Go Pro
→ The end may be near for these iconic stocks (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free GPM Stock Alerts

Golden Prospect Precious Metal (GPM) Competitors

Golden Prospect Precious Metal logo
GBX 102.50 -2.50 (-2.38%)
As of 12:20 PM Eastern
Compare

GPM vs. ARR, AATG, PEMB, FJV, and BGLF

Should you buy Golden Prospect Precious Metal stock or one of its competitors? Golden Prospect Precious Metal's main competitors and comparable companies include Aurora Investment Trust (ARR), Albion Technology & Gen VCT (AATG), Pembroke VCT B (PEMB), Fidelity Japan Trust (FJV), and Blackstone Loan Financing (BGLF). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Golden Prospect Precious Metal compare to Aurora Investment Trust?

Golden Prospect Precious Metal (LON:GPM) and Aurora Investment Trust (LON:ARR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and profitability.

Aurora Investment Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Golden Prospect Precious Metal. Golden Prospect Precious Metal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aurora Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Prospect Precious Metal£79.06M1.06-£1.53M£80.021.28
Aurora Investment Trust£48.61M5.67£50.31M£41.896.14

In the previous week, Golden Prospect Precious Metal's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aurora Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golden Prospect Precious Metal Neutral
Aurora Investment Trust Neutral

6.7% of Golden Prospect Precious Metal shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.5% of Aurora Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Golden Prospect Precious Metal shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Aurora Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Golden Prospect Precious Metal has a net margin of 576.39% compared to Aurora Investment Trust's net margin of 96.96%. Golden Prospect Precious Metal's return on equity of 83.81% beat Aurora Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden Prospect Precious Metal576.39% 83.81% N/A
Aurora Investment Trust 96.96%16.54%18.36%

Golden Prospect Precious Metal has a beta of 1.238, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aurora Investment Trust has a beta of 1.363, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Aurora Investment Trust beats Golden Prospect Precious Metal on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Prospect Precious Metal compare to Albion Technology & Gen VCT?

Albion Technology & Gen VCT (LON:AATG) and Golden Prospect Precious Metal (LON:GPM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Albion Technology & Gen VCT has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Golden Prospect Precious Metal. Golden Prospect Precious Metal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Albion Technology & Gen VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Albion Technology & Gen VCT£5.74M44.92£5.59M£1.2749.61
Golden Prospect Precious Metal£79.06M1.06-£1.53M£80.021.28

Golden Prospect Precious Metal has a net margin of 576.39% compared to Albion Technology & Gen VCT's net margin of 82.73%. Golden Prospect Precious Metal's return on equity of 83.81% beat Albion Technology & Gen VCT's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Albion Technology & Gen VCT82.73% 1.73% 2.17%
Golden Prospect Precious Metal 576.39%83.81%N/A

In the previous week, Albion Technology & Gen VCT had 1 more articles in the media than Golden Prospect Precious Metal. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Albion Technology & Gen VCT and 0 mentions for Golden Prospect Precious Metal. Albion Technology & Gen VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Golden Prospect Precious Metal'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Albion Technology & Gen VCT Neutral
Golden Prospect Precious Metal Neutral

1.6% of Albion Technology & Gen VCT shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of Golden Prospect Precious Metal shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Albion Technology & Gen VCT shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Golden Prospect Precious Metal shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Golden Prospect Precious Metal beats Albion Technology & Gen VCT on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Prospect Precious Metal compare to Pembroke VCT B?

Golden Prospect Precious Metal (LON:GPM) and Pembroke VCT B (LON:PEMB) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Golden Prospect Precious Metal has a net margin of 576.39% compared to Pembroke VCT B's net margin of 60.95%. Golden Prospect Precious Metal's return on equity of 83.81% beat Pembroke VCT B's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden Prospect Precious Metal576.39% 83.81% N/A
Pembroke VCT B 60.95%3.63%-3.97%

In the previous week, Golden Prospect Precious Metal's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pembroke VCT B'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golden Prospect Precious Metal Neutral
Pembroke VCT B Neutral

Golden Prospect Precious Metal has higher revenue and earnings than Pembroke VCT B. Golden Prospect Precious Metal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembroke VCT B, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Prospect Precious Metal£79.06M1.06-£1.53M£80.021.28
Pembroke VCT B£11.50M23.80-£6.61M£3.7025.27

6.7% of Golden Prospect Precious Metal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.8% of Pembroke VCT B shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Golden Prospect Precious Metal shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Pembroke VCT B shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Golden Prospect Precious Metal has a beta of 1.238, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pembroke VCT B has a beta of -0.05, meaning that its share price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Golden Prospect Precious Metal beats Pembroke VCT B on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Prospect Precious Metal compare to Fidelity Japan Trust?

Golden Prospect Precious Metal (LON:GPM) and Fidelity Japan Trust (LON:FJV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Golden Prospect Precious Metal has a beta of 1.238, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Japan Trust has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Golden Prospect Precious Metal's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fidelity Japan Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golden Prospect Precious Metal Neutral
Fidelity Japan Trust Neutral

6.7% of Golden Prospect Precious Metal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fidelity Japan Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Golden Prospect Precious Metal shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Fidelity Japan Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Golden Prospect Precious Metal has a net margin of 576.39% compared to Fidelity Japan Trust's net margin of 152.44%. Golden Prospect Precious Metal's return on equity of 83.81% beat Fidelity Japan Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden Prospect Precious Metal576.39% 83.81% N/A
Fidelity Japan Trust 152.44%-3.08%1.92%

Fidelity Japan Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Golden Prospect Precious Metal. Golden Prospect Precious Metal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Japan Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Prospect Precious Metal£79.06M1.06-£1.53M£80.021.28
Fidelity Japan Trust£9.26M28.94£6.24M£6.9234.06

Summary

Golden Prospect Precious Metal beats Fidelity Japan Trust on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Golden Prospect Precious Metal compare to Blackstone Loan Financing?

Golden Prospect Precious Metal (LON:GPM) and Blackstone Loan Financing (LON:BGLF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Golden Prospect Precious Metal has a net margin of 576.39% compared to Blackstone Loan Financing's net margin of 96.70%. Golden Prospect Precious Metal's return on equity of 83.81% beat Blackstone Loan Financing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golden Prospect Precious Metal576.39% 83.81% N/A
Blackstone Loan Financing 96.70%19.06%11.82%

In the previous week, Golden Prospect Precious Metal's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Blackstone Loan Financing'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golden Prospect Precious Metal Neutral
Blackstone Loan Financing Neutral

Blackstone Loan Financing has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Prospect Precious Metal. Blackstone Loan Financing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golden Prospect Precious Metal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golden Prospect Precious Metal£79.06M1.06-£1.53M£80.021.28
Blackstone Loan Financing£7.00B0.00£6.86B£0.28N/A

6.7% of Golden Prospect Precious Metal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.5% of Blackstone Loan Financing shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Golden Prospect Precious Metal shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of Blackstone Loan Financing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Golden Prospect Precious Metal has a beta of 1.238, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blackstone Loan Financing has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Blackstone Loan Financing beats Golden Prospect Precious Metal on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Golden Prospect Precious Metal News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GPM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GPM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricGolden Prospect Precious MetalCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£83.44M£5.66B£14.05B£2.89B
Dividend Yield5.92%7.39%5.88%6.11%
P/E Ratio1.2837.3427.99368.55
Price / Sales1.061,266.86514.6983,655.22
Price / CashN/A48.3339.9727.89
Price / Book2.863.733.707.32
Net Income-£1.53M£417.15M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance9.98%1.02%0.89%1.14%
1 Month Performance11.90%1.39%1.92%2.66%
1 Year Performance72.92%7.84%12.07%69.71%

Golden Prospect Precious Metal Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GPM
Golden Prospect Precious Metal
N/AGBX 102.50
-2.4%		N/A+77.4%£83.44M£79.06M1.28N/A
ARR
Aurora Investment Trust
N/AGBX 256
+1.2%		N/A+2.4%£275.18M£48.61M6.11N/A
AATG
Albion Technology & Gen VCT
N/AGBX 67
+2.3%		N/A-10.0%£274.13M£5.74M52.76N/A
PEMB
Pembroke VCT B
N/AGBX 92
flat		N/AN/A£269.20M£11.50M24.86N/A
FJV
Fidelity Japan Trust
N/AGBX 235.72
flat		N/AN/A£267.96M£9.26M34.06N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:GPM) was last updated on 8/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel