Go Pro
→ Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture (From Altimetry) (Ad)tc pixel Free HWG Stock Alerts

Harworth Group (HWG) Competitors

Harworth Group logo
GBX 132.58 +1.38 (+1.05%)
As of 11:53 AM Eastern
Compare

HWG vs. HKLD, CIC, DAR, TRAF, and INL

Should you buy Harworth Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Harworth Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Harworth Group include Hongkong Land (HKLD), Conygar Investment (CIC), Dar Global (DAR), Trafalgar Property Group (TRAF), and Inland Homes (INL). These companies are all part of the "real estate" sector.

How does Harworth Group compare to Hongkong Land?

Harworth Group (LON:HWG) and Hongkong Land (LON:HKLD) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Harworth Group has a net margin of 7.25% compared to Hongkong Land's net margin of -31.57%. Harworth Group's return on equity of 1.36% beat Hongkong Land's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harworth Group7.25% 1.36% -1.45%
Hongkong Land -31.57%-1.77%1.15%

Harworth Group has a beta of 0.529, meaning that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hongkong Land has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Harworth Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Hongkong Land pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 276.0%. Harworth Group pays out 59.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hongkong Land pays out 38.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hongkong Land is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Harworth Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hongkong Land. Hongkong Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harworth Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harworth Group£129.75M3.32£50.80M£2.8047.35
Hongkong Land£1.33B0.13-£582.30M£57.690.14

In the previous week, Hongkong Land had 1 more articles in the media than Harworth Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Hongkong Land and 0 mentions for Harworth Group. Harworth Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Hongkong Land'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Harworth Group Neutral
Hongkong Land Neutral

13.7% of Harworth Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.7% of Hongkong Land shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Harworth Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Hongkong Land shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Harworth Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 209.75, indicating a potential upside of 58.21%. Given Harworth Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Harworth Group is more favorable than Hongkong Land.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Harworth Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Hongkong Land
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Harworth Group beats Hongkong Land on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harworth Group compare to Conygar Investment?

Conygar Investment (LON:CIC) and Harworth Group (LON:HWG) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, Conygar Investment had 1 more articles in the media than Harworth Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Conygar Investment and 0 mentions for Harworth Group. Conygar Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Harworth Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Conygar Investment Neutral
Harworth Group Neutral

Harworth Group has a consensus target price of GBX 209.75, suggesting a potential upside of 58.21%. Given Harworth Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Harworth Group is more favorable than Conygar Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Conygar Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Harworth Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Harworth Group has higher revenue and earnings than Conygar Investment. Conygar Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harworth Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Conygar Investment£32.12M0.46-£31.48M-£15.91N/A
Harworth Group£129.75M3.32£50.80M£2.8047.35

11.2% of Conygar Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.7% of Harworth Group shares are held by institutional investors. 26.0% of Conygar Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Harworth Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Harworth Group has a net margin of 7.25% compared to Conygar Investment's net margin of -29.54%. Harworth Group's return on equity of 1.36% beat Conygar Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Conygar Investment-29.54% -19.67% -5.03%
Harworth Group 7.25%1.36%-1.45%

Conygar Investment has a beta of 0.467, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harworth Group has a beta of 0.529, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Harworth Group beats Conygar Investment on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harworth Group compare to Dar Global?

Dar Global (LON:DAR) and Harworth Group (LON:HWG) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Dar Global has a net margin of 16.72% compared to Harworth Group's net margin of 7.25%. Dar Global's return on equity of 11.65% beat Harworth Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dar Global16.72% 11.65% 3.68%
Harworth Group 7.25%1.36%-1.45%

13.7% of Harworth Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 88.0% of Dar Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Harworth Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Harworth Group has a consensus target price of GBX 209.75, indicating a potential upside of 58.21%. Given Harworth Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Harworth Group is more favorable than Dar Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dar Global
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Harworth Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Harworth Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Dar Global. Dar Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harworth Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dar Global£538.62M0.03£49.60M£56.000.15
Harworth Group£129.75M3.32£50.80M£2.8047.35

In the previous week, Dar Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Harworth Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Dar Global Neutral
Harworth Group Neutral

Summary

Harworth Group beats Dar Global on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harworth Group compare to Trafalgar Property Group?

Trafalgar Property Group (LON:TRAF) and Harworth Group (LON:HWG) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and earnings.

Harworth Group has higher revenue and earnings than Trafalgar Property Group. Trafalgar Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harworth Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trafalgar Property Group£714.60K12.05N/A-£50.00N/A
Harworth Group£129.75M3.32£50.80M£2.8047.35

Trafalgar Property Group has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harworth Group has a beta of 0.529, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

13.7% of Harworth Group shares are held by institutional investors. 46.9% of Trafalgar Property Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Harworth Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Trafalgar Property Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Harworth Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Trafalgar Property Group Neutral
Harworth Group Neutral

Harworth Group has a net margin of 7.25% compared to Trafalgar Property Group's net margin of 0.00%. Harworth Group's return on equity of 1.36% beat Trafalgar Property Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trafalgar Property GroupN/A N/A -21.70%
Harworth Group 7.25%1.36%-1.45%

Harworth Group has a consensus target price of GBX 209.75, indicating a potential upside of 58.21%. Given Harworth Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Harworth Group is more favorable than Trafalgar Property Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trafalgar Property Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Harworth Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Harworth Group beats Trafalgar Property Group on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harworth Group compare to Inland Homes?

Inland Homes (LON:INL) and Harworth Group (LON:HWG) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

Harworth Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Inland Homes. Inland Homes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harworth Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Inland Homes£184.20M0.00£6.90M£0.01N/A
Harworth Group£129.75M3.32£50.80M£2.8047.35

Inland Homes has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harworth Group has a beta of 0.529, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Harworth Group has a net margin of 7.25% compared to Inland Homes' net margin of 3.80%. Inland Homes' return on equity of 4.09% beat Harworth Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Inland Homes3.80% 4.09% 3.90%
Harworth Group 7.25%1.36%-1.45%

In the previous week, Inland Homes' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Harworth Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Inland Homes Neutral
Harworth Group Neutral

10.0% of Inland Homes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.7% of Harworth Group shares are held by institutional investors. 68.1% of Inland Homes shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Harworth Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Harworth Group has a consensus price target of GBX 209.75, indicating a potential upside of 58.21%. Given Harworth Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Harworth Group is more favorable than Inland Homes.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Inland Homes
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Harworth Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Harworth Group beats Inland Homes on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Harworth Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HWG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HWG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HWG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHarworth GroupReal Estate Management & Development IndustryReal Estate SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£431.17M£3.31B£5.66B£2.83B
Dividend Yield1.36%4.49%6.15%6.15%
P/E Ratio47.3518.1836.13368.41
Price / Sales3.3289.79137.6283,654.70
Price / Cash8.8219.0434.2327.89
Price / Book0.662.121.927.06
Net Income£50.80M-£436.16M-£64.08M£5.89B
7 Day Performance5.73%-0.11%-0.63%0.21%
1 Month Performance4.56%-1.22%-1.14%0.22%
1 Year Performance-28.34%-7.10%14.89%64.12%

Harworth Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HWG
Harworth Group
N/AGBX 132.58
+1.1%		GBX 209.75
+58.2%		-29.5%£431.17M£129.75M47.35120
HKLD
Hongkong Land
N/AGBX 7.54
+1.8%		N/A+36.9%£161.23M£1.45B0.132,991
CIC
Conygar Investment
N/AGBX 25.30
+1.2%		N/A-18.0%£14.91M£32.12MN/A111
DAR
Dar Global
N/AGBX 7.75
-2.8%		N/A+8.9%£13.95M£538.62M0.1414,600
TRAF
Trafalgar Property Group
N/AGBX 22.50
flat		N/A-16.0%£9.23M£714.60KN/A7

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HWG) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Porter flew 3,300 miles to investigate this system
Porter Stansberry flew the Porter and Co. team 3,300 miles to Dublin to investigate a 17-year investing experi...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel