Go Pro
→ These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000] (From Golden Portfolio) (Ad)tc pixel Free IIG Stock Alerts

Intuitive Investments Group (IIG) Competitors

Intuitive Investments Group logo
GBX 242 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 08/13/2026
Compare

IIG vs. JTC, MYI, N91, FEV, and JAM

Should you buy Intuitive Investments Group stock or one of its competitors? Intuitive Investments Group's main competitors and comparable companies include JTC (JTC), Murray International (MYI), Ninety One Group (N91), Fidelity European Trust (FEV), and JPMorgan American (JAM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Intuitive Investments Group compare to JTC?

JTC (LON:JTC) and Intuitive Investments Group (LON:IIG) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

JTC has a beta of 0.911, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intuitive Investments Group has a beta of 0.9329976, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, JTC's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Intuitive Investments Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
JTC Neutral
Intuitive Investments Group Neutral

JTC presently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,112.50, suggesting a potential downside of 16.92%. Given JTC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe JTC is more favorable than Intuitive Investments Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
JTC
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Intuitive Investments Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

JTC has higher revenue and earnings than Intuitive Investments Group. Intuitive Investments Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JTC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JTC£381.95M6.04£29.99M£0.552,434.55
Intuitive Investments Group£152.88M3.83-£2.34M£69.453.48

JTC has a net margin of 0.24% compared to Intuitive Investments Group's net margin of -5,705.75%. Intuitive Investments Group's return on equity of 36.76% beat JTC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JTC0.24% 0.18% 4.96%
Intuitive Investments Group -5,705.75%36.76%-0.20%

29.1% of JTC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of JTC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

JTC beats Intuitive Investments Group on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intuitive Investments Group compare to Murray International?

Intuitive Investments Group (LON:IIG) and Murray International (LON:MYI) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

0.3% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.6% of Murray International shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Murray International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Murray International has a net margin of 95.58% compared to Intuitive Investments Group's net margin of -5,705.75%. Intuitive Investments Group's return on equity of 36.76% beat Murray International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intuitive Investments Group-5,705.75% 36.76% -0.20%
Murray International 95.58%22.48%6.89%

Intuitive Investments Group has a beta of 0.9329976, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Murray International has a beta of 0.864, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Murray International had 1 more articles in the media than Intuitive Investments Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Murray International and 0 mentions for Intuitive Investments Group. Intuitive Investments Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Murray International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intuitive Investments Group Neutral
Murray International Neutral

Murray International has higher revenue and earnings than Intuitive Investments Group. Intuitive Investments Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murray International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intuitive Investments Group£152.88M3.83-£2.34M£69.453.48
Murray International£358.82M6.23£178.39M£58.706.40

Summary

Murray International beats Intuitive Investments Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intuitive Investments Group compare to Ninety One Group?

Intuitive Investments Group (LON:IIG) and Ninety One Group (LON:N91) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Ninety One Group has a net margin of 19.63% compared to Intuitive Investments Group's net margin of -5,705.75%. Intuitive Investments Group's return on equity of 36.76% beat Ninety One Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intuitive Investments Group-5,705.75% 36.76% -0.20%
Ninety One Group 19.63%28.08%1.15%

0.3% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.6% of Ninety One Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Ninety One Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Intuitive Investments Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ninety One Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intuitive Investments Group Neutral
Ninety One Group Neutral

Intuitive Investments Group has a beta of 0.9329976, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ninety One Group has a beta of 0.753, indicating that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Ninety One Group has higher revenue and earnings than Intuitive Investments Group. Intuitive Investments Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ninety One Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intuitive Investments Group£152.88M3.83-£2.34M£69.453.48
Ninety One Group£763.30M2.75£154.01M£17.1012.35

Ninety One Group has a consensus target price of GBX 206, suggesting a potential downside of 2.46%. Given Ninety One Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ninety One Group is more favorable than Intuitive Investments Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intuitive Investments Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ninety One Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Ninety One Group beats Intuitive Investments Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intuitive Investments Group compare to Fidelity European Trust?

Intuitive Investments Group (LON:IIG) and Fidelity European Trust (LON:FEV) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Fidelity European Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Intuitive Investments Group. Intuitive Investments Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity European Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intuitive Investments Group£152.88M3.83-£2.34M£69.453.48
Fidelity European Trust£276.56M7.86£208.32M£62.807.02

0.3% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of Fidelity European Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Fidelity European Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Intuitive Investments Group has a beta of 0.9329976, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity European Trust has a beta of 1.189, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity European Trust has a net margin of 93.61% compared to Intuitive Investments Group's net margin of -5,705.75%. Intuitive Investments Group's return on equity of 36.76% beat Fidelity European Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intuitive Investments Group-5,705.75% 36.76% -0.20%
Fidelity European Trust 93.61%13.99%10.56%

In the previous week, Fidelity European Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Intuitive Investments Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fidelity European Trust and 0 mentions for Intuitive Investments Group. Fidelity European Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Intuitive Investments Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity European Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intuitive Investments Group Neutral
Fidelity European Trust Positive

Summary

Fidelity European Trust beats Intuitive Investments Group on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intuitive Investments Group compare to JPMorgan American?

Intuitive Investments Group (LON:IIG) and JPMorgan American (LON:JAM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

In the previous week, JPMorgan American's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Intuitive Investments Group's score of 0.00 indicating that JPMorgan American is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intuitive Investments Group Neutral
JPMorgan American Positive

0.3% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.6% of JPMorgan American shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of JPMorgan American shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Intuitive Investments Group has a beta of 0.9329976, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan American has a beta of 0.747, indicating that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

JPMorgan American has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Intuitive Investments Group. Intuitive Investments Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan American, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intuitive Investments Group£152.88M3.83-£2.34M£69.453.48
JPMorgan American£86.07M23.22£420.73M£46.2126.18

JPMorgan American has a net margin of 95.43% compared to Intuitive Investments Group's net margin of -5,705.75%. Intuitive Investments Group's return on equity of 36.76% beat JPMorgan American's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intuitive Investments Group-5,705.75% 36.76% -0.20%
JPMorgan American 95.43%18.71%15.33%

Summary

JPMorgan American beats Intuitive Investments Group on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Intuitive Investments Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IIG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IIG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricIntuitive Investments GroupCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£585.25M£5.71B£14.06B£2.93B
Dividend YieldN/A7.40%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio3.4832.5526.70367.32
Price / Sales3.831,229.32516.4883,741.35
Price / Cash1.5648.3338.5027.89
Price / Book1.572.132.187.02
Net Income-£2.34M£417.46M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A0.60%1.38%0.89%
1 Month Performance0.83%2.36%2.93%3.27%
1 Year Performance101.67%7.75%11.49%22.28%

Intuitive Investments Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IIG
Intuitive Investments Group
N/AGBX 242
flat		N/AN/A£585.25M£152.88M3.485
JTC
JTC
N/AGBX 1,337
-0.1%		GBX 1,112.50
-16.8%		N/A£2.30B£381.95M2,430.911,603
MYI
Murray International
N/AGBX 369
-0.3%		N/A+25.0%£2.20B£358.82M6.29N/A
N91
Ninety One Group
N/AGBX 219.40
+0.5%		GBX 206
-6.1%		+9.1%£2.18B£763.30M12.831,180
FEV
Fidelity European Trust
N/AGBX 442
-0.5%		N/A+8.4%£2.18B£276.56M7.04N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:IIG) was last updated on 8/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Bezos… DOOMED
A single FCC filing hints Elon Musk is planning his biggest project yet - bigger than Tesla, SpaceX, and X com...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
A $382 trillion migration and the position no one is talking about
Trump just signed a law requiring America's entire $382 trillion financial system to migrate to a new money ne...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your withdrawal order could cost you in taxes
If you have $2M or more saved, the 4% rule points to roughly $92,000 a year - but it's a single-variable answe...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
"Second Wave” Hitting Iran Soon? Wall Street Issues Warning
Analysts at Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are warning that a quiet domestic threat - unrelated to overseas ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
How options let you do more with less capital
Would you rather spend $5,000 buying 100 shares of a $50 stock, or control those same 100 shares for a fractio...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
I found Rolls-Royce at $2 - now I see the same setup again
In 2022, Karim Rahemtulla recommended Rolls-Royce under $2 - a misunderstood aerospace name the market had wri...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trade I’ve been waiting for since 2011
Ross Givens, Director of Research at Traders Agency, is calling for gold to reach $10,000 an ounce this superc...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel