Free Trial
→ Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid (From Altimetry) (Ad)tc pixel Free TEM Stock Alerts

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (TEM) Competitors

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust logo
GBX 332.99 +0.99 (+0.30%)
As of 10/9/2026 11:57 AM Eastern
Compare

TEM vs. SDR, PCT, MNG, FCIT, and PSH

Should you buy Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust stock or one of its competitors? Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's main competitors and comparable companies include Schroders (SDR), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), M&G (MNG), F&C Investment Trust (FCIT), and Pershing Square (PSH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust compare to Schroders?

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) and Schroders (LON:SDR) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

10.8% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.9% of Schroders shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Schroders shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroders has a consensus price target of GBX 460, suggesting a potential downside of 21.89%. Given Schroders' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Schroders is more favorable than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Schroders
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.012, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroders has a beta of 1.076, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a net margin of 96.24% compared to Schroders' net margin of 20.13%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat Schroders' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust96.24% 31.30% 4.50%
Schroders 20.13%15.55%1.86%

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroders pays out 49.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust both had 1 articles in the media. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Schroders' score of 0.00 indicating that Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Schroders
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.60£130.50M£77.544.29
Schroders£3.51B2.62£355.50M£43.5013.54

Summary

Schroders beats Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) and Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 249.53% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's net margin of 96.24%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 55.87% beat Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust96.24% 31.30% 4.50%
Polar Capital Technology Trust 249.53%55.87%20.70%

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.012, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.739, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust. Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's score of 0.97 indicating that Polar Capital Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Positive
Polar Capital Technology Trust Positive

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.60£130.50M£77.544.29
Polar Capital Technology Trust£3.76B2.06£1.20B£330.422.12

10.8% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Polar Capital Technology Trust beats Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust compare to M&G?

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) and M&G (LON:MNG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

M&G has higher revenue and earnings than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust. M&G is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.60£130.50M£77.544.29
M&G£24.97B0.29£166.98M-£4.80N/A

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.012, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, M&G has a beta of 0.949, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. M&G pays out -427.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. M&G is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

M&G has a consensus price target of GBX 685, suggesting a potential upside of 125.11%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe M&G is more favorable than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
M&G
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

10.8% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.4% of M&G shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of M&G shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a net margin of 96.24% compared to M&G's net margin of -0.44%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat M&G's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust96.24% 31.30% 4.50%
M&G -0.44%-3.86%0.40%

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust both had 1 articles in the media. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat M&G's score of 0.95 indicating that Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
M&G
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

M&G beats Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust compare to F&C Investment Trust?

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) and F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

10.8% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.012, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.736, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

F&C Investment Trust has a net margin of 103.67% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's net margin of 96.24%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat F&C Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust96.24% 31.30% 4.50%
F&C Investment Trust 103.67%22.14%10.80%

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust both had 1 articles in the media. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat F&C Investment Trust's score of -1.00 indicating that Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Positive
F&C Investment Trust Negative

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. F&C Investment Trust pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than F&C Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.60£130.50M£77.544.29
F&C Investment Trust£1.46B4.46£935.32M£75.804.63

Summary

F&C Investment Trust beats Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust compare to Pershing Square?

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust (LON:TEM) and Pershing Square (LON:PSH) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Pershing Square has a net margin of 97.16% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's net margin of 96.24%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's return on equity of 31.30% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust96.24% 31.30% 4.50%
Pershing Square 97.16%-2.59%11.83%

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust and 0 mentions for Pershing Square. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Pershing Square's score of 0.00 indicating that Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Positive
Pershing Square Neutral

Pershing Square has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust£781.18M3.60£130.50M£77.544.29
Pershing Square-£1.26B-5.21£2.71B-£752.00N/A

10.8% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Pershing Square shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust has a beta of 1.012, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pershing Square has a beta of 0.842, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 69.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pershing Square pays out -9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pershing Square is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust beats Pershing Square on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TEM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TEM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TEM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricTempleton Emerging Markets Investment TrustCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.00B£5.13B£13.07B£2.44B
Dividend Yield1.58%7.62%6.08%6.27%
P/E Ratio4.2930.0724.74367.13
Price / Sales3.601,132.39476.4888,484.04
Price / Cash10.2247.5845.1327.89
Price / Book1.843.482.717.13
Net Income£130.50M£415.02M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.00%-0.32%-0.51%-0.08%
1 Month Performance2.76%-1.60%-2.39%-0.37%
1 Year Performance48.44%9.28%10.29%22.43%

Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TEM
Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust
N/AGBX 332.99
+0.3%		N/A+48.7%£3.00B£781.18M4.29N/A
SDR
Schroders
1.4037 of 5 stars		GBX 588.94
0.0%		GBX 453.33
-23.0%		+47.6%£9.18B£3.51B13.546,438
PCT
Polar Capital Technology Trust
N/AGBX 696.50
flat		N/A+58.1%£7.70B£3.76B2.11120
MNG
M&G
2.2163 of 5 stars		GBX 310.70
flat		GBX 685
+120.5%		+19.5%£7.40B£24.97BN/A6,101
FCIT
F&C Investment Trust
N/AGBX 343.40
-0.1%		N/A+16.1%£6.43B£1.46B4.53N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TEM) was last updated on 10/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
This free guide explains options the way they should be taught
Most options educators jump straight into Greeks, spreads, and implied volatility - losing beginners before th...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The AI Stock to Keep an Eye on Before Election Day (See Why)
In 2019, Charles Mizrahi named Marvell Technology his top AI pick. It's since climbed 1300 percent. Now he'...
Prosperity Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
The only 5 stocks that matter
SpaceX's IPO reportedly minted 4,400 new millionaires, and OpenAI is said to be eyeing a 1 trillion dollar IPO...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
A weekly dividend fund holding Nvidia and Palantir
CrowdStrike, Palantir, Nvidia none of them pay a real dividend. But one fund holding the biggest AI names dist...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Tech expert smashes iPhone with golf club
Twenty years ago, Josh Baylin told Congress the iPhone was coming, three years before it launched. A $1,500 be...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel