Sareum (SAR) Competitors

Sareum logo
GBX 22.04 -0.96 (-4.17%)
As of 12:22 PM Eastern

SAR vs. SPE, IGR, PHD, FEN, and NMT

Should you buy Sareum stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Sareum with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Sareum include Sopheon (SPE), IG Design Group (IGR), Proactis (PHD), Frenkel Topping Group (FEN), and Neometals (NMT). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does Sareum compare to Sopheon?

Sopheon (LON:SPE) and Sareum (LON:SAR) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Sareum has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Sopheon's net margin of -0.14%. Sopheon's return on equity of -0.18% beat Sareum's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sopheon-0.14% -0.18% 2.70%
Sareum N/A -284.01%-113.80%

In the previous week, Sopheon and Sopheon both had 1 articles in the media. Sopheon's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sareum'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sopheon
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Sareum
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Sopheon has higher revenue and earnings than Sareum.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sopheon£38.12M0.00N/AN/AN/A
SareumN/AN/A-£5.28M-£3.90N/A

41.4% of Sopheon shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.9% of Sopheon shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.7% of Sareum shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sopheon has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sareum has a beta of -1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 208% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Sopheon beats Sareum on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sareum compare to IG Design Group?

Sareum (LON:SAR) and IG Design Group (LON:IGR) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, IG Design Group had 6 more articles in the media than Sareum. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for IG Design Group and 1 mentions for Sareum. IG Design Group's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Sareum's score of 0.00 indicating that IG Design Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sareum
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
IG Design Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Sareum has a net margin of 0.00% compared to IG Design Group's net margin of -23.57%. IG Design Group's return on equity of -56.70% beat Sareum's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SareumN/A -284.01% -113.80%
IG Design Group -23.57%-56.70%2.85%

19.4% of IG Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. 35.7% of Sareum shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of IG Design Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

IG Design Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sareum. Sareum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IG Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SareumN/AN/A-£5.28M-£3.90N/A
IG Design Group£217.87M0.34£29.18M-£262.40N/A

Sareum has a beta of -1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 208% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IG Design Group has a beta of 0.752, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

IG Design Group has a consensus price target of GBX 150, suggesting a potential upside of 92.31%. Given IG Design Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe IG Design Group is more favorable than Sareum.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sareum
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
IG Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

IG Design Group beats Sareum on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sareum compare to Proactis?

Sareum (LON:SAR) and Proactis (LON:PHD) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, Sareum had 1 more articles in the media than Proactis. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Sareum and 0 mentions for Proactis. Sareum's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Proactis'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sareum Neutral
Proactis Neutral

Proactis' return on equity of 0.00% beat Sareum's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SareumN/A -284.01% -113.80%
Proactis N/A N/A N/A

Proactis has higher revenue and earnings than Sareum. Sareum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Proactis, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SareumN/AN/A-£5.28M-£3.90N/A
Proactis£48.90M0.00N/A-£20.70N/A

Summary

Proactis beats Sareum on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sareum compare to Frenkel Topping Group?

Frenkel Topping Group (LON:FEN) and Sareum (LON:SAR) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Frenkel Topping Group has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Sareum's net margin of 0.00%. Frenkel Topping Group's return on equity of 6.57% beat Sareum's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frenkel Topping Group6.83% 6.57% 5.96%
Sareum N/A -284.01%-113.80%

12.6% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are held by institutional investors. 48.8% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.7% of Sareum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Frenkel Topping Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sareum. Sareum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frenkel Topping Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frenkel Topping Group£40.46M1.50£1.05M£3.1015.96
SareumN/AN/A-£5.28M-£3.90N/A

Frenkel Topping Group has a beta of 0.25956267, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sareum has a beta of -1.08, suggesting that its share price is 208% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Frenkel Topping Group and Frenkel Topping Group both had 1 articles in the media. Frenkel Topping Group's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Sareum's score of 0.00 indicating that Frenkel Topping Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Frenkel Topping Group Positive
Sareum Neutral

Summary

Frenkel Topping Group beats Sareum on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sareum compare to Neometals?

Neometals (LON:NMT) and Sareum (LON:SAR) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Neometals and Neometals both had 1 articles in the media. Neometals' average media sentiment score of 1.69 beat Sareum's score of 0.00 indicating that Neometals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Neometals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Sareum
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Neometals has a beta of 1.44, meaning that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sareum has a beta of -1.08, meaning that its share price is 208% less volatile than the broader market.

Neometals' return on equity of -106.33% beat Sareum's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NeometalsN/A -106.33% -15.03%
Sareum N/A -284.01%-113.80%

0.8% of Neometals shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.5% of Neometals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.7% of Sareum shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Sareum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neometals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NeometalsN/AN/A-£71.35M-£1.61N/A
SareumN/AN/A-£5.28M-£3.90N/A

Summary

Neometals beats Sareum on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sareum News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SAR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SAR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SAR vs. The Competition

MetricSareumBiotechnology IndustryMedical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£30.54M£467.51M£6.48B£2.78B
Dividend Yield1.10%3.86%2.68%6.16%
P/E Ratio-5.653.1824.66365.72
Price / SalesN/A6,492.90529.8986,253.73
Price / Cash11.3213.1327.9227.85
Price / Book8.4491.5010.847.93
Net Income-£5.28M-£96.07M£3.56B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-8.17%1.66%1.71%-0.87%
1 Month Performance7.51%0.74%0.48%-0.76%
1 Year Performance50.96%64.24%32.98%70.67%

Sareum Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SAR
Sareum
N/AGBX 22.04
-4.2%
N/A+50.8%£30.54MN/AN/A3,211
SPE
Sopheon
N/AN/AN/AN/A£106.03M£38.12MN/A174
IGR
IG Design Group
4.0633 of 5 stars
GBX 76.50
flat
GBX 150
+96.1%
-10.1%£72.91M£217.87MN/A3,092
PHD
Proactis
N/AN/AN/AN/A£70.69M£48.90MN/A516
FEN
Frenkel Topping Group
N/AGBX 50
flat
N/A+5.0%£61.45M£40.46M16.13307

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SAR) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners