Go Pro
→ My top 3 AI picks for the next decade (From The Oxford Club) (Ad)tc pixel Free CIC Stock Alerts

Conygar Investment (CIC) Competitors

Conygar Investment logo
GBX 24.58 +0.08 (+0.31%)
As of 03:47 AM Eastern
Compare

CIC vs. TRAF, INL, OHG, ASPL, and HWG

Should you buy Conygar Investment stock or one of its competitors? Conygar Investment's main competitors and comparable companies include Trafalgar Property Group (TRAF), Inland Homes (INL), One Heritage Group (OHG), Aseana Properties (ASPL), and Harworth Group (HWG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "real estate development" industry.

How does Conygar Investment compare to Trafalgar Property Group?

Trafalgar Property Group (LON:TRAF) and Conygar Investment (LON:CIC) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

11.2% of Conygar Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.9% of Trafalgar Property Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.0% of Conygar Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Conygar Investment had 1 more articles in the media than Trafalgar Property Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Conygar Investment and 0 mentions for Trafalgar Property Group. Trafalgar Property Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Conygar Investment'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Trafalgar Property Group Neutral
Conygar Investment Neutral

Trafalgar Property Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Conygar Investment's net margin of -29.54%. Trafalgar Property Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Conygar Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trafalgar Property GroupN/A N/A -21.70%
Conygar Investment -29.54%-19.67%-5.03%

Trafalgar Property Group has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conygar Investment has a beta of 0.474, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Trafalgar Property Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Conygar Investment. Conygar Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trafalgar Property Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trafalgar Property Group£714.60K13.32N/A-£50.00N/A
Conygar Investment£32.12M0.46-£31.48M-£15.91N/A

Summary

Trafalgar Property Group beats Conygar Investment on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conygar Investment compare to Inland Homes?

Inland Homes (LON:INL) and Conygar Investment (LON:CIC) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Inland Homes has a net margin of 3.80% compared to Conygar Investment's net margin of -29.54%. Inland Homes' return on equity of 4.09% beat Conygar Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Inland Homes3.80% 4.09% 3.90%
Conygar Investment -29.54%-19.67%-5.03%

Inland Homes has higher revenue and earnings than Conygar Investment. Conygar Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Inland Homes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Inland Homes£184.20M0.00£6.90M£0.01N/A
Conygar Investment£32.12M0.46-£31.48M-£15.91N/A

Inland Homes has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conygar Investment has a beta of 0.474, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

10.0% of Inland Homes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.2% of Conygar Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 68.1% of Inland Homes shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.0% of Conygar Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Conygar Investment had 1 more articles in the media than Inland Homes. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Conygar Investment and 0 mentions for Inland Homes. Inland Homes' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Conygar Investment'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Inland Homes Neutral
Conygar Investment Neutral

Summary

Inland Homes beats Conygar Investment on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conygar Investment compare to One Heritage Group?

Conygar Investment (LON:CIC) and One Heritage Group (LON:OHG) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

11.2% of Conygar Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.0% of Conygar Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 81.3% of One Heritage Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Conygar Investment had 1 more articles in the media than One Heritage Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Conygar Investment and 0 mentions for One Heritage Group. Conygar Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled One Heritage Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Conygar Investment Neutral
One Heritage Group Neutral

Conygar Investment has a beta of 0.474, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, One Heritage Group has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

One Heritage Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Conygar Investment. Conygar Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Heritage Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Conygar Investment£32.12M0.46-£31.48M-£15.91N/A
One Heritage Group£19M0.00-£2.82M-£0.07N/A

One Heritage Group has a net margin of -14.86% compared to Conygar Investment's net margin of -29.54%. Conygar Investment's return on equity of -19.67% beat One Heritage Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Conygar Investment-29.54% -19.67% -5.03%
One Heritage Group -14.86%-83,575.24%-5.10%

Summary

Conygar Investment beats One Heritage Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conygar Investment compare to Aseana Properties?

Aseana Properties (LON:ASPL) and Conygar Investment (LON:CIC) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Conygar Investment had 1 more articles in the media than Aseana Properties. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Conygar Investment and 0 mentions for Aseana Properties. Aseana Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Conygar Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Aseana Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aseana Properties Positive
Conygar Investment Neutral

Aseana Properties has a beta of 0.4596019, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conygar Investment has a beta of 0.474, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Aseana Properties has a net margin of 32.63% compared to Conygar Investment's net margin of -29.54%. Aseana Properties' return on equity of 15.40% beat Conygar Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aseana Properties32.63% 15.40% -4.90%
Conygar Investment -29.54%-19.67%-5.03%

3.3% of Aseana Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.2% of Conygar Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 43.6% of Aseana Properties shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 26.0% of Conygar Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Conygar Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aseana Properties. Conygar Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aseana Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aseana Properties£44.13M0.00-£777.99M£5.350.01
Conygar Investment£32.12M0.46-£31.48M-£15.91N/A

Summary

Aseana Properties beats Conygar Investment on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conygar Investment compare to Harworth Group?

Harworth Group (LON:HWG) and Conygar Investment (LON:CIC) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Harworth Group has a beta of 0.538, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conygar Investment has a beta of 0.474, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Harworth Group has higher revenue and earnings than Conygar Investment. Conygar Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harworth Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harworth Group£129.75M4.46£50.80M£2.8063.57
Conygar Investment£32.12M0.46-£31.48M-£15.91N/A

In the previous week, Harworth Group had 2 more articles in the media than Conygar Investment. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Harworth Group and 1 mentions for Conygar Investment. Harworth Group's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Conygar Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Harworth Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Harworth Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Conygar Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

13.6% of Harworth Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.2% of Conygar Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Harworth Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 26.0% of Conygar Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Harworth Group has a net margin of 7.25% compared to Conygar Investment's net margin of -29.54%. Harworth Group's return on equity of 1.36% beat Conygar Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harworth Group7.25% 1.36% -1.45%
Conygar Investment -29.54%-19.67%-5.03%

Harworth Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 196.75, indicating a potential upside of 10.53%. Given Harworth Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Harworth Group is more favorable than Conygar Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Harworth Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Conygar Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Harworth Group beats Conygar Investment on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Conygar Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CIC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricConygar InvestmentReal Estate Management & Development IndustryReal Estate SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£14.66M£3.34B£5.70B£2.92B
Dividend Yield1.13%4.33%6.30%6.17%
P/E Ratio-1.5414.6629.22367.27
Price / Sales0.4692.21129.5983,460.67
Price / Cash4.6419.2334.3427.89
Price / Book0.242.882.207.12
Net Income-£31.48M-£436.16M-£63.99M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.50%0.76%0.87%0.74%
1 Month Performance-2.86%1.44%-0.32%3.13%
1 Year Performance-15.26%-8.22%11.93%22.34%

Conygar Investment Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CIC
Conygar Investment
N/AGBX 24.58
+0.3%		N/A-15.3%£14.66M£32.12MN/A111
TRAF
Trafalgar Property Group
N/AGBX 22.50
flat		N/A-22.7%£9.23M£714.60KN/A7
INL
Inland Homes
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.52M£184.20M200.00149
OHG
One Heritage Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.16M£19MN/A28
ASPL
Aseana Properties
N/AGBX 0.07
flat		N/AN/A£188K£44.13M0.01235

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CIC) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel