Go Pro

Personal Assets (PNL) Competitors

Personal Assets logo
GBX 537 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 12:00 PM Eastern

PNL vs. FCIT, PSH, ICP, SDRC, and STJ

Should you buy Personal Assets stock or one of its competitors? Personal Assets's main competitors and comparable companies include F&C Investment Trust (FCIT), Pershing Square (PSH), Intermediate Capital Group (ICP), Schroders (SDRC), and St. James's Place (STJ). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Personal Assets compare to F&C Investment Trust?

Personal Assets (LON:PNL) and F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and dividends.

F&C Investment Trust has a net margin of 103.67% compared to Personal Assets' net margin of 71.98%. F&C Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.14% beat Personal Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Personal Assets71.98% 6.04% 1.96%
F&C Investment Trust 103.67%22.14%10.80%

In the previous week, Personal Assets had 1 more articles in the media than F&C Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Personal Assets and 0 mentions for F&C Investment Trust. Personal Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat F&C Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Personal Assets is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Personal Assets Positive
F&C Investment Trust Neutral

Personal Assets has a beta of 0.337, indicating that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.736, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Personal Assets. F&C Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Personal Assets£105.16M15.78£124.81M£32.4816.59
F&C Investment Trust£1.46B4.44£935.32M£75.804.58

0.1% of Personal Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Personal Assets pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. F&C Investment Trust pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. F&C Investment Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

F&C Investment Trust beats Personal Assets on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Personal Assets compare to Pershing Square?

Pershing Square (LON:PSH) and Personal Assets (LON:PNL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

5.8% of Pershing Square shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Personal Assets shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Pershing Square and Pershing Square both had 1 articles in the media. Personal Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Pershing Square's score of 0.00 indicating that Personal Assets is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pershing Square
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Personal Assets
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Pershing Square has a net margin of 97.16% compared to Personal Assets' net margin of 71.98%. Personal Assets' return on equity of 6.04% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pershing Square97.16% -2.59% 11.83%
Personal Assets 71.98%6.04%1.96%

Pershing Square has a beta of 0.842, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Personal Assets has a beta of 0.337, meaning that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Pershing Square has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Personal Assets. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pershing Square-£1.26B-5.09£2.71B-£752.00N/A
Personal Assets£105.16M15.78£124.81M£32.4816.59

Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 69.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Pershing Square pays out -9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Personal Assets pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pershing Square is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Pershing Square beats Personal Assets on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Personal Assets compare to Intermediate Capital Group?

Intermediate Capital Group (LON:ICP) and Personal Assets (LON:PNL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and earnings.

Intermediate Capital Group has higher revenue and earnings than Personal Assets. Intermediate Capital Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intermediate Capital Group£831.60M0.00£409.10M£0.77N/A
Personal Assets£105.16M15.78£124.81M£32.4816.59

Personal Assets has a net margin of 71.98% compared to Intermediate Capital Group's net margin of 56.78%. Intermediate Capital Group's return on equity of 20.09% beat Personal Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intermediate Capital Group56.78% 20.09% 4.57%
Personal Assets 71.98%6.04%1.96%

70.4% of Intermediate Capital Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Personal Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Intermediate Capital Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Personal Assets had 1 more articles in the media than Intermediate Capital Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Personal Assets and 0 mentions for Intermediate Capital Group. Personal Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Intermediate Capital Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Personal Assets is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intermediate Capital Group Neutral
Personal Assets Positive

Intermediate Capital Group has a beta of 1.9, suggesting that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Personal Assets has a beta of 0.337, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Intermediate Capital Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 78 per share. Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Intermediate Capital Group pays out 10,129.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Personal Assets pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Personal Assets is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Intermediate Capital Group beats Personal Assets on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Personal Assets compare to Schroders?

Personal Assets (LON:PNL) and Schroders (LON:SDRC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

Personal Assets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schroders. Schroders is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Personal Assets£105.16M15.78£124.81M£32.4816.59
Schroders£3.14B0.00N/A£2.02N/A

In the previous week, Personal Assets had 1 more articles in the media than Schroders. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Personal Assets and 0 mentions for Schroders. Personal Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Schroders' score of 0.00 indicating that Personal Assets is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Personal Assets Positive
Schroders Neutral

Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.22 per share. Personal Assets pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroders pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Personal Assets is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

0.1% of Personal Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Personal Assets has a net margin of 71.98% compared to Schroders' net margin of 0.00%. Personal Assets' return on equity of 6.04% beat Schroders' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Personal Assets71.98% 6.04% 1.96%
Schroders N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Personal Assets beats Schroders on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Personal Assets compare to St. James's Place?

Personal Assets (LON:PNL) and St. James's Place (LON:STJ) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Personal Assets has a net margin of 71.98% compared to St. James' Place's net margin of 1.25%. St. James' Place's return on equity of 37.02% beat Personal Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Personal Assets71.98% 6.04% 1.96%
St. James's Place 1.25%37.02%0.22%

In the previous week, St. James's Place had 1 more articles in the media than Personal Assets. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for St. James's Place and 1 mentions for Personal Assets. Personal Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat St. James' Place's score of -0.49 indicating that Personal Assets is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Personal Assets
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
St. James's Place
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Personal Assets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than St. James's Place. St. James's Place is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Personal Assets£105.16M15.78£124.81M£32.4816.59
St. James's Place£44.81B0.12-£6.46M£106.609.77

St. James's Place has a consensus price target of GBX 1,721.86, suggesting a potential upside of 65.40%. Given St. James' Place's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe St. James's Place is more favorable than Personal Assets.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Personal Assets
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
St. James's Place
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

0.1% of Personal Assets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.8% of St. James's Place shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of St. James's Place shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Personal Assets has a beta of 0.337, indicating that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, St. James's Place has a beta of 1.011, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. St. James's Place pays an annual dividend of GBX 18 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Personal Assets pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. St. James's Place pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. St. James's Place is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

St. James's Place beats Personal Assets on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Personal Assets News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PNL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PNL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PNL vs. The Competition

MetricPersonal AssetsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.65B£5.15B£13.32B£2.80B
Dividend Yield1.04%7.55%6.03%6.18%
P/E Ratio16.5329.4024.49366.17
Price / Sales15.721,241.57504.0489,425.29
Price / Cash37.4647.7747.4527.89
Price / Book1.113.492.706.83
Net Income£124.81M£417.69M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.47%-0.74%-1.04%-0.75%
1 Month Performance-2.19%5.22%1.00%16.84%
1 Year Performance2.48%3.31%8.15%16.40%

Personal Assets Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PNL
Personal Assets
N/AGBX 537
flat
N/A+2.5%£1.65B£105.16M16.53N/A
FCIT
F&C Investment Trust
N/AGBX 343.20
-0.5%
N/A+14.7%£6.43B£1.46B4.53N/A
PSH
Pershing Square
N/AGBX 3,622
-1.0%
N/A-20.6%£6.38B-£1.26BN/AN/A
ICP
Intermediate Capital Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.24B£831.60M2,787.76579
SDRC
Schroders
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.12B£3.14B1,071.785,750

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PNL) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners