Go Pro
→ Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside) (From InvestorPlace) (Ad)tc pixel Free PNL Stock Alerts

Personal Assets (PNL) Competitors

Personal Assets logo
GBX 549.01 +4.01 (+0.74%)
As of 05:52 AM Eastern
Compare

PNL vs. PSH, ICP, FCIT, SDRC, and STJ

Should you buy Personal Assets stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Personal Assets with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Personal Assets include Pershing Square (PSH), Intermediate Capital Group (ICP), F&C Investment Trust (FCIT), Schroders (SDRC), and St. James's Place (STJ).

How does Personal Assets compare to Pershing Square?

Pershing Square (LON:PSH) and Personal Assets (LON:PNL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

5.8% of Pershing Square shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Personal Assets shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than Personal Assets. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pershing Square£2.57B2.64£2.71B£1.41 thousand2.76
Personal Assets£105.16M16.12£124.81M£32.4816.90

Personal Assets has a net margin of 95.99% compared to Pershing Square's net margin of 94.13%. Pershing Square's return on equity of 16.97% beat Personal Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pershing Square94.13% 16.97% 11.83%
Personal Assets 95.99%6.04%1.96%

In the previous week, Pershing Square's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Personal Assets'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pershing Square Neutral
Personal Assets Neutral

Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Personal Assets pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pershing Square is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Pershing Square has a beta of 0.8576274, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Personal Assets has a beta of 0.33214432, suggesting that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pershing Square beats Personal Assets on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Personal Assets compare to Intermediate Capital Group?

Intermediate Capital Group (LON:ICP) and Personal Assets (LON:PNL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Intermediate Capital Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 78 per share. Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Intermediate Capital Group pays out 10,129.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Personal Assets pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Personal Assets is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Intermediate Capital Group has higher revenue and earnings than Personal Assets. Intermediate Capital Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intermediate Capital Group£831.60M0.00£409.10M£0.77N/A
Personal Assets£105.16M16.12£124.81M£32.4816.90

70.4% of Intermediate Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Personal Assets shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Intermediate Capital Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Intermediate Capital Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Personal Assets'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intermediate Capital Group Neutral
Personal Assets Neutral

Personal Assets has a net margin of 95.99% compared to Intermediate Capital Group's net margin of 56.78%. Intermediate Capital Group's return on equity of 20.09% beat Personal Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intermediate Capital Group56.78% 20.09% 4.57%
Personal Assets 95.99%6.04%1.96%

Intermediate Capital Group has a beta of 1.9, meaning that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Personal Assets has a beta of 0.33214432, meaning that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Intermediate Capital Group beats Personal Assets on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Personal Assets compare to F&C Investment Trust?

Personal Assets (LON:PNL) and F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and dividends.

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Personal Assets. F&C Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Personal Assets£105.16M16.12£124.81M£32.4816.90
F&C Investment Trust£683.36M9.21£935.32M£34.649.64

Personal Assets has a beta of 0.33214432, meaning that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.7953292, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Personal Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled F&C Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Personal Assets Neutral
F&C Investment Trust Neutral

F&C Investment Trust has a net margin of 105.66% compared to Personal Assets' net margin of 95.99%. F&C Investment Trust's return on equity of 11.28% beat Personal Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Personal Assets95.99% 6.04% 1.96%
F&C Investment Trust 105.66%11.28%10.80%

0.1% of Personal Assets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Personal Assets pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. F&C Investment Trust pays out 11.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. F&C Investment Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

F&C Investment Trust beats Personal Assets on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Personal Assets compare to Schroders?

Personal Assets (LON:PNL) and Schroders (LON:SDRC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Personal Assets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schroders. Schroders is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Personal Assets£105.16M16.12£124.81M£32.4816.90
Schroders£3.14B0.00N/A£2.02N/A

0.1% of Personal Assets shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.22 per share. Personal Assets pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroders pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Personal Assets is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Personal Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Schroders'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Personal Assets Neutral
Schroders Neutral

Personal Assets has a net margin of 95.99% compared to Schroders' net margin of 0.00%. Personal Assets' return on equity of 6.04% beat Schroders' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Personal Assets95.99% 6.04% 1.96%
Schroders N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Personal Assets beats Schroders on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Personal Assets compare to St. James's Place?

St. James's Place (LON:STJ) and Personal Assets (LON:PNL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

St. James's Place presently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,702.57, indicating a potential upside of 57.28%. Given St. James' Place's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe St. James's Place is more favorable than Personal Assets.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
St. James's Place
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Personal Assets
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, St. James's Place had 17 more articles in the media than Personal Assets. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for St. James's Place and 0 mentions for Personal Assets. St. James' Place's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Personal Assets' score of 0.00 indicating that St. James's Place is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
St. James's Place Positive
Personal Assets Neutral

77.8% of St. James's Place shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Personal Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of St. James's Place shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Personal Assets has a net margin of 95.99% compared to St. James' Place's net margin of 1.25%. St. James' Place's return on equity of 37.02% beat Personal Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
St. James's Place1.25% 37.02% 0.22%
Personal Assets 95.99%6.04%1.96%

Personal Assets has lower revenue, but higher earnings than St. James's Place. St. James's Place is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
St. James's Place£44.81B0.12-£6.46M£98.8010.96
Personal Assets£105.16M16.12£124.81M£32.4816.90

St. James's Place pays an annual dividend of GBX 18 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. St. James's Place pays out 18.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Personal Assets pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

St. James's Place has a beta of 1.016, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Personal Assets has a beta of 0.33214432, meaning that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

St. James's Place beats Personal Assets on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Personal Assets News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PNL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PNL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PNL vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPersonal AssetsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.70B£5.46B£13.87B£2.82B
Dividend Yield1.03%7.51%5.95%6.15%
P/E Ratio16.9036.7828.68368.45
Price / Sales16.121,121.76465.5283,500.12
Price / Cash37.4684.8844.5027.89
Price / Book1.143.693.687.06
Net Income£124.81M£417.14M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.05%7.86%3.70%6.48%
1 Month Performance1.67%-1.16%0.13%0.22%
1 Year Performance7.65%5.77%13.07%64.32%

Personal Assets Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PNL
Personal Assets
N/AGBX 549.01
+0.7%		N/A+6.9%£1.70B£105.16M16.90N/A
PSH
Pershing Square
N/AGBX 3,720
-0.4%		N/A-8.1%£6.51B£2.57B2.64N/A
ICP
Intermediate Capital Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.24B£831.60M2,787.76579
FCIT
F&C Investment Trust
N/AGBX 330
-0.7%		N/A+14.4%£6.22B£683.36M9.53N/A
SDRC
Schroders
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.12B£3.14B1,071.785,750

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PNL) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
“The unseen winner of the AI race” is not SpaceX
Marc Chaikin - the analyst who called Nvidia before its historic run - says a tech firm labeled 'the unseen wi...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Where to Put $100 Before Trump's New Tech Law Rolls Out
The Financial Times says a new tech law puts America 'on the verge of a financial revolution.' Yahoo Finance e...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel