Pershing Square (PSH) Competitors

Scottish Mortgage has a net margin of 97.38% compared to Pershing Square's net margin of 94.13%. Scottish Mortgage's return on equity of 22.34% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Scottish Mortgage pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Scottish Mortgage pays out 1.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

5.8% of Pershing Square shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.1% of Scottish Mortgage shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Scottish Mortgage shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Scottish Mortgage had 1 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Scottish Mortgage and 1 mentions for Pershing Square. Pershing Square's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Scottish Mortgage's score of 0.25 indicating that Pershing Square is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Pershing Square has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Scottish Mortgage. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scottish Mortgage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Pershing Square has a beta of 0.8576274, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scottish Mortgage has a beta of 1.088, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Schroders currently has a consensus target price of GBX 453.33, indicating a potential downside of 22.24%. Given Schroders' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Schroders is more favorable than Pershing Square.

Schroders has a beta of 1.081, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pershing Square has a beta of 0.8576274, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Pershing Square has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Schroders. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Pershing Square has a net margin of 94.13% compared to Schroders' net margin of 19.94%. Pershing Square's return on equity of 16.97% beat Schroders' return on equity.

In the previous week, Schroders had 6 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Schroders and 1 mentions for Pershing Square. Schroders' average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Pershing Square's score of 0.88 indicating that Schroders is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Schroders pays out 49.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

16.9% of Schroders shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Pershing Square shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Schroders shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pershing Square has a net margin of 94.13% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. Pershing Square's return on equity of 16.97% beat M&G's return on equity.

In the previous week, M&G had 2 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for M&G and 1 mentions for Pershing Square. M&G's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Pershing Square's score of 0.88 indicating that M&G is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Pershing Square has a beta of 0.8576274, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, M&G has a beta of 0.953, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

M&G has a consensus target price of GBX 677.86, suggesting a potential upside of 89.50%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe M&G is more favorable than Pershing Square.

Pershing Square has higher earnings, but lower revenue than M&G. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

5.8% of Pershing Square shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.1% of M&G shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of M&G shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. M&G pays out 164.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.737, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pershing Square has a beta of 0.8576274, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Polar Capital Technology Trust and Polar Capital Technology Trust both had 1 articles in the media. Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Pershing Square's score of 0.88 indicating that Polar Capital Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 249.53% compared to Pershing Square's net margin of 94.13%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 55.87% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

87.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Pershing Square shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pershing Square has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Polar Capital Technology Trust. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pershing Square, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.