Do analysts prefer MNKS or SDR?

Schroders has a consensus price target of GBX 453.33, indicating a potential downside of 22.71%. Given Schroders' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Schroders is more favorable than Monks. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Monks 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Schroders 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MNKS or SDR?

Monks has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schroders. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Monks £635.93M 3.94 £589.71M £368.55 4.41 Schroders £3.25B 2.81 £355.50M £33.60 17.46

Is MNKS or SDR more profitable?

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to Schroders' net margin of 16.44%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat Schroders' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Monks 96.74% 24.22% 9.21% Schroders 16.44% 12.35% 1.86%

Do analysts rate MNKS or MNG?

M&G has a consensus target price of GBX 677.86, suggesting a potential upside of 95.88%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe M&G is more favorable than Monks. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Monks 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 M&G 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.43

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MNKS or MNG?

Monks has higher earnings, but lower revenue than M&G. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Monks £635.93M 3.94 £589.71M £368.55 4.41 M&G £21.71B 0.38 £166.98M £12.30 28.13

Is MNKS or MNG more profitable?

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat M&G's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Monks 96.74% 24.22% 9.21% M&G 1.73% 9.49% 0.40%

Does the media favor MNKS or MNG?

In the previous week, Monks had 6 more articles in the media than M&G. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Monks and 2 mentions for M&G. M&G's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Monks' score of 0.05 indicating that M&G is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Monks 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral M&G 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to PCT or MNKS?

In the previous week, Monks had 7 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Monks and 1 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust. Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.49 beat Monks' score of 0.05 indicating that Polar Capital Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Polar Capital Technology Trust 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Monks 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer MNKS or STJ?

St. James's Place has a consensus price target of GBX 1,689.71, suggesting a potential upside of 46.68%. Given St. James' Place's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe St. James's Place is more favorable than Monks. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Monks 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 St. James's Place 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.71

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, MNKS or STJ?

Monks has higher earnings, but lower revenue than St. James's Place. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than St. James's Place, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Monks £635.93M 3.94 £589.71M £368.55 4.41 St. James's Place £30.14B 0.19 -£6.46M £98.80 11.66

Is MNKS or STJ more profitable?

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to St. James' Place's net margin of 1.76%. St. James' Place's return on equity of 37.33% beat Monks' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Monks 96.74% 24.22% 9.21% St. James's Place 1.76% 37.33% 0.22%

Does the media favor MNKS or STJ?

In the previous week, Monks had 6 more articles in the media than St. James's Place. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Monks and 2 mentions for St. James's Place. St. James' Place's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Monks' score of 0.05 indicating that St. James's Place is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Monks 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral St. James's Place 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, PSH or MNKS?

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than Monks. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Pershing Square £2.57B 2.64 £2.71B £1.41 thousand 2.75 Monks £635.93M 3.94 £589.71M £368.55 4.41

Is PSH or MNKS more profitable?

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to Pershing Square's net margin of 94.13%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat Pershing Square's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Pershing Square 94.13% 16.97% 11.83% Monks 96.74% 24.22% 9.21%

Monks (MNKS) Competitors

GBX 1,626 -10.00 (-0.61%)

As of 07/13/2026 11:53 AM Eastern

Compare

MNKS vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, STJ, and PSH

Should you buy Monks stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Monks with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Monks include Schroders (SDR), M&G (MNG), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), St. James's Place (STJ), and Pershing Square (PSH). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Monks compare to Schroders?

Monks (LON:MNKS) and Schroders (LON:SDR) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Monks pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroders pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Schroders has a consensus price target of GBX 453.33, indicating a potential downside of 22.71%. Given Schroders' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Schroders is more favorable than Monks.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Monks	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Schroders	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

10.1% of Monks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of Schroders shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Monks shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Schroders shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Monks has a beta of 0.94357127, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroders has a beta of 1.081, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Monks had 8 more articles in the media than Schroders. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Monks and 0 mentions for Schroders. Monks' average media sentiment score of 0.05 beat Schroders' score of 0.00 indicating that Monks is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Monks	Neutral
Schroders	Neutral

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to Schroders' net margin of 16.44%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat Schroders' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Monks	96.74%	24.22%	9.21%
Schroders	16.44%	12.35%	1.86%

Monks has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schroders. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Monks	£635.93M	3.94	£589.71M	£368.55	4.41
Schroders	£3.25B	2.81	£355.50M	£33.60	17.46

Summary

Monks and Schroders tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Monks compare to M&G?

Monks (LON:MNKS) and M&G (LON:MNG) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

Monks has a beta of 0.94357127, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, M&G has a beta of 0.941, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Monks pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. M&G pays out 164.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Monks had 6 more articles in the media than M&G. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Monks and 2 mentions for M&G. M&G's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Monks' score of 0.05 indicating that M&G is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Monks	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
M&G	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat M&G's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Monks	96.74%	24.22%	9.21%
M&G	1.73%	9.49%	0.40%

Monks has higher earnings, but lower revenue than M&G. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Monks	£635.93M	3.94	£589.71M	£368.55	4.41
M&G	£21.71B	0.38	£166.98M	£12.30	28.13

M&G has a consensus target price of GBX 677.86, suggesting a potential upside of 95.88%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe M&G is more favorable than Monks.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Monks	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
M&G	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43

10.1% of Monks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.9% of M&G shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Monks shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of M&G shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Monks beats M&G on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Monks compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) and Monks (LON:MNKS) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

7.1% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Monks shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Monks shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Monks. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Technology Trust	£2.14B	3.44	£1.20B	£188.58	3.53
Monks	£635.93M	3.94	£589.71M	£368.55	4.41

In the previous week, Monks had 7 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Monks and 1 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust. Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.49 beat Monks' score of 0.05 indicating that Polar Capital Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Technology Trust	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Monks	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.9269671, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monks has a beta of 0.94357127, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 249.53% compared to Monks' net margin of 96.74%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 55.87% beat Monks' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Polar Capital Technology Trust	249.53%	55.87%	20.70%
Monks	96.74%	24.22%	9.21%

Summary

Monks beats Polar Capital Technology Trust on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Monks compare to St. James's Place?

Monks (LON:MNKS) and St. James's Place (LON:STJ) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

Monks has a beta of 0.94357127, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, St. James's Place has a beta of 1.016, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to St. James' Place's net margin of 1.76%. St. James' Place's return on equity of 37.33% beat Monks' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Monks	96.74%	24.22%	9.21%
St. James's Place	1.76%	37.33%	0.22%

Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. St. James's Place pays an annual dividend of GBX 18 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Monks pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. St. James's Place pays out 18.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

St. James's Place has a consensus price target of GBX 1,689.71, suggesting a potential upside of 46.68%. Given St. James' Place's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe St. James's Place is more favorable than Monks.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Monks	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
St. James's Place	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

Monks has higher earnings, but lower revenue than St. James's Place. Monks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than St. James's Place, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Monks	£635.93M	3.94	£589.71M	£368.55	4.41
St. James's Place	£30.14B	0.19	-£6.46M	£98.80	11.66

10.1% of Monks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.8% of St. James's Place shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Monks shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of St. James's Place shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Monks had 6 more articles in the media than St. James's Place. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Monks and 2 mentions for St. James's Place. St. James' Place's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Monks' score of 0.05 indicating that St. James's Place is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Monks	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
St. James's Place	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

St. James's Place beats Monks on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Monks compare to Pershing Square?

Pershing Square (LON:PSH) and Monks (LON:MNKS) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and media sentiment.

Monks has a net margin of 96.74% compared to Pershing Square's net margin of 94.13%. Monks' return on equity of 24.22% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pershing Square	94.13%	16.97%	11.83%
Monks	96.74%	24.22%	9.21%

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than Monks. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pershing Square	£2.57B	2.64	£2.71B	£1.41 thousand	2.75
Monks	£635.93M	3.94	£589.71M	£368.55	4.41

Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Monks pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monks pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

5.8% of Pershing Square shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Monks shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Monks shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pershing Square has a beta of 0.8576274, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monks has a beta of 0.94357127, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Monks had 8 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Monks and 0 mentions for Pershing Square. Monks' average media sentiment score of 0.05 beat Pershing Square's score of 0.00 indicating that Monks is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pershing Square	Neutral
Monks	Neutral

Summary

Monks beats Pershing Square on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Monks News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MNKS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MNKS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Monks	Asset Management Industry	Financial Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£2.51B	£2.43B	£6.19B	£2.85B
Dividend Yield	0.06%	6.01%	5.23%	6.17%
P/E Ratio	4.41	61.84	29.75	368.18
Price / Sales	3.94	1,858.15	1,187.15	84,612.72
Price / Cash	90.93	60.33	88.64	27.87
Price / Book	1.29	1.39	6.43	7.49
Net Income	£589.71M	£265.27M	£1.13B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-0.37%	-0.06%	-0.13%	-0.19%
1 Month Performance	1.39%	0.23%	0.30%	-1.00%
1 Year Performance	23.37%	7.68%	15.08%	61.67%

Monks Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MNKS Monks	N/A	GBX 1,626 -0.6%	N/A	+23.9%	£2.51B	£635.93M	4.41	N/A
SDR Schroders	1.5196 of 5 stars	GBX 587 +0.1%	GBX 453.33 -22.8%	+52.7%	£9.15B	£3.25B	17.47	6,438
MNG M&G	3.9507 of 5 stars	GBX 342.71 +0.8%	GBX 677.86 +97.8%	+34.3%	£8.16B	£21.71B	27.86	6,101	News Coverage
PCT Polar Capital Technology Trust	N/A	GBX 684 +0.7%	N/A	+78.4%	£7.61B	£2.14B	3.63	120	Gap Up
STJ St. James's Place	4.4557 of 5 stars	GBX 1,303 +2.1%	GBX 1,689.71 +29.7%	-5.9%	£6.63B	£30.14B	13.19	2,298

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MNKS) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Monks (MNKS) Competitors

MNKS vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, STJ, and PSH

How does Monks compare to Schroders?

Summary

How does Monks compare to M&G?

Summary

How does Monks compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Summary

How does Monks compare to St. James's Place?

Summary

How does Monks compare to Pershing Square?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MNKS vs. The Competition

Monks Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Monks (MNKS) Competitors

MNKS vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, STJ, and PSH

How does Monks compare to Schroders?

Is MNKS or SDR a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer MNKS or SDR?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MNKS or SDR?

Which has more risk and volatility, MNKS or SDR?

Does the media refer more to MNKS or SDR?

Is MNKS or SDR more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MNKS or SDR?

Summary

How does Monks compare to M&G?

Which has more volatility & risk, MNKS or MNG?

Is MNKS or MNG a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor MNKS or MNG?

Is MNKS or MNG more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MNKS or MNG?

Do analysts rate MNKS or MNG?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MNKS or MNG?

Summary

How does Monks compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PCT or MNKS?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PCT or MNKS?

Does the media refer more to PCT or MNKS?

Which has more volatility & risk, PCT or MNKS?

Is PCT or MNKS more profitable?

Summary

How does Monks compare to St. James's Place?

Which has more volatility & risk, MNKS or STJ?

Is MNKS or STJ more profitable?

Is MNKS or STJ a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer MNKS or STJ?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, MNKS or STJ?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MNKS or STJ?

Does the media favor MNKS or STJ?

Summary

How does Monks compare to Pershing Square?

Is PSH or MNKS more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, PSH or MNKS?

Is PSH or MNKS a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PSH or MNKS?

Which has more volatility and risk, PSH or MNKS?

Does the media refer more to PSH or MNKS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MNKS vs. The Competition

Monks Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools