Go Pro
→ Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside) (From InvestorPlace) (Ad)tc pixel Free INPP Stock Alerts

International Public Partnerships (INPP) Competitors

International Public Partnerships logo
GBX 140 +0.40 (+0.29%)
As of 07:39 AM Eastern
Compare

INPP vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, FCIT, and PSH

Should you buy International Public Partnerships stock or one of its competitors? International Public Partnerships's main competitors and comparable companies include Schroders (SDR), M&G (MNG), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), F&C Investment Trust (FCIT), and Pershing Square (PSH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to Schroders?

Schroders (LON:SDR) and International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Schroders presently has a consensus target price of GBX 453.33, indicating a potential downside of 23.00%. Given Schroders' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Schroders is more favorable than International Public Partnerships.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Schroders
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
International Public Partnerships
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

16.9% of Schroders shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Schroders shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroders has a beta of 1.076, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.533, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Schroders pays out 49.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 95.13% compared to Schroders' net margin of 20.13%. Schroders' return on equity of 15.55% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroders20.13% 15.55% 1.86%
International Public Partnerships 95.13%8.29%0.63%

In the previous week, Schroders had 1 more articles in the media than International Public Partnerships. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroders and 0 mentions for International Public Partnerships. Schroders' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat International Public Partnerships' score of 0.00 indicating that Schroders is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroders Positive
International Public Partnerships Neutral

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroders£3.51B2.62£355.50M£43.5013.53
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.35£43.53M£14.289.80

Summary

Schroders beats International Public Partnerships on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to M&G?

M&G (LON:MNG) and International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends and media sentiment.

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 95.13% compared to M&G's net margin of -0.44%. International Public Partnerships' return on equity of 8.29% beat M&G's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
M&G-0.44% -3.86% 0.40%
International Public Partnerships 95.13%8.29%0.63%

M&G currently has a consensus target price of GBX 685, suggesting a potential upside of 108.08%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe M&G is more favorable than International Public Partnerships.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
M&G
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
International Public Partnerships
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

42.9% of M&G shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of M&G shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

M&G has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. M&G is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
M&G£24.97B0.31£166.98M-£4.80N/A
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.35£43.53M£14.289.80

M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. M&G pays out -427.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. M&G is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, M&G had 4 more articles in the media than International Public Partnerships. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for M&G and 0 mentions for International Public Partnerships. M&G's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat International Public Partnerships' score of 0.00 indicating that M&G is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
M&G Positive
International Public Partnerships Neutral

M&G has a beta of 0.949, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.533, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

M&G beats International Public Partnerships on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) and International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 249.53% compared to International Public Partnerships' net margin of 95.13%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 55.87% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Technology Trust249.53% 55.87% 20.70%
International Public Partnerships 95.13%8.29%0.63%

87.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Technology Trust£3.76B2.05£1.20B£330.422.11
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.35£43.53M£14.289.80

In the previous week, Polar Capital Technology Trust had 1 more articles in the media than International Public Partnerships. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust and 0 mentions for International Public Partnerships. Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat International Public Partnerships' score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Capital Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Technology Trust Positive
International Public Partnerships Neutral

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.739, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.533, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Polar Capital Technology Trust beats International Public Partnerships on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to F&C Investment Trust?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

F&C Investment Trust has a net margin of 103.67% compared to International Public Partnerships' net margin of 95.13%. F&C Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.14% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships95.13% 8.29% 0.63%
F&C Investment Trust 103.67%22.14%10.80%

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. F&C Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.35£43.53M£14.289.80
F&C Investment Trust£1.46B4.43£935.32M£75.804.56

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.533, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.736, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled F&C Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships Neutral
F&C Investment Trust Neutral

International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. F&C Investment Trust pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

F&C Investment Trust beats International Public Partnerships on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to Pershing Square?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and Pershing Square (LON:PSH) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Pershing Square had 1 more articles in the media than International Public Partnerships. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pershing Square and 0 mentions for International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pershing Square'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships Neutral
Pershing Square Neutral

International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 69.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pershing Square pays out -9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pershing Square has lower revenue, but higher earnings than International Public Partnerships. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.35£43.53M£14.289.80
Pershing Square-£1.26B-5.10£2.71B-£752.00N/A

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.533, meaning that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pershing Square has a beta of 0.842, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Pershing Square shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pershing Square has a net margin of 97.16% compared to International Public Partnerships' net margin of 95.13%. International Public Partnerships' return on equity of 8.29% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships95.13% 8.29% 0.63%
Pershing Square 97.16%-2.59%11.83%

Summary

International Public Partnerships and Pershing Square tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get International Public Partnerships News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for INPP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding INPP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

INPP vs. The Competition

Export
MetricInternational Public PartnershipsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.50B£5.40B£13.86B£2.90B
Dividend Yield6.17%7.49%5.94%6.22%
P/E Ratio9.8029.9725.32366.52
Price / Sales9.351,273.84521.8590,110.43
Price / Cash12.7147.8746.7827.89
Price / Book0.943.532.736.42
Net Income£43.53M£417.39M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.38%1.45%0.75%0.77%
1 Month Performance-0.64%-1.14%-0.09%-0.03%
1 Year Performance15.81%5.11%9.29%19.08%

International Public Partnerships Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
INPP
International Public Partnerships
N/AGBX 140
+0.3%		N/A+15.8%£2.51B£267.76M9.80N/A
SDR
Schroders
1.7715 of 5 stars		GBX 587
-0.1%		GBX 453.33
-22.8%		+55.7%£9.15B£3.51B13.496,438
MNG
M&G
2.3313 of 5 stars		GBX 341
+1.3%		GBX 677.86
+98.8%		+29.9%£8.12B£24.97BN/A6,101
PCT
Polar Capital Technology Trust
N/AGBX 657
+2.1%		N/A+57.4%£7.27B£3.76B1.99120
FCIT
F&C Investment Trust
N/AGBX 342.40
+1.1%		N/A+16.3%£6.41B£1.46B4.52N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:INPP) was last updated on 9/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s Why Trump Won’t End The Iran War
Trump has called an Iran deal close 38 times since the war began, yet the fighting keeps flaring back up. O...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bank of America: 'Digital Dollar Inevitable'
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
100% overnight gains?
Rumors are circulating that Elon Musk is preparing to acquire three publicly traded companies. Dr. Mark Sko...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
The trade I’ve been waiting for since 2011
Ross Givens, Director of Research at Traders Agency, is calling for gold to reach $10,000 an ounce this superc...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your withdrawal order could cost you in taxes
If you have $2M or more saved, the 4% rule points to roughly $92,000 a year - but it's a single-variable answe...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Earth's biggest energy source: near Grand Canyon
The largest energy source on Earth contains 50,000 times every oil and gas reserve on the planet combined - an...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel