JPMorgan China Growth & Income (JCGI) Competitors

GBX 290.50 -3.50 (-1.19%)

As of 12:27 PM Eastern

JCGI vs. RICA, USA, TFIF, CORD, and MRCH

Should you buy JPMorgan China Growth & Income stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares JPMorgan China Growth & Income with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with JPMorgan China Growth & Income include Ruffer Investment (RICA), Baillie Gifford US Growth (USA), TwentyFour Income (TFIF), Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (CORD), and The Merchants Trust (MRCH). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to Ruffer Investment?

JPMorgan China Growth & Income (LON:JCGI) and Ruffer Investment (LON:RICA) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

4.9% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.1% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a beta of 0.84105676, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ruffer Investment has a beta of 0.214, indicating that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

Ruffer Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. JPMorgan China Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ruffer Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan China Growth & Income	£64.40M	3.68	£6.34M	£76.32	3.81
Ruffer Investment	£44.42M	20.29	£8.78M	£12.61	24.19

JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Ruffer Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays out 14.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ruffer Investment pays out 47.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. JPMorgan China Growth & Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a net margin of 300.88% compared to Ruffer Investment's net margin of 62.53%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income's return on equity of 24.72% beat Ruffer Investment's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
JPMorgan China Growth & Income	300.88%	24.72%	-21.06%
Ruffer Investment	62.53%	4.37%	0.45%

In the previous week, Ruffer Investment had 2 more articles in the media than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ruffer Investment and 0 mentions for JPMorgan China Growth & Income. JPMorgan China Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Ruffer Investment's score of -0.24 indicating that JPMorgan China Growth & Income is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan China Growth & Income	Neutral
Ruffer Investment	Neutral

Summary

JPMorgan China Growth & Income beats Ruffer Investment on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to Baillie Gifford US Growth?

JPMorgan China Growth & Income (LON:JCGI) and Baillie Gifford US Growth (LON:USA) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

4.9% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.0% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a beta of 0.84105676, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford US Growth has a beta of 0.6652421, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Baillie Gifford US Growth has lower revenue, but higher earnings than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. JPMorgan China Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford US Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan China Growth & Income	£64.40M	3.68	£6.34M	£76.32	3.81
Baillie Gifford US Growth	£58.05M	15.53	£84.35M	£19.81	16.45

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a net margin of 300.88% compared to Baillie Gifford US Growth's net margin of 88.83%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income's return on equity of 24.72% beat Baillie Gifford US Growth's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
JPMorgan China Growth & Income	300.88%	24.72%	-21.06%
Baillie Gifford US Growth	88.83%	7.17%	N/A

In the previous week, JPMorgan China Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Baillie Gifford US Growth'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan China Growth & Income	Neutral
Baillie Gifford US Growth	Neutral

Summary

JPMorgan China Growth & Income beats Baillie Gifford US Growth on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to TwentyFour Income?

JPMorgan China Growth & Income (LON:JCGI) and TwentyFour Income (LON:TFIF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a beta of 0.84105676, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TwentyFour Income has a beta of 0.23198003, indicating that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

4.9% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.8% of TwentyFour Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of TwentyFour Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. TwentyFour Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays out 14.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TwentyFour Income pays out 88.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, JPMorgan China Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled TwentyFour Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan China Growth & Income	Neutral
TwentyFour Income	Neutral

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a net margin of 300.88% compared to TwentyFour Income's net margin of 62.41%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income's return on equity of 24.72% beat TwentyFour Income's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
JPMorgan China Growth & Income	300.88%	24.72%	-21.06%
TwentyFour Income	62.41%	11.04%	N/A

TwentyFour Income has higher revenue and earnings than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. JPMorgan China Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan China Growth & Income	£64.40M	3.68	£6.34M	£76.32	3.81
TwentyFour Income	£97.54M	9.59	£868.58M	£12.47	8.63

Summary

TwentyFour Income beats JPMorgan China Growth & Income on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to Cordiant Digital Infrastructure?

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (LON:CORD) and JPMorgan China Growth & Income (LON:JCGI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has a beta of 0.611, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a beta of 0.84105676, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

39.6% of Cordiant Digital Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.9% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Cordiant Digital Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure pays out 21.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays out 14.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. JPMorgan China Growth & Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Cordiant Digital Infrastructure had 2 more articles in the media than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Cordiant Digital Infrastructure and 0 mentions for JPMorgan China Growth & Income. JPMorgan China Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Cordiant Digital Infrastructure's score of -0.46 indicating that JPMorgan China Growth & Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure	Neutral
JPMorgan China Growth & Income	Neutral

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has a net margin of 784.69% compared to JPMorgan China Growth & Income's net margin of 300.88%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income's return on equity of 24.72% beat Cordiant Digital Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure	784.69%	14.85%	5.89%
JPMorgan China Growth & Income	300.88%	24.72%	-21.06%

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. JPMorgan China Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cordiant Digital Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure	£155.72M	5.78	£846.28M	£20.02	5.87
JPMorgan China Growth & Income	£64.40M	3.68	£6.34M	£76.32	3.81

Summary

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure beats JPMorgan China Growth & Income on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to The Merchants Trust?

JPMorgan China Growth & Income (LON:JCGI) and The Merchants Trust (LON:MRCH) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, The Merchants Trust had 2 more articles in the media than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for The Merchants Trust and 0 mentions for JPMorgan China Growth & Income. The Merchants Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat JPMorgan China Growth & Income's score of 0.00 indicating that The Merchants Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan China Growth & Income	Neutral
The Merchants Trust	Positive

4.9% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.3% of The Merchants Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of The Merchants Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a beta of 0.84105676, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Merchants Trust has a beta of 0.686, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

The Merchants Trust has higher revenue and earnings than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. JPMorgan China Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Merchants Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan China Growth & Income	£64.40M	3.68	£6.34M	£76.32	3.81
The Merchants Trust	£165.40M	5.50	£109.11M	£109.59	5.62

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a net margin of 300.88% compared to The Merchants Trust's net margin of 93.22%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income's return on equity of 24.72% beat The Merchants Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
JPMorgan China Growth & Income	300.88%	24.72%	-21.06%
The Merchants Trust	93.22%	17.67%	7.70%

JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. The Merchants Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 29.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays out 14.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Merchants Trust pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

The Merchants Trust beats JPMorgan China Growth & Income on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get JPMorgan China Growth & Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

JCGI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	JPMorgan China Growth & Income	Asset Management Industry	Financial Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£237.07M	£2.37B	£5.76B	£2.79B
Dividend Yield	4.74%	5.99%	5.27%	6.09%
P/E Ratio	3.81	25.21	15.77	366.15
Price / Sales	3.68	1,964.78	995.10	88,429.84
Price / Cash	148.77	60.17	90.32	27.89
Price / Book	1.06	1.35	4.40	7.74
Net Income	£6.34M	£265.53M	£1.15B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	2.47%	-0.13%	0.43%	0.82%
1 Month Performance	4.87%	2.39%	2.27%	2.78%
1 Year Performance	17.61%	13.44%	21.89%	87.90%

JPMorgan China Growth & Income Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
JCGI JPMorgan China Growth & Income	N/A	GBX 290.50 -1.2%	N/A	+22.5%	£237.07M	£64.40M	3.81	N/A
RICA Ruffer Investment	N/A	GBX 308.36 -0.2%	N/A	+9.7%	£909.55M	£44.42M	24.45	N/A	Gap Down
USA Baillie Gifford US Growth	N/A	GBX 327 +1.2%	N/A	+31.6%	£904.89M	£58.05M	16.51	N/A
TFIF TwentyFour Income	N/A	GBX 106.42 -0.2%	N/A	-1.8%	£904.77M	£97.54M	8.54	N/A
CORD Cordiant Digital Infrastructure	N/A	GBX 117.14 -0.3%	N/A	+37.4%	£896.92M	£155.72M	5.85	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:JCGI) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income (JCGI) Competitors

JCGI vs. RICA, USA, TFIF, CORD, and MRCH

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to Ruffer Investment?

Summary

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to Baillie Gifford US Growth?

Summary

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to TwentyFour Income?

Summary

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to Cordiant Digital Infrastructure?

Summary

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to The Merchants Trust?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

JCGI vs. The Competition

JPMorgan China Growth & Income Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

JPMorgan China Growth & Income (JCGI) Competitors

JCGI vs. RICA, USA, TFIF, CORD, and MRCH

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to Ruffer Investment?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in JCGI or RICA?

Which has more risk & volatility, JCGI or RICA?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, JCGI or RICA?

Is JCGI or RICA a better dividend stock?

Is JCGI or RICA more profitable?

Does the media favor JCGI or RICA?

Summary

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to Baillie Gifford US Growth?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in JCGI or USA?

Which has more volatility and risk, JCGI or USA?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, JCGI or USA?

Is JCGI or USA more profitable?

Does the media prefer JCGI or USA?

Summary

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to TwentyFour Income?

Which has more risk and volatility, JCGI or TFIF?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in JCGI or TFIF?

Is JCGI or TFIF a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor JCGI or TFIF?

Is JCGI or TFIF more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, JCGI or TFIF?

Summary

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to Cordiant Digital Infrastructure?

Which has more risk and volatility, CORD or JCGI?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CORD or JCGI?

Is CORD or JCGI a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer CORD or JCGI?

Is CORD or JCGI more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CORD or JCGI?

Summary

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to The Merchants Trust?

Does the media prefer JCGI or MRCH?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in JCGI or MRCH?

Which has more risk & volatility, JCGI or MRCH?

Which has better valuation and earnings, JCGI or MRCH?

Is JCGI or MRCH more profitable?

Is JCGI or MRCH a better dividend stock?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

JCGI vs. The Competition

JPMorgan China Growth & Income Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools