Go Pro
→ Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid (From Altimetry) (Ad)tc pixel Free ASPL Stock Alerts

Aseana Properties (ASPL) Competitors

Aseana Properties logo
GBX 0.06 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 08/11/2026
Compare

ASPL vs. HWG, HKLD, CIC, TRAF, and INL

Should you buy Aseana Properties stock or one of its competitors? Aseana Properties's main competitors and comparable companies include Harworth Group (HWG), Hongkong Land (HKLD), Conygar Investment (CIC), Trafalgar Property Group (TRAF), and Inland Homes (INL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "real estate development" industry.

How does Aseana Properties compare to Harworth Group?

Aseana Properties (LON:ASPL) and Harworth Group (LON:HWG) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Aseana Properties has a net margin of 50.59% compared to Harworth Group's net margin of 7.25%. Aseana Properties' return on equity of 24.07% beat Harworth Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aseana Properties50.59% 24.07% -4.90%
Harworth Group 7.25%1.36%-1.45%

3.3% of Aseana Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.6% of Harworth Group shares are held by institutional investors. 43.6% of Aseana Properties shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Harworth Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Harworth Group has higher revenue and earnings than Aseana Properties. Aseana Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harworth Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aseana Properties£44.13M0.00-£777.99M£5.350.01
Harworth Group£129.75M4.51£50.80M£2.8064.29

In the previous week, Harworth Group had 7 more articles in the media than Aseana Properties. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Harworth Group and 0 mentions for Aseana Properties. Aseana Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Harworth Group's score of -0.03 indicating that Aseana Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aseana Properties Neutral
Harworth Group Neutral

Harworth Group has a consensus target price of GBX 196.75, suggesting a potential upside of 9.31%. Given Harworth Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Harworth Group is more favorable than Aseana Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aseana Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Harworth Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Aseana Properties has a beta of 0.4596019, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harworth Group has a beta of 0.538, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Harworth Group beats Aseana Properties on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aseana Properties compare to Hongkong Land?

Hongkong Land (LON:HKLD) and Aseana Properties (LON:ASPL) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Hongkong Land has higher revenue and earnings than Aseana Properties. Aseana Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hongkong Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hongkong Land£1.33B0.13-£582.30M£106.190.08
Aseana Properties£44.13M0.00-£777.99M£5.350.01

Aseana Properties has a net margin of 50.59% compared to Hongkong Land's net margin of -31.57%. Aseana Properties' return on equity of 24.07% beat Hongkong Land's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hongkong Land-31.57% -1.77% 1.15%
Aseana Properties 50.59%24.07%-4.90%

19.7% of Hongkong Land shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Hongkong Land shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hongkong Land has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aseana Properties has a beta of 0.4596019, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hongkong Land's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aseana Properties'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hongkong Land Neutral
Aseana Properties Neutral

Summary

Hongkong Land beats Aseana Properties on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aseana Properties compare to Conygar Investment?

Conygar Investment (LON:CIC) and Aseana Properties (LON:ASPL) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Conygar Investment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aseana Properties. Conygar Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aseana Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Conygar Investment£32.12M0.46-£31.48M-£15.91N/A
Aseana Properties£44.13M0.00-£777.99M£5.350.01

11.2% of Conygar Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Aseana Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 26.0% of Conygar Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Aseana Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Aseana Properties has a net margin of 50.59% compared to Conygar Investment's net margin of -29.54%. Aseana Properties' return on equity of 24.07% beat Conygar Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Conygar Investment-29.54% -19.67% -5.03%
Aseana Properties 50.59%24.07%-4.90%

Conygar Investment has a beta of 0.474, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aseana Properties has a beta of 0.4596019, meaning that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Conygar Investment had 1 more articles in the media than Aseana Properties. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Conygar Investment and 0 mentions for Aseana Properties. Conygar Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aseana Properties'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Conygar Investment Neutral
Aseana Properties Neutral

Summary

Aseana Properties beats Conygar Investment on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aseana Properties compare to Trafalgar Property Group?

Trafalgar Property Group (LON:TRAF) and Aseana Properties (LON:ASPL) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Aseana Properties has a net margin of 50.59% compared to Trafalgar Property Group's net margin of 0.00%. Aseana Properties' return on equity of 24.07% beat Trafalgar Property Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trafalgar Property GroupN/A N/A -21.70%
Aseana Properties 50.59%24.07%-4.90%

3.3% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.9% of Trafalgar Property Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Trafalgar Property Group has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aseana Properties has a beta of 0.4596019, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Trafalgar Property Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aseana Properties. Trafalgar Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aseana Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trafalgar Property Group£714.60K12.05N/A-£50.00N/A
Aseana Properties£44.13M0.00-£777.99M£5.350.01

In the previous week, Trafalgar Property Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aseana Properties'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Trafalgar Property Group Neutral
Aseana Properties Neutral

Summary

Aseana Properties beats Trafalgar Property Group on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aseana Properties compare to Inland Homes?

Inland Homes (LON:INL) and Aseana Properties (LON:ASPL) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

10.0% of Inland Homes shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 68.1% of Inland Homes shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Aseana Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Aseana Properties has a net margin of 50.59% compared to Inland Homes' net margin of 3.80%. Aseana Properties' return on equity of 24.07% beat Inland Homes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Inland Homes3.80% 4.09% 3.90%
Aseana Properties 50.59%24.07%-4.90%

Inland Homes has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aseana Properties has a beta of 0.4596019, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Inland Homes' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aseana Properties'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Inland Homes Neutral
Aseana Properties Neutral

Inland Homes has higher revenue and earnings than Aseana Properties. Inland Homes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aseana Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Inland Homes£184.20M0.00£6.90M£0.01N/A
Aseana Properties£44.13M0.00-£777.99M£5.350.01

Summary

Inland Homes beats Aseana Properties on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Aseana Properties News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ASPL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ASPL vs. The Competition

Export
MetricAseana PropertiesReal Estate Management & Development IndustryReal Estate SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£188K£3.29B£5.56B£2.88B
Dividend YieldN/A4.50%6.16%6.09%
P/E Ratio0.0114.3037.38368.56
Price / Sales0.0090.49139.2983,672.53
Price / Cash0.0320.1834.3527.89
Price / Book0.002.121.917.26
Net Income-£777.99M-£436.16M-£63.69M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A0.63%-0.11%1.12%
1 Month PerformanceN/A0.17%-0.66%2.56%
1 Year PerformanceN/A-7.94%12.72%70.21%

Aseana Properties Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ASPL
Aseana Properties
N/AGBX 0.07
flat		N/AN/A£188K£44.13M0.01235
HWG
Harworth Group
1.7761 of 5 stars		GBX 130.40
-0.6%		GBX 209.75
+60.9%		-0.4%£424.08M£129.75M46.57120
HKLD
Hongkong Land
N/AGBX 8.12
flat		N/A+30.1%£173.63M£1.33B0.142,991
CIC
Conygar Investment
N/AGBX 25
flat		N/A-17.7%£14.91M£32.12MN/A111
TRAF
Trafalgar Property Group
N/AGBX 21
flat		N/A-6.3%£8.61M£714.60KN/A7

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:ASPL) was last updated on 8/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Iran War: What Happened at 1:11 P.M. Outside D.C.?
A source with ties to Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and the U.S. State Department revealed details of a potential 7 t...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
$8B is moving in... are you?
Venture capital investment in US crypto companies hit $7.9 billion last year, up 44 percent from the year befo...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
Nvidia's CEO says this small device is critical for AI growth
A tiny glass device smaller than a fingertip could redefine AI hardware. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang calls it esse...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel