Go Pro
→ ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow! (From Weiss Ratings) (Ad)tc pixel Free JCGI Stock Alerts

JPMorgan China Growth & Income (JCGI) Competitors

JPMorgan China Growth & Income logo
GBX 273 +4.50 (+1.68%)
As of 11:53 AM Eastern
Compare

JCGI vs. RICA, ICGT, PHI, JUP, and OCI

Should you buy JPMorgan China Growth & Income stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares JPMorgan China Growth & Income with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with JPMorgan China Growth & Income include Ruffer Investment (RICA), ICG Enterprise Trust (ICGT), Pacific Horizon Investment Trust (PHI), Jupiter Fund Management (JUP), and Oakley Capital Investments (OCI).

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to Ruffer Investment?

Ruffer Investment (LON:RICA) and JPMorgan China Growth & Income (LON:JCGI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

7.7% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Ruffer Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ruffer Investment has a beta of 0.201, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a beta of 0.8547659, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ruffer Investment had 1 more articles in the media than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ruffer Investment and 0 mentions for JPMorgan China Growth & Income. Ruffer Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan China Growth & Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ruffer Investment Neutral
JPMorgan China Growth & Income Neutral

Ruffer Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Ruffer Investment pays out 21.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays out 36.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Ruffer Investment has higher revenue and earnings than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. JPMorgan China Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ruffer Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ruffer Investment£91.91M9.40£8.78M£28.3510.34
JPMorgan China Growth & Income£28.86M7.57£6.34M£33.478.16

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a net margin of 60,650.00% compared to Ruffer Investment's net margin of 62.53%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income's return on equity of 10.57% beat Ruffer Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ruffer Investment62.53% 4.37% 0.45%
JPMorgan China Growth & Income 60,650.00%10.57%-21.06%

Summary

Ruffer Investment beats JPMorgan China Growth & Income on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to ICG Enterprise Trust?

JPMorgan China Growth & Income (LON:JCGI) and ICG Enterprise Trust (LON:ICGT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

ICG Enterprise Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. ICG Enterprise Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan China Growth & Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan China Growth & Income£28.86M7.57£6.34M£33.478.16
ICG Enterprise Trust£2.98M292.26£32.56M-£13.35N/A

In the previous week, ICG Enterprise Trust had 4 more articles in the media than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for ICG Enterprise Trust and 0 mentions for JPMorgan China Growth & Income. ICG Enterprise Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.78 beat JPMorgan China Growth & Income's score of 0.00 indicating that ICG Enterprise Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan China Growth & Income Neutral
ICG Enterprise Trust Very Positive

JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. ICG Enterprise Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays out 36.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ICG Enterprise Trust pays out -277.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a beta of 0.8547659, indicating that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ICG Enterprise Trust has a beta of 0.488, indicating that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

5.1% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.6% of ICG Enterprise Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of ICG Enterprise Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a net margin of 60,650.00% compared to ICG Enterprise Trust's net margin of -52.20%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income's return on equity of 10.57% beat ICG Enterprise Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan China Growth & Income60,650.00% 10.57% -21.06%
ICG Enterprise Trust -52.20%-0.66%0.78%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
JPMorgan China Growth & Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
ICG Enterprise Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

ICG Enterprise Trust beats JPMorgan China Growth & Income on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to Pacific Horizon Investment Trust?

JPMorgan China Growth & Income (LON:JCGI) and Pacific Horizon Investment Trust (LON:PHI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a net margin of 60,650.00% compared to Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's net margin of 97.19%. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's return on equity of 34.20% beat JPMorgan China Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan China Growth & Income60,650.00% 10.57% -21.06%
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust 97.19%34.20%3.98%

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a beta of 0.8547659, suggesting that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has a beta of 1.2724831, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays out 36.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Pacific Horizon Investment Trust had 3 more articles in the media than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pacific Horizon Investment Trust and 0 mentions for JPMorgan China Growth & Income. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat JPMorgan China Growth & Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Pacific Horizon Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan China Growth & Income Neutral
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust Very Positive

5.1% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan China Growth & Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan China Growth & Income£28.86M7.57£6.34M£33.478.16
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust£243.03M3.44£26.66M£288.483.67

Summary

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust beats JPMorgan China Growth & Income on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to Jupiter Fund Management?

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) and JPMorgan China Growth & Income (LON:JCGI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Jupiter Fund Management currently has a consensus price target of GBX 173, suggesting a potential upside of 8.25%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than JPMorgan China Growth & Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
JPMorgan China Growth & Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Jupiter Fund Management's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat JPMorgan China Growth & Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Jupiter Fund Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Fund Management Positive
JPMorgan China Growth & Income Neutral

37.6% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. JPMorgan China Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Fund Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Fund Management£525.40M1.51-£8.84M£17.908.93
JPMorgan China Growth & Income£28.86M7.57£6.34M£33.478.16

Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays out 36.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.301, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a beta of 0.8547659, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a net margin of 60,650.00% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of 19.32%. Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity of 11.59% beat JPMorgan China Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Fund Management19.32% 11.59% 4.00%
JPMorgan China Growth & Income 60,650.00%10.57%-21.06%

Summary

Jupiter Fund Management beats JPMorgan China Growth & Income on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to Oakley Capital Investments?

JPMorgan China Growth & Income (LON:JCGI) and Oakley Capital Investments (LON:OCI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a beta of 0.8547659, indicating that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oakley Capital Investments has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a net margin of 60,650.00% compared to Oakley Capital Investments' net margin of 74.73%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income's return on equity of 10.57% beat Oakley Capital Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan China Growth & Income60,650.00% 10.57% -21.06%
Oakley Capital Investments 74.73%4.67%4.33%

5.1% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.6% of Oakley Capital Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.0% of Oakley Capital Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Oakley Capital Investments had 5 more articles in the media than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Oakley Capital Investments and 0 mentions for JPMorgan China Growth & Income. JPMorgan China Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Oakley Capital Investments'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan China Growth & Income Neutral
Oakley Capital Investments Neutral

Oakley Capital Investments has higher revenue and earnings than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. JPMorgan China Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oakley Capital Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan China Growth & Income£28.86M7.57£6.34M£33.478.16
Oakley Capital Investments£66.57M12.82£88.03M£34.0015.24

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
JPMorgan China Growth & Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Oakley Capital Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Oakley Capital Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays out 36.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Oakley Capital Investments pays out 6.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Oakley Capital Investments beats JPMorgan China Growth & Income on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get JPMorgan China Growth & Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for JCGI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding JCGI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

JCGI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricJPMorgan China Growth & IncomeCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£218.54M£5.51B£13.96B£2.83B
Dividend Yield5.02%7.51%5.96%6.15%
P/E Ratio8.1636.8728.79368.41
Price / Sales7.571,120.25464.7383,654.70
Price / Cash148.7748.0429.9527.89
Price / Book1.003.723.717.06
Net Income£6.34M£417.17M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.87%0.63%0.83%0.21%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-0.63%0.83%0.22%
1 Year Performance9.64%6.33%13.80%64.12%

JPMorgan China Growth & Income Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
JCGI
JPMorgan China Growth & Income
N/AGBX 273
+1.7%		N/A+7.8%£218.54M£28.86M8.16N/A
RICA
Ruffer Investment
N/AGBX 293.50
-0.7%		N/A+4.4%£865.72M£91.91M10.35N/A
ICGT
ICG Enterprise Trust
1.6164 of 5 stars		GBX 1,414
-1.0%		N/A-1.1%£860.28M£2.98MN/AN/A
PHI
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust
N/AGBX 1,074
+3.5%		N/A+65.5%£847.76M£243.03M3.7218,800
JUP
Jupiter Fund Management
2.7461 of 5 stars		GBX 170
-0.7%		GBX 173
+1.8%		+25.2%£843.07M£465.70M9.50522

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:JCGI) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Where to Put $100 Before Trump's New Tech Law Rolls Out
The Financial Times says a new tech law puts America 'on the verge of a financial revolution.' Yahoo Finance e...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
“The unseen winner of the AI race” is not SpaceX
Marc Chaikin - the analyst who called Nvidia before its historic run - says a tech firm labeled 'the unseen wi...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel