Go Pro
→ Your book attached (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free TEM Stock Alerts

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEM) Competitors

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust logo
GBX 320.50 +6.50 (+2.07%)
As of 08/21/2026 12:52 PM Eastern
Compare

TEM vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, PSH, and FCIT

Should you buy Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust stock or one of its competitors? Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's main competitors and comparable companies include Schroders (SDR), M&G (MNG), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), Pershing Square (PSH), and F&C Investment Trust (FCIT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust compare to Schroders?

Schroders (LON:SDR) and Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, Schroders had 1 more articles in the media than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Schroders and 4 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust. Schroders' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's score of 0.80 indicating that Schroders is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Schroders
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a net margin of 96.24% compared to Schroders' net margin of 19.22%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat Schroders' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroders19.22% 15.55% 1.86%
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust 96.24%31.30%4.50%

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroders£3.51B2.59£355.50M£43.5013.43
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.78£130.50M£77.544.13

Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Schroders pays out 49.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

16.9% of Schroders shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.8% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Schroders shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroders currently has a consensus target price of GBX 453.33, indicating a potential downside of 22.37%. Given Schroders' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Schroders is more favorable than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Schroders
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Schroders has a beta of 1.081, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.013, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Schroders beats Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust compare to M&G?

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) and M&G (LON:MNG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust had 3 more articles in the media than M&G. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and 1 mentions for M&G. M&G's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's score of 0.80 indicating that M&G is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
M&G
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a net margin of 96.24% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat M&G's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust96.24% 31.30% 4.50%
M&G 1.73%9.49%0.40%

M&G has higher revenue and earnings than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.78£130.50M£77.544.13
M&G£21.71B0.38£166.98M£12.3028.17

M&G has a consensus target price of GBX 677.86, suggesting a potential upside of 95.63%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe M&G is more favorable than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
M&G
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

10.8% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.1% of M&G shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of M&G shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.013, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, M&G has a beta of 0.953, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. M&G pays out 164.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

M&G beats Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) and Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

87.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.8% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust had 3 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and 1 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Polar Capital Technology Trust's score of 0.72 indicating that Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Technology Trust
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 249.53% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's net margin of 96.24%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 55.87% beat Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Technology Trust249.53% 55.87% 20.70%
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust 96.24%31.30%4.50%

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Technology Trust£3.76B1.89£1.20B£330.421.94
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.78£130.50M£77.544.13

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.737, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.013, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Polar Capital Technology Trust beats Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust compare to Pershing Square?

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) and Pershing Square (LON:PSH) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.78£130.50M£77.544.13
Pershing Square£2.57B2.66£2.71B£1.41 thousand2.78

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and 2 mentions for Pershing Square. Pershing Square's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's score of 0.80 indicating that Pershing Square is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Pershing Square
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pershing Square is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Pershing Square has a net margin of 97.16% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's net margin of 96.24%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust96.24% 31.30% 4.50%
Pershing Square 97.16%-2.59%11.83%

10.8% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Pershing Square shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.013, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pershing Square has a beta of 0.849, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pershing Square beats Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust compare to F&C Investment Trust?

F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) and Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.8% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.749, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.013, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. F&C Investment Trust pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

F&C Investment Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than F&C Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
F&C Investment Trust£683.36M9.40£935.32M£75.804.50
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.78£130.50M£77.544.13

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust had 4 more articles in the media than F&C Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and 0 mentions for F&C Investment Trust. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat F&C Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
F&C Investment Trust Neutral
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Positive

F&C Investment Trust has a net margin of 103.67% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's net margin of 96.24%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat F&C Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
F&C Investment Trust103.67% 22.14% 10.80%
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust 96.24%31.30%4.50%

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust beats F&C Investment Trust on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TEM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TEM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TEM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricTempleton Emerging Markets Investment TrustCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.88B£5.66B£13.63B£2.54B
Dividend Yield1.67%7.38%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio4.1339.1029.61367.57
Price / Sales3.781,260.31521.3183,481.74
Price / Cash10.2248.3138.1927.89
Price / Book1.772.132.187.19
Net Income£130.50M£416.48M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.06%-0.25%-0.30%0.30%
1 Month Performance2.72%2.06%2.37%3.31%
1 Year Performance60.72%5.71%9.68%22.13%

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TEM
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
N/AGBX 320.50
+2.1%		N/A+60.7%£2.88B£781.18M4.13N/A
SDR
Schroders
1.9762 of 5 stars		GBX 584
+0.2%		GBX 453.33
-22.4%		+47.3%£9.08B£3.51B13.436,438
MNG
M&G
3.3731 of 5 stars		GBX 353.40
+0.6%		GBX 677.86
+91.8%		+29.2%£8.44B£21.71B28.736,101
PCT
Polar Capital Technology Trust
N/AGBX 685
+1.2%		N/A+61.8%£7.34B£3.76B2.07120
PSH
Pershing Square
N/AGBX 3,868
-0.7%		N/A-8.8%£6.77B£2.57B2.75N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TEM) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel