Free Trial
→ Iran's New Leader Just Said Something That Should Terrify Every American (From American Alternative) (Ad)tc pixel Free TRIG Stock Alerts

The Renewables Infrastructure Group (TRIG) Competitors

The Renewables Infrastructure Group logo
GBX 71.15 +0.75 (+1.06%)
As of 12:34 PM Eastern
Compare

TRIG vs. STJ, ICP, FCIT, SDRC, and HL

Should you buy The Renewables Infrastructure Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares The Renewables Infrastructure Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with The Renewables Infrastructure Group include St. James's Place (STJ), Intermediate Capital Group (ICP), F&C Investment Trust (FCIT), Schroders (SDRC), and Hargreaves Lansdown (HL). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does The Renewables Infrastructure Group compare to St. James's Place?

St. James's Place (LON:STJ) and The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

St. James's Place has higher revenue and earnings than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than St. James's Place, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
St. James's Place£30.14B0.20-£6.46M£98.8011.94
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£123.70M-13.58-£37.22M-£5.40N/A

St. James's Place presently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,675.43, suggesting a potential upside of 42.07%. The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a consensus target price of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 40.55%. Given St. James' Place's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe St. James's Place is more favorable than The Renewables Infrastructure Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
St. James's Place
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, St. James's Place had 2 more articles in the media than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for St. James's Place and 2 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group. St. James' Place's average media sentiment score of 1.70 beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's score of 0.03 indicating that St. James's Place is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
St. James's Place
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

St. James's Place has a beta of 1.009, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a beta of 0.374, indicating that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to St. James' Place's net margin of 1.76%. St. James' Place's return on equity of 37.33% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
St. James's Place1.76% 37.33% 0.22%
The Renewables Infrastructure Group 328.03%-5.09%-1.63%

77.8% of St. James's Place shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of St. James's Place shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

St. James's Place pays an annual dividend of GBX 18 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. St. James's Place pays out 18.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -139.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

St. James's Place beats The Renewables Infrastructure Group on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Renewables Infrastructure Group compare to Intermediate Capital Group?

Intermediate Capital Group (LON:ICP) and The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, The Renewables Infrastructure Group had 2 more articles in the media than Intermediate Capital Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group and 0 mentions for Intermediate Capital Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group's average media sentiment score of 0.03 beat Intermediate Capital Group's score of 0.00 indicating that The Renewables Infrastructure Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intermediate Capital Group Neutral
The Renewables Infrastructure Group Neutral

Intermediate Capital Group has a beta of 1.9, indicating that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a beta of 0.374, indicating that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

70.4% of Intermediate Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Intermediate Capital Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Intermediate Capital Group has higher revenue and earnings than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intermediate Capital Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intermediate Capital Group£831.60M0.00£409.10M£0.77N/A
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£123.70M-13.58-£37.22M-£5.40N/A

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a consensus target price of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 40.55%. Given The Renewables Infrastructure Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe The Renewables Infrastructure Group is more favorable than Intermediate Capital Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intermediate Capital Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to Intermediate Capital Group's net margin of 56.78%. Intermediate Capital Group's return on equity of 20.09% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intermediate Capital Group56.78% 20.09% 4.57%
The Renewables Infrastructure Group 328.03%-5.09%-1.63%

Intermediate Capital Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 78 per share. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Intermediate Capital Group pays out 10,129.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -139.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Intermediate Capital Group beats The Renewables Infrastructure Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Renewables Infrastructure Group compare to F&C Investment Trust?

The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) and F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to F&C Investment Trust's net margin of 90.89%. F&C Investment Trust's return on equity of 11.28% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Renewables Infrastructure Group328.03% -5.09% -1.63%
F&C Investment Trust 90.89%11.28%10.80%

In the previous week, F&C Investment Trust had 5 more articles in the media than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for F&C Investment Trust and 2 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group. F&C Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's score of 0.03 indicating that F&C Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
F&C Investment Trust
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

The Renewables Infrastructure Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 100, indicating a potential upside of 40.55%. Given The Renewables Infrastructure Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe The Renewables Infrastructure Group is more favorable than F&C Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
F&C Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 16.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -139.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. F&C Investment Trust pays out 11.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a beta of 0.374, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.7981012, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than F&C Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£123.70M-13.58-£37.22M-£5.40N/A
F&C Investment Trust£683.36M2.30£935.32M£138.562.40

37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

F&C Investment Trust beats The Renewables Infrastructure Group on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Renewables Infrastructure Group compare to Schroders?

The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) and Schroders (LON:SDRC) are both asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, The Renewables Infrastructure Group had 2 more articles in the media than Schroders. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group and 0 mentions for Schroders. The Renewables Infrastructure Group's average media sentiment score of 0.03 beat Schroders' score of 0.00 indicating that The Renewables Infrastructure Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Renewables Infrastructure Group Neutral
Schroders Neutral

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£123.70M-13.58-£37.22M-£5.40N/A
Schroders£3.14B0.00N/A£2.02N/A

The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.22 per share. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -139.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroders pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to Schroders' net margin of 0.00%. Schroders' return on equity of 0.00% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Renewables Infrastructure Group328.03% -5.09% -1.63%
Schroders N/A N/A N/A

The Renewables Infrastructure Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 40.55%. Given The Renewables Infrastructure Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe The Renewables Infrastructure Group is more favorable than Schroders.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Schroders
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

The Renewables Infrastructure Group beats Schroders on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Renewables Infrastructure Group compare to Hargreaves Lansdown?

The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) and Hargreaves Lansdown (LON:HL) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Hargreaves Lansdown pays an annual dividend of GBX 43 per share. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -139.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hargreaves Lansdown pays out 6,935.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Hargreaves Lansdown has higher revenue and earnings than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hargreaves Lansdown, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£123.70M-13.58-£37.22M-£5.40N/A
Hargreaves Lansdown£764.90M0.00£293.20M£0.62N/A

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to Hargreaves Lansdown's net margin of 38.33%. Hargreaves Lansdown's return on equity of 38.46% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Renewables Infrastructure Group328.03% -5.09% -1.63%
Hargreaves Lansdown 38.33%38.46%17.10%

37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.7% of Hargreaves Lansdown shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 29.4% of Hargreaves Lansdown shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 40.55%. Given The Renewables Infrastructure Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe The Renewables Infrastructure Group is more favorable than Hargreaves Lansdown.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Hargreaves Lansdown
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, The Renewables Infrastructure Group had 2 more articles in the media than Hargreaves Lansdown. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group and 0 mentions for Hargreaves Lansdown. The Renewables Infrastructure Group's average media sentiment score of 0.03 beat Hargreaves Lansdown's score of 0.00 indicating that The Renewables Infrastructure Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Renewables Infrastructure Group Neutral
Hargreaves Lansdown Neutral

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a beta of 0.374, suggesting that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hargreaves Lansdown has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hargreaves Lansdown beats The Renewables Infrastructure Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get The Renewables Infrastructure Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TRIG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRIG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TRIG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricThe Renewables Infrastructure GroupAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.68B£2.38B£5.76B£2.79B
Dividend Yield10.79%5.99%5.27%6.09%
P/E Ratio-13.1825.2215.79366.15
Price / Sales-13.581,964.78933.8888,429.84
Price / Cash34.6560.1790.3227.89
Price / Book0.581.354.407.74
Net Income-£37.22M£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.11%-0.09%0.41%0.82%
1 Month Performance6.83%2.43%2.25%2.78%
1 Year Performance-8.67%13.46%21.92%87.90%

The Renewables Infrastructure Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TRIG
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
3.081 of 5 stars		GBX 71.15
+1.1%		GBX 100
+40.6%		-12.4%£1.68B-£123.70MN/AN/A
STJ
St. James's Place
4.6059 of 5 stars		GBX 1,240
+3.7%		GBX 1,675.43
+35.1%		+6.7%£6.37B£30.14B12.552,298
ICP
Intermediate Capital Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.24B£831.60M2,787.76579
FCIT
F&C Investment Trust
N/AGBX 1,312.94
+1.3%		N/A+19.7%£6.20B£683.36M9.48N/A
SDRC
Schroders
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.12B£3.14B1,071.785,750

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TRIG) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Microscopic Footage Shows Immune Cells Attacking Cancer
Early human trial data from one NASDAQ-listed biotech showed up to a 63.7% reduction in cancer burden using it...
Market Tactic | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran's New Leader Just Said Something That Should Terrify Every American
Iran's Supreme Leader has declared the Strait of Hormuz closed as leverage against the U.S. - and with 40% of ...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Rare Earth Shift Few Saw Coming
Rare earth elements are the hidden backbone of electric vehicles, modern defense technology, and advanced elec...
i2i Marketing Group, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
You'll buy SpaceX at $1.75 trillion. Insiders bought at $20 billion.
Insiders bought SpaceX at $20 billion. Banks got in at $100 billion. By the time it hits your brokerage accoun...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Peptide Company Lands Exclusive MMA Wellness Partnership
A publicly traded peptide company just signed an exclusive partnership with a NYSE-listed MMA media platform t...
The Tomorrow Investor | Sponsoredtc pixel
Before you buy SpaceX shares, consider this alternative approach
SpaceX has confidentially filed for an IPO with the SEC, targeting a June 2026 listing at a valuation exceedin...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
The system holding the dollar together is gone…
Saudi Arabia has terminated its 1974 petrodollar agreement with the United States - the deal that forced every...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel