of Tharisa shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Tharisa shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 88.0% of Dar Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dar Global has a net margin of 16.72% compared to Tharisa's net margin of 12.17%. Dar Global's return on equity of 11.65% beat Tharisa's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tharisa12.17% 10.95% 5.09%
Dar Global 16.72%11.65%3.68%

Summary

Tharisa beats Dar Global on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tharisa News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for THS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

THS vs. The Competition

MetricTharisaOther Precious Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£343.66M£653.10M£4.71B£2.73B
Dividend Yield2.03%6.03%4.98%6.11%
P/E Ratio4.4612.3421.30365.30
Price / Sales0.513,619.857,361.2987,989.37
Price / Cash2.1013.0427.2827.89
Price / Book0.4613.617.707.39
Net Income£96.84M-£4.87M£159.29M£5.89B
7 Day Performance4.50%-2.03%0.01%0.88%
1 Month Performance1.75%-0.03%2.58%5.27%
1 Year Performance107.14%102.76%76.05%80.43%

Tharisa Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
THS
Tharisa
N/AGBX 116
+3.6%
GBX 177.50
+53.0%
N/A£343.66M£670.22M4.467,500
BGS
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon
N/AGBX 146.80
flat
N/AN/A£301.97M£8.93M57.803,080
MED
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£39.06M£5.28MN/A870
FLO
Flowtech Fluidpower
3.0246 of 5 stars
GBX 45.13
-1.9%
GBX 100
+121.6%
N/A£36.75M£116.92MN/A582
PPC
President Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/A£15.95M£34.68M156.5761,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:THS) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners