Pershing Square (PSH) Competitors

5.8% of Pershing Square shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.1% of Scottish Mortgage shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Scottish Mortgage shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pershing Square has a beta of 0.842, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scottish Mortgage has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Scottish Mortgage has a net margin of 97.38% compared to Pershing Square's net margin of 97.16%. Scottish Mortgage's return on equity of 22.34% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

In the previous week, Pershing Square had 1 more articles in the media than Scottish Mortgage. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pershing Square and 2 mentions for Scottish Mortgage. Scottish Mortgage's average media sentiment score of 0.15 beat Pershing Square's score of -0.15 indicating that Scottish Mortgage is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 69.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Scottish Mortgage pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Pershing Square pays out -9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Scottish Mortgage pays out 1.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pershing Square is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Pershing Square has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Scottish Mortgage. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scottish Mortgage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Pershing Square had 3 more articles in the media than Schroders. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pershing Square and 0 mentions for Schroders. Schroders' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Pershing Square's score of -0.15 indicating that Schroders is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 69.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Pershing Square pays out -9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroders pays out 49.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pershing Square has a beta of 0.842, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroders has a beta of 1.076, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Pershing Square has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schroders. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Schroders has a consensus price target of GBX 453.33, indicating a potential downside of 22.97%. Given Schroders' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Schroders is more favorable than Pershing Square.

Pershing Square has a net margin of 97.16% compared to Schroders' net margin of 20.13%. Schroders' return on equity of 15.55% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

5.8% of Pershing Square shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.9% of Schroders shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Schroders shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

M&G has a consensus target price of GBX 685, suggesting a potential upside of 109.67%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe M&G is more favorable than Pershing Square.

Pershing Square has a beta of 0.842, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, M&G has a beta of 0.949, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 69.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Pershing Square pays out -9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. M&G pays out -427.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. M&G is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Pershing Square has a net margin of 97.16% compared to M&G's net margin of -0.44%. Pershing Square's return on equity of -2.59% beat M&G's return on equity.

In the previous week, M&G had 3 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for M&G and 3 mentions for Pershing Square. M&G's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Pershing Square's score of -0.15 indicating that M&G is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

5.8% of Pershing Square shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.9% of M&G shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of M&G shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pershing Square has higher earnings, but lower revenue than M&G. M&G is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pershing Square, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

87.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Pershing Square shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.739, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pershing Square has a beta of 0.842, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 249.53% compared to Pershing Square's net margin of 97.16%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 55.87% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

In the previous week, Pershing Square had 2 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pershing Square and 1 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust. Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Pershing Square's score of -0.15 indicating that Polar Capital Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Pershing Square has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Polar Capital Technology Trust. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital Technology Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.