Free Trial

Intuitive Investments Group (IIG) Competitors

Intuitive Investments Group logo
GBX 210.66 -1.34 (-0.63%)
As of 04:20 AM Eastern

IIG vs. RAT, JAM, N91, CLDN, and BRWM

Should you buy Intuitive Investments Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Intuitive Investments Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Intuitive Investments Group include Rathbones Group (RAT), JPMorgan American (JAM), Ninety One Group (N91), Caledonia Investments (CLDN), and BlackRock World Mining Trust (BRWM). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Intuitive Investments Group compare to Rathbones Group?

Rathbones Group (LON:RAT) and Intuitive Investments Group (LON:IIG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Rathbones Group had 1 more articles in the media than Intuitive Investments Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Rathbones Group and 0 mentions for Intuitive Investments Group. Rathbones Group's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Intuitive Investments Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Rathbones Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Rathbones Group Neutral
Intuitive Investments Group Neutral

Rathbones Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 2,025, indicating a potential upside of 4.92%. Given Rathbones Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Rathbones Group is more favorable than Intuitive Investments Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rathbones Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Intuitive Investments Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Rathbones Group has a beta of 0.718, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intuitive Investments Group has a beta of 0.99475217, suggesting that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

37.0% of Rathbones Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Rathbones Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Rathbones Group has higher revenue and earnings than Intuitive Investments Group. Intuitive Investments Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rathbones Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rathbones Group£923.30M2.16£63.46M£104.7018.43
Intuitive Investments Group-£3.34M-150.93-£2.34M-£2.05N/A

Intuitive Investments Group has a net margin of 128.05% compared to Rathbones Group's net margin of 10.85%. Rathbones Group's return on equity of 8.33% beat Intuitive Investments Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rathbones Group10.85% 8.33% 3.57%
Intuitive Investments Group 128.05%-1.32%-0.20%

Summary

Rathbones Group beats Intuitive Investments Group on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intuitive Investments Group compare to JPMorgan American?

Intuitive Investments Group (LON:IIG) and JPMorgan American (LON:JAM) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

JPMorgan American has higher revenue and earnings than Intuitive Investments Group. Intuitive Investments Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan American, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intuitive Investments Group-£3.34M-150.93-£2.34M-£2.05N/A
JPMorgan American£86.07M23.40£420.73M£46.2126.18

Intuitive Investments Group has a net margin of 128.05% compared to JPMorgan American's net margin of 89.80%. JPMorgan American's return on equity of 4.28% beat Intuitive Investments Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intuitive Investments Group128.05% -1.32% -0.20%
JPMorgan American 89.80%4.28%15.33%

0.3% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.6% of JPMorgan American shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of JPMorgan American shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Intuitive Investments Group has a beta of 0.99475217, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan American has a beta of 0.7448402, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Intuitive Investments Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan American'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intuitive Investments Group Neutral
JPMorgan American Neutral

Summary

JPMorgan American beats Intuitive Investments Group on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intuitive Investments Group compare to Ninety One Group?

Ninety One Group (LON:N91) and Intuitive Investments Group (LON:IIG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

Ninety One Group has higher revenue and earnings than Intuitive Investments Group. Intuitive Investments Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ninety One Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ninety One Group£713.90M2.80£154.01M£18.3012.09
Intuitive Investments Group-£3.34M-150.93-£2.34M-£2.05N/A

In the previous week, Ninety One Group had 2 more articles in the media than Intuitive Investments Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ninety One Group and 0 mentions for Intuitive Investments Group. Ninety One Group's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Intuitive Investments Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Ninety One Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ninety One Group Positive
Intuitive Investments Group Neutral

11.9% of Ninety One Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Ninety One Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ninety One Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 206, indicating a potential downside of 6.87%. Given Ninety One Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ninety One Group is more favorable than Intuitive Investments Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ninety One Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Intuitive Investments Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Intuitive Investments Group has a net margin of 128.05% compared to Ninety One Group's net margin of 21.56%. Ninety One Group's return on equity of 41.35% beat Intuitive Investments Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ninety One Group21.56% 41.35% 1.15%
Intuitive Investments Group 128.05%-1.32%-0.20%

Ninety One Group has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intuitive Investments Group has a beta of 0.99475217, suggesting that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ninety One Group beats Intuitive Investments Group on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intuitive Investments Group compare to Caledonia Investments?

Intuitive Investments Group (LON:IIG) and Caledonia Investments (LON:CLDN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Caledonia Investments had 3 more articles in the media than Intuitive Investments Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Caledonia Investments and 0 mentions for Intuitive Investments Group. Caledonia Investments' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Intuitive Investments Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Caledonia Investments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intuitive Investments Group Neutral
Caledonia Investments Positive

Caledonia Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Intuitive Investments Group. Intuitive Investments Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caledonia Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intuitive Investments Group-£3.34M-150.93-£2.34M-£2.05N/A
Caledonia Investments£225M8.42£199.92M£34.5310.64

Intuitive Investments Group has a beta of 0.99475217, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caledonia Investments has a beta of 1.2766, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

0.3% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.3% of Caledonia Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Caledonia Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Intuitive Investments Group has a net margin of 128.05% compared to Caledonia Investments' net margin of 81.74%. Caledonia Investments' return on equity of 4.51% beat Intuitive Investments Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intuitive Investments Group128.05% -1.32% -0.20%
Caledonia Investments 81.74%4.51%4.23%

Summary

Caledonia Investments beats Intuitive Investments Group on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intuitive Investments Group compare to BlackRock World Mining Trust?

BlackRock World Mining Trust (LON:BRWM) and Intuitive Investments Group (LON:IIG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Intuitive Investments Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than BlackRock World Mining Trust. Intuitive Investments Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BlackRock World Mining Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock World Mining Trust£693.80M2.70-£13.42M£365.862.75
Intuitive Investments Group-£3.34M-150.93-£2.34M-£2.05N/A

BlackRock World Mining Trust has a beta of 1.732185, meaning that its share price is 73% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intuitive Investments Group has a beta of 0.99475217, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Intuitive Investments Group has a net margin of 128.05% compared to BlackRock World Mining Trust's net margin of 98.77%. BlackRock World Mining Trust's return on equity of 52.74% beat Intuitive Investments Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock World Mining Trust98.77% 52.74% -0.10%
Intuitive Investments Group 128.05%-1.32%-0.20%

8.3% of BlackRock World Mining Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of BlackRock World Mining Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Intuitive Investments Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, BlackRock World Mining Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Intuitive Investments Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for BlackRock World Mining Trust and 0 mentions for Intuitive Investments Group. BlackRock World Mining Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Intuitive Investments Group's score of 0.00 indicating that BlackRock World Mining Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock World Mining Trust Positive
Intuitive Investments Group Neutral

Summary

BlackRock World Mining Trust beats Intuitive Investments Group on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Intuitive Investments Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IIG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IIG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IIG vs. The Competition

MetricIntuitive Investments GroupAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£504.12M£2.40B£5.75B£2.79B
Dividend YieldN/A6.03%5.29%6.13%
P/E Ratio-102.7625.4516.15364.75
Price / Sales-150.932,017.301,043.0187,595.97
Price / Cash1.5660.1591.3227.85
Price / Book1.361.376.527.74
Net Income-£2.34M£264.62M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.31%-0.16%0.23%0.43%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-32.65%-7.70%N/A
1 Year Performance75.55%11.45%19.62%75.20%

Intuitive Investments Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IIG
Intuitive Investments Group
N/AGBX 210.66
-0.6%
N/A+77.2%£504.12M-£3.34MN/A5
RAT
Rathbones Group
1.6534 of 5 stars
GBX 1,980
+0.8%
GBX 2,025
+2.3%
+16.1%£2.04B£923.30M18.913,500
JAM
JPMorgan American
N/AGBX 1,214.18
-0.3%
N/A+22.4%£2.02B£86.07M26.28N/A
N91
Ninety One Group
1.2751 of 5 stars
GBX 222
-1.2%
GBX 206
-7.2%
+30.7%£2.00B£713.90M12.131,180
CLDN
Caledonia Investments
N/AGBX 364.50
+0.3%
N/A-90.4%£1.88B£225M10.5674

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:IIG) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners