Free Trial
→ Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside) (From InvestorPlace) (Ad)tc pixel Free PHI Stock Alerts

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust (PHI) Competitors

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust logo
GBX 1,160 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 12:13 PM Eastern
Compare

PHI vs. BBGI, TEF, CNCT, CEL, and CNSL

Should you buy Pacific Horizon Investment Trust stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Pacific Horizon Investment Trust with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Pacific Horizon Investment Trust include BBGI Global Infrastructure (BBGI), Telford Homes (TEF), Smiths News Plc (CNCT.L) (CNCT), Celadon Pharmaceuticals (CEL), and Cambridge Nutritional Sciences (CNSL). These companies are all part of the "communication" industry.

How does Pacific Horizon Investment Trust compare to BBGI Global Infrastructure?

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust (LON:PHI) and BBGI Global Infrastructure (LON:BBGI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

BBGI Global Infrastructure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pacific Horizon Investment Trust. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BBGI Global Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust£243.03M3.87£26.66M£288.484.02
BBGI Global Infrastructure£67.98M14.48£54.89M£7.7217.93

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has a beta of 0.824, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BBGI Global Infrastructure has a beta of 0.23, meaning that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pacific Horizon Investment Trust had 4 more articles in the media than BBGI Global Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Pacific Horizon Investment Trust and 0 mentions for BBGI Global Infrastructure. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat BBGI Global Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that Pacific Horizon Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust Very Positive
BBGI Global Infrastructure Neutral

9.0% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.9% of BBGI Global Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of BBGI Global Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. BBGI Global Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BBGI Global Infrastructure pays out 103.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has a net margin of 97.19% compared to BBGI Global Infrastructure's net margin of 61.84%. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's return on equity of 34.20% beat BBGI Global Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust97.19% 34.20% 3.98%
BBGI Global Infrastructure 61.84%2.52%3.32%

Summary

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust beats BBGI Global Infrastructure on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Horizon Investment Trust compare to Telford Homes?

Telford Homes (LON:TEF) and Pacific Horizon Investment Trust (LON:PHI) are both small-cap communication companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Telford Homes. Telford Homes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pacific Horizon Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Telford Homes£336.12M0.00N/A£44.50N/A
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust£243.03M3.87£26.66M£288.484.02

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has a net margin of 97.19% compared to Telford Homes' net margin of 0.00%. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's return on equity of 34.20% beat Telford Homes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Telford HomesN/A N/A N/A
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust 97.19%34.20%3.98%

9.0% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Telford Homes pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.17 per share. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Telford Homes pays out 0.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Pacific Horizon Investment Trust had 4 more articles in the media than Telford Homes. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Pacific Horizon Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Telford Homes. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat Telford Homes' score of 0.00 indicating that Pacific Horizon Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Telford Homes Neutral
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust Very Positive

Summary

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust beats Telford Homes on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Horizon Investment Trust compare to Smiths News Plc (CNCT.L)?

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust (LON:PHI) and Smiths News Plc (CNCT.L) (LON:CNCT) are both small-cap communication companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Pacific Horizon Investment Trust had 4 more articles in the media than Smiths News Plc (CNCT.L). MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Pacific Horizon Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Smiths News Plc (CNCT.L). Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat Smiths News Plc (CNCT.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Pacific Horizon Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust Very Positive
Smiths News Plc (CNCT.L) Neutral

9.0% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Smiths News Plc (CNCT.L). Smiths News Plc (CNCT.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pacific Horizon Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust£243.03M3.87£26.66M£288.484.02
Smiths News Plc (CNCT.L)£1.44B0.00N/A-£18.20N/A

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Smiths News Plc (CNCT.L) pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Smiths News Plc (CNCT.L) pays out -5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has a net margin of 97.19% compared to Smiths News Plc (CNCT.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's return on equity of 34.20% beat Smiths News Plc (CNCT.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust97.19% 34.20% 3.98%
Smiths News Plc (CNCT.L) N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust beats Smiths News Plc (CNCT.L) on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Horizon Investment Trust compare to Celadon Pharmaceuticals?

Celadon Pharmaceuticals (LON:CEL) and Pacific Horizon Investment Trust (LON:PHI) are both small-cap communication companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Celadon Pharmaceuticals. Celadon Pharmaceuticals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pacific Horizon Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celadon Pharmaceuticals£123.38K66.61-£4.97M-£7.98N/A
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust£243.03M3.87£26.66M£288.484.02

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has a net margin of 97.19% compared to Celadon Pharmaceuticals' net margin of -9,520.00%. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's return on equity of 34.20% beat Celadon Pharmaceuticals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celadon Pharmaceuticals-9,520.00% -131.82% -34.40%
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust 97.19%34.20%3.98%

10.7% of Celadon Pharmaceuticals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.0% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 65.1% of Celadon Pharmaceuticals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Pacific Horizon Investment Trust had 4 more articles in the media than Celadon Pharmaceuticals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Pacific Horizon Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Celadon Pharmaceuticals. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat Celadon Pharmaceuticals' score of 0.00 indicating that Pacific Horizon Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celadon Pharmaceuticals Neutral
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust Very Positive

Celadon Pharmaceuticals has a beta of -0.26, suggesting that its share price is 126% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has a beta of 0.824, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust beats Celadon Pharmaceuticals on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pacific Horizon Investment Trust compare to Cambridge Nutritional Sciences?

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust (LON:PHI) and Cambridge Nutritional Sciences (LON:CNSL) are both small-cap communication companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has a net margin of 97.19% compared to Cambridge Nutritional Sciences' net margin of 16.94%. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's return on equity of 34.20% beat Cambridge Nutritional Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust97.19% 34.20% 3.98%
Cambridge Nutritional Sciences 16.94%12.15%-2.36%

In the previous week, Pacific Horizon Investment Trust had 4 more articles in the media than Cambridge Nutritional Sciences. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Pacific Horizon Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Cambridge Nutritional Sciences. Pacific Horizon Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat Cambridge Nutritional Sciences' score of 0.00 indicating that Pacific Horizon Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust Very Positive
Cambridge Nutritional Sciences Neutral

9.0% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of Cambridge Nutritional Sciences shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Pacific Horizon Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.8% of Cambridge Nutritional Sciences shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has a beta of 0.824, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cambridge Nutritional Sciences has a beta of 2.101, meaning that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Cambridge Nutritional Sciences. Cambridge Nutritional Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pacific Horizon Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust£243.03M3.87£26.66M£288.484.02
Cambridge Nutritional Sciences£8.06M0.54-£3.03M£0.603.05

Summary

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust beats Cambridge Nutritional Sciences on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pacific Horizon Investment Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PHI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PHI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PHI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPacific Horizon Investment TrustAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£939.81M£2.42B£5.83B£2.81B
Dividend Yield0.13%5.92%5.20%6.06%
P/E Ratio4.0225.3615.95365.74
Price / Sales3.872,033.101,030.7787,755.58
Price / Cash99.3260.1693.8627.89
Price / Book1.751.386.517.79
Net Income£26.66M£264.68M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.57%0.97%0.96%0.88%
1 Month Performance14.17%3.45%3.09%11.26%
1 Year Performance96.28%13.33%20.37%78.56%

Pacific Horizon Investment Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PHI
Pacific Horizon Investment Trust
N/AGBX 1,160
flat		N/A+98.0%£939.81M£243.03M4.0218,800
BBGI
BBGI Global Infrastructure
N/AGBX 138.50
flat		N/AN/A£984.71M£67.98M17.931,160
TEF
Telford Homes
N/AN/AN/AN/A£265.88M£336.12M7.85104,200
CNCT
Smiths News Plc (CNCT.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£63.41M£1.44BN/A3
CEL
Celadon Pharmaceuticals
N/AGBX 13.40
flat		N/AN/A£8.22M£123.38KN/A2,780

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PHI) was last updated on 5/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The 1934 playbook
In 1934, a legal government maneuver transferred billions in wealth overnight. Most Americans never saw it com...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX eyes a 1.75 trillion valuation - here's what to know
Elon Musk's team has quietly filed confidential paperwork with the SEC for what Bloomberg estimates could be a...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
$30 stock to buy before Starlink goes public (WATCH NOW!)
In the next 3 minutes… James Altucher – legendary investor and venture capitalist… And someone who’s kno...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Emmy-winning analyst releases his next big story Whitney Tilson shocked the nation on 60 Minutes when he ac...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX just filed. The clock is ticking.
Reuters reports Elon Musk filed secretly. Barron's says it's being finalized behind closed doors. CNBC just re...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX will mint billionaires. You won't be one of them.
By the time a company goes public, 95% of profits have already been made. Insiders bought SpaceX at $20 billio...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel