Go Pro

Beacon Energy (BCE) Competitors

Beacon Energy logo
GBX 2.78 -0.22 (-7.43%)
As of 05:30 AM Eastern

BCE vs. CEL, CNSL, OTT, FOX, and CZN

Should you buy Beacon Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Beacon Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Beacon Energy include Celadon Pharmaceuticals (CEL), Cambridge Nutritional Sciences (CNSL), Oxford Technology 3 Venture Capital Trust (OTT), Fox Marble (FOX), and Curzon Energy (CZN). These companies are all part of the "communication" industry.

How does Beacon Energy compare to Celadon Pharmaceuticals?

Beacon Energy (LON:BCE) and Celadon Pharmaceuticals (LON:CEL) are both small-cap communication companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, Beacon Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Celadon Pharmaceuticals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Beacon Energy Neutral
Celadon Pharmaceuticals Neutral

5.0% of Beacon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Celadon Pharmaceuticals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Beacon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 65.1% of Celadon Pharmaceuticals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Beacon Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Celadon Pharmaceuticals. Celadon Pharmaceuticals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beacon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Beacon EnergyN/AN/A-£1.58M-£5.65N/A
Celadon Pharmaceuticals£123.38K66.61-£4.97M-£7.98N/A

Beacon Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Celadon Pharmaceuticals' net margin of -9,520.00%. Celadon Pharmaceuticals' return on equity of -131.82% beat Beacon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Beacon EnergyN/A -196.88% -6.61%
Celadon Pharmaceuticals -9,520.00%-131.82%-34.40%

Beacon Energy has a beta of -0.3, meaning that its stock price is 130% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celadon Pharmaceuticals has a beta of -0.26, meaning that its stock price is 126% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Beacon Energy and Celadon Pharmaceuticals tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beacon Energy compare to Cambridge Nutritional Sciences?

Cambridge Nutritional Sciences (LON:CNSL) and Beacon Energy (LON:BCE) are both small-cap communication companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

1.6% of Cambridge Nutritional Sciences shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.0% of Beacon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.8% of Cambridge Nutritional Sciences shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Beacon Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cambridge Nutritional Sciences' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Beacon Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cambridge Nutritional Sciences Neutral
Beacon Energy Neutral

Cambridge Nutritional Sciences has a beta of 1.93, meaning that its stock price is 93% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Beacon Energy has a beta of -0.3, meaning that its stock price is 130% less volatile than the broader market.

Beacon Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cambridge Nutritional Sciences. Beacon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cambridge Nutritional Sciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cambridge Nutritional Sciences£8.06M0.50-£3.03M£0.602.81
Beacon EnergyN/AN/A-£1.58M-£5.65N/A

Cambridge Nutritional Sciences has a net margin of 16.94% compared to Beacon Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Cambridge Nutritional Sciences' return on equity of 12.15% beat Beacon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cambridge Nutritional Sciences16.94% 12.15% -2.36%
Beacon Energy N/A -196.88%-6.61%

Summary

Cambridge Nutritional Sciences beats Beacon Energy on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beacon Energy compare to Oxford Technology 3 Venture Capital Trust?

Oxford Technology 3 Venture Capital Trust (LON:OTT) and Beacon Energy (LON:BCE) are both small-cap communication companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

5.0% of Beacon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Beacon Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Oxford Technology 3 Venture Capital Trust's return on equity of 0.00% beat Beacon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oxford Technology 3 Venture Capital TrustN/A N/A N/A
Beacon Energy N/A -196.88%-6.61%

Oxford Technology 3 Venture Capital Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Beacon Energy. Beacon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Technology 3 Venture Capital Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Technology 3 Venture Capital Trust-£85K0.00N/A-£2.70N/A
Beacon EnergyN/AN/A-£1.58M-£5.65N/A

In the previous week, Oxford Technology 3 Venture Capital Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Beacon Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Oxford Technology 3 Venture Capital Trust Neutral
Beacon Energy Neutral

Summary

Beacon Energy beats Oxford Technology 3 Venture Capital Trust on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beacon Energy compare to Fox Marble?

Beacon Energy (LON:BCE) and Fox Marble (LON:FOX) are both small-cap communication companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Fox Marble is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beacon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Beacon EnergyN/AN/A-£1.58M-£5.65N/A
Fox MarbleN/AN/A-£2.04M-£0.03N/A

Beacon Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fox Marble's net margin of -282.21%. Fox Marble's return on equity of -38.15% beat Beacon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Beacon EnergyN/A -196.88% -6.61%
Fox Marble -282.21%-38.15%-10.32%

Beacon Energy has a beta of -0.3, suggesting that its share price is 130% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fox Marble has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

5.0% of Beacon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of Fox Marble shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Beacon Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of Fox Marble shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Beacon Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fox Marble'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Beacon Energy Neutral
Fox Marble Neutral

Summary

Beacon Energy beats Fox Marble on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beacon Energy compare to Curzon Energy?

Curzon Energy (LON:CZN) and Beacon Energy (LON:BCE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Curzon Energy has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Beacon Energy has a beta of -0.3, meaning that its stock price is 130% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Curzon Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Beacon Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Curzon Energy Neutral
Beacon Energy Neutral

5.0% of Beacon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.3% of Curzon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Beacon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Curzon Energy's return on equity of 0.00% beat Beacon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Curzon EnergyN/A N/A -272.65%
Beacon Energy N/A -196.88%-6.61%

Beacon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curzon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Curzon EnergyN/AN/AN/A-£0.01N/A
Beacon EnergyN/AN/A-£1.58M-£5.65N/A

Summary

Beacon Energy beats Curzon Energy on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Beacon Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BCE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BCE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BCE vs. The Competition

MetricBeacon EnergyOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.47M£2.00B£10.09B£2.82B
Dividend YieldN/A7.58%11.40%6.15%
P/E Ratio-0.4930.0918.96367.99
Price / SalesN/A1,156.16371.7183,997.84
Price / CashN/A85.5336.6127.89
Price / BookN/A2.294.077.31
Net Income-£1.58M£82.07M£4.24B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.82%0.34%-1.76%0.30%
1 Month Performance2.85%3.29%0.88%0.31%
1 Year PerformanceN/A33.79%25.17%67.61%

Beacon Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BCE
Beacon Energy
N/AGBX 2.78
-7.4%
N/AN/A£3.47MN/AN/A44,600
CEL
Celadon Pharmaceuticals
N/AGBX 13.40
flat
N/AN/A£8.22M£123.38KN/A2,780
CNSL
Cambridge Nutritional Sciences
N/AGBX 1.66
-5.4%
N/A-52.3%£3.94M£8.06M2.763,200
OTT
Oxford Technology 3 Venture Capital Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.13M-£85KN/A203
FOX
Fox Marble
N/AGBX 0.02
-13.0%
N/A-47.5%£704KN/AN/A10,600

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:BCE) was last updated on 7/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners