Go Pro

Mercia Asset Management (MERC) Competitors

Mercia Asset Management logo
GBX 28.06 -0.13 (-0.46%)
As of 12:32 PM Eastern

MERC vs. JII, BIPS, GHE, SSIT, and AAIF

Should you buy Mercia Asset Management stock or one of its competitors? Mercia Asset Management's main competitors and comparable companies include JPMorgan Indian (JII), Invesco Bond Income Plus (BIPS), Gresham House (GHE), Seraphim Space Investment Trust (SSIT), and abrdn Asian Income Fund (AAIF). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Mercia Asset Management compare to JPMorgan Indian?

Mercia Asset Management (LON:MERC) and JPMorgan Indian (LON:JII) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

JPMorgan Indian has a net margin of 101.13% compared to Mercia Asset Management's net margin of -25.23%. Mercia Asset Management's return on equity of -4.78% beat JPMorgan Indian's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mercia Asset Management-25.23% -4.78% 0.31%
JPMorgan Indian 101.13%-22.45%10.97%

In the previous week, Mercia Asset Management had 2 more articles in the media than JPMorgan Indian. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mercia Asset Management and 1 mentions for JPMorgan Indian. Mercia Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat JPMorgan Indian's score of 0.67 indicating that Mercia Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Mercia Asset Management
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
JPMorgan Indian
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

32.1% of Mercia Asset Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of JPMorgan Indian shares are held by institutional investors. 18.6% of Mercia Asset Management shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of JPMorgan Indian shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mercia Asset Management has higher revenue and earnings than JPMorgan Indian. Mercia Asset Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Indian, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mercia Asset Management£34.14M3.46£436.32M-£2.00N/A
JPMorgan Indian£29.88M15.46£121.67M£0.195,295.66

Mercia Asset Management presently has a consensus target price of GBX 67, suggesting a potential upside of 138.77%. Given Mercia Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Mercia Asset Management is more favorable than JPMorgan Indian.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mercia Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
JPMorgan Indian
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Mercia Asset Management has a beta of 0.761, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Indian has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Mercia Asset Management beats JPMorgan Indian on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mercia Asset Management compare to Invesco Bond Income Plus?

Mercia Asset Management (LON:MERC) and Invesco Bond Income Plus (LON:BIPS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Mercia Asset Management has a beta of 0.761, meaning that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Invesco Bond Income Plus has a beta of 0.307, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Mercia Asset Management has higher revenue and earnings than Invesco Bond Income Plus. Mercia Asset Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Invesco Bond Income Plus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mercia Asset Management£34.14M3.46£436.32M-£2.00N/A
Invesco Bond Income Plus£31.43M14.38£39.68M£14.1512.01

Invesco Bond Income Plus has a net margin of 93.24% compared to Mercia Asset Management's net margin of -25.23%. Invesco Bond Income Plus' return on equity of 7.00% beat Mercia Asset Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mercia Asset Management-25.23% -4.78% 0.31%
Invesco Bond Income Plus 93.24%7.00%5.67%

In the previous week, Mercia Asset Management had 2 more articles in the media than Invesco Bond Income Plus. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mercia Asset Management and 1 mentions for Invesco Bond Income Plus. Mercia Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Invesco Bond Income Plus' score of 0.67 indicating that Mercia Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Mercia Asset Management
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Invesco Bond Income Plus
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

32.1% of Mercia Asset Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.3% of Invesco Bond Income Plus shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.6% of Mercia Asset Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Invesco Bond Income Plus shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mercia Asset Management presently has a consensus price target of GBX 67, suggesting a potential upside of 138.77%. Given Mercia Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Mercia Asset Management is more favorable than Invesco Bond Income Plus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mercia Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Invesco Bond Income Plus
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Mercia Asset Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Invesco Bond Income Plus pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Mercia Asset Management pays out -48.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Invesco Bond Income Plus pays out 86.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Mercia Asset Management beats Invesco Bond Income Plus on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mercia Asset Management compare to Gresham House?

Mercia Asset Management (LON:MERC) and Gresham House (LON:GHE) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Mercia Asset Management currently has a consensus target price of GBX 67, suggesting a potential upside of 138.77%. Given Mercia Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Mercia Asset Management is more favorable than Gresham House.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mercia Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gresham House
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Mercia Asset Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Gresham House pays an annual dividend of GBX 16 per share. Mercia Asset Management pays out -48.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gresham House pays out 4,444.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mercia Asset Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

32.1% of Mercia Asset Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.2% of Gresham House shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.6% of Mercia Asset Management shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.5% of Gresham House shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Mercia Asset Management had 2 more articles in the media than Gresham House. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mercia Asset Management and 1 mentions for Gresham House. Mercia Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Gresham House's score of 0.55 indicating that Mercia Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Mercia Asset Management
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gresham House
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Mercia Asset Management has a beta of 0.761, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gresham House has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Mercia Asset Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gresham House. Mercia Asset Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gresham House, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mercia Asset Management£34.14M3.46£436.32M-£2.00N/A
Gresham House£86.03M0.00£14.13M£0.36N/A

Gresham House has a net margin of 16.16% compared to Mercia Asset Management's net margin of -25.23%. Gresham House's return on equity of 9.68% beat Mercia Asset Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mercia Asset Management-25.23% -4.78% 0.31%
Gresham House 16.16%9.68%3.69%

Summary

Mercia Asset Management beats Gresham House on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mercia Asset Management compare to Seraphim Space Investment Trust?

Mercia Asset Management (LON:MERC) and Seraphim Space Investment Trust (LON:SSIT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and earnings.

Seraphim Space Investment Trust has a net margin of 1,940.84% compared to Mercia Asset Management's net margin of -25.23%. Seraphim Space Investment Trust's return on equity of 20.81% beat Mercia Asset Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mercia Asset Management-25.23% -4.78% 0.31%
Seraphim Space Investment Trust 1,940.84%20.81%N/A

Mercia Asset Management presently has a consensus price target of GBX 67, suggesting a potential upside of 138.77%. Given Mercia Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Mercia Asset Management is more favorable than Seraphim Space Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mercia Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Seraphim Space Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Mercia Asset Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Seraphim Space Investment Trust. Mercia Asset Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seraphim Space Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mercia Asset Management£34.14M3.46£436.32M-£2.00N/A
Seraphim Space Investment Trust£99.56M4.45£6.88M£41.264.52

32.1% of Mercia Asset Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Seraphim Space Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.6% of Mercia Asset Management shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Seraphim Space Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Mercia Asset Management has a beta of 0.761, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seraphim Space Investment Trust has a beta of 2.112, suggesting that its stock price is 111% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mercia Asset Management had 3 more articles in the media than Seraphim Space Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mercia Asset Management and 0 mentions for Seraphim Space Investment Trust. Mercia Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Seraphim Space Investment Trust's score of 1.02 indicating that Mercia Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mercia Asset Management Positive
Seraphim Space Investment Trust Positive

Summary

Mercia Asset Management beats Seraphim Space Investment Trust on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mercia Asset Management compare to abrdn Asian Income Fund?

abrdn Asian Income Fund (LON:AAIF) and Mercia Asset Management (LON:MERC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Mercia Asset Management has lower revenue, but higher earnings than abrdn Asian Income Fund. Mercia Asset Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn Asian Income Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Asian Income Fund£183.65M2.51£42.37M£125.502.58
Mercia Asset Management£34.14M3.46£436.32M-£2.00N/A

In the previous week, Mercia Asset Management had 2 more articles in the media than abrdn Asian Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mercia Asset Management and 1 mentions for abrdn Asian Income Fund. Mercia Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat abrdn Asian Income Fund's score of 0.75 indicating that Mercia Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
abrdn Asian Income Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Mercia Asset Management
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

abrdn Asian Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Mercia Asset Management pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. abrdn Asian Income Fund pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mercia Asset Management pays out -48.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

abrdn Asian Income Fund has a net margin of 93.24% compared to Mercia Asset Management's net margin of -25.23%. abrdn Asian Income Fund's return on equity of 39.44% beat Mercia Asset Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn Asian Income Fund93.24% 39.44% 7.35%
Mercia Asset Management -25.23%-4.78%0.31%

Mercia Asset Management has a consensus price target of GBX 67, indicating a potential upside of 138.77%. Given Mercia Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Mercia Asset Management is more favorable than abrdn Asian Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
abrdn Asian Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Mercia Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

4.8% of abrdn Asian Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.1% of Mercia Asset Management shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of abrdn Asian Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.6% of Mercia Asset Management shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

abrdn Asian Income Fund has a beta of 0.699, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mercia Asset Management has a beta of 0.761, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Mercia Asset Management beats abrdn Asian Income Fund on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mercia Asset Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MERC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MERC vs. The Competition

MetricMercia Asset ManagementCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£118.14M£5.20B£13.58B£2.89B
Dividend Yield3.57%7.51%5.99%6.22%
P/E Ratio-14.0329.5224.58366.61
Price / Sales3.461,198.50506.0889,510.94
Price / Cash2.6047.8929.8727.89
Price / Book0.653.502.706.33
Net Income£436.32M£417.69M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.04%-1.43%0.29%-0.12%
1 Month Performance5.89%-3.11%-2.17%5.22%
1 Year Performance-16.11%1.00%7.22%18.52%

Mercia Asset Management Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MERC
Mercia Asset Management
4.2826 of 5 stars
GBX 28.06
-0.5%
GBX 67
+138.8%
-15.7%£118.14M£34.14MN/A3,320
JII
JPMorgan Indian
N/AGBX 1,012
+0.2%
N/A-0.2%£461.80M£29.88M5,295.66N/A
BIPS
Invesco Bond Income Plus
N/AGBX 170.50
-0.3%
N/A-2.8%£454.57M£31.43M12.05N/A
GHE
Gresham House
N/AN/AN/AN/A£451.55M£86.03M3,055.56216
SSIT
Seraphim Space Investment Trust
N/AGBX 189.12
-0.6%
N/A+166.3%£451.15M£99.56M4.58N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:MERC) was last updated on 9/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners