Go Pro
→ The cat is out the bag (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free SCF Stock Alerts

Schroder Income Growth (SCF) Competitors

Schroder Income Growth logo
GBX 375 +2.00 (+0.54%)
As of 11:58 AM Eastern
Compare

SCF vs. TRY, CORD, MUT, APAX, and SLPE

Should you buy Schroder Income Growth stock or one of its competitors? Schroder Income Growth's main competitors and comparable companies include TR Property Investment Trust (TRY), Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (CORD), Murray Income Trust (MUT), Apax Global Alpha (APAX), and Standard Life Private Equity Trust (SLPE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Schroder Income Growth compare to TR Property Investment Trust?

TR Property Investment Trust (LON:TRY) and Schroder Income Growth (LON:SCF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

12.4% of TR Property Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of Schroder Income Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of TR Property Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Schroder Income Growth shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, TR Property Investment Trust and TR Property Investment Trust both had 1 articles in the media. TR Property Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Schroder Income Growth's score of 1.26 indicating that TR Property Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TR Property Investment Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Schroder Income Growth
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

TR Property Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 16 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Schroder Income Growth pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. TR Property Investment Trust pays out 71.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroder Income Growth pays out 18.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

TR Property Investment Trust has a beta of 1.488, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder Income Growth has a beta of 1.079, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

TR Property Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Schroder Income Growth. Schroder Income Growth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TR Property Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TR Property Investment Trust£77.76M12.24£284.71M£22.3213.44
Schroder Income Growth£54.92M4.47£37.42M£79.774.70

Schroder Income Growth has a net margin of 94.75% compared to TR Property Investment Trust's net margin of 79.93%. Schroder Income Growth's return on equity of 21.54% beat TR Property Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TR Property Investment Trust79.93% 6.52% -24.58%
Schroder Income Growth 94.75%21.54%4.32%

Summary

TR Property Investment Trust beats Schroder Income Growth on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder Income Growth compare to Cordiant Digital Infrastructure?

Schroder Income Growth (LON:SCF) and Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (LON:CORD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

Schroder Income Growth has a beta of 1.079, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has a beta of 0.819, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Schroder Income Growth pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Schroder Income Growth pays out 18.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cordiant Digital Infrastructure pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Schroder Income Growth is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has a net margin of 432.24% compared to Schroder Income Growth's net margin of 94.75%. Schroder Income Growth's return on equity of 21.54% beat Cordiant Digital Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Income Growth94.75% 21.54% 4.32%
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure 432.24%14.55%5.89%

Cordiant Digital Infrastructure has higher revenue and earnings than Schroder Income Growth. Schroder Income Growth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cordiant Digital Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Income Growth£54.92M4.47£37.42M£79.774.70
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure£163.11M5.89£846.28M£20.816.03

In the previous week, Schroder Income Growth had 1 more articles in the media than Cordiant Digital Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder Income Growth and 0 mentions for Cordiant Digital Infrastructure. Schroder Income Growth's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Cordiant Digital Infrastructure's score of 0.25 indicating that Schroder Income Growth is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder Income Growth Positive
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure Neutral

8.3% of Schroder Income Growth shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.2% of Cordiant Digital Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Schroder Income Growth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cordiant Digital Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Schroder Income Growth beats Cordiant Digital Infrastructure on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder Income Growth compare to Murray Income Trust?

Schroder Income Growth (LON:SCF) and Murray Income Trust (LON:MUT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Schroder Income Growth pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Murray Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Schroder Income Growth pays out 18.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Murray Income Trust pays out 33.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Schroder Income Growth had 1 more articles in the media than Murray Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder Income Growth and 0 mentions for Murray Income Trust. Schroder Income Growth's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Murray Income Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder Income Growth is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder Income Growth Positive
Murray Income Trust Neutral

Schroder Income Growth has a beta of 1.079, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Murray Income Trust has a beta of 1.177, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Schroder Income Growth has a net margin of 94.75% compared to Murray Income Trust's net margin of 93.90%. Schroder Income Growth's return on equity of 21.54% beat Murray Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Income Growth94.75% 21.54% 4.32%
Murray Income Trust 93.90%12.73%4.65%

8.3% of Schroder Income Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.3% of Murray Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Schroder Income Growth shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Murray Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Murray Income Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Schroder Income Growth. Schroder Income Growth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murray Income Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Income Growth£54.92M4.47£37.42M£79.774.70
Murray Income Trust£120.88M7.67£90.45M£119.708.30

Summary

Murray Income Trust beats Schroder Income Growth on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder Income Growth compare to Apax Global Alpha?

Schroder Income Growth (LON:SCF) and Apax Global Alpha (LON:APAX) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Schroder Income Growth pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Apax Global Alpha pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Schroder Income Growth pays out 18.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Apax Global Alpha pays out -120.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Schroder Income Growth has higher revenue and earnings than Apax Global Alpha. Apax Global Alpha is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder Income Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder Income Growth£54.92M4.47£37.42M£79.774.70
Apax Global Alpha-£44.79M-20.62£4.12M-£0.11N/A

In the previous week, Schroder Income Growth had 1 more articles in the media than Apax Global Alpha. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder Income Growth and 0 mentions for Apax Global Alpha. Schroder Income Growth's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Apax Global Alpha's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder Income Growth is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder Income Growth Positive
Apax Global Alpha Neutral

Schroder Income Growth has a beta of 1.079, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Apax Global Alpha has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

8.3% of Schroder Income Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.3% of Apax Global Alpha shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Schroder Income Growth shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Apax Global Alpha shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroder Income Growth has a net margin of 94.75% compared to Apax Global Alpha's net margin of 57.27%. Schroder Income Growth's return on equity of 21.54% beat Apax Global Alpha's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder Income Growth94.75% 21.54% 4.32%
Apax Global Alpha 57.27%0.67%2.57%

Summary

Schroder Income Growth beats Apax Global Alpha on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder Income Growth compare to Standard Life Private Equity Trust?

Standard Life Private Equity Trust (LON:SLPE) and Schroder Income Growth (LON:SCF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Standard Life Private Equity Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Schroder Income Growth pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Standard Life Private Equity Trust pays out 7.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroder Income Growth pays out 18.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Schroder Income Growth has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Standard Life Private Equity Trust. Standard Life Private Equity Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder Income Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Standard Life Private Equity Trust£289.51M3.18N/A£186.203.21
Schroder Income Growth£54.92M4.47£37.42M£79.774.70

In the previous week, Schroder Income Growth had 1 more articles in the media than Standard Life Private Equity Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder Income Growth and 0 mentions for Standard Life Private Equity Trust. Schroder Income Growth's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Standard Life Private Equity Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder Income Growth is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Standard Life Private Equity Trust Neutral
Schroder Income Growth Positive

17.9% of Standard Life Private Equity Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of Schroder Income Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Standard Life Private Equity Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Schroder Income Growth shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroder Income Growth has a net margin of 94.75% compared to Standard Life Private Equity Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Schroder Income Growth's return on equity of 21.54% beat Standard Life Private Equity Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Standard Life Private Equity TrustN/A N/A N/A
Schroder Income Growth 94.75%21.54%4.32%

Summary

Schroder Income Growth beats Standard Life Private Equity Trust on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Schroder Income Growth News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SCF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SCF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSchroder Income GrowthCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£245.52M£5.70B£14.22B£2.91B
Dividend Yield3.95%7.39%5.89%6.18%
P/E Ratio4.7031.3026.01367.06
Price / Sales4.471,272.70524.2083,891.82
Price / Cash91.3348.0638.3727.89
Price / Book1.121.982.136.75
Net Income£37.42M£419.47M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.27%-0.54%0.24%5.57%
1 Month Performance0.54%0.60%1.54%2.30%
1 Year Performance18.61%7.60%12.04%21.81%

Schroder Income Growth Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SCF
Schroder Income Growth
N/AGBX 375
+0.5%		N/A+19.2%£245.52M£54.92M4.70N/A
TRY
TR Property Investment Trust
N/AGBX 306.51
-0.3%		N/A-4.6%£972.70M£77.76M13.7326
CORD
Cordiant Digital Infrastructure
N/AGBX 123.50
flat		N/A+31.9%£945.66M£163.11M5.93N/A
MUT
Murray Income Trust
N/AGBX 1,004
+0.8%		N/A+12.5%£936.87M£120.88M8.39147,000
APAX
Apax Global Alpha
N/AGBX 191.50
flat		N/AN/A£923.78M-£44.79MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SCF) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Congress Just Opened the Floodgates
The House passed the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act 294 to 134, creating the most comprehensive financial te...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
FDA Momentum is Building Around NNVC!
NanoViricides (NYSE: NNVC) just received regulatory approval to begin a Phase II trial of NV-387 Oral Gummies ...
Smallcaps Daily | Sponsoredtc pixel
Major Buy Alert Issued for September 30th
Keith Kaplan has invested $17 million into his own AI research tools, building a platform now used by 180,000 ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Earth's biggest energy source: near Grand Canyon
The largest energy source on Earth contains 50,000 times every oil and gas reserve on the planet combined - an...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Rickards Predicts: Trump to buy tiny $2 stock?
Jim Rickards believes the Trump administration is about to take a direct stake in a $2 stock sitting on the la...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Near retirement? Buy this stock
On August 9, the Wall Street Journal profiled a unique AI strategy used by three companies. Whitney Tilson of ...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s “new Petrodollar” exposed
Trump has reportedly secured control over 65 billion barrels across 17 Venezuelan oil fields, more than the en...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Wall Street pays $32K for this type of stock market data. (But see this Labor Day deal now!)
The Bloomberg Terminal costs $32,000 a year and sits on the desks of more than 350,000 Wall Street traders. Mo...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel