abrdn (ABDN) Competitors

abrdn pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Scottish Mortgage pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. abrdn pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Scottish Mortgage pays out 1.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, abrdn had 12 more articles in the media than Scottish Mortgage. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for abrdn and 0 mentions for Scottish Mortgage. abrdn's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Scottish Mortgage's score of 0.90 indicating that abrdn is being referred to more favorably in the media.

abrdn has a beta of 1.393, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scottish Mortgage has a beta of 1.1591227, suggesting that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

Scottish Mortgage has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn. Scottish Mortgage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Scottish Mortgage has a net margin of 97.38% compared to abrdn's net margin of 22.68%. Scottish Mortgage's return on equity of 22.34% beat abrdn's return on equity.

abrdn currently has a consensus target price of GBX 226.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.05%. Given abrdn's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe abrdn is more favorable than Scottish Mortgage.

42.1% of abrdn shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.1% of Scottish Mortgage shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of abrdn shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Scottish Mortgage shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn. abrdn is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

abrdn has a beta of 1.393, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroders has a beta of 1.081, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

abrdn has a net margin of 22.68% compared to Schroders' net margin of 19.94%. Schroders' return on equity of 15.55% beat abrdn's return on equity.

abrdn pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. abrdn pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroders pays out 49.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

42.1% of abrdn shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of Schroders shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of abrdn shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Schroders shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, abrdn had 10 more articles in the media than Schroders. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for abrdn and 2 mentions for Schroders. abrdn's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Schroders' score of 0.69 indicating that abrdn is being referred to more favorably in the media.

abrdn currently has a consensus price target of GBX 226.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.05%. Schroders has a consensus price target of GBX 453.33, suggesting a potential downside of 23.09%. Given abrdn's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe abrdn is more favorable than Schroders.

abrdn has lower revenue, but higher earnings than M&G. abrdn is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

M&G has a beta of 0.941, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn has a beta of 1.393, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

M&G presently has a consensus price target of GBX 677.86, indicating a potential upside of 86.48%. abrdn has a consensus price target of GBX 226.50, indicating a potential downside of 10.05%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe M&G is more favorable than abrdn.

In the previous week, abrdn had 10 more articles in the media than M&G. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for abrdn and 2 mentions for M&G. abrdn's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat M&G's score of 0.70 indicating that abrdn is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. abrdn pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. M&G pays out 164.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. abrdn pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. abrdn is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

42.9% of M&G shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.1% of abrdn shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of M&G shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of abrdn shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

abrdn has a net margin of 22.68% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. M&G's return on equity of 9.49% beat abrdn's return on equity.

In the previous week, abrdn had 11 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for abrdn and 1 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust. Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat abrdn's score of 0.95 indicating that Polar Capital Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.8378958, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn has a beta of 1.393, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

7.1% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.1% of abrdn shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of abrdn shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 249.53% compared to abrdn's net margin of 22.68%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 55.87% beat abrdn's return on equity.

abrdn has a consensus target price of GBX 226.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.05%. Given abrdn's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe abrdn is more favorable than Polar Capital Technology Trust.