Go Pro
→ The Starlink of Energy (From Monument Traders Alliance) (Ad)tc pixel Free ASPL Stock Alerts

Aseana Properties (ASPL) Competitors

Aseana Properties logo
GBX 0.06 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/21/2026
Compare

ASPL vs. HWG, HKLD, DAR, CIC, and TRAF

Should you buy Aseana Properties stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Aseana Properties with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Aseana Properties include Harworth Group (HWG), Hongkong Land (HKLD), Dar Global (DAR), Conygar Investment (CIC), and Trafalgar Property Group (TRAF). These companies are all part of the "real estate - development" industry.

How does Aseana Properties compare to Harworth Group?

Harworth Group (LON:HWG) and Aseana Properties (LON:ASPL) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

13.7% of Harworth Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Harworth Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Harworth Group had 5 more articles in the media than Aseana Properties. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Harworth Group and 1 mentions for Aseana Properties. Harworth Group's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Aseana Properties' score of 0.00 indicating that Harworth Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Harworth Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Aseana Properties
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Harworth Group has a beta of 0.529, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aseana Properties has a beta of 0.4596019, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Harworth Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 209.75, indicating a potential upside of 63.36%. Given Harworth Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Harworth Group is more favorable than Aseana Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Harworth Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Aseana Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Aseana Properties has a net margin of 50.59% compared to Harworth Group's net margin of 7.25%. Aseana Properties' return on equity of 24.07% beat Harworth Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harworth Group7.25% 1.36% -1.45%
Aseana Properties 50.59%24.07%-4.90%

Harworth Group has higher revenue and earnings than Aseana Properties. Aseana Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harworth Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harworth Group£129.75M3.22£50.80M£2.8045.86
Aseana Properties£44.13M0.00-£777.99M£5.350.01

Summary

Harworth Group beats Aseana Properties on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aseana Properties compare to Hongkong Land?

Hongkong Land (LON:HKLD) and Aseana Properties (LON:ASPL) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Hongkong Land has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aseana Properties has a beta of 0.4596019, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Aseana Properties had 1 more articles in the media than Hongkong Land. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Aseana Properties and 0 mentions for Hongkong Land. Hongkong Land's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aseana Properties'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hongkong Land Neutral
Aseana Properties Neutral

19.7% of Hongkong Land shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Hongkong Land shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Aseana Properties has a net margin of 50.59% compared to Hongkong Land's net margin of -31.57%. Aseana Properties' return on equity of 24.07% beat Hongkong Land's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hongkong Land-31.57% -1.77% 1.15%
Aseana Properties 50.59%24.07%-4.90%

Hongkong Land has higher revenue and earnings than Aseana Properties. Aseana Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hongkong Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hongkong Land£1.45B0.11-£582.30M£57.690.13
Aseana Properties£44.13M0.00-£777.99M£5.350.01

Summary

Hongkong Land beats Aseana Properties on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aseana Properties compare to Dar Global?

Dar Global (LON:DAR) and Aseana Properties (LON:ASPL) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Dar Global has higher revenue and earnings than Aseana Properties. Aseana Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dar Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dar Global£538.62M0.03£49.60M£56.000.15
Aseana Properties£44.13M0.00-£777.99M£5.350.01

In the previous week, Aseana Properties had 1 more articles in the media than Dar Global. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Aseana Properties and 0 mentions for Dar Global. Dar Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aseana Properties'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Dar Global Neutral
Aseana Properties Neutral

3.3% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 88.0% of Dar Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Aseana Properties has a net margin of 50.59% compared to Dar Global's net margin of 16.72%. Aseana Properties' return on equity of 24.07% beat Dar Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dar Global16.72% 11.65% 3.68%
Aseana Properties 50.59%24.07%-4.90%

Summary

Dar Global beats Aseana Properties on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aseana Properties compare to Conygar Investment?

Aseana Properties (LON:ASPL) and Conygar Investment (LON:CIC) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Aseana Properties has a net margin of 50.59% compared to Conygar Investment's net margin of -29.54%. Aseana Properties' return on equity of 24.07% beat Conygar Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aseana Properties50.59% 24.07% -4.90%
Conygar Investment -29.54%-19.67%-5.03%

Conygar Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aseana Properties. Conygar Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aseana Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aseana Properties£44.13M0.00-£777.99M£5.350.01
Conygar Investment£32.12M0.47-£31.48M-£15.91N/A

In the previous week, Aseana Properties and Aseana Properties both had 1 articles in the media. Conygar Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Aseana Properties' score of 0.00 indicating that Conygar Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Aseana Properties
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Conygar Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Aseana Properties has a beta of 0.4596019, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conygar Investment has a beta of 0.467, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

3.3% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.2% of Conygar Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 43.6% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.0% of Conygar Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Aseana Properties beats Conygar Investment on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aseana Properties compare to Trafalgar Property Group?

Trafalgar Property Group (LON:TRAF) and Aseana Properties (LON:ASPL) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

3.3% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.9% of Trafalgar Property Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Aseana Properties had 1 more articles in the media than Trafalgar Property Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Aseana Properties and 0 mentions for Trafalgar Property Group. Trafalgar Property Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aseana Properties'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Trafalgar Property Group Neutral
Aseana Properties Neutral

Trafalgar Property Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aseana Properties. Trafalgar Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aseana Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trafalgar Property Group£714.60K12.91N/A-£50.00N/A
Aseana Properties£44.13M0.00-£777.99M£5.350.01

Aseana Properties has a net margin of 50.59% compared to Trafalgar Property Group's net margin of 0.00%. Aseana Properties' return on equity of 24.07% beat Trafalgar Property Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trafalgar Property GroupN/A N/A -21.70%
Aseana Properties 50.59%24.07%-4.90%

Trafalgar Property Group has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aseana Properties has a beta of 0.4596019, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Aseana Properties beats Trafalgar Property Group on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Aseana Properties News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ASPL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ASPL vs. The Competition

Export
MetricAseana PropertiesReal Estate IndustryReal Estate SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£188K£3.32B£2.02B£2.88B
Dividend YieldN/A3.57%7.28%6.16%
P/E Ratio0.013.7929.88368.27
Price / Sales0.00140.59364.2284,379.67
Price / Cash0.0392.6068.4327.89
Price / Book0.000.651.387.61
Net Income-£777.99M-£122.40M-£125.49M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A0.63%-0.15%0.39%
1 Month PerformanceN/A2.76%0.95%-0.64%
1 Year PerformanceN/A-3.78%-0.94%62.99%

Aseana Properties Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ASPL
Aseana Properties
N/AGBX 0.07
flat		N/AN/A£188K£44.13M0.01235
HWG
Harworth Group
3.4869 of 5 stars		GBX 126
flat		GBX 209.75
+66.5%		-30.2%£409.77M£129.75M45.00120
HKLD
Hongkong Land
N/AGBX 7.32
flat		N/A+20.3%£156.52M£1.45B0.132,991
DAR
Dar Global
N/AGBX 8.18
flat		N/A+5.6%£14.72M£538.62M0.1514,600
CIC
Conygar Investment
N/AGBX 24
flat		N/A-20.9%£14.31M£32.12MN/A111

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:ASPL) was last updated on 7/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
America’s answer to universal basic income
Robert Kiyosaki, author of Rich Dad Poor Dad, is highlighting an income strategy he calls the Patriot Income P...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock is hoarding it. JPMorgan is hoarding it. Do you own it?
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
TSM just handed Trump's secretive AI project $100 billion
Taiwan Semiconductor just committed another $100 billion to U.S. chip manufacturing - on top of $165 billion a...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Starlink of Energy
A portable energy unit - already used by the U.S. Navy for decades - is now drawing serious attention from Big...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon is about to dominate the biggest arms race in tech history
Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and Meta have collectively poured nearly $700 billion into AI infrastructure in 2...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
It all happens tonight.
Tonight, trader Sean Allison is hosting a live session to walk through his Zero-Dollar Trade Advantage strateg...
Trade Thirsty | Sponsoredtc pixel
The options guide that actually starts at the beginning
Most options educators jump straight into Greeks, spreads, and implied volatility - losing beginners before th...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel