Go Pro
→ Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside) (From InvestorPlace) (Ad)tc pixel Free PNL Stock Alerts

Personal Assets (PNL) Competitors

Personal Assets logo
GBX 550 +4.00 (+0.73%)
As of 08/21/2026 12:05 PM Eastern
Compare

PNL vs. PSH, FCIT, ICP, SDRC, and STJ

Should you buy Personal Assets stock or one of its competitors? Personal Assets's main competitors and comparable companies include Pershing Square (PSH), F&C Investment Trust (FCIT), Intermediate Capital Group (ICP), Schroders (SDRC), and St. James's Place (STJ). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Personal Assets compare to Pershing Square?

Personal Assets (LON:PNL) and Pershing Square (LON:PSH) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than Personal Assets. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Personal Assets£105.16M16.11£124.81M£32.4816.93
Pershing Square£2.57B2.66£2.71B£1.41 thousand2.78

Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Personal Assets pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pershing Square is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Pershing Square has a net margin of 97.16% compared to Personal Assets' net margin of 95.99%. Personal Assets' return on equity of 6.04% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Personal Assets95.99% 6.04% 1.96%
Pershing Square 97.16%-2.59%11.83%

In the previous week, Pershing Square had 2 more articles in the media than Personal Assets. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pershing Square and 0 mentions for Personal Assets. Pershing Square's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Personal Assets' score of 0.00 indicating that Pershing Square is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Personal Assets Neutral
Pershing Square Positive

0.1% of Personal Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Pershing Square shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Personal Assets has a beta of 0.33214432, suggesting that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pershing Square has a beta of 0.849, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pershing Square beats Personal Assets on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Personal Assets compare to F&C Investment Trust?

F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) and Personal Assets (LON:PNL) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.749, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Personal Assets has a beta of 0.33214432, meaning that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Personal Assets shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. F&C Investment Trust pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Personal Assets pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. F&C Investment Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

F&C Investment Trust has a net margin of 103.67% compared to Personal Assets' net margin of 95.99%. F&C Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.14% beat Personal Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
F&C Investment Trust103.67% 22.14% 10.80%
Personal Assets 95.99%6.04%1.96%

In the previous week, F&C Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Personal Assets'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
F&C Investment Trust Neutral
Personal Assets Neutral

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Personal Assets. F&C Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
F&C Investment Trust£683.36M9.40£935.32M£75.804.50
Personal Assets£105.16M16.11£124.81M£32.4816.93

Summary

F&C Investment Trust beats Personal Assets on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Personal Assets compare to Intermediate Capital Group?

Personal Assets (LON:PNL) and Intermediate Capital Group (LON:ICP) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

Intermediate Capital Group has higher revenue and earnings than Personal Assets. Intermediate Capital Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Personal Assets£105.16M16.11£124.81M£32.4816.93
Intermediate Capital Group£831.60M0.00£409.10M£0.77N/A

Personal Assets has a net margin of 95.99% compared to Intermediate Capital Group's net margin of 56.78%. Intermediate Capital Group's return on equity of 20.09% beat Personal Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Personal Assets95.99% 6.04% 1.96%
Intermediate Capital Group 56.78%20.09%4.57%

In the previous week, Personal Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Intermediate Capital Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Personal Assets Neutral
Intermediate Capital Group Neutral

0.1% of Personal Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.4% of Intermediate Capital Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Intermediate Capital Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Personal Assets has a beta of 0.33214432, indicating that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intermediate Capital Group has a beta of 1.9, indicating that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market.

Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Intermediate Capital Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 78 per share. Personal Assets pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Intermediate Capital Group pays out 10,129.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Personal Assets is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Intermediate Capital Group beats Personal Assets on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Personal Assets compare to Schroders?

Personal Assets (LON:PNL) and Schroders (LON:SDRC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

0.1% of Personal Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Personal Assets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schroders. Schroders is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Personal Assets£105.16M16.11£124.81M£32.4816.93
Schroders£3.14B0.00N/A£2.02N/A

Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.22 per share. Personal Assets pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroders pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Personal Assets is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Personal Assets has a net margin of 95.99% compared to Schroders' net margin of 0.00%. Personal Assets' return on equity of 6.04% beat Schroders' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Personal Assets95.99% 6.04% 1.96%
Schroders N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Personal Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Schroders'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Personal Assets Neutral
Schroders Neutral

Summary

Personal Assets beats Schroders on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Personal Assets compare to St. James's Place?

Personal Assets (LON:PNL) and St. James's Place (LON:STJ) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

0.1% of Personal Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.8% of St. James's Place shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Personal Assets shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of St. James's Place shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

St. James's Place has a consensus target price of GBX 1,721.86, indicating a potential upside of 44.94%. Given St. James' Place's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe St. James's Place is more favorable than Personal Assets.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Personal Assets
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
St. James's Place
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Personal Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. St. James's Place pays an annual dividend of GBX 18 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Personal Assets pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. St. James's Place pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. St. James's Place is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Personal Assets has a net margin of 95.99% compared to St. James' Place's net margin of 1.25%. St. James' Place's return on equity of 37.02% beat Personal Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Personal Assets95.99% 6.04% 1.96%
St. James's Place 1.25%37.02%0.22%

In the previous week, St. James' Place's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Personal Assets' score of 0.00 indicating that St. James's Place is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Personal Assets Neutral
St. James's Place Positive

Personal Assets has a beta of 0.33214432, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, St. James's Place has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Personal Assets has higher earnings, but lower revenue than St. James's Place. St. James's Place is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Personal Assets, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Personal Assets£105.16M16.11£124.81M£32.4816.93
St. James's Place£44.81B0.13-£6.46M£106.6011.14

Summary

St. James's Place beats Personal Assets on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Personal Assets News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PNL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PNL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PNL vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPersonal AssetsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.68B£5.66B£13.63B£2.54B
Dividend Yield1.03%7.38%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio16.9339.0929.61367.57
Price / Sales16.111,235.25516.5783,481.74
Price / Cash37.4648.3138.1927.89
Price / Book1.142.132.187.19
Net Income£124.81M£416.48M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.18%-0.25%-0.30%0.30%
1 Month Performance3.19%2.06%2.37%3.31%
1 Year Performance6.80%5.71%9.68%22.13%

Personal Assets Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PNL
Personal Assets
N/AGBX 550
+0.7%		N/A+6.8%£1.68B£105.16M16.93N/A
PSH
Pershing Square
N/AGBX 3,868
-0.7%		N/A-8.8%£6.77B£2.57B2.75N/A
FCIT
F&C Investment Trust
N/AGBX 344.60
+0.1%		N/A+16.5%£6.47B£683.36M4.55N/A
ICP
Intermediate Capital Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.24B£831.60M2,787.76579
SDRC
Schroders
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.12B£3.14B1,071.785,750

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PNL) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel