Go Pro

Pennant International Group (PEN) Competitors

Pennant International Group logo
GBX 31.55 -0.45 (-1.41%)
As of 11:36 AM Eastern

PEN vs. SAAS, VRE, GETB, OMG, and CALL

Should you buy Pennant International Group stock or one of its competitors? Pennant International Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Microlise Group (SAAS), VR Education (VRE), GetBusy (GETB), Oxford Metrics (OMG), and Cloudcall Group (CALL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "application software" industry.

How does Pennant International Group compare to Microlise Group?

Microlise Group (LON:SAAS) and Pennant International Group (LON:PEN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

22.4% of Microlise Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.6% of Pennant International Group shares are held by institutional investors. 51.9% of Microlise Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.0% of Pennant International Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Microlise Group has a beta of 0.375, indicating that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pennant International Group has a beta of 0.176, indicating that its share price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

Microlise Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pennant International Group. Microlise Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pennant International Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Microlise Group£84.03M0.76£1.35M-£1.87N/A
Pennant International Group£10.99M1.37-£1.09M-£1.70N/A

In the previous week, Pennant International Group had 1 more articles in the media than Microlise Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pennant International Group and 0 mentions for Microlise Group. Pennant International Group's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Microlise Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Pennant International Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Microlise Group Neutral
Pennant International Group Neutral

Microlise Group has a net margin of -3.05% compared to Pennant International Group's net margin of -8.06%. Microlise Group's return on equity of -3.58% beat Pennant International Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Microlise Group-3.05% -3.58% 0.85%
Pennant International Group -8.06%-13.64%-0.28%

Microlise Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 150, indicating a potential upside of 174.22%. Given Microlise Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Microlise Group is more favorable than Pennant International Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Microlise Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pennant International Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Microlise Group beats Pennant International Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pennant International Group compare to VR Education?

Pennant International Group (LON:PEN) and VR Education (LON:VRE) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

VR Education has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pennant International Group. Pennant International Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than VR Education, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pennant International Group£10.99M1.37-£1.09M-£1.70N/A
VR Education£1.98M0.00N/A-£0.90N/A

VR Education has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Pennant International Group's net margin of -8.06%. VR Education's return on equity of 0.00% beat Pennant International Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pennant International Group-8.06% -13.64% -0.28%
VR Education N/A N/A N/A

9.6% of Pennant International Group shares are held by institutional investors. 37.0% of Pennant International Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Pennant International Group had 1 more articles in the media than VR Education. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pennant International Group and 0 mentions for VR Education. Pennant International Group's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat VR Education's score of 0.00 indicating that Pennant International Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pennant International Group Neutral
VR Education Neutral

Summary

Pennant International Group beats VR Education on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pennant International Group compare to GetBusy?

GetBusy (LON:GETB) and Pennant International Group (LON:PEN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

7.9% of GetBusy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.6% of Pennant International Group shares are held by institutional investors. 38.3% of GetBusy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.0% of Pennant International Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

GetBusy has a beta of 0.392, indicating that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pennant International Group has a beta of 0.176, indicating that its share price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

GetBusy has a net margin of -5.45% compared to Pennant International Group's net margin of -8.06%. GetBusy's return on equity of 34.82% beat Pennant International Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GetBusy-5.45% 34.82% 2.80%
Pennant International Group -8.06%-13.64%-0.28%

GetBusy has higher revenue and earnings than Pennant International Group. GetBusy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pennant International Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GetBusy£22.05M1.91£531.26K-£2.85N/A
Pennant International Group£10.99M1.37-£1.09M-£1.70N/A

In the previous week, Pennant International Group had 1 more articles in the media than GetBusy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pennant International Group and 0 mentions for GetBusy. Pennant International Group's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat GetBusy's score of 0.00 indicating that Pennant International Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GetBusy Neutral
Pennant International Group Neutral

Summary

GetBusy beats Pennant International Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pennant International Group compare to Oxford Metrics?

Pennant International Group (LON:PEN) and Oxford Metrics (LON:OMG) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Oxford Metrics has higher revenue and earnings than Pennant International Group. Oxford Metrics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pennant International Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pennant International Group£10.99M1.37-£1.09M-£1.70N/A
Oxford Metrics£45.40M0.89£3.63M-£0.21N/A

Oxford Metrics has a net margin of -1.37% compared to Pennant International Group's net margin of -8.06%. Oxford Metrics' return on equity of -0.98% beat Pennant International Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pennant International Group-8.06% -13.64% -0.28%
Oxford Metrics -1.37%-0.98%2.41%

In the previous week, Pennant International Group had 1 more articles in the media than Oxford Metrics. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pennant International Group and 0 mentions for Oxford Metrics. Pennant International Group's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Oxford Metrics' score of 0.00 indicating that Pennant International Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pennant International Group Neutral
Oxford Metrics Neutral

Oxford Metrics has a consensus price target of GBX 85, indicating a potential upside of 136.11%. Given Oxford Metrics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Oxford Metrics is more favorable than Pennant International Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pennant International Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Oxford Metrics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

9.6% of Pennant International Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.6% of Oxford Metrics shares are held by institutional investors. 37.0% of Pennant International Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.2% of Oxford Metrics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pennant International Group has a beta of 0.176, meaning that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oxford Metrics has a beta of 0.675, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Oxford Metrics beats Pennant International Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pennant International Group compare to Cloudcall Group?

Cloudcall Group (LON:CALL) and Pennant International Group (LON:PEN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Cloudcall Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pennant International Group. Pennant International Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cloudcall Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cloudcall Group£12.43M0.00N/A-£17.20N/A
Pennant International Group£10.99M1.37-£1.09M-£1.70N/A

9.6% of Pennant International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 37.0% of Pennant International Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Pennant International Group had 1 more articles in the media than Cloudcall Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pennant International Group and 0 mentions for Cloudcall Group. Pennant International Group's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Cloudcall Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Pennant International Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cloudcall Group Neutral
Pennant International Group Neutral

Cloudcall Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Pennant International Group's net margin of -8.06%. Cloudcall Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Pennant International Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cloudcall GroupN/A N/A N/A
Pennant International Group -8.06%-13.64%-0.28%

Summary

Cloudcall Group and Pennant International Group tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pennant International Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PEN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PEN vs. The Competition

MetricPennant International GroupSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£15.03M£16.11B£31.68B£2.80B
Dividend Yield8.76%3.43%2.75%6.18%
P/E Ratio-18.56143.7281.29366.17
Price / Sales1.371,278.47589.1989,425.29
Price / Cash20.6345.1349.1327.89
Price / Book1.168.798.126.83
Net Income-£1.09M£431.57M£702.36M£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.77%0.33%0.55%-0.75%
1 Month Performance5.17%-1.67%1.04%16.84%
1 Year Performance52.27%-0.56%168.47%16.40%

Pennant International Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PEN
Pennant International Group
N/AGBX 31.55
-1.4%
N/A+61.8%£15.03M£10.99MN/A3,900
SAAS
Microlise Group
N/AGBX 47.35
-1.4%
GBX 150
+216.8%
-63.1%£54.92M£84.03MN/A715
VRE
VR Education
N/AN/AN/AN/A£53.52M£1.98MN/A220
GETB
GetBusy
N/AGBX 81.74
-0.3%
N/A+7.8%£41.44M£22.05MN/A147
OMG
Oxford Metrics
1.9339 of 5 stars
GBX 36.30
-0.8%
GBX 85
+134.2%
-10.4%£40.63M£45.40MN/A167

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PEN) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners