Go Pro
→ BlackRock and Vanguard already own THIS (From Monument Traders Alliance) (Ad)tc pixel Free CIC Stock Alerts

Conygar Investment (CIC) Competitors

Conygar Investment logo
GBX 25.46 +0.05 (+0.19%)
As of 12:49 PM Eastern
Compare

CIC vs. TRAF, INL, OHG, ASPL, and HWG

Should you buy Conygar Investment stock or one of its competitors? Conygar Investment's main competitors and comparable companies include Trafalgar Property Group (TRAF), Inland Homes (INL), One Heritage Group (OHG), Aseana Properties (ASPL), and Harworth Group (HWG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "real estate development" industry.

How does Conygar Investment compare to Trafalgar Property Group?

Conygar Investment (LON:CIC) and Trafalgar Property Group (LON:TRAF) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

11.2% of Conygar Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.0% of Conygar Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 46.9% of Trafalgar Property Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Conygar Investment has a beta of 0.474, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trafalgar Property Group has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Trafalgar Property Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Conygar Investment's net margin of -29.54%. Trafalgar Property Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Conygar Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Conygar Investment-29.54% -19.67% -5.03%
Trafalgar Property Group N/A N/A -21.70%

In the previous week, Conygar Investment had 4 more articles in the media than Trafalgar Property Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Conygar Investment and 0 mentions for Trafalgar Property Group. Conygar Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Trafalgar Property Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Conygar Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Conygar Investment Neutral
Trafalgar Property Group Neutral

Trafalgar Property Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Conygar Investment. Conygar Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trafalgar Property Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Conygar Investment£32.12M0.47-£31.48M-£15.91N/A
Trafalgar Property Group£714.60K10.90N/A-£50.00N/A

Summary

Conygar Investment and Trafalgar Property Group tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conygar Investment compare to Inland Homes?

Inland Homes (LON:INL) and Conygar Investment (LON:CIC) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Inland Homes has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conygar Investment has a beta of 0.474, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Inland Homes has a net margin of 3.80% compared to Conygar Investment's net margin of -29.54%. Inland Homes' return on equity of 4.09% beat Conygar Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Inland Homes3.80% 4.09% 3.90%
Conygar Investment -29.54%-19.67%-5.03%

In the previous week, Conygar Investment had 4 more articles in the media than Inland Homes. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Conygar Investment and 0 mentions for Inland Homes. Conygar Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Inland Homes' score of 0.00 indicating that Conygar Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Inland Homes Neutral
Conygar Investment Neutral

10.0% of Inland Homes shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.2% of Conygar Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 68.1% of Inland Homes shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.0% of Conygar Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Inland Homes has higher revenue and earnings than Conygar Investment. Conygar Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Inland Homes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Inland Homes£184.20M0.00£6.90M£0.01N/A
Conygar Investment£32.12M0.47-£31.48M-£15.91N/A

Summary

Inland Homes beats Conygar Investment on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conygar Investment compare to One Heritage Group?

Conygar Investment (LON:CIC) and One Heritage Group (LON:OHG) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk and analyst recommendations.

11.2% of Conygar Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 26.0% of Conygar Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 81.3% of One Heritage Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Conygar Investment has a beta of 0.474, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, One Heritage Group has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

One Heritage Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Conygar Investment. Conygar Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than One Heritage Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Conygar Investment£32.12M0.47-£31.48M-£15.91N/A
One Heritage Group£19M0.00-£2.82M-£0.07N/A

In the previous week, Conygar Investment had 4 more articles in the media than One Heritage Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Conygar Investment and 0 mentions for One Heritage Group. Conygar Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat One Heritage Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Conygar Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Conygar Investment Neutral
One Heritage Group Neutral

One Heritage Group has a net margin of -14.86% compared to Conygar Investment's net margin of -29.54%. Conygar Investment's return on equity of -19.67% beat One Heritage Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Conygar Investment-29.54% -19.67% -5.03%
One Heritage Group -14.86%-83,575.24%-5.10%

Summary

Conygar Investment beats One Heritage Group on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conygar Investment compare to Aseana Properties?

Conygar Investment (LON:CIC) and Aseana Properties (LON:ASPL) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

Conygar Investment has a beta of 0.474, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aseana Properties has a beta of 0.4596019, meaning that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Conygar Investment had 4 more articles in the media than Aseana Properties. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Conygar Investment and 0 mentions for Aseana Properties. Conygar Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Aseana Properties' score of 0.00 indicating that Conygar Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Conygar Investment Neutral
Aseana Properties Neutral

Aseana Properties has a net margin of 32.63% compared to Conygar Investment's net margin of -29.54%. Aseana Properties' return on equity of 15.40% beat Conygar Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Conygar Investment-29.54% -19.67% -5.03%
Aseana Properties 32.63%15.40%-4.90%

11.2% of Conygar Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.0% of Conygar Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Conygar Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Aseana Properties. Conygar Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aseana Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Conygar Investment£32.12M0.47-£31.48M-£15.91N/A
Aseana Properties£30.06M0.01-£777.99M£3.780.02

Summary

Conygar Investment beats Aseana Properties on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Conygar Investment compare to Harworth Group?

Conygar Investment (LON:CIC) and Harworth Group (LON:HWG) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

Harworth Group has a consensus target price of GBX 196.75, indicating a potential upside of 11.79%. Given Harworth Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Harworth Group is more favorable than Conygar Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Conygar Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Harworth Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Harworth Group had 4 more articles in the media than Conygar Investment. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Harworth Group and 4 mentions for Conygar Investment. Harworth Group's average media sentiment score of 0.24 beat Conygar Investment's score of 0.22 indicating that Harworth Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Conygar Investment Neutral
Harworth Group Neutral

Harworth Group has a net margin of -20.56% compared to Conygar Investment's net margin of -29.54%. Harworth Group's return on equity of -3.74% beat Conygar Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Conygar Investment-29.54% -19.67% -5.03%
Harworth Group -20.56%-3.74%-1.45%

11.2% of Conygar Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.7% of Harworth Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.0% of Conygar Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Harworth Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Harworth Group has higher revenue and earnings than Conygar Investment. Conygar Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harworth Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Conygar Investment£32.12M0.47-£31.48M-£15.91N/A
Harworth Group£123.55M4.63£50.80M£2.8062.86

Conygar Investment has a beta of 0.474, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harworth Group has a beta of 0.573, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Harworth Group beats Conygar Investment on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Conygar Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CIC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricConygar InvestmentReal Estate Management & Development IndustryReal Estate SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£15.18M£3.14B£5.43B£2.87B
Dividend Yield1.13%4.46%6.49%6.25%
P/E Ratio-1.6014.8028.20367.03
Price / Sales0.4787.24124.0989,972.82
Price / Cash4.6418.9334.0527.89
Price / Book0.252.041.816.30
Net Income-£31.48M-£436.24M-£63.40M£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.90%-2.04%-1.76%-1.13%
1 Month Performance3.08%-4.20%-3.87%-0.61%
1 Year Performance-10.82%-12.73%-1.09%19.59%

Conygar Investment Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CIC
Conygar Investment
N/AGBX 25.46
+0.2%		N/A-11.0%£15.18M£32.12MN/A111
TRAF
Trafalgar Property Group
N/AGBX 18.10
flat		N/A-35.7%£7.42M£714.60KN/A7
INL
Inland Homes
N/AN/AN/AN/A£5.52M£184.20M200.00149
OHG
One Heritage Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.16M£19MN/A28
ASPL
Aseana Properties
N/AGBX 0.07
flat		N/AN/A£203K£30.06M0.02235

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CIC) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Your backdoor link (still works)
Bill Poulos is offering a private link to download his book Simple Options Trading For Beginners, bypassing th...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock and Vanguard already own THIS
Institutions own roughly 88 percent of an overlooked American oil and natural gas company. BlackRock holds 32 ...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trade I’ve been waiting for since 2011
Ross Givens, Director of Research at Traders Agency, is calling for gold to reach $10,000 an ounce this superc...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
Gold majors have a big problem
Newmont spent 15 billion dollars acquiring Newcrest in 2023, the largest deal in gold mining history. Yet prod...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
Gold just passed our debt as the world's #1 asset
China's US Treasury holdings have fallen from a peak of $1.32 trillion to roughly $659 billion, an 18-year low...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
I don't write about politics. Until today.
Polls have favored a House flip all summer, and forecasters now expect Washington to change hands in November....
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
Jon Najarian's #1 Energy Trade for 2026
Jon Najarian says he's never been more excited about an energy opportunity. SpaceX just went public at over $2...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel