Free Trial

Harworth Group (HWG) Competitors

Harworth Group logo
GBX 125.80 +3.80 (+3.11%)
As of 12:30 PM Eastern

HWG vs. TRAF, HKLD, DAR, CIC, and INL

Should you buy Harworth Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Harworth Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Harworth Group include Trafalgar Property Group (TRAF), Hongkong Land (HKLD), Dar Global (DAR), Conygar Investment (CIC), and Inland Homes (INL). These companies are all part of the "real estate - development" industry.

How does Harworth Group compare to Trafalgar Property Group?

Trafalgar Property Group (LON:TRAF) and Harworth Group (LON:HWG) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Harworth Group has a consensus target price of GBX 209.75, suggesting a potential upside of 66.73%. Given Harworth Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Harworth Group is more favorable than Trafalgar Property Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trafalgar Property Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Harworth Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Harworth Group has a net margin of 7.25% compared to Trafalgar Property Group's net margin of 0.00%. Harworth Group's return on equity of 1.36% beat Trafalgar Property Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trafalgar Property GroupN/A N/A -21.70%
Harworth Group 7.25%1.36%-1.45%

In the previous week, Harworth Group had 4 more articles in the media than Trafalgar Property Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Harworth Group and 0 mentions for Trafalgar Property Group. Harworth Group's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Trafalgar Property Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Harworth Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Trafalgar Property Group Neutral
Harworth Group Positive

Harworth Group has higher revenue and earnings than Trafalgar Property Group. Trafalgar Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harworth Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trafalgar Property Group£714.60K537.54N/A-£0.05N/A
Harworth Group£129.75M3.15£50.80M£2.8044.93

13.6% of Harworth Group shares are held by institutional investors. 46.9% of Trafalgar Property Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Harworth Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Trafalgar Property Group has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harworth Group has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Harworth Group beats Trafalgar Property Group on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harworth Group compare to Hongkong Land?

Hongkong Land (LON:HKLD) and Harworth Group (LON:HWG) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Harworth Group has a net margin of 7.25% compared to Hongkong Land's net margin of -31.57%. Harworth Group's return on equity of 1.36% beat Hongkong Land's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hongkong Land-31.57% -1.77% 1.15%
Harworth Group 7.25%1.36%-1.45%

In the previous week, Harworth Group had 4 more articles in the media than Hongkong Land. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Harworth Group and 0 mentions for Hongkong Land. Harworth Group's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Hongkong Land's score of 0.00 indicating that Harworth Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hongkong Land Neutral
Harworth Group Positive

19.4% of Hongkong Land shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.6% of Harworth Group shares are held by institutional investors. 53.4% of Hongkong Land shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Harworth Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hongkong Land has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harworth Group has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Harworth Group has a consensus target price of GBX 209.75, suggesting a potential upside of 66.73%. Given Harworth Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Harworth Group is more favorable than Hongkong Land.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hongkong Land
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Harworth Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Hongkong Land pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 302.4%. Harworth Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Hongkong Land pays out 38.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Harworth Group pays out 59.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hongkong Land is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Harworth Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hongkong Land. Hongkong Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harworth Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hongkong Land£1.45B0.11-£582.30M£57.690.13
Harworth Group£129.75M3.15£50.80M£2.8044.93

Summary

Harworth Group beats Hongkong Land on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harworth Group compare to Dar Global?

Harworth Group (LON:HWG) and Dar Global (LON:DAR) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

13.6% of Harworth Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Harworth Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 88.0% of Dar Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Harworth Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Dar Global. Dar Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harworth Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harworth Group£129.75M3.15£50.80M£2.8044.93
Dar Global£538.62M0.03£49.60M£56.000.15

Dar Global has a net margin of 16.72% compared to Harworth Group's net margin of 7.25%. Dar Global's return on equity of 11.65% beat Harworth Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harworth Group7.25% 1.36% -1.45%
Dar Global 16.72%11.65%3.68%

In the previous week, Harworth Group had 4 more articles in the media than Dar Global. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Harworth Group and 0 mentions for Dar Global. Harworth Group's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Dar Global's score of 0.00 indicating that Harworth Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Harworth Group Positive
Dar Global Neutral

Harworth Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 209.75, indicating a potential upside of 66.73%. Given Harworth Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Harworth Group is more favorable than Dar Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Harworth Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Dar Global
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Harworth Group beats Dar Global on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harworth Group compare to Conygar Investment?

Harworth Group (LON:HWG) and Conygar Investment (LON:CIC) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Harworth Group has a net margin of 7.25% compared to Conygar Investment's net margin of -29.54%. Harworth Group's return on equity of 1.36% beat Conygar Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harworth Group7.25% 1.36% -1.45%
Conygar Investment -29.54%-19.67%-5.03%

In the previous week, Harworth Group had 3 more articles in the media than Conygar Investment. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Harworth Group and 1 mentions for Conygar Investment. Harworth Group's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Conygar Investment's score of 0.75 indicating that Harworth Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Harworth Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Conygar Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Harworth Group has higher revenue and earnings than Conygar Investment. Conygar Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harworth Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harworth Group£129.75M3.15£50.80M£2.8044.93
Conygar Investment£21.89M0.63-£31.48M-£32.78N/A

13.6% of Harworth Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.2% of Conygar Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Harworth Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 26.0% of Conygar Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Harworth Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 209.75, suggesting a potential upside of 66.73%. Given Harworth Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Harworth Group is more favorable than Conygar Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Harworth Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Conygar Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Harworth Group has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conygar Investment has a beta of 0.634339, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Harworth Group beats Conygar Investment on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harworth Group compare to Inland Homes?

Inland Homes (LON:INL) and Harworth Group (LON:HWG) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

10.0% of Inland Homes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.6% of Harworth Group shares are held by institutional investors. 68.1% of Inland Homes shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Harworth Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Harworth Group had 4 more articles in the media than Inland Homes. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Harworth Group and 0 mentions for Inland Homes. Harworth Group's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Inland Homes' score of 0.00 indicating that Harworth Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Inland Homes Neutral
Harworth Group Positive

Harworth Group has a net margin of 7.25% compared to Inland Homes' net margin of 3.80%. Inland Homes' return on equity of 4.09% beat Harworth Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Inland Homes3.80% 4.09% 3.90%
Harworth Group 7.25%1.36%-1.45%

Harworth Group has a consensus target price of GBX 209.75, indicating a potential upside of 66.73%. Given Harworth Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Harworth Group is more favorable than Inland Homes.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Inland Homes
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Harworth Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Inland Homes has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harworth Group has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Harworth Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Inland Homes. Inland Homes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harworth Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Inland Homes£184.20M0.00£6.90M£0.01N/A
Harworth Group£129.75M3.15£50.80M£2.8044.93

Summary

Harworth Group beats Inland Homes on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Harworth Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HWG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HWG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HWG vs. The Competition

MetricHarworth GroupReal Estate IndustryReal Estate SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£408.61M£3.53B£2.00B£2.78B
Dividend Yield1.45%3.58%7.16%6.13%
P/E Ratio44.933.7129.18364.74
Price / Sales3.154,513.13776.7587,565.33
Price / Cash8.8292.6068.0327.85
Price / Book0.630.581.307.71
Net Income£50.80M-£122.40M-£124.57M£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.45%-1.28%-0.88%0.07%
1 Month Performance-6.81%-2.54%-1.76%3.26%
1 Year Performance-25.78%1.06%0.75%75.52%

Harworth Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HWG
Harworth Group
3.6526 of 5 stars
GBX 125.80
+3.1%
GBX 209.75
+66.7%
-27.6%£408.61M£129.75M44.93120
TRAF
Trafalgar Property Group
N/AGBX 22
-6.4%
N/AN/A£384.12M£714.60KN/A7
HKLD
Hongkong Land
N/AGBX 7.62
+2.8%
N/A+40.1%£163.71M£1.45B0.132,991
DAR
Dar Global
N/AGBX 7.80
-5.5%
N/A-2.4%£14.04M£538.62M0.1414,600
CIC
Conygar Investment
N/AGBX 22.88
+1.7%
N/A-30.3%£13.65M£21.89MN/A111

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:HWG) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners