Free Trial

Tharisa (THS) Competitors

Tharisa logo
GBX 120.75 +2.75 (+2.33%)
As of 05:24 AM Eastern

THS vs. BGS, FLO, MED, PPC, and DAR

Should you buy Tharisa stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Tharisa with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Tharisa include Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (BGS), Flowtech Fluidpower (FLO), Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) (MED), President Energy (PPC), and Dar Global (DAR). These companies are all part of the "food products" industry.

How does Tharisa compare to Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon?

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon (LON:BGS) and Tharisa (LON:THS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a beta of 0.92498237, indicating that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tharisa has a beta of 0.684, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tharisa had 1 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tharisa and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tharisa'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon Neutral
Tharisa Neutral

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon. Tharisa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon£14.48M22.06-£55.32M£4.9932.05
Tharisa£748.73M0.48£96.84M£39.303.07

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon has a net margin of 101.98% compared to Tharisa's net margin of 16.17%. Tharisa's return on equity of 14.75% beat Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon101.98% 3.55% -7.19%
Tharisa 16.17%14.75%5.09%

Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Tharisa pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon pays out 12.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tharisa pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tharisa is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

8.5% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.7% of Tharisa shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Tharisa shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tharisa has a consensus target price of GBX 177.50, suggesting a potential upside of 47.00%. Given Tharisa's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Tharisa is more favorable than Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Tharisa beats Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tharisa compare to Flowtech Fluidpower?

Flowtech Fluidpower (LON:FLO) and Tharisa (LON:THS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

17.2% of Flowtech Fluidpower shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.7% of Tharisa shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Flowtech Fluidpower shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Tharisa shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Flowtech Fluidpower presently has a consensus price target of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 84.43%. Tharisa has a consensus price target of GBX 177.50, suggesting a potential upside of 47.00%. Given Flowtech Fluidpower's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Flowtech Fluidpower is more favorable than Tharisa.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Flowtech Fluidpower
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Flowtech Fluidpower has a beta of 0.559, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tharisa has a beta of 0.684, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Tharisa has a net margin of 16.17% compared to Flowtech Fluidpower's net margin of -2.84%. Tharisa's return on equity of 14.75% beat Flowtech Fluidpower's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Flowtech Fluidpower-2.84% -8.17% 1.96%
Tharisa 16.17%14.75%5.09%

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than Flowtech Fluidpower. Flowtech Fluidpower is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tharisa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flowtech Fluidpower£116.92M0.38-£14.47M-£5.24N/A
Tharisa£748.73M0.48£96.84M£39.303.07

In the previous week, Flowtech Fluidpower and Flowtech Fluidpower both had 1 articles in the media. Flowtech Fluidpower's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Tharisa's score of 0.00 indicating that Flowtech Fluidpower is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Flowtech Fluidpower
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Tharisa
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Tharisa beats Flowtech Fluidpower on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tharisa compare to Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)?

Tharisa (LON:THS) and Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) (LON:MED) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

1.7% of Tharisa shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Tharisa shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L). Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tharisa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tharisa£748.73M0.48£96.84M£39.303.07
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)£5.28M0.00N/A-£1.90N/A

In the previous week, Tharisa had 1 more articles in the media than Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tharisa and 0 mentions for Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L). Tharisa's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tharisa Neutral
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) Neutral

Tharisa has a net margin of 16.17% compared to Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Tharisa's return on equity of 14.75% beat Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tharisa16.17% 14.75% 5.09%
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) N/A N/A N/A

Tharisa presently has a consensus target price of GBX 177.50, indicating a potential upside of 47.00%. Given Tharisa's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Tharisa is more favorable than Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Tharisa beats Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L) on 12 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tharisa compare to President Energy?

President Energy (LON:PPC) and Tharisa (LON:THS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Tharisa has a net margin of 16.17% compared to President Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Tharisa's return on equity of 14.75% beat President Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
President EnergyN/A N/A N/A
Tharisa 16.17%14.75%5.09%

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than President Energy. President Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tharisa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
President Energy£34.68M0.00N/A£0.99N/A
Tharisa£748.73M0.48£96.84M£39.303.07

In the previous week, Tharisa had 1 more articles in the media than President Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tharisa and 0 mentions for President Energy. President Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tharisa'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
President Energy Neutral
Tharisa Neutral

Tharisa has a consensus price target of GBX 177.50, suggesting a potential upside of 47.00%. Given Tharisa's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Tharisa is more favorable than President Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
President Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

1.7% of Tharisa shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Tharisa shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Tharisa beats President Energy on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tharisa compare to Dar Global?

Dar Global (LON:DAR) and Tharisa (LON:THS) are both small-cap food products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Dar Global has a net margin of 16.72% compared to Tharisa's net margin of 16.17%. Tharisa's return on equity of 14.75% beat Dar Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dar Global16.72% 11.65% 3.68%
Tharisa 16.17%14.75%5.09%

Tharisa has a consensus target price of GBX 177.50, suggesting a potential upside of 47.00%. Given Tharisa's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Tharisa is more favorable than Dar Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dar Global
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Tharisa
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Tharisa had 1 more articles in the media than Dar Global. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tharisa and 0 mentions for Dar Global. Dar Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tharisa'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Dar Global Neutral
Tharisa Neutral

Tharisa has higher revenue and earnings than Dar Global. Dar Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tharisa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dar Global£538.62M0.03£49.60M£56.000.15
Tharisa£748.73M0.48£96.84M£39.303.07

1.7% of Tharisa shares are owned by institutional investors. 88.0% of Dar Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Tharisa shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Tharisa beats Dar Global on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tharisa News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for THS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

THS vs. The Competition

MetricTharisaOther Precious Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£357.77M£654.10M£4.81B£2.82B
Dividend Yield3.23%6.08%4.99%6.18%
P/E Ratio3.0713.0923.34367.09
Price / Sales0.483,697.845,584.4886,383.74
Price / Cash2.1013.0424.2827.87
Price / Book0.4859.059.147.83
Net Income£96.84M-£4.87M£156.77M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.83%1.43%0.83%1.13%
1 Month Performance-4.17%-9.71%-3.42%2.26%
1 Year Performance45.48%64.04%57.93%76.62%

Tharisa Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
THS
Tharisa
3.0485 of 5 stars
GBX 120.75
+2.3%
GBX 177.50
+47.0%
+42.2%£357.77M£748.73M3.077,500
BGS
Baillie Gifford Shin Nippon
N/AGBX 159.60
+1.8%
N/A+31.8%£319.30M£14.48M31.983,080
FLO
Flowtech Fluidpower
2.7415 of 5 stars
GBX 56
flat
GBX 100
+78.6%
-12.1%£45.60M£116.92MN/A582
MED
Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc (MED.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£39.06M£5.28MN/A870
PPC
President Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/A£15.95M£34.68M156.5761,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:THS) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners