Do analysts prefer SDR or MNKS?

Schroders presently has a consensus price target of GBX 453.33, indicating a potential downside of 22.97%. Given Schroders' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Schroders is more favorable than Monks. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Schroders 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Monks 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, SDR or MNKS?

Monks has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Schroders. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Schroders £3.51B 2.61 £355.50M £33.60 17.51 Monks £635.93M 3.83 £589.71M £368.55 4.28

Is SDR or MNKS more profitable?

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to Schroders' net margin of 19.94%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat Schroders' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Schroders 19.94% 15.55% 1.86% Monks 96.74% 24.22% 9.21%

Does the media refer more to SDR or MNKS?

In the previous week, Monks had 6 more articles in the media than Schroders. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Monks and 2 mentions for Schroders. Schroders' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Monks' score of 0.10 indicating that Schroders is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Schroders 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Monks 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend MNKS or MNG?

M&G has a consensus target price of GBX 677.86, indicating a potential upside of 89.61%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe M&G is more favorable than Monks. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Monks 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 M&G 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.43

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MNKS or MNG?

Monks has higher earnings, but lower revenue than M&G. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Monks £635.93M 3.83 £589.71M £368.55 4.28 M&G £21.71B 0.39 £166.98M £12.30 29.07

Is MNKS or MNG more profitable?

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat M&G's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Monks 96.74% 24.22% 9.21% M&G 1.73% 9.49% 0.40%

Does the media refer more to MNKS or MNG?

In the previous week, Monks had 7 more articles in the media than M&G. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Monks and 1 mentions for M&G. Monks' average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat M&G's score of 0.00 indicating that Monks is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Monks 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral M&G 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer PCT or MNKS?

In the previous week, Monks had 7 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Monks and 1 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust. Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Monks' score of 0.10 indicating that Polar Capital Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Polar Capital Technology Trust 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Monks 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher valuation and earnings, PSH or MNKS?

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than Monks. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Pershing Square £2.57B 2.57 £2.71B £1.41 thousand 2.69 Monks £635.93M 3.83 £589.71M £368.55 4.28

Is PSH or MNKS more profitable?

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to Pershing Square's net margin of 94.13%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat Pershing Square's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Pershing Square 94.13% 16.97% 11.83% Monks 96.74% 24.22% 9.21%

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MNKS or FCIT?

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Monks. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than F&C Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Monks £635.93M 3.83 £589.71M £368.55 4.28 F&C Investment Trust £683.36M 9.14 £935.32M £34.64 9.56

Is MNKS or FCIT more profitable?

F&C Investment Trust has a net margin of 105.66% compared to Monks' net margin of 96.74%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat F&C Investment Trust's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Monks 96.74% 24.22% 9.21% F&C Investment Trust 105.66% 11.28% 10.80%

Monks (MNKS) Competitors

GBX 1,578 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 07/31/2026 12:33 PM Eastern

Compare

MNKS vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, PSH, and FCIT

Should you buy Monks stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Monks with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Monks include Schroders (SDR), M&G (MNG), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), Pershing Square (PSH), and F&C Investment Trust (FCIT). These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Monks compare to Schroders?

Schroders (LON:SDR) and Monks (LON:MNKS) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Schroders pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monks pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to Schroders' net margin of 19.94%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat Schroders' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Schroders	19.94%	15.55%	1.86%
Monks	96.74%	24.22%	9.21%

Schroders has a beta of 1.081, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monks has a beta of 0.94357127, meaning that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Monks had 6 more articles in the media than Schroders. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Monks and 2 mentions for Schroders. Schroders' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Monks' score of 0.10 indicating that Schroders is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Schroders	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Monks	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Schroders presently has a consensus price target of GBX 453.33, indicating a potential downside of 22.97%. Given Schroders' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Schroders is more favorable than Monks.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Schroders	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Monks	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Monks has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Schroders. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Schroders	£3.51B	2.61	£355.50M	£33.60	17.51
Monks	£635.93M	3.83	£589.71M	£368.55	4.28

17.2% of Schroders shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Monks shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Schroders shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Monks shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Schroders beats Monks on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Monks compare to M&G?

Monks (LON:MNKS) and M&G (LON:MNG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends and institutional ownership.

10.1% of Monks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.9% of M&G shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Monks shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of M&G shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat M&G's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Monks	96.74%	24.22%	9.21%
M&G	1.73%	9.49%	0.40%

Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Monks pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. M&G pays out 164.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

M&G has a consensus target price of GBX 677.86, indicating a potential upside of 89.61%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe M&G is more favorable than Monks.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Monks	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
M&G	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43

In the previous week, Monks had 7 more articles in the media than M&G. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Monks and 1 mentions for M&G. Monks' average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat M&G's score of 0.00 indicating that Monks is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Monks	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
M&G	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Monks has a beta of 0.94357127, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, M&G has a beta of 0.941, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Monks has higher earnings, but lower revenue than M&G. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Monks	£635.93M	3.83	£589.71M	£368.55	4.28
M&G	£21.71B	0.39	£166.98M	£12.30	29.07

Summary

Monks beats M&G on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Monks compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) and Monks (LON:MNKS) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Monks had 7 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Monks and 1 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust. Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Monks' score of 0.10 indicating that Polar Capital Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Technology Trust	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Monks	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

7.1% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Monks shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Monks shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.9269671, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monks has a beta of 0.94357127, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Monks. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Technology Trust	£2.14B	3.24	£1.20B	£188.58	3.32
Monks	£635.93M	3.83	£589.71M	£368.55	4.28

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 249.53% compared to Monks' net margin of 96.74%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 55.87% beat Monks' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Polar Capital Technology Trust	249.53%	55.87%	20.70%
Monks	96.74%	24.22%	9.21%

Summary

Monks beats Polar Capital Technology Trust on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Monks compare to Pershing Square?

Pershing Square (LON:PSH) and Monks (LON:MNKS) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and profitability.

5.8% of Pershing Square shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Monks shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Monks shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than Monks. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pershing Square	£2.57B	2.57	£2.71B	£1.41 thousand	2.69
Monks	£635.93M	3.83	£589.71M	£368.55	4.28

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to Pershing Square's net margin of 94.13%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pershing Square	94.13%	16.97%	11.83%
Monks	96.74%	24.22%	9.21%

In the previous week, Monks had 8 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Monks and 0 mentions for Pershing Square. Monks' average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Pershing Square's score of 0.00 indicating that Monks is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pershing Square	Neutral
Monks	Neutral

Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monks pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pershing Square has a beta of 0.8576274, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monks has a beta of 0.94357127, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Monks beats Pershing Square on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Monks compare to F&C Investment Trust?

Monks (LON:MNKS) and F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Monks pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. F&C Investment Trust pays out 11.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

F&C Investment Trust has a net margin of 105.66% compared to Monks' net margin of 96.74%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat F&C Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Monks	96.74%	24.22%	9.21%
F&C Investment Trust	105.66%	11.28%	10.80%

10.1% of Monks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Monks shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Monks had 8 more articles in the media than F&C Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Monks and 0 mentions for F&C Investment Trust. Monks' average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat F&C Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Monks is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Monks	Neutral
F&C Investment Trust	Neutral

Monks has a beta of 0.94357127, meaning that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.7953292, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Monks. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than F&C Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Monks	£635.93M	3.83	£589.71M	£368.55	4.28
F&C Investment Trust	£683.36M	9.14	£935.32M	£34.64	9.56

Summary

Monks beats F&C Investment Trust on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Monks News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MNKS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MNKS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Monks	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£2.43B	£5.45B	£13.87B	£2.82B
Dividend Yield	0.06%	7.50%	5.95%	6.15%
P/E Ratio	4.28	36.77	28.67	368.29
Price / Sales	3.83	1,129.60	468.29	83,501.30
Price / Cash	90.93	84.88	44.50	27.89
Price / Book	1.25	3.68	3.68	7.04
Net Income	£589.71M	£417.14M	£1.31B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-0.86%	7.75%	3.63%	6.05%
1 Month Performance	-3.78%	-1.25%	0.07%	-0.22%
1 Year Performance	17.76%	5.61%	12.94%	63.72%

Monks Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MNKS Monks	N/A	GBX 1,578 flat	N/A	+17.8%	£2.43B	£635.93M	4.28	N/A
SDR Schroders	1.6893 of 5 stars	GBX 588.50 +0.0%	GBX 453.33 -23.0%	+54.8%	£9.18B	£3.25B	17.51	6,438	News Coverage Earnings Report
MNG M&G	2.989 of 5 stars	GBX 357.50 +0.4%	GBX 677.86 +89.6%	+39.4%	£8.52B	£21.71B	29.07	6,101
PCT Polar Capital Technology Trust	N/A	GBX 626.50 +2.5%	N/A	+59.0%	£6.94B	£2.14B	3.32	120	High Trading Volume
PSH Pershing Square	N/A	GBX 3,780.54 +1.6%	N/A	-8.1%	£6.62B	£2.57B	2.69	N/A	High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MNKS) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Monks (MNKS) Competitors

MNKS vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, PSH, and FCIT

How does Monks compare to Schroders?

Summary

How does Monks compare to M&G?

Summary

How does Monks compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Summary

How does Monks compare to Pershing Square?

Summary

How does Monks compare to F&C Investment Trust?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MNKS vs. The Competition

Monks Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Monks (MNKS) Competitors

MNKS vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, PSH, and FCIT

How does Monks compare to Schroders?

Is SDR or MNKS a better dividend stock?

Is SDR or MNKS more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, SDR or MNKS?

Does the media refer more to SDR or MNKS?

Do analysts prefer SDR or MNKS?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, SDR or MNKS?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in SDR or MNKS?

Summary

How does Monks compare to M&G?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MNKS or MNG?

Is MNKS or MNG more profitable?

Is MNKS or MNG a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend MNKS or MNG?

Does the media refer more to MNKS or MNG?

Which has more risk and volatility, MNKS or MNG?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MNKS or MNG?

Summary

How does Monks compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Does the media prefer PCT or MNKS?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PCT or MNKS?

Which has more volatility & risk, PCT or MNKS?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PCT or MNKS?

Is PCT or MNKS more profitable?

Summary

How does Monks compare to Pershing Square?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PSH or MNKS?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, PSH or MNKS?

Is PSH or MNKS more profitable?

Does the media refer more to PSH or MNKS?

Is PSH or MNKS a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, PSH or MNKS?

Summary

How does Monks compare to F&C Investment Trust?

Is MNKS or FCIT a better dividend stock?

Is MNKS or FCIT more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in MNKS or FCIT?

Does the media prefer MNKS or FCIT?

Which has more risk and volatility, MNKS or FCIT?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MNKS or FCIT?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MNKS vs. The Competition

Monks Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools