Top 5 Stocks to Buy Now
→ Now that SpaceX is public, buy this ticker (no, not SpaceX or Tesla) (From Brownstone Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free JCGI Stock Alerts

JPMorgan China Growth & Income (JCGI) Competitors

JPMorgan China Growth & Income logo
GBX 278.50 +5.50 (+2.01%)
As of 04:40 AM Eastern
Compare

JCGI vs. JEO, JUP, APEO, RICA, and OCI

Should you buy JPMorgan China Growth & Income stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares JPMorgan China Growth & Income with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with JPMorgan China Growth & Income include European Opportunities Trust (JEO), Jupiter Fund Management (JUP), abrdn Private Equity Opportunities (APEO), Ruffer Investment (RICA), and Oakley Capital Investments (OCI). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to European Opportunities Trust?

European Opportunities Trust (LON:JEO) and JPMorgan China Growth & Income (LON:JCGI) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a net margin of 60,650.00% compared to European Opportunities Trust's net margin of 0.00%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income's return on equity of 10.57% beat European Opportunities Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
European Opportunities TrustN/A N/A N/A
JPMorgan China Growth & Income 60,650.00%10.57%-21.06%

European Opportunities Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.04 per share. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. European Opportunities Trust pays out -0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays out 14.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has higher revenue and earnings than European Opportunities Trust. European Opportunities Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan China Growth & Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
European Opportunities Trust-£62.33M0.00N/A-£65.20N/A
JPMorgan China Growth & Income£64.40M3.49£6.34M£76.323.65

5.1% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, European Opportunities Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan China Growth & Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
European Opportunities Trust Neutral
JPMorgan China Growth & Income Neutral

Summary

JPMorgan China Growth & Income beats European Opportunities Trust on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to Jupiter Fund Management?

Jupiter Fund Management (LON:JUP) and JPMorgan China Growth & Income (LON:JCGI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

36.9% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Jupiter Fund Management shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Jupiter Fund Management's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat JPMorgan China Growth & Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Jupiter Fund Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Fund Management Positive
JPMorgan China Growth & Income Neutral

Jupiter Fund Management presently has a consensus price target of GBX 155.33, indicating a potential downside of 5.40%. Given Jupiter Fund Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Jupiter Fund Management is more favorable than JPMorgan China Growth & Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jupiter Fund Management
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
JPMorgan China Growth & Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a net margin of 60,650.00% compared to Jupiter Fund Management's net margin of 21.19%. Jupiter Fund Management's return on equity of 11.49% beat JPMorgan China Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Fund Management21.19% 11.49% 4.00%
JPMorgan China Growth & Income 60,650.00%10.57%-21.06%

Jupiter Fund Management has a beta of 1.295, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a beta of 0.8422751, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jupiter Fund Management. JPMorgan China Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Fund Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Fund Management£465.70M1.77-£8.84M£17.909.17
JPMorgan China Growth & Income£64.40M3.49£6.34M£76.323.65

Jupiter Fund Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Jupiter Fund Management pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays out 14.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. JPMorgan China Growth & Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Jupiter Fund Management beats JPMorgan China Growth & Income on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to abrdn Private Equity Opportunities?

abrdn Private Equity Opportunities (LON:APEO) and JPMorgan China Growth & Income (LON:JCGI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

72.2% of abrdn Private Equity Opportunities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of abrdn Private Equity Opportunities shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

abrdn Private Equity Opportunities has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a beta of 0.8422751, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

abrdn Private Equity Opportunities pays an annual dividend of GBX 17 per share. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. abrdn Private Equity Opportunities pays out 4,250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays out 14.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan China Growth & Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, abrdn Private Equity Opportunities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan China Growth & Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn Private Equity Opportunities Neutral
JPMorgan China Growth & Income Neutral

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a net margin of 60,650.00% compared to abrdn Private Equity Opportunities' net margin of 76.01%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income's return on equity of 10.57% beat abrdn Private Equity Opportunities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn Private Equity Opportunities76.01% 5.18% 3.35%
JPMorgan China Growth & Income 60,650.00%10.57%-21.06%

abrdn Private Equity Opportunities has higher revenue and earnings than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. abrdn Private Equity Opportunities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan China Growth & Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Private Equity Opportunities£80.21M0.00£60.96M£0.40N/A
JPMorgan China Growth & Income£64.40M3.49£6.34M£76.323.65

Summary

abrdn Private Equity Opportunities and JPMorgan China Growth & Income tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to Ruffer Investment?

Ruffer Investment (LON:RICA) and JPMorgan China Growth & Income (LON:JCGI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, Ruffer Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan China Growth & Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ruffer Investment Neutral
JPMorgan China Growth & Income Neutral

Ruffer Investment pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.95 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Ruffer Investment pays out 47.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays out 14.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. JPMorgan China Growth & Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a net margin of 60,650.00% compared to Ruffer Investment's net margin of 62.53%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income's return on equity of 10.57% beat Ruffer Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ruffer Investment62.53% 4.37% 0.45%
JPMorgan China Growth & Income 60,650.00%10.57%-21.06%

Ruffer Investment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. JPMorgan China Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ruffer Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ruffer Investment£44.42M19.55£8.78M£12.6123.31
JPMorgan China Growth & Income£64.40M3.49£6.34M£76.323.65

Ruffer Investment has a beta of 0.203, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a beta of 0.8422751, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

8.1% of Ruffer Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Ruffer Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

JPMorgan China Growth & Income beats Ruffer Investment on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does JPMorgan China Growth & Income compare to Oakley Capital Investments?

Oakley Capital Investments (LON:OCI) and JPMorgan China Growth & Income (LON:JCGI) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Oakley Capital Investments had 2 more articles in the media than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Oakley Capital Investments and 0 mentions for JPMorgan China Growth & Income. Oakley Capital Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat JPMorgan China Growth & Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Oakley Capital Investments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Oakley Capital Investments Positive
JPMorgan China Growth & Income Neutral

Oakley Capital Investments has a beta of 0.73994994, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a beta of 0.8422751, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Oakley Capital Investments pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 10.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Oakley Capital Investments pays out 6.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan China Growth & Income pays out 14.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a net margin of 60,650.00% compared to Oakley Capital Investments' net margin of 74.73%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income's return on equity of 10.57% beat Oakley Capital Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oakley Capital Investments74.73% 4.67% 4.33%
JPMorgan China Growth & Income 60,650.00%10.57%-21.06%

25.6% of Oakley Capital Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.0% of Oakley Capital Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Oakley Capital Investments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
JPMorgan China Growth & Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Oakley Capital Investments has higher revenue and earnings than JPMorgan China Growth & Income. JPMorgan China Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oakley Capital Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oakley Capital Investments£66.57M11.83£88.03M£34.0014.00
JPMorgan China Growth & Income£64.40M3.49£6.34M£76.323.65

Summary

Oakley Capital Investments beats JPMorgan China Growth & Income on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get JPMorgan China Growth & Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for JCGI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

JCGI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricJPMorgan China Growth & IncomeAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£224.96M£2.57B£6.06B£2.78B
Dividend Yield4.90%6.03%5.27%6.16%
P/E Ratio3.6525.8716.31366.35
Price / Sales3.492,100.961,446.1786,117.98
Price / Cash148.7760.1684.9827.85
Price / Book1.021.376.657.86
Net Income£6.34M£264.62M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.46%-0.44%-0.21%-0.89%
1 Month Performance-0.54%-0.08%1.04%-0.68%
1 Year Performance19.02%9.72%19.72%69.45%

JPMorgan China Growth & Income Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
JCGI
JPMorgan China Growth & Income
N/AGBX 278.50
+2.0%		N/A+17.7%£224.96M£64.40M3.65N/A
JEO
European Opportunities Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£886.70M-£62.33MN/AN/A
JUP
Jupiter Fund Management
1.8764 of 5 stars		GBX 175.62
-0.2%		GBX 155.33
-11.6%		+75.9%£881.58M£465.70M9.81522
APEO
abrdn Private Equity Opportunities
N/AN/AN/AN/A£880.29M£80.21M1,435.00N/A
RICA
Ruffer Investment
N/AGBX 295
-1.5%		N/A+3.1%£871.62M£44.42M23.39N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:JCGI) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Nearly 40% of Americans now hold a positive view of socialism - and former hedge fund manager Whitney Tilson s...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Quick favor to ask you
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book at no charge - the same book that sells for $...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Top Banks Warn: A Strange Day is Coming to America
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are warning clients about a developing crisis that could suppress portfolio g...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
A drilling crew just broke a record nobody expected
A drilling crew in Beaver County, Utah hit 15,765 feet of solid granite in 16 days - a job the Department of E...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon Musk, Larry Fink & Brian Armstrong are ALL Piling into This
Elon Musk, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong are all quietly investing in the same te...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Karp just filed Form 144
On May 12, 2026, Palantir CEO Alex Karp filed to sell 585,000 shares - roughly $95.93 million. Combined with f...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel