Go Pro

Aseana Properties (ASPL) Competitors

Aseana Properties logo
GBX 0.07 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 09/21/2026

ASPL vs. HWG, HKLD, CIC, TRAF, and INL

Should you buy Aseana Properties stock or one of its competitors? Aseana Properties's main competitors and comparable companies include Harworth Group (HWG), Hongkong Land (HKLD), Conygar Investment (CIC), Trafalgar Property Group (TRAF), and Inland Homes (INL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "real estate development" industry.

How does Aseana Properties compare to Harworth Group?

Aseana Properties (LON:ASPL) and Harworth Group (LON:HWG) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Harworth Group has higher revenue and earnings than Aseana Properties. Aseana Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harworth Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aseana Properties£30.06M0.01-£777.99M£3.780.02
Harworth Group£123.55M4.69£50.80M£2.8063.64

In the previous week, Harworth Group had 18 more articles in the media than Aseana Properties. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Harworth Group and 0 mentions for Aseana Properties. Harworth Group's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Aseana Properties' score of 0.00 indicating that Harworth Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aseana Properties Neutral
Harworth Group Neutral

3.3% of Aseana Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.7% of Harworth Group shares are held by institutional investors. 43.6% of Aseana Properties shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Harworth Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Harworth Group has a consensus target price of GBX 195, suggesting a potential upside of 9.43%. Given Harworth Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Harworth Group is more favorable than Aseana Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aseana Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Harworth Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Aseana Properties has a beta of 0.4596019, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harworth Group has a beta of 0.573, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Aseana Properties has a net margin of 32.63% compared to Harworth Group's net margin of -20.56%. Aseana Properties' return on equity of 15.40% beat Harworth Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aseana Properties32.63% 15.40% -4.90%
Harworth Group -20.56%-3.74%-1.45%

Summary

Harworth Group beats Aseana Properties on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aseana Properties compare to Hongkong Land?

Aseana Properties (LON:ASPL) and Hongkong Land (LON:HKLD) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Aseana Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Hongkong Land'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aseana Properties Neutral
Hongkong Land Neutral

3.3% of Aseana Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.7% of Hongkong Land shares are held by institutional investors. 43.6% of Aseana Properties shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Hongkong Land shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Aseana Properties has a net margin of 32.63% compared to Hongkong Land's net margin of -31.57%. Aseana Properties' return on equity of 15.40% beat Hongkong Land's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aseana Properties32.63% 15.40% -4.90%
Hongkong Land -31.57%-1.77%1.15%

Hongkong Land has higher revenue and earnings than Aseana Properties. Aseana Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hongkong Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aseana Properties£30.06M0.01-£777.99M£3.780.02
Hongkong Land£1.33B0.14-£582.30M£106.190.08

Aseana Properties has a beta of 0.4596019, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hongkong Land has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hongkong Land beats Aseana Properties on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aseana Properties compare to Conygar Investment?

Aseana Properties (LON:ASPL) and Conygar Investment (LON:CIC) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Aseana Properties has a net margin of 32.63% compared to Conygar Investment's net margin of -29.54%. Aseana Properties' return on equity of 15.40% beat Conygar Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aseana Properties32.63% 15.40% -4.90%
Conygar Investment -29.54%-19.67%-5.03%

Aseana Properties has a beta of 0.4596019, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conygar Investment has a beta of 0.474, meaning that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Conygar Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Aseana Properties. Conygar Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aseana Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aseana Properties£30.06M0.01-£777.99M£3.780.02
Conygar Investment£32.12M0.51-£31.48M-£15.91N/A

In the previous week, Aseana Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Conygar Investment'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aseana Properties Neutral
Conygar Investment Neutral

3.3% of Aseana Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.2% of Conygar Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 43.6% of Aseana Properties shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.0% of Conygar Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Aseana Properties beats Conygar Investment on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aseana Properties compare to Trafalgar Property Group?

Aseana Properties (LON:ASPL) and Trafalgar Property Group (LON:TRAF) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

Aseana Properties has a net margin of 32.63% compared to Trafalgar Property Group's net margin of 0.00%. Aseana Properties' return on equity of 15.40% beat Trafalgar Property Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aseana Properties32.63% 15.40% -4.90%
Trafalgar Property Group N/A N/A -21.70%

Aseana Properties has a beta of 0.4596019, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trafalgar Property Group has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Aseana Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trafalgar Property Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aseana Properties Neutral
Trafalgar Property Group Neutral

3.3% of Aseana Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 43.6% of Aseana Properties shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 46.9% of Trafalgar Property Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Trafalgar Property Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aseana Properties. Trafalgar Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aseana Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aseana Properties£30.06M0.01-£777.99M£3.780.02
Trafalgar Property Group£714.60K10.88N/A-£50.00N/A

Summary

Aseana Properties beats Trafalgar Property Group on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aseana Properties compare to Inland Homes?

Inland Homes (LON:INL) and Aseana Properties (LON:ASPL) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

Inland Homes has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aseana Properties has a beta of 0.4596019, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Inland Homes has higher revenue and earnings than Aseana Properties. Inland Homes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aseana Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Inland Homes£184.20M0.00£6.90M£0.01N/A
Aseana Properties£30.06M0.01-£777.99M£3.780.02

10.0% of Inland Homes shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 68.1% of Inland Homes shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Inland Homes' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aseana Properties'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Inland Homes Neutral
Aseana Properties Neutral

Aseana Properties has a net margin of 32.63% compared to Inland Homes' net margin of 3.80%. Aseana Properties' return on equity of 15.40% beat Inland Homes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Inland Homes3.80% 4.09% 3.90%
Aseana Properties 32.63%15.40%-4.90%

Summary

Inland Homes beats Aseana Properties on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Aseana Properties News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ASPL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ASPL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ASPL vs. The Competition

MetricAseana PropertiesReal Estate Management & Development IndustryReal Estate SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£203K£3.12B£5.37B£2.90B
Dividend YieldN/A4.48%6.49%6.22%
P/E Ratio0.0214.2927.99366.53
Price / Sales0.0188.39126.9990,276.50
Price / Cash0.0318.7133.9827.89
Price / Book0.002.011.806.40
Net Income-£777.99M-£436.30M-£66.52M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.72%-0.31%1.06%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-4.94%-4.00%0.12%
1 Year PerformanceN/A-13.29%1.53%19.58%

Aseana Properties Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ASPL
Aseana Properties
N/AGBX 0.07
flat
N/AN/A£203K£30.06M0.02316
HWG
Harworth Group
2.7518 of 5 stars
GBX 176.80
flat
GBX 196.75
+11.3%
+5.7%£575.00M£123.55M63.14120
HKLD
Hongkong Land
N/AGBX 8.48
+14.4%
N/A+28.4%£181.32M£1.33B0.082,991
CIC
Conygar Investment
N/AGBX 25.41
flat
N/A-6.2%£15.21M£32.12MN/A111
TRAF
Trafalgar Property Group
N/AGBX 18
flat
N/A-37.4%£7.38M£714.60KN/A7

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:ASPL) was last updated on 9/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners