Go Pro

Glenveagh Properties (GLV) Competitors

Glenveagh Properties logo
GBX 2.36 +0.06 (+2.78%)
As of 09/11/2026 12:29 PM Eastern

GLV vs. WJG, ULTP, CHH, PMP, and AIEA

Should you buy Glenveagh Properties stock or one of its competitors? Glenveagh Properties's main competitors and comparable companies include Watkin Jones (WJG), Ultimate Products (ULTP), Churchill China (CHH), Portmeirion Group (PMP), and AIREA (AIEA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "household durables" industry.

How does Glenveagh Properties compare to Watkin Jones?

Watkin Jones (LON:WJG) and Glenveagh Properties (LON:GLV) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Glenveagh Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Watkin Jones. Watkin Jones is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Glenveagh Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Watkin Jones£250.83M0.16-£30.76M-£3.35N/A
Glenveagh Properties£925.88M0.01£4.39B£19.700.12

Glenveagh Properties has a net margin of 11.62% compared to Watkin Jones' net margin of -3.43%. Glenveagh Properties' return on equity of 13.97% beat Watkin Jones' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Watkin Jones-3.43% -6.89% -5.63%
Glenveagh Properties 11.62%13.97%4.28%

Watkin Jones has a beta of 1.359, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Glenveagh Properties has a beta of 0.833, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Watkin Jones presently has a consensus target price of GBX 38, indicating a potential upside of 136.91%. Given Watkin Jones' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Watkin Jones is more favorable than Glenveagh Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Watkin Jones
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Glenveagh Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Watkin Jones had 1 more articles in the media than Glenveagh Properties. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Watkin Jones and 0 mentions for Glenveagh Properties. Watkin Jones' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Glenveagh Properties'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Watkin Jones Neutral
Glenveagh Properties Neutral

22.8% of Watkin Jones shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.9% of Glenveagh Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Watkin Jones shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Glenveagh Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Glenveagh Properties beats Watkin Jones on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Glenveagh Properties compare to Ultimate Products?

Ultimate Products (LON:ULTP) and Glenveagh Properties (LON:GLV) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Glenveagh Properties has a net margin of 11.62% compared to Ultimate Products' net margin of 2.69%. Glenveagh Properties' return on equity of 13.97% beat Ultimate Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ultimate Products2.69% 8.41% 9.97%
Glenveagh Properties 11.62%13.97%4.28%

17.2% of Ultimate Products shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.9% of Glenveagh Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 43.2% of Ultimate Products shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Glenveagh Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ultimate Products has a beta of 0.598, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Glenveagh Properties has a beta of 0.833, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ultimate Products' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Glenveagh Properties'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ultimate Products Neutral
Glenveagh Properties Neutral

Glenveagh Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Ultimate Products. Glenveagh Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ultimate Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ultimate Products£145.10M0.28£10.32M£4.5010.91
Glenveagh Properties£925.88M0.01£4.39B£19.700.12

Ultimate Products presently has a consensus price target of GBX 75, suggesting a potential upside of 52.75%. Given Ultimate Products' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ultimate Products is more favorable than Glenveagh Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ultimate Products
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Glenveagh Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Glenveagh Properties beats Ultimate Products on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Glenveagh Properties compare to Churchill China?

Glenveagh Properties (LON:GLV) and Churchill China (LON:CHH) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Glenveagh Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Churchill China. Glenveagh Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Glenveagh Properties£925.88M0.01£4.39B£19.700.12
Churchill China£76.28M0.53£7.84M£39.709.32

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Glenveagh Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Churchill China
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Glenveagh Properties has a net margin of 11.62% compared to Churchill China's net margin of 4.96%. Glenveagh Properties' return on equity of 13.97% beat Churchill China's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Glenveagh Properties11.62% 13.97% 4.28%
Churchill China 4.96%6.05%8.74%

40.9% of Glenveagh Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of Churchill China shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.1% of Glenveagh Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.2% of Churchill China shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Churchill China had 2 more articles in the media than Glenveagh Properties. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Churchill China and 0 mentions for Glenveagh Properties. Churchill China's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Glenveagh Properties' score of 0.00 indicating that Churchill China is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Glenveagh Properties Neutral
Churchill China Neutral

Glenveagh Properties has a beta of 0.833, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Churchill China has a beta of 0.804, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Glenveagh Properties beats Churchill China on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Glenveagh Properties compare to Portmeirion Group?

Portmeirion Group (LON:PMP) and Glenveagh Properties (LON:GLV) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Glenveagh Properties has a net margin of 11.62% compared to Portmeirion Group's net margin of -6.86%. Glenveagh Properties' return on equity of 13.97% beat Portmeirion Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Portmeirion Group-6.86% -12.61% 1.87%
Glenveagh Properties 11.62%13.97%4.28%

In the previous week, Portmeirion Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Glenveagh Properties'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Portmeirion Group Neutral
Glenveagh Properties Neutral

Glenveagh Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Portmeirion Group. Portmeirion Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Glenveagh Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Portmeirion Group£91.06M0.28-£10.98M-£45.30N/A
Glenveagh Properties£925.88M0.01£4.39B£19.700.12

Portmeirion Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 98.93%. Given Portmeirion Group's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Portmeirion Group is more favorable than Glenveagh Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Portmeirion Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Glenveagh Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Portmeirion Group has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Glenveagh Properties has a beta of 0.833, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

0.8% of Portmeirion Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.9% of Glenveagh Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Portmeirion Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Glenveagh Properties shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Glenveagh Properties beats Portmeirion Group on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Glenveagh Properties compare to AIREA?

AIREA (LON:AIEA) and Glenveagh Properties (LON:GLV) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Glenveagh Properties has a net margin of 11.62% compared to AIREA's net margin of 0.31%. Glenveagh Properties' return on equity of 13.97% beat AIREA's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AIREA0.31% 0.39% 1.99%
Glenveagh Properties 11.62%13.97%4.28%

10.7% of AIREA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.9% of Glenveagh Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.0% of AIREA shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Glenveagh Properties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Glenveagh Properties has higher revenue and earnings than AIREA. Glenveagh Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AIREA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AIREA£21.45M0.50£1.17M£2.5410.63
Glenveagh Properties£925.88M0.01£4.39B£19.700.12

AIREA has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Glenveagh Properties has a beta of 0.833, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
AIREA
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Glenveagh Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, AIREA's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Glenveagh Properties'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
AIREA Neutral
Glenveagh Properties Neutral

Summary

Glenveagh Properties beats AIREA on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Glenveagh Properties News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GLV and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GLV vs. The Competition

MetricGlenveagh PropertiesHousehold Durables IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£12.20M£5.20B£12.71B£2.51B
Dividend YieldN/A3.63%58.25%6.24%
P/E Ratio0.1212.5245.78366.83
Price / Sales0.0159.9193.5889,753.13
Price / Cash0.069.0528.5627.89
Price / Book0.022.694.086.33
Net Income£4.39B£270.86M£445.67M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-4.37%-2.96%-2.31%-0.69%
1 Month Performance-5.93%-2.71%-3.96%0.18%
1 Year Performance21.86%-7.93%-6.12%20.03%

Glenveagh Properties Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GLV
Glenveagh Properties
N/AGBX 2.36
+2.8%
N/A+19.8%£12.20M£925.88M0.12502
WJG
Watkin Jones
2.6709 of 5 stars
GBX 16.36
+1.7%
GBX 38
+132.3%
-48.6%£42.03M£250.83MN/A727
ULTP
Ultimate Products
N/AGBX 48.60
-3.2%
GBX 75
+54.3%
-21.6%£40.55M£145.10M10.80361
CHH
Churchill China
N/AGBX 367.15
+4.9%
N/A-12.2%£40.38M£76.28M9.251,500
PMP
Portmeirion Group
N/AGBX 50.90
-4.0%
GBX 100
+96.5%
-61.0%£25.83M£91.06MN/A802

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GLV) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners