Go Pro

Neo Energy Metals (NEO) Competitors

Neo Energy Metals logo
GBX 0.83 -0.03 (-3.72%)
As of 07/31/2026 11:40 AM Eastern

NEO vs. TUNG, ADT, ULS, STAF, and FCCN

Should you buy Neo Energy Metals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Neo Energy Metals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Neo Energy Metals include Tungsten (TUNG), AdEPT Technology Group (ADT), ULS Technology (ULS), Staffline Group (STAF), and French Connection Group (FCCN).

How does Neo Energy Metals compare to Tungsten?

Neo Energy Metals (LON:NEO) and Tungsten (LON:TUNG) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Tungsten's return on equity of 0.00% beat Neo Energy Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neo Energy MetalsN/A -503.60% N/A
Tungsten N/A N/A N/A

2.3% of Neo Energy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 40.8% of Neo Energy Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tungsten has higher revenue and earnings than Neo Energy Metals. Tungsten is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neo Energy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neo Energy MetalsN/AN/A-£4.24M£0.184.55
Tungsten£36.39M0.00N/A-£2.80N/A

In the previous week, Tungsten had 6 more articles in the media than Neo Energy Metals. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Tungsten and 1 mentions for Neo Energy Metals. Neo Energy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Tungsten's score of 0.07 indicating that Neo Energy Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Neo Energy Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Tungsten
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Neo Energy Metals beats Tungsten on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Energy Metals compare to AdEPT Technology Group?

Neo Energy Metals (LON:NEO) and AdEPT Technology Group (LON:ADT) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Neo Energy Metals has a beta of 5.044, suggesting that its stock price is 404% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AdEPT Technology Group has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

2.3% of Neo Energy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of AdEPT Technology Group shares are held by institutional investors. 40.8% of Neo Energy Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 61.8% of AdEPT Technology Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Neo Energy Metals had 1 more articles in the media than AdEPT Technology Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Neo Energy Metals and 0 mentions for AdEPT Technology Group. Neo Energy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat AdEPT Technology Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Neo Energy Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Neo Energy Metals Positive
AdEPT Technology Group Neutral

Neo Energy Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AdEPT Technology Group. AdEPT Technology Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neo Energy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neo Energy MetalsN/AN/A-£4.24M£0.184.55
AdEPT Technology Group£68.03M0.00-£4.27M-£0.17N/A

Neo Energy Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to AdEPT Technology Group's net margin of -6.28%. AdEPT Technology Group's return on equity of -29.41% beat Neo Energy Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neo Energy MetalsN/A -503.60% N/A
AdEPT Technology Group -6.28%-29.41%0.16%

Summary

Neo Energy Metals beats AdEPT Technology Group on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Energy Metals compare to ULS Technology?

ULS Technology (LON:ULS) and Neo Energy Metals (LON:NEO) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

2.3% of Neo Energy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.8% of Neo Energy Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ULS Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Neo Energy Metals. ULS Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neo Energy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ULS Technology£20.22M0.00N/A£23.30N/A
Neo Energy MetalsN/AN/A-£4.24M£0.184.55

In the previous week, Neo Energy Metals had 1 more articles in the media than ULS Technology. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Neo Energy Metals and 0 mentions for ULS Technology. Neo Energy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat ULS Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Neo Energy Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
ULS Technology Neutral
Neo Energy Metals Positive

ULS Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Neo Energy Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ULS TechnologyN/A N/A N/A
Neo Energy Metals N/A -503.60%N/A

Summary

Neo Energy Metals beats ULS Technology on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Energy Metals compare to Staffline Group?

Staffline Group (LON:STAF) and Neo Energy Metals (LON:NEO) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation and dividends.

20.8% of Staffline Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.3% of Neo Energy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 36.4% of Staffline Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 40.8% of Neo Energy Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Staffline Group had 5 more articles in the media than Neo Energy Metals. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Staffline Group and 1 mentions for Neo Energy Metals. Neo Energy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Staffline Group's score of 0.59 indicating that Neo Energy Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Staffline Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Neo Energy Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Staffline Group has a net margin of 0.43% compared to Neo Energy Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Staffline Group's return on equity of 13.11% beat Neo Energy Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Staffline Group0.43% 13.11% 2.83%
Neo Energy Metals N/A -503.60%N/A

Staffline Group has a beta of 0.522, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neo Energy Metals has a beta of 5.044, suggesting that its stock price is 404% more volatile than the broader market.

Neo Energy Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Staffline Group. Neo Energy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Staffline Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Staffline Group£1.11B0.04-£18.31M£3.8011.45
Neo Energy MetalsN/AN/A-£4.24M£0.184.55

Summary

Staffline Group beats Neo Energy Metals on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Energy Metals compare to French Connection Group?

Neo Energy Metals (LON:NEO) and French Connection Group (LON:FCCN) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

French Connection Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Neo Energy Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neo Energy MetalsN/A -503.60% N/A
French Connection Group N/A N/A N/A

2.3% of Neo Energy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.8% of Neo Energy Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

French Connection Group has higher revenue and earnings than Neo Energy Metals. French Connection Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neo Energy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neo Energy MetalsN/AN/A-£4.24M£0.184.55
French Connection Group£87.80M0.00N/A-£7.80N/A

In the previous week, Neo Energy Metals had 1 more articles in the media than French Connection Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Neo Energy Metals and 0 mentions for French Connection Group. Neo Energy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat French Connection Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Neo Energy Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Neo Energy Metals Positive
French Connection Group Neutral

Summary

Neo Energy Metals beats French Connection Group on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Neo Energy Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NEO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NEO vs. The Competition

MetricNeo Energy MetalsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£24.02M£11.01B£9.61B£2.68B
Dividend YieldN/A11.26%11.53%6.15%
P/E Ratio4.5519.5719.33368.29
Price / SalesN/A424.24348.1783,501.20
Price / CashN/A39.6536.1027.89
Price / Book2.384.403.987.04
Net Income-£4.24M£5.28B£4.35B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-11.91%-0.42%-0.74%6.44%
1 Month Performance-22.62%5.14%4.30%0.09%
1 Year PerformanceN/A34.39%35.76%63.74%

Neo Energy Metals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NEO
Neo Energy Metals
N/AGBX 0.83
-3.7%
N/AN/A£24.02MN/A4.552,100
TUNG
Tungsten
N/AN/AN/AN/A£69.09M£36.39MN/A200
ADT
AdEPT Technology Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£50.21M£68.03MN/A25,000
ULS
ULS Technology
N/AN/AN/AN/A£47.36M£20.22M3.13100
STAF
Staffline Group
N/AGBX 42
+0.5%
N/A+4.6%£45.95M£1.11B11.052,300

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:NEO) was last updated on 8/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners