Free Trial
→ Read this warning immediately (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free FEN Stock Alerts

Frenkel Topping Group (FEN) Competitors

Frenkel Topping Group logo
GBX 49.50 -0.50 (-1.00%)
As of 11:54 AM Eastern
Compare

FEN vs. GRX, CHI, IRR, MHN, and SPE

Should you buy Frenkel Topping Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Frenkel Topping Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Frenkel Topping Group include GreenX Metals (GRX), CT UK High Income Trust (CHI), IronRidge Resources (IRR), Menhaden Resource Efficiency (MHN), and Sopheon (SPE). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does Frenkel Topping Group compare to GreenX Metals?

Frenkel Topping Group (LON:FEN) and GreenX Metals (LON:GRX) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Frenkel Topping Group has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GreenX Metals has a beta of 0.976, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Frenkel Topping Group and Frenkel Topping Group both had 1 articles in the media. Frenkel Topping Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled GreenX Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Frenkel Topping Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
GreenX Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

12.6% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of GreenX Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.8% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.5% of GreenX Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Frenkel Topping Group has higher revenue and earnings than GreenX Metals. GreenX Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frenkel Topping Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frenkel Topping Group£40.46M1.50£1.05M£3.1015.97
GreenX Metals£244.87K635.71-£9.45M-£4.27N/A

Frenkel Topping Group has a net margin of 10.00% compared to GreenX Metals' net margin of -989.60%. Frenkel Topping Group's return on equity of 9.45% beat GreenX Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frenkel Topping Group10.00% 9.45% 5.96%
GreenX Metals -989.60%-113.12%-14.69%

Summary

Frenkel Topping Group beats GreenX Metals on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frenkel Topping Group compare to CT UK High Income Trust?

Frenkel Topping Group (LON:FEN) and CT UK High Income Trust (LON:CHI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

CT UK High Income Trust has a net margin of 120.92% compared to Frenkel Topping Group's net margin of 10.00%. CT UK High Income Trust's return on equity of 15.96% beat Frenkel Topping Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frenkel Topping Group10.00% 9.45% 5.96%
CT UK High Income Trust 120.92%15.96%6.32%

In the previous week, Frenkel Topping Group had 1 more articles in the media than CT UK High Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Frenkel Topping Group and 0 mentions for CT UK High Income Trust. Frenkel Topping Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT UK High Income Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Frenkel Topping Group Neutral
CT UK High Income Trust Neutral

12.6% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of CT UK High Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 48.8% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of CT UK High Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Frenkel Topping Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. CT UK High Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Frenkel Topping Group pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CT UK High Income Trust pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CT UK High Income Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Frenkel Topping Group. CT UK High Income Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frenkel Topping Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frenkel Topping Group£40.46M1.50£1.05M£3.1015.97
CT UK High Income Trust£21.36M6.20£11.22M£7.5014.53

Frenkel Topping Group has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT UK High Income Trust has a beta of 0.7569438, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CT UK High Income Trust beats Frenkel Topping Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frenkel Topping Group compare to IronRidge Resources?

IronRidge Resources (LON:IRR) and Frenkel Topping Group (LON:FEN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Frenkel Topping Group has a net margin of 10.00% compared to IronRidge Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Frenkel Topping Group's return on equity of 9.45% beat IronRidge Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IronRidge ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Frenkel Topping Group 10.00%9.45%5.96%

In the previous week, Frenkel Topping Group had 1 more articles in the media than IronRidge Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Frenkel Topping Group and 0 mentions for IronRidge Resources. IronRidge Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Frenkel Topping Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
IronRidge Resources Neutral
Frenkel Topping Group Neutral

12.6% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.8% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Frenkel Topping Group has higher revenue and earnings than IronRidge Resources. IronRidge Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frenkel Topping Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IronRidge Resources£56.06K0.00N/A-£0.60N/A
Frenkel Topping Group£40.46M1.50£1.05M£3.1015.97

Summary

Frenkel Topping Group beats IronRidge Resources on 9 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frenkel Topping Group compare to Menhaden Resource Efficiency?

Menhaden Resource Efficiency (LON:MHN) and Frenkel Topping Group (LON:FEN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Menhaden Resource Efficiency pays an annual dividend of GBX 0 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Frenkel Topping Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Menhaden Resource Efficiency pays out 0.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Frenkel Topping Group pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

31.3% of Menhaden Resource Efficiency shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.6% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are held by institutional investors. 37.0% of Menhaden Resource Efficiency shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 48.8% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Menhaden Resource Efficiency has a net margin of 97.04% compared to Frenkel Topping Group's net margin of 10.00%. Menhaden Resource Efficiency's return on equity of 20.90% beat Frenkel Topping Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Menhaden Resource Efficiency97.04% 20.90% N/A
Frenkel Topping Group 10.00%9.45%5.96%

In the previous week, Frenkel Topping Group had 1 more articles in the media than Menhaden Resource Efficiency. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Frenkel Topping Group and 0 mentions for Menhaden Resource Efficiency. Menhaden Resource Efficiency's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Frenkel Topping Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Menhaden Resource Efficiency Neutral
Frenkel Topping Group Neutral

Menhaden Resource Efficiency has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Frenkel Topping Group. Menhaden Resource Efficiency is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frenkel Topping Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Menhaden Resource Efficiency£2.24M53.81£16.15M£20.497.47
Frenkel Topping Group£40.46M1.50£1.05M£3.1015.97

Summary

Menhaden Resource Efficiency beats Frenkel Topping Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frenkel Topping Group compare to Sopheon?

Frenkel Topping Group (LON:FEN) and Sopheon (LON:SPE) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Frenkel Topping Group has a net margin of 10.00% compared to Sopheon's net margin of -0.14%. Frenkel Topping Group's return on equity of 9.45% beat Sopheon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frenkel Topping Group10.00% 9.45% 5.96%
Sopheon -0.14%-0.18%2.70%

Frenkel Topping Group has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sopheon has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

12.6% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.4% of Sopheon shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.8% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 48.9% of Sopheon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Frenkel Topping Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Sopheon pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Frenkel Topping Group pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Frenkel Topping Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sopheon.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frenkel Topping Group£40.46M1.50£1.05M£3.1015.97
Sopheon£38.12M0.00N/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Frenkel Topping Group had 1 more articles in the media than Sopheon. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Frenkel Topping Group and 0 mentions for Sopheon. Frenkel Topping Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sopheon'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Frenkel Topping Group Neutral
Sopheon Neutral

Summary

Frenkel Topping Group beats Sopheon on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Frenkel Topping Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FEN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FEN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFrenkel Topping GroupAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£60.83M£2.45B£5.71B£2.74B
Dividend Yield2.75%6.02%5.28%6.16%
P/E Ratio15.9725.8616.35366.44
Price / Sales1.502,084.661,110.3987,084.52
Price / Cash43.3860.1548.6827.85
Price / Book1.431.366.497.61
Net Income£1.05M£264.62M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.02%-1.04%-0.76%-0.95%
1 Month Performance2.23%-0.47%0.56%1.56%
1 Year Performance4.87%10.11%18.81%72.41%

Frenkel Topping Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FEN
Frenkel Topping Group
N/AGBX 49.50
-1.0%		N/A+5.9%£60.83M£40.46M15.97307
GRX
GreenX Metals
N/AGBX 50.37
+1.8%		N/A+32.2%£156.82M£244.87KN/AN/A
CHI
CT UK High Income Trust
N/AGBX 114.75
+3.4%		N/A+7.5%£139.37M£17.18M7.93N/A
IRR
IronRidge Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/A£134.83M£56.06KN/AN/A
MHN
Menhaden Resource Efficiency
N/AGBX 153
+∞		N/AN/A£120.60M£2.24M7.47147,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:FEN) was last updated on 6/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Tiny Nasdaq Firm Lands €13.9 Million Semiconductor Deal
One small Nasdaq-listed company just landed a 13.9 million euro contract tied to a new advanced-node semicondu...
Finplays | Sponsoredtc pixel
Goldman Sachs just told you what to buy (most people missed it)
Goldman Sachs just revealed that 40% of AI data centers will be crippled by electricity shortages by 2027 - no...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
No. You’re not imagining it…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
One hidden supplier shipped 5 billion parts to SpaceX
Most investors are focused on the historic $1.75 trillion SpaceX IPO expected around June 30. But there's a le...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran
For a moment… Forget about Trump’s ties to Israel. Forget about reports of Iran’s nuclear program. Be...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel