Go Pro
→ This looks like plywood. It's not. (From Eagle Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free TRIG Stock Alerts

The Renewables Infrastructure Group (TRIG) Competitors

The Renewables Infrastructure Group logo
GBX 76.54 +0.84 (+1.10%)
As of 09/11/2026 11:58 AM Eastern
Compare

TRIG vs. PSH, FCIT, ICP, SDRC, and STJ

Should you buy The Renewables Infrastructure Group stock or one of its competitors? The Renewables Infrastructure Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Pershing Square (PSH), F&C Investment Trust (FCIT), Intermediate Capital Group (ICP), Schroders (SDRC), and St. James's Place (STJ). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does The Renewables Infrastructure Group compare to Pershing Square?

Pershing Square (LON:PSH) and The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Pershing Square has a beta of 0.842, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a beta of 0.421, meaning that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, The Renewables Infrastructure Group had 2 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group and 0 mentions for Pershing Square. The Renewables Infrastructure Group's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Pershing Square's score of 0.00 indicating that The Renewables Infrastructure Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pershing Square Neutral
The Renewables Infrastructure Group Positive

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to Pershing Square's net margin of 97.16%. Pershing Square's return on equity of -2.59% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pershing Square97.16% -2.59% 11.83%
The Renewables Infrastructure Group 328.03%-5.36%-1.63%

Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 69.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. Pershing Square pays out -9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -1,258.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

5.8% of Pershing Square shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pershing Square has higher earnings, but lower revenue than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pershing Square, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pershing Square-£1.26B-5.23£2.71B-£752.00N/A
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£7.60M-233.37-£37.22M-£0.60N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pershing Square
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

The Renewables Infrastructure Group beats Pershing Square on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Renewables Infrastructure Group compare to F&C Investment Trust?

F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) and The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, The Renewables Infrastructure Group had 2 more articles in the media than F&C Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group and 0 mentions for F&C Investment Trust. The Renewables Infrastructure Group's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat F&C Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that The Renewables Infrastructure Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
F&C Investment Trust Neutral
The Renewables Infrastructure Group Positive

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to F&C Investment Trust's net margin of 103.67%. F&C Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.14% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
F&C Investment Trust103.67% 22.14% 10.80%
The Renewables Infrastructure Group 328.03%-5.36%-1.63%

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than F&C Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
F&C Investment Trust£1.46B4.37£935.32M£75.804.51
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£7.60M-233.37-£37.22M-£0.60N/A

F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. F&C Investment Trust pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -1,258.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
F&C Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.736, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a beta of 0.421, meaning that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

F&C Investment Trust beats The Renewables Infrastructure Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Renewables Infrastructure Group compare to Intermediate Capital Group?

Intermediate Capital Group (LON:ICP) and The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Intermediate Capital Group has higher revenue and earnings than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intermediate Capital Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intermediate Capital Group£831.60M0.00£409.10M£0.77N/A
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£7.60M-233.37-£37.22M-£0.60N/A

In the previous week, The Renewables Infrastructure Group had 2 more articles in the media than Intermediate Capital Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group and 0 mentions for Intermediate Capital Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Intermediate Capital Group's score of 0.00 indicating that The Renewables Infrastructure Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intermediate Capital Group Neutral
The Renewables Infrastructure Group Positive

Given Intermediate Capital Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Intermediate Capital Group is more favorable than The Renewables Infrastructure Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intermediate Capital Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to Intermediate Capital Group's net margin of 56.78%. Intermediate Capital Group's return on equity of 20.09% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intermediate Capital Group56.78% 20.09% 4.57%
The Renewables Infrastructure Group 328.03%-5.36%-1.63%

Intermediate Capital Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 78 per share. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. Intermediate Capital Group pays out 10,129.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -1,258.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Intermediate Capital Group has a beta of 1.9, meaning that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a beta of 0.421, meaning that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

70.4% of Intermediate Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Intermediate Capital Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Intermediate Capital Group beats The Renewables Infrastructure Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Renewables Infrastructure Group compare to Schroders?

The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) and Schroders (LON:SDRC) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to Schroders' net margin of 0.00%. Schroders' return on equity of 0.00% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Renewables Infrastructure Group328.03% -5.36% -1.63%
Schroders N/A N/A N/A

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£7.60M-233.37-£37.22M-£0.60N/A
Schroders£3.14B0.00N/A£2.02N/A

37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Given Schroders' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Schroders is more favorable than The Renewables Infrastructure Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Schroders
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.22 per share. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -1,258.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroders pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, The Renewables Infrastructure Group had 2 more articles in the media than Schroders. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group and 0 mentions for Schroders. The Renewables Infrastructure Group's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Schroders' score of 0.00 indicating that The Renewables Infrastructure Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Renewables Infrastructure Group Positive
Schroders Neutral

Summary

The Renewables Infrastructure Group beats Schroders on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does The Renewables Infrastructure Group compare to St. James's Place?

The Renewables Infrastructure Group (LON:TRIG) and St. James's Place (LON:STJ) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a beta of 0.421, indicating that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, St. James's Place has a beta of 1.011, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

The Renewables Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 328.03% compared to St. James' Place's net margin of 1.25%. St. James' Place's return on equity of 37.02% beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Renewables Infrastructure Group328.03% -5.36% -1.63%
St. James's Place 1.25%37.02%0.22%

The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. St. James's Place pays an annual dividend of GBX 18 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. The Renewables Infrastructure Group pays out -1,258.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. St. James's Place pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

St. James's Place has a consensus price target of GBX 1,721.86, suggesting a potential upside of 52.78%. Given St. James' Place's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe St. James's Place is more favorable than The Renewables Infrastructure Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
St. James's Place
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

37.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.8% of St. James's Place shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of The Renewables Infrastructure Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of St. James's Place shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, The Renewables Infrastructure Group had 1 more articles in the media than St. James's Place. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for The Renewables Infrastructure Group and 1 mentions for St. James's Place. St. James' Place's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat The Renewables Infrastructure Group's score of 0.60 indicating that St. James's Place is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
St. James's Place
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

St. James's Place has higher revenue and earnings than The Renewables Infrastructure Group. The Renewables Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than St. James's Place, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Renewables Infrastructure Group-£7.60M-233.37-£37.22M-£0.60N/A
St. James's Place£44.81B0.13-£6.46M£106.6010.57

Summary

St. James's Place beats The Renewables Infrastructure Group on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get The Renewables Infrastructure Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TRIG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRIG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TRIG vs. The Competition

Export
MetricThe Renewables Infrastructure GroupCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.77B£5.50B£13.99B£2.87B
Dividend Yield9.93%7.47%5.94%6.23%
P/E Ratio-127.5630.5425.67366.83
Price / Sales-233.371,218.06506.9183,599.70
Price / Cash34.6547.8940.1627.89
Price / Book0.623.532.756.33
Net Income-£37.22M£418.04M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.71%-1.39%-1.17%-0.69%
1 Month Performance-1.62%-1.45%0.25%0.18%
1 Year Performance2.32%4.83%9.27%20.03%

The Renewables Infrastructure Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TRIG
The Renewables Infrastructure Group
0.8718 of 5 stars		GBX 76.54
+1.1%		N/A+2.0%£1.77B-£7.60MN/AN/A
PSH
Pershing Square
N/AGBX 3,782
-1.5%		N/A-18.2%£6.59B-£1.26BN/AN/A
FCIT
F&C Investment Trust
N/AGBX 339.20
-1.5%		N/A+16.1%£6.35B£1.46B4.47N/A
ICP
Intermediate Capital Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.24B£831.60M2,787.76579
SDRC
Schroders
N/AN/AN/AN/A£6.12B£3.14B1,071.785,750

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TRIG) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Bezos… DOOMED
A single FCC filing hints Elon Musk is planning his biggest project yet - bigger than Tesla, SpaceX, and X com...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Shocking AI prediction from the “Billionaire Whisperer"
Marc Chaikin's Power Gauge system flagged Micron before it soared 970 percent, Celestica before a 6,600 percen...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
This 38 Dollar Fund Holds Every Major AI Stock and Pays Weekly
The biggest AI stocks like Nvidia, CrowdStrike, and Palantir now trade for hundreds of dollars a share. One fu...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
How options let you do more with less capital
Would you rather spend $5,000 buying 100 shares of a $50 stock, or control those same 100 shares for a fractio...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The retirement income that answers “yes” when everything else says no
Todd Phillips has spent 30 years studying safe-money income. He says most so-called income sources fail one te...
Eagle Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My ‘one day’ retirement secret
TradeSmith's AI research team, backed by a $17 million investment and led by a former NSA codebreaker, built a...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel