Go Pro

TwentyFour Income (TFIF) Competitors

TwentyFour Income logo
GBX 108 +0.20 (+0.19%)
As of 08/21/2026 11:56 AM Eastern

TFIF vs. ATST, 3IN, EMG, JGGI, and PHLL

Should you buy TwentyFour Income stock or one of its competitors? TwentyFour Income's main competitors and comparable companies include Alliance Trust (ATST), 3i Infrastructure (3IN), Man Group (EMG), JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (JGGI), and Petershill Partners (PHLL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does TwentyFour Income compare to Alliance Trust?

Alliance Trust (LON:ATST) and TwentyFour Income (LON:TFIF) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

Alliance Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 26 per share. TwentyFour Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. Alliance Trust pays out 1,226.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TwentyFour Income pays out 159.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TwentyFour Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

6.9% of Alliance Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.5% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Alliance Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Alliance Trust has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TwentyFour Income has a beta of 0.222, indicating that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

Alliance Trust has a net margin of 92.17% compared to TwentyFour Income's net margin of 60.39%. Alliance Trust's return on equity of 17.93% beat TwentyFour Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alliance Trust92.17% 17.93% 10.95%
TwentyFour Income 60.39%6.11%N/A

TwentyFour Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Alliance Trust. Alliance Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alliance Trust£652.76M0.00£601.66M£2.12N/A
TwentyFour Income£57.89M17.10£868.58M£6.9315.58

In the previous week, TwentyFour Income had 2 more articles in the media than Alliance Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for TwentyFour Income and 0 mentions for Alliance Trust. Alliance Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled TwentyFour Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alliance Trust Neutral
TwentyFour Income Neutral

Summary

Alliance Trust beats TwentyFour Income on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Income compare to 3i Infrastructure?

3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) and TwentyFour Income (LON:TFIF) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TwentyFour Income has a beta of 0.222, meaning that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to TwentyFour Income's net margin of 60.39%. 3i Infrastructure's return on equity of 10.77% beat TwentyFour Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3i Infrastructure92.78% 10.77% 4.83%
TwentyFour Income 60.39%6.11%N/A

In the previous week, TwentyFour Income had 1 more articles in the media than 3i Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for TwentyFour Income and 1 mentions for 3i Infrastructure. 3i Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat TwentyFour Income's score of 0.00 indicating that 3i Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
3i Infrastructure
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TwentyFour Income
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

24.2% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.5% of TwentyFour Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of TwentyFour Income shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TwentyFour Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than 3i Infrastructure. 3i Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3i Infrastructure£301M12.00£347M£32.0012.23
TwentyFour Income£57.89M17.10£868.58M£6.9315.58

3i Infrastructure currently has a consensus target price of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 14.94%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than TwentyFour Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3i Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
TwentyFour Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. TwentyFour Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TwentyFour Income pays out 159.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

3i Infrastructure beats TwentyFour Income on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Income compare to Man Group?

TwentyFour Income (LON:TFIF) and Man Group (LON:EMG) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

TwentyFour Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Man Group. Man Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TwentyFour Income£57.89M17.10£868.58M£6.9315.58
Man Group£1.69B2.06£382.68M£28.1010.81

TwentyFour Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. Man Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 17.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. TwentyFour Income pays out 159.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Man Group pays out 60.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Man Group has a consensus price target of GBX 304.75, indicating a potential upside of 0.31%. Given Man Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Man Group is more favorable than TwentyFour Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TwentyFour Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Man Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

In the previous week, TwentyFour Income and TwentyFour Income both had 2 articles in the media. Man Group's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat TwentyFour Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Man Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TwentyFour Income
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Man Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

TwentyFour Income has a net margin of 60.39% compared to Man Group's net margin of 18.60%. Man Group's return on equity of 20.41% beat TwentyFour Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TwentyFour Income60.39% 6.11% N/A
Man Group 18.60%20.41%4.61%

37.5% of TwentyFour Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.5% of Man Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of TwentyFour Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.5% of Man Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TwentyFour Income has a beta of 0.222, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Man Group has a beta of 0.631, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Man Group beats TwentyFour Income on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Income compare to JPMorgan Global Growth & Income?

TwentyFour Income (LON:TFIF) and JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (LON:JGGI) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and valuation.

TwentyFour Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 22.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. TwentyFour Income pays out 159.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

TwentyFour Income has a beta of 0.222, indicating that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a beta of 0.783, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

TwentyFour Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JPMorgan Global Growth & Income. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TwentyFour Income£57.89M17.10£868.58M£6.9315.58
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income£255.23M13.17£625.87M£41.8114.73

37.5% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.1% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of JPMorgan Global Growth & Income shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, TwentyFour Income had 2 more articles in the media than JPMorgan Global Growth & Income. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for TwentyFour Income and 0 mentions for JPMorgan Global Growth & Income. TwentyFour Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Global Growth & Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
TwentyFour Income Neutral
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income Neutral

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income has a net margin of 91.40% compared to TwentyFour Income's net margin of 60.39%. JPMorgan Global Growth & Income's return on equity of 7.63% beat TwentyFour Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TwentyFour Income60.39% 6.11% N/A
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income 91.40%7.63%10.62%

Summary

JPMorgan Global Growth & Income beats TwentyFour Income on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TwentyFour Income compare to Petershill Partners?

Petershill Partners (LON:PHLL) and TwentyFour Income (LON:TFIF) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

3.7% of Petershill Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.5% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Petershill Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of TwentyFour Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Petershill Partners pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. TwentyFour Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 11.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. Petershill Partners pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TwentyFour Income pays out 159.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Petershill Partners presently has a consensus target price of GBX 309, indicating a potential downside of 0.48%. Given Petershill Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Petershill Partners is more favorable than TwentyFour Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Petershill Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
TwentyFour Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

TwentyFour Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Petershill Partners. Petershill Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TwentyFour Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petershill Partners£1.15B2.93£420.55M£86.433.59
TwentyFour Income£57.89M17.10£868.58M£6.9315.58

In the previous week, TwentyFour Income had 2 more articles in the media than Petershill Partners. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for TwentyFour Income and 0 mentions for Petershill Partners. Petershill Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled TwentyFour Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Petershill Partners Neutral
TwentyFour Income Neutral

Petershill Partners has a net margin of 67.97% compared to TwentyFour Income's net margin of 60.39%. Petershill Partners' return on equity of 16.42% beat TwentyFour Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petershill Partners67.97% 16.42% 5.95%
TwentyFour Income 60.39%6.11%N/A

Petershill Partners has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TwentyFour Income has a beta of 0.222, indicating that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Petershill Partners beats TwentyFour Income on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TwentyFour Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TFIF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TFIF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TFIF vs. The Competition

MetricTwentyFour IncomeCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£995.75M£5.66B£13.63B£2.54B
Dividend Yield10.03%7.38%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio15.5839.0929.61367.57
Price / Sales17.101,213.32512.5883,481.74
Price / CashN/A48.3138.1927.89
Price / Book0.942.132.187.19
Net Income£868.58M£416.48M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.18%-0.25%-0.30%0.30%
1 Month Performance0.56%2.06%2.37%3.31%
1 Year Performance-3.91%5.71%9.68%22.13%

TwentyFour Income Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TFIF
TwentyFour Income
N/AGBX 108
+0.2%
N/A-3.9%£995.75M£57.89M15.58N/A
ATST
Alliance Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£3.58B£652.76M600.003
3IN
3i Infrastructure
2.3346 of 5 stars
GBX 383
-0.3%
GBX 450
+17.5%
+11.4%£3.53B£301M11.97N/A
EMG
Man Group
2.2662 of 5 stars
GBX 314
+0.2%
GBX 304.75
-2.9%
+83.2%£3.49B£1.69B11.171,790
JGGI
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income
N/AGBX 633
-0.2%
N/A+6.4%£3.45B£255.23M15.14N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TFIF) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners