Go Pro

Macfarlane Group (MACF) Competitors

Macfarlane Group logo
GBX 71 -1.00 (-1.39%)
As of 07:37 AM Eastern

MACF vs. RM2, RBN, SYM, CRU, and SWR

Should you buy Macfarlane Group stock or one of its competitors? Macfarlane Group's main competitors and comparable companies include RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L) (RM2), Robinson (RBN), Symphony Environmental Technologies (SYM), Coral Products (CRU), and Smurfit Westrock (di) (SWR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "containers & packaging" industry.

How does Macfarlane Group compare to RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L)?

RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L) (LON:RM2) and Macfarlane Group (LON:MACF) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Macfarlane Group had 1 more articles in the media than RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Macfarlane Group and 0 mentions for RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L). RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Macfarlane Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L) Neutral
Macfarlane Group Neutral

33.2% of Macfarlane Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Macfarlane Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Macfarlane Group has a consensus price target of GBX 120, suggesting a potential upside of 69.01%. Given Macfarlane Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Macfarlane Group is more favorable than RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Macfarlane Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Macfarlane Group has a net margin of 2.10% compared to RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Macfarlane Group's return on equity of 5.20% beat RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L)N/A N/A N/A
Macfarlane Group 2.10%5.20%6.12%

Macfarlane Group has higher revenue and earnings than RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L). RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Macfarlane Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L)£5.49M0.00N/A-£692.00N/A
Macfarlane Group£300.81M0.37£14.61M£3.9817.84

Summary

Macfarlane Group beats RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L) on 12 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Macfarlane Group compare to Robinson?

Robinson (LON:RBN) and Macfarlane Group (LON:MACF) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, Robinson and Robinson both had 1 articles in the media. Robinson's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Macfarlane Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Robinson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Robinson
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Macfarlane Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

0.0% of Robinson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.2% of Macfarlane Group shares are held by institutional investors. 12.1% of Robinson shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Macfarlane Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Macfarlane Group has higher revenue and earnings than Robinson. Robinson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Macfarlane Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Robinson£56.21M0.40£541.00K£13.609.92
Macfarlane Group£300.81M0.37£14.61M£3.9817.84

Robinson has a net margin of 4.05% compared to Macfarlane Group's net margin of 2.10%. Robinson's return on equity of 8.96% beat Macfarlane Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Robinson4.05% 8.96% 2.58%
Macfarlane Group 2.10%5.20%6.12%

Robinson pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Macfarlane Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Robinson pays out 44.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Macfarlane Group pays out 92.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Robinson has a beta of 0.074, indicating that its stock price is 93% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Macfarlane Group has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Macfarlane Group has a consensus price target of GBX 120, indicating a potential upside of 69.01%. Given Macfarlane Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Macfarlane Group is more favorable than Robinson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Robinson
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Macfarlane Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Macfarlane Group beats Robinson on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Macfarlane Group compare to Symphony Environmental Technologies?

Macfarlane Group (LON:MACF) and Symphony Environmental Technologies (LON:SYM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and profitability.

Macfarlane Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 120, suggesting a potential upside of 69.01%. Given Macfarlane Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Macfarlane Group is more favorable than Symphony Environmental Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Macfarlane Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Symphony Environmental Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Macfarlane Group and Macfarlane Group both had 1 articles in the media. Macfarlane Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Symphony Environmental Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Macfarlane Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Symphony Environmental Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Macfarlane Group has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Symphony Environmental Technologies has a beta of 0.811, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

33.2% of Macfarlane Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.7% of Symphony Environmental Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Macfarlane Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.8% of Symphony Environmental Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Macfarlane Group has higher revenue and earnings than Symphony Environmental Technologies. Symphony Environmental Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Macfarlane Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Macfarlane Group£300.81M0.37£14.61M£3.9817.84
Symphony Environmental Technologies£5.73M3.51-£2.16M-£1.08N/A

Macfarlane Group has a net margin of 2.10% compared to Symphony Environmental Technologies' net margin of -43.53%. Macfarlane Group's return on equity of 5.20% beat Symphony Environmental Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Macfarlane Group2.10% 5.20% 6.12%
Symphony Environmental Technologies -43.53%-1,282.78%-18.50%

Summary

Macfarlane Group beats Symphony Environmental Technologies on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Macfarlane Group compare to Coral Products?

Coral Products (LON:CRU) and Macfarlane Group (LON:MACF) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and profitability.

Coral Products has a net margin of 5.39% compared to Macfarlane Group's net margin of 2.10%. Coral Products' return on equity of 14.91% beat Macfarlane Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Coral Products5.39% 14.91% 0.70%
Macfarlane Group 2.10%5.20%6.12%

Coral Products pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Macfarlane Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Coral Products pays out 11.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Macfarlane Group pays out 92.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Macfarlane Group has a consensus price target of GBX 120, indicating a potential upside of 69.01%. Given Macfarlane Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Macfarlane Group is more favorable than Coral Products.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Coral Products
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Macfarlane Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Macfarlane Group had 1 more articles in the media than Coral Products. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Macfarlane Group and 0 mentions for Coral Products. Coral Products' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Macfarlane Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Coral Products Neutral
Macfarlane Group Neutral

Macfarlane Group has higher revenue and earnings than Coral Products. Coral Products is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Macfarlane Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Coral Products£33.26M0.15-£908.66K£2.142.57
Macfarlane Group£300.81M0.37£14.61M£3.9817.84

6.8% of Coral Products shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.2% of Macfarlane Group shares are held by institutional investors. 33.0% of Coral Products shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Macfarlane Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Coral Products has a beta of 0.306, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Macfarlane Group has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Macfarlane Group beats Coral Products on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Macfarlane Group compare to Smurfit Westrock (di)?

Macfarlane Group (LON:MACF) and Smurfit Westrock (di) (LON:SWR) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Macfarlane Group had 1 more articles in the media than Smurfit Westrock (di). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Macfarlane Group and 0 mentions for Smurfit Westrock (di). Macfarlane Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Smurfit Westrock (di)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Macfarlane Group Neutral
Smurfit Westrock (di) Neutral

Macfarlane Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Smurfit Westrock (di) pays an annual dividend of GBX 174.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Macfarlane Group pays out 92.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Smurfit Westrock (di) pays out 242.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Macfarlane Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Smurfit Westrock (di). Macfarlane Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Smurfit Westrock (di), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Macfarlane Group£300.81M0.37£14.61M£3.9817.84
Smurfit Westrock (di)£31.24B0.56N/A£72.0046.65

Macfarlane Group has a net margin of 2.10% compared to Smurfit Westrock (di)'s net margin of 0.00%. Macfarlane Group's return on equity of 5.20% beat Smurfit Westrock (di)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Macfarlane Group2.10% 5.20% 6.12%
Smurfit Westrock (di) N/A N/A N/A

Macfarlane Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 120, indicating a potential upside of 69.01%. Smurfit Westrock (di) has a consensus target price of GBX 4,200, indicating a potential upside of 25.04%. Given Macfarlane Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Macfarlane Group is more favorable than Smurfit Westrock (di).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Macfarlane Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Smurfit Westrock (di)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

33.2% of Macfarlane Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.7% of Smurfit Westrock (di) shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Macfarlane Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Smurfit Westrock (di) shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Macfarlane Group beats Smurfit Westrock (di) on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Macfarlane Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MACF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MACF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MACF vs. The Competition

MetricMacfarlane GroupContainers & Packaging IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£110.27M£6.80B£4.85B£2.87B
Dividend Yield5.06%2.86%4.71%6.10%
P/E Ratio17.8418.2027.53368.05
Price / Sales0.3715.984,291.7383,204.98
Price / Cash24.84-0.8424.6527.89
Price / Book0.963.068.857.06
Net Income£14.61M£205.07M£154.79M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-3.14%-0.48%0.47%0.40%
1 Month Performance4.72%2.36%9.17%3.04%
1 Year Performance-25.73%2.55%44.13%64.41%

Macfarlane Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MACF
Macfarlane Group
2.8061 of 5 stars
GBX 71
-1.4%
GBX 120
+69.0%
-24.2%£110.27M£300.81M17.841,000
RM2
RM2 International S.A. (RM2.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£28.89M£5.49MN/A93
RBN
Robinson
N/AGBX 131.60
-0.7%
N/A-5.3%£22.05M£56.21M9.68346
SYM
Symphony Environmental Technologies
N/AGBX 8.50
+6.3%
N/A-22.7%£20.09M£5.73MN/A1,120
CRU
Coral Products
N/AGBX 5.50
-4.3%
N/A-45.8%£4.89M£33.26M2.57186

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:MACF) was last updated on 8/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners