Go Pro
→ $8B is moving in... are you? (From Awesomely) (Ad)tc pixel Free USA Stock Alerts

Baillie Gifford US Growth (USA) Competitors

Baillie Gifford US Growth logo
GBX 324.50 +0.50 (+0.15%)
As of 12:24 PM Eastern
Compare

USA vs. PHLL, RCP, CTY, BPT, and TEM

Should you buy Baillie Gifford US Growth stock or one of its competitors? Baillie Gifford US Growth's main competitors and comparable companies include Petershill Partners (PHLL), RIT Capital Partners (RCP), City of London (CTY), Bridgepoint Group (BPT), and Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Baillie Gifford US Growth compare to Petershill Partners?

Baillie Gifford US Growth (LON:USA) and Petershill Partners (LON:PHLL) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Baillie Gifford US Growth's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Petershill Partners'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford US Growth Neutral
Petershill Partners Neutral

Petershill Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford US Growth. Petershill Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford US Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford US Growth£58.05M15.47£84.35M£19.8116.38
Petershill Partners£1.15B2.93£420.55M£86.433.59

Baillie Gifford US Growth has a net margin of 88.83% compared to Petershill Partners' net margin of 67.97%. Petershill Partners' return on equity of 16.42% beat Baillie Gifford US Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford US Growth88.83% 7.17% N/A
Petershill Partners 67.97%16.42%5.95%

Baillie Gifford US Growth has a beta of 0.631, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petershill Partners has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

5.8% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.7% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Petershill Partners has a consensus price target of GBX 309, suggesting a potential downside of 0.48%. Given Petershill Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Petershill Partners is more favorable than Baillie Gifford US Growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baillie Gifford US Growth
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Petershill Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Petershill Partners beats Baillie Gifford US Growth on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford US Growth compare to RIT Capital Partners?

RIT Capital Partners (LON:RCP) and Baillie Gifford US Growth (LON:USA) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

8.4% of RIT Capital Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 21.9% of RIT Capital Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

RIT Capital Partners has a net margin of 2,025.88% compared to Baillie Gifford US Growth's net margin of 88.83%. RIT Capital Partners' return on equity of 16.54% beat Baillie Gifford US Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RIT Capital Partners2,025.88% 16.54% 4.22%
Baillie Gifford US Growth 88.83%7.17%N/A

RIT Capital Partners has a beta of 0.7545988, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford US Growth has a beta of 0.631, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

RIT Capital Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford US Growth. RIT Capital Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford US Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RIT Capital Partners£730.20M4.45£167.81M£327.008.03
Baillie Gifford US Growth£58.05M15.47£84.35M£19.8116.38

In the previous week, RIT Capital Partners had 2 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford US Growth. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for RIT Capital Partners and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford US Growth. RIT Capital Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Baillie Gifford US Growth's score of 0.00 indicating that RIT Capital Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
RIT Capital Partners Positive
Baillie Gifford US Growth Neutral

Summary

RIT Capital Partners beats Baillie Gifford US Growth on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford US Growth compare to City of London?

City of London (LON:CTY) and Baillie Gifford US Growth (LON:USA) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

City of London has a net margin of 97.40% compared to Baillie Gifford US Growth's net margin of 88.83%. City of London's return on equity of 22.92% beat Baillie Gifford US Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London97.40% 22.92% 4.00%
Baillie Gifford US Growth 88.83%7.17%N/A

8.7% of City of London shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of City of London shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, City of London's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Baillie Gifford US Growth'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
City of London Neutral
Baillie Gifford US Growth Neutral

City of London has a beta of 0.869, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford US Growth has a beta of 0.631, indicating that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

City of London has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford US Growth. City of London is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford US Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London£568.96M5.35£294.08M£113.995.18
Baillie Gifford US Growth£58.05M15.47£84.35M£19.8116.38

Summary

City of London beats Baillie Gifford US Growth on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford US Growth compare to Bridgepoint Group?

Bridgepoint Group (LON:BPT) and Baillie Gifford US Growth (LON:USA) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Bridgepoint Group has a beta of 1.388, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baillie Gifford US Growth has a beta of 0.631, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Baillie Gifford US Growth has a net margin of 88.83% compared to Bridgepoint Group's net margin of 4.18%. Baillie Gifford US Growth's return on equity of 7.17% beat Bridgepoint Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bridgepoint Group4.18% 2.71% 3.47%
Baillie Gifford US Growth 88.83%7.17%N/A

In the previous week, Bridgepoint Group had 2 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford US Growth. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Bridgepoint Group and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford US Growth. Bridgepoint Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Baillie Gifford US Growth'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bridgepoint Group Neutral
Baillie Gifford US Growth Neutral

Baillie Gifford US Growth has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bridgepoint Group. Baillie Gifford US Growth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bridgepoint Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bridgepoint Group£583.70M5.11£45.58M£3.00112.87
Baillie Gifford US Growth£58.05M15.47£84.35M£19.8116.38

27.1% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Bridgepoint Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Bridgepoint Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 390, suggesting a potential upside of 15.18%. Given Bridgepoint Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Bridgepoint Group is more favorable than Baillie Gifford US Growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bridgepoint Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Baillie Gifford US Growth
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Bridgepoint Group beats Baillie Gifford US Growth on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Baillie Gifford US Growth compare to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust?

Baillie Gifford US Growth (LON:USA) and Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Baillie Gifford US Growth has a beta of 0.631, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.013, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

5.8% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.8% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baillie Gifford US Growth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Baillie Gifford US Growth. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baillie Gifford US Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford US Growth£58.05M15.47£84.35M£19.8116.38
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.75£130.50M£77.544.10

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a net margin of 96.24% compared to Baillie Gifford US Growth's net margin of 88.83%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat Baillie Gifford US Growth's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford US Growth88.83% 7.17% N/A
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust 96.24%31.30%4.50%

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford US Growth. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford US Growth. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Baillie Gifford US Growth's score of 0.00 indicating that Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford US Growth Neutral
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Positive

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust beats Baillie Gifford US Growth on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Baillie Gifford US Growth News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for USA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding USA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

USA vs. The Competition

Export
MetricBaillie Gifford US GrowthCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£897.97M£5.65B£14.02B£2.88B
Dividend YieldN/A7.40%5.89%6.09%
P/E Ratio16.3838.0029.21368.56
Price / Sales15.471,226.13512.9183,672.53
Price / CashN/A48.2838.6827.89
Price / Book1.533.713.677.26
Net Income£84.35M£417.15M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.88%0.62%0.27%1.12%
1 Month Performance-3.42%0.66%1.19%2.56%
1 Year Performance21.99%8.45%12.52%70.21%

Baillie Gifford US Growth Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
USA
Baillie Gifford US Growth
N/AGBX 324.50
+0.2%		N/A+20.0%£897.97M£58.05M16.38N/A
PHLL
Petershill Partners
N/AGBX 310.50
flat		GBX 309
-0.5%		N/A£3.36B£1.15B3.59N/A
RCP
RIT Capital Partners
N/AGBX 2,630
+0.6%		N/A+33.7%£3.24B£730.20M8.0462
CTY
City of London
N/AGBX 597
+0.7%		N/A+19.1%£3.08B£568.96M5.24N/A
BPT
Bridgepoint Group
1.6532 of 5 stars		GBX 342
+1.4%		GBX 390
+14.0%		-0.2%£2.97B£583.70M114.00391

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:USA) was last updated on 8/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The cat is out the bag
Almost 80,000 tech jobs vanished in the first three months of 2026. Meta cut 14,000 roles, Microsoft offered s...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trading strategy that works BECAUSE you have a life
Tim Sykes built a trading strategy for people who can't watch charts from 9:30 to 4:00 every day. It's not ...
Tim Sykes | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
My next big call (under $1)
17,556% on KDA. Here's what I'm buying now. It's a coin under $1.00 that most investors have never heard of...
Crypto 101 Media | Sponsoredtc pixel