Free Trial

Ironveld (IRON) Competitors

Ironveld logo

IRON vs. ALT, JAN, PHE, HALO, and IDP

Should you buy Ironveld stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Ironveld with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Ironveld include Altitude Group (ALT), Jangada Mines (JAN), PowerHouse Energy Group (PHE), HaloSource (HALO), and InnovaDerma (IDP). These companies are all part of the "pharmaceutical products" industry.

How does Ironveld compare to Altitude Group?

Altitude Group (LON:ALT) and Ironveld (LON:IRON) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, Altitude Group had 1 more articles in the media than Ironveld. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Altitude Group and 0 mentions for Ironveld. Altitude Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ironveld'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Altitude Group Neutral
Ironveld Neutral

Altitude Group has a beta of 0.574, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ironveld has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

6.4% of Altitude Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.2% of Ironveld shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.2% of Altitude Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.3% of Ironveld shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Altitude Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ironveld's net margin of -526.22%. Altitude Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Ironveld's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Altitude Group0.00% 0.00% 1.65%
Ironveld -526.22%-7.17%-1.97%

Altitude Group has higher revenue and earnings than Ironveld. Ironveld is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Altitude Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Altitude Group£40.47M0.34£682.34K£0.7624.41
Ironveld£4K0.00N/A-£0.00N/A

Summary

Altitude Group beats Ironveld on 10 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ironveld compare to Jangada Mines?

Ironveld (LON:IRON) and Jangada Mines (LON:JAN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Ironveld has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jangada Mines has a beta of 1.774, suggesting that its share price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

6.2% of Ironveld shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Jangada Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.3% of Ironveld shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.5% of Jangada Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Jangada Mines had 1 more articles in the media than Ironveld. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Jangada Mines and 0 mentions for Ironveld. Ironveld's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Jangada Mines'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ironveld Neutral
Jangada Mines Neutral

Ironveld has higher revenue and earnings than Jangada Mines. Jangada Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ironveld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ironveld£4K0.00N/A-£0.00N/A
Jangada MinesN/AN/A-£835.63-£0.51N/A

Jangada Mines has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ironveld's net margin of -526.22%. Ironveld's return on equity of -7.17% beat Jangada Mines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ironveld-526.22% -7.17% -1.97%
Jangada Mines N/A -37.79%-14.48%

Summary

Ironveld beats Jangada Mines on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ironveld compare to PowerHouse Energy Group?

PowerHouse Energy Group (LON:PHE) and Ironveld (LON:IRON) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, PowerHouse Energy Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ironveld'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
PowerHouse Energy Group Neutral
Ironveld Neutral

Ironveld has a net margin of -526.22% compared to PowerHouse Energy Group's net margin of -913.32%. Ironveld's return on equity of -7.17% beat PowerHouse Energy Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PowerHouse Energy Group-913.32% -115.89% -17.45%
Ironveld -526.22%-7.17%-1.97%

Ironveld has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PowerHouse Energy Group. PowerHouse Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ironveld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PowerHouse Energy Group£588.58K15.65-£2.22M-£0.12N/A
Ironveld£4K0.00N/A-£0.00N/A

0.2% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.2% of Ironveld shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of PowerHouse Energy Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.3% of Ironveld shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PowerHouse Energy Group has a beta of 1.783, meaning that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ironveld has a beta of 0.37, meaning that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ironveld beats PowerHouse Energy Group on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ironveld compare to HaloSource?

Ironveld (LON:IRON) and HaloSource (LON:HALO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Ironveld's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled HaloSource'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ironveld Neutral
HaloSource Neutral

HaloSource has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ironveld's net margin of -526.22%. HaloSource's return on equity of 0.00% beat Ironveld's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ironveld-526.22% -7.17% -1.97%
HaloSource N/A N/A N/A

HaloSource is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ironveld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ironveld£4K0.00N/A-£0.00N/A
HaloSourceN/AN/AN/A-£5.17N/A

6.2% of Ironveld shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.3% of Ironveld shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ironveld and HaloSource tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ironveld compare to InnovaDerma?

Ironveld (LON:IRON) and InnovaDerma (LON:IDP) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ironveld£4K0.00N/A-£0.00N/A
InnovaDerma£9.82M0.00N/A-£7.50N/A

In the previous week, Ironveld's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled InnovaDerma'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ironveld Neutral
InnovaDerma Neutral

6.2% of Ironveld shares are held by institutional investors. 25.3% of Ironveld shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

InnovaDerma has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ironveld's net margin of -526.22%. InnovaDerma's return on equity of 0.00% beat Ironveld's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ironveld-526.22% -7.17% -1.97%
InnovaDerma N/A N/A N/A

Summary

InnovaDerma beats Ironveld on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ironveld News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IRON and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IRON vs. The Competition

MetricIronveldOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£4.56M£1.64B£4.96B£2.80B
Dividend Yield1.65%6.56%4.96%6.06%
P/E Ratio-5.5030.3023.63365.74
Price / SalesN/A55,533.966,553.5987,758.72
Price / Cash9.6024.6327.3627.89
Price / BookN/A5.859.627.79
Net IncomeN/A£70.60M£157.24M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A1.68%2.41%0.82%
1 Month PerformanceN/A2.59%2.30%10.96%
1 Year PerformanceN/A123.67%77.13%78.69%

Ironveld Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IRON
Ironveld
N/AN/AN/A-55.1%£4.56M£4KN/A30
ALT
Altitude Group
N/AGBX 18.31
-1.0%
N/A-14.1%£13.54M£40.47M24.0950
JAN
Jangada Mines
N/AGBX 1.50
+3.4%
N/A-3.7%£12.44MN/AN/A1
PHE
PowerHouse Energy Group
N/AGBX 0.25
-2.0%
N/A-58.0%£12.23M£588.58KN/A4
HALO
HaloSource
N/AGBX 8.68
-4.9%
N/AN/A£10.11MN/AN/A390

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:IRON) was last updated on 5/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners