The Renewables Infrastructure Group (TRIG) Competitors

The Renewables Infrastructure Group logo
GBX 74.30 -0.20 (-0.27%)
As of 11:53 AM Eastern

TRIG vs. PSH, FCIT, ICP, SDRC, and STJ

Should you buy The Renewables Infrastructure Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares The Renewables Infrastructure Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with The Renewables Infrastructure Group include Pershing Square (PSH), F&C Investment Trust (FCIT), Intermediate Capital Group (ICP), Schroders (SDRC), and St. James's Place (STJ). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does The Renewables Infrastructure Group compare to Pershing Square?

Pershing Square (LON:PSH) and The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -139.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

5.9% of Pershing Square shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to Pershing Square's net margin of 94.13%. Pershing Square's return on equity of 16.97% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pershing Square94.13% 16.97% 11.83%
The Renewables Infrastructure Group 328.03%-5.09%-1.63%

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a consensus target price of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 34.59%. Given The Renewables Infrastructure Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe The Renewables Infrastructure Group is more favorable than Pershing Square.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pershing Square
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, The Renewables Infrastructure Group had 1 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group and 0 mentions for Pershing Square. Pershing Square's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's score of -0.02 indicating that Pershing Square is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pershing Square Neutral
The Renewables Infrastructure Group Neutral

Pershing Square has a beta of 0.8564921, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a beta of 0.382, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pershing Square, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pershing Square£2.57B2.54£2.71B£1.41 thousand2.65
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£123.70M-14.11-£37.22M-£5.40N/A

Summary

Pershing Square beats The Renewables Infrastructure Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Renewables Infrastructure Group compare to F&C Investment Trust?

The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) and F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) are both financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to F&C Investment Trust's net margin of 105.66%. F&C Investment Trust's return on equity of 11.28% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Renewables Infrastructure Group328.03% -5.09% -1.63%
F&C Investment Trust 105.66%11.28%10.80%

The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -139.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. F&C Investment Trust pays out 11.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than F&C Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£123.70M-14.11-£37.22M-£5.40N/A
F&C Investment Trust£683.36M9.54£935.32M£34.649.98

37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, The Renewables Infrastructure Group had 1 more articles in the media than F&C Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group and 0 mentions for F&C Investment Trust. F&C Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's score of -0.02 indicating that F&C Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Renewables Infrastructure Group Neutral
F&C Investment Trust Neutral

The Renewables Infrastructure Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 34.59%. Given The Renewables Infrastructure Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe The Renewables Infrastructure Group is more favorable than F&C Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
F&C Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a beta of 0.382, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.79671425, indicating that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

F&C Investment Trust beats The Renewables Infrastructure Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Renewables Infrastructure Group compare to Intermediate Capital Group?

The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) and Intermediate Capital Group (LON:ICP) are both financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a beta of 0.382, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intermediate Capital Group has a beta of 1.9, indicating that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the broader market.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 100, suggesting a potential upside of 34.59%. Given The Renewables Infrastructure Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe The Renewables Infrastructure Group is more favorable than Intermediate Capital Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Intermediate Capital Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to Intermediate Capital Group's net margin of 56.78%. Intermediate Capital Group's return on equity of 20.09% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Renewables Infrastructure Group328.03% -5.09% -1.63%
Intermediate Capital Group 56.78%20.09%4.57%

Intermediate Capital Group has higher revenue and earnings than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intermediate Capital Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£123.70M-14.11-£37.22M-£5.40N/A
Intermediate Capital Group£831.60M0.00£409.10M£0.77N/A

The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Intermediate Capital Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 78 per share. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -139.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Intermediate Capital Group pays out 10,129.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, The Renewables Infrastructure Group had 1 more articles in the media than Intermediate Capital Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group and 0 mentions for Intermediate Capital Group. Intermediate Capital Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's score of -0.02 indicating that Intermediate Capital Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Renewables Infrastructure Group Neutral
Intermediate Capital Group Neutral

37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.4% of Intermediate Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Intermediate Capital Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Intermediate Capital Group beats The Renewables Infrastructure Group on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Renewables Infrastructure Group compare to Schroders?

Schroders (LON:SDRC) and The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) are both asset management industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, The Renewables Infrastructure Group had 1 more articles in the media than Schroders. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group and 0 mentions for Schroders. Schroders' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's score of -0.02 indicating that Schroders is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroders Neutral
The Renewables Infrastructure Group Neutral

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroders£3.14B0.00N/A£2.02N/A
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£123.70M-14.11-£37.22M-£5.40N/A

Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.22 per share. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Schroders pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -139.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a consensus price target of GBX 100, indicating a potential upside of 34.59%. Given The Renewables Infrastructure Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe The Renewables Infrastructure Group is more favorable than Schroders.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Schroders
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to Schroders' net margin of 0.00%. Schroders' return on equity of 0.00% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SchrodersN/A N/A N/A
The Renewables Infrastructure Group 328.03%-5.09%-1.63%

Summary

The Renewables Infrastructure Group beats Schroders on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Renewables Infrastructure Group compare to St. James's Place?

St. James's Place (LON:STJ) and The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) are both financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, The Renewables Infrastructure Group had 1 more articles in the media than St. James's Place. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group and 0 mentions for St. James's Place. St. James' Place's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's score of -0.02 indicating that St. James's Place is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
St. James's Place Neutral
The Renewables Infrastructure Group Neutral

St. James's Place has a beta of 1.005, suggesting that its stock price is 0% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a beta of 0.382, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

St. James's Place pays an annual dividend of GBX 18 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. St. James's Place pays out 18.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -139.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

St. James's Place has higher revenue and earnings than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than St. James's Place, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
St. James's Place£30.14B0.19-£6.46M£98.8011.60
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£123.70M-14.11-£37.22M-£5.40N/A

77.8% of St. James's Place shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of St. James's Place shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to St. James' Place's net margin of 1.76%. St. James' Place's return on equity of 37.33% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
St. James's Place1.76% 37.33% 0.22%
The Renewables Infrastructure Group 328.03%-5.09%-1.63%

St. James's Place currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,675.43, indicating a potential upside of 46.13%. The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a consensus target price of GBX 100, indicating a potential upside of 34.59%. Given St. James' Place's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe St. James's Place is more favorable than The Renewables Infrastructure Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
St. James's Place
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

St. James's Place beats The Renewables Infrastructure Group on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get The Renewables Infrastructure Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TRIG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRIG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TRIG vs. The Competition

MetricThe Renewables Infrastructure GroupAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.75B£2.45B£6.05B£2.78B
Dividend Yield10.20%6.03%5.27%6.16%
P/E Ratio-13.7625.8716.31365.72
Price / Sales-14.112,081.991,101.4386,253.69
Price / Cash34.6560.1648.6327.85
Price / Book0.601.376.637.92
Net Income-£37.22M£264.62M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.13%-0.64%-0.41%-0.87%
1 Month Performance2.85%-0.17%1.00%-0.76%
1 Year Performance-14.57%10.15%20.45%70.67%

The Renewables Infrastructure Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TRIG
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
2.3232 of 5 stars
GBX 74.30
-0.3%
GBX 100
+34.6%
-13.5%£1.75B-£123.70MN/AN/A
PSH
Pershing Square
N/AGBX 3,950.78
+1.1%
N/A-1.6%£6.92B£2.57B2.81N/A
FCIT
F&C Investment Trust
N/AGBX 349.60
+0.4%
N/A+29.6%£6.59B£683.36M10.09N/A
ICP
Intermediate Capital Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.24B£831.60M2,787.76579
SDRC
Schroders
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.12B£3.14B1,071.785,750

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TRIG) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners