Go Pro

TwentyFour Income (TFIF) Competitors

TwentyFour Income logo
GBX 109.79 -0.01 (-0.01%)
As of 05:22 AM Eastern

TFIF vs. ATST, 3IN, PHLL, JGGI, and EMG

Should you buy TwentyFour Income stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares TwentyFour Income with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with TwentyFour Income include Alliance Trust (ATST), 3i Infrastructure (3IN), Petershill Partners (PHLL), JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (JGGI), and Man Group (EMG). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does TwentyFour Income compare to Alliance Trust?

TwentyFour Income (LON:TFIF) and Alliance Trust (LON:ATST) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

TwentyFour Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. Alliance Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 26 per share. TwentyFour Income pays out 88.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Alliance Trust pays out 1,226.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TwentyFour Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

18.0% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of Alliance Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Alliance Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, TwentyFour Income had 6 more articles in the media than Alliance Trust. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for TwentyFour Income and 0 mentions for Alliance Trust. Alliance Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat TwentyFour Income's score of -0.53 indicating that Alliance Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TwentyFour Income Negative
Alliance Trust Neutral

Alliance Trust has a net margin of 92.17% compared to TwentyFour Income's net margin of 62.41%. Alliance Trust's return on equity of 17.93% beat TwentyFour Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TwentyFour Income62.41% 11.04% N/A
Alliance Trust 92.17%17.93%10.95%

TwentyFour Income has a beta of 0.2308851, meaning that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alliance Trust has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

TwentyFour Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alliance Trust. Alliance Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TwentyFour Income£97.54M10.21£868.58M£12.478.81
Alliance Trust£652.76M0.00£601.66M£2.12N/A

Summary

Alliance Trust beats TwentyFour Income on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Income compare to 3i Infrastructure?

TwentyFour Income (LON:TFIF) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

3i Infrastructure has a consensus target price of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 17.30%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than TwentyFour Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TwentyFour Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
3i Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, TwentyFour Income had 6 more articles in the media than 3i Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for TwentyFour Income and 0 mentions for 3i Infrastructure. 3i Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat TwentyFour Income's score of -0.53 indicating that 3i Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TwentyFour Income Negative
3i Infrastructure Neutral

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to TwentyFour Income's net margin of 62.41%. TwentyFour Income's return on equity of 11.04% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TwentyFour Income62.41% 11.04% N/A
3i Infrastructure 92.78%10.77%4.83%

TwentyFour Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. 3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. TwentyFour Income pays out 88.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

TwentyFour Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than 3i Infrastructure. TwentyFour Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TwentyFour Income£97.54M10.21£868.58M£12.478.81
3i Infrastructure£301M11.76£347M£32.0011.99

TwentyFour Income has a beta of 0.2308851, suggesting that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

18.0% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.5% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

3i Infrastructure beats TwentyFour Income on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Income compare to Petershill Partners?

Petershill Partners (LON:PHLL) and TwentyFour Income (LON:TFIF) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Petershill Partners has a net margin of 67.97% compared to TwentyFour Income's net margin of 62.41%. Petershill Partners' return on equity of 16.42% beat TwentyFour Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petershill Partners67.97% 16.42% 5.95%
TwentyFour Income 62.41%11.04%N/A

Petershill Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. TwentyFour Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. Petershill Partners pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TwentyFour Income pays out 88.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Petershill Partners has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TwentyFour Income has a beta of 0.2308851, meaning that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TwentyFour Income had 6 more articles in the media than Petershill Partners. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for TwentyFour Income and 0 mentions for Petershill Partners. Petershill Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat TwentyFour Income's score of -0.53 indicating that Petershill Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Petershill Partners Neutral
TwentyFour Income Negative

TwentyFour Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Petershill Partners. Petershill Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petershill Partners£1.15B2.93£420.55M£86.433.59
TwentyFour Income£97.54M10.21£868.58M£12.478.81

Petershill Partners currently has a consensus price target of GBX 311.33, indicating a potential upside of 0.27%. Given Petershill Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Petershill Partners is more favorable than TwentyFour Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Petershill Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
TwentyFour Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

3.7% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.0% of TwentyFour Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Petershill Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of TwentyFour Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Petershill Partners beats TwentyFour Income on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Income compare to JPMorgan Global Growth & Income?

TwentyFour Income (LON:TFIF) and JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (LON:JGGI) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

TwentyFour Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. TwentyFour Income pays out 88.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

18.0% of TwentyFour Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.1% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of TwentyFour Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, TwentyFour Income had 6 more articles in the media than JPMorgan Global Growth & Income. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for TwentyFour Income and 0 mentions for JPMorgan Global Growth & Income. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat TwentyFour Income's score of -0.53 indicating that JPMorgan Global Growth & Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TwentyFour Income Negative
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income Neutral

TwentyFour Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JPMorgan Global Growth & Income. TwentyFour Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Global Growth & Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TwentyFour Income£97.54M10.21£868.58M£12.478.81
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income£255.23M13.00£625.87M£41.8114.54

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a net margin of 91.40% compared to TwentyFour Income's net margin of 62.41%. TwentyFour Income's return on equity of 11.04% beat JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TwentyFour Income62.41% 11.04% N/A
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income 91.40%7.63%10.62%

TwentyFour Income has a beta of 0.2308851, suggesting that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a beta of 0.79442686, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income beats TwentyFour Income on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Income compare to Man Group?

Man Group (LON:EMG) and TwentyFour Income (LON:TFIF) are both financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

Man Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. TwentyFour Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. Man Group pays out 115.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TwentyFour Income pays out 88.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TwentyFour Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Man Group has a beta of 0.636, suggesting that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TwentyFour Income has a beta of 0.2308851, suggesting that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

TwentyFour Income has a net margin of 62.41% compared to Man Group's net margin of 12.23%. Man Group's return on equity of 11.51% beat TwentyFour Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Man Group12.23% 11.51% 4.61%
TwentyFour Income 62.41%11.04%N/A

TwentyFour Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Man Group. TwentyFour Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Man Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Man Group£1.41B2.39£382.68M£15.0020.07
TwentyFour Income£97.54M10.21£868.58M£12.478.81

In the previous week, TwentyFour Income had 4 more articles in the media than Man Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for TwentyFour Income and 2 mentions for Man Group. Man Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat TwentyFour Income's score of -0.53 indicating that Man Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Man Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
TwentyFour Income
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Man Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 271, indicating a potential downside of 9.97%. Given Man Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Man Group is more favorable than TwentyFour Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Man Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
TwentyFour Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

47.3% of Man Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.0% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by institutional investors. 7.7% of Man Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Man Group beats TwentyFour Income on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TwentyFour Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TFIF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TFIF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TFIF vs. The Competition

MetricTwentyFour IncomeAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£996.02M£2.42B£6.16B£2.76B
Dividend Yield9.88%6.01%5.23%6.16%
P/E Ratio8.8161.8029.71368.06
Price / Sales10.211,850.571,183.4684,617.43
Price / CashN/A60.3388.6427.87
Price / Book0.951.396.477.48
Net Income£868.58M£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.36%-0.15%-0.19%-0.40%
1 Month Performance-0.19%0.13%0.24%-1.17%
1 Year Performance-3.35%7.60%15.01%61.57%

TwentyFour Income Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TFIF
TwentyFour Income
N/AGBX 109.79
0.0%
N/A-3.2%£996.02M£97.54M8.81N/A
ATST
Alliance Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.58B£652.76M600.003
3IN
3i Infrastructure
2.2421 of 5 stars
GBX 385
+0.5%
GBX 450
+16.9%
+11.5%£3.55B£301M12.03N/A
PHLL
Petershill Partners
N/AGBX 310.50
flat
GBX 311.33
+0.3%
N/A£3.36B£1.15B3.59N/A
JGGI
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income
N/AGBX 613
+0.7%
N/A+10.1%£3.35B£255.23M14.66N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TFIF) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners