Free Trial
→ The roadshow starts Monday. This stock isn't ready. (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free INPP Stock Alerts

International Public Partnerships (INPP) Competitors

International Public Partnerships logo
GBX 138.40 +0.20 (+0.14%)
As of 08:20 AM Eastern
Compare

INPP vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, PSH, and FCIT

Should you buy International Public Partnerships stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares International Public Partnerships with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with International Public Partnerships include Schroders (SDR), M&G (MNG), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), Pershing Square (PSH), and F&C Investment Trust (FCIT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to Schroders?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and Schroders (LON:SDR) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Schroders has a consensus price target of GBX 453.33, indicating a potential downside of 22.44%. Given Schroders' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Schroders is more favorable than International Public Partnerships.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
International Public Partnerships
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Schroders
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54675525, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroders has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.26£43.53M£14.289.69
Schroders£3.25B2.80£355.50M£33.6017.40

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Schroders shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Schroders shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships and International Public Partnerships both had 5 articles in the media. Schroders' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat International Public Partnerships' score of 0.73 indicating that Schroders is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships
1 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Schroders
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to Schroders' net margin of 16.44%. Schroders' return on equity of 12.35% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships97.32% 9.61% 0.63%
Schroders 16.44%12.35%1.86%

International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroders pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. International Public Partnerships is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Schroders beats International Public Partnerships on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to M&G?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and M&G (LON:MNG) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. International Public Partnerships' return on equity of 9.61% beat M&G's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships97.32% 9.61% 0.63%
M&G 1.73%9.49%0.40%

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54675525, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, M&G has a beta of 0.952, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

M&G has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.26£43.53M£14.289.69
M&G£21.71B0.36£166.98M£12.3026.45

International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. M&G pays out 164.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

M&G has a consensus target price of GBX 677.86, indicating a potential upside of 108.38%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe M&G is more favorable than International Public Partnerships.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
International Public Partnerships
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
M&G
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.7% of M&G shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of M&G shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships had 3 more articles in the media than M&G. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for International Public Partnerships and 2 mentions for M&G. M&G's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat International Public Partnerships' score of 0.73 indicating that M&G is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships
1 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
M&G
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

M&G beats International Public Partnerships on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) and International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, earnings and risk.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.92025226, indicating that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54675525, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

7.3% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships had 5 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for International Public Partnerships and 0 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust. International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Polar Capital Technology Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that International Public Partnerships is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Technology Trust Neutral
International Public Partnerships Positive

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 294.06% compared to International Public Partnerships' net margin of 97.32%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 43.14% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Technology Trust294.06% 43.14% 20.70%
International Public Partnerships 97.32%9.61%0.63%

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Technology Trust£2.14B3.79£1.20B£188.583.87
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.26£43.53M£14.289.69

Summary

Polar Capital Technology Trust beats International Public Partnerships on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to Pershing Square?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and Pershing Square (LON:PSH) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54675525, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pershing Square has a beta of 0.8564921, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to Pershing Square's net margin of 94.13%. Pershing Square's return on equity of 16.97% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships97.32% 9.61% 0.63%
Pershing Square 94.13%16.97%11.83%

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.26£43.53M£14.289.69
Pershing Square£2.57B2.69£2.71B£1.41 thousand2.81

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Pershing Square shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships had 4 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for International Public Partnerships and 1 mentions for Pershing Square. International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Pershing Square's score of 0.00 indicating that International Public Partnerships is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships
1 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Pershing Square
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Pershing Square beats International Public Partnerships on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to F&C Investment Trust?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. F&C Investment Trust pays out 11.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships had 3 more articles in the media than F&C Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for International Public Partnerships and 2 mentions for F&C Investment Trust. F&C Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat International Public Partnerships' score of 0.73 indicating that F&C Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships
1 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
F&C Investment Trust
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54675525, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.79671425, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than F&C Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.26£43.53M£14.289.69
F&C Investment Trust£683.36M9.64£935.32M£34.6410.09

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to F&C Investment Trust's net margin of 90.89%. F&C Investment Trust's return on equity of 11.28% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships97.32% 9.61% 0.63%
F&C Investment Trust 90.89%11.28%10.80%

Summary

F&C Investment Trust beats International Public Partnerships on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get International Public Partnerships News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for INPP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding INPP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

INPP vs. The Competition

Export
MetricInternational Public PartnershipsAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.48B£2.47B£5.95B£2.81B
Dividend Yield9.20%6.04%5.28%6.18%
P/E Ratio9.6925.9216.36366.65
Price / Sales9.262,114.801,289.6186,431.79
Price / Cash12.7160.1648.6727.85
Price / Book0.931.386.587.72
Net Income£43.53M£264.62M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.37%1.02%1.62%0.79%
1 Month Performance7.66%1.06%2.11%1.67%
1 Year Performance13.82%11.05%20.68%73.25%

International Public Partnerships Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
INPP
International Public Partnerships
N/AGBX 138.40
+0.1%		N/A+13.7%£2.48B£267.76M9.69N/A
SDR
Schroders
1.8627 of 5 stars		GBX 583
flat		GBX 453.33
-22.2%		+64.0%£9.09B£3.25B17.356,438
MNG
M&G
4.1042 of 5 stars		GBX 315.50
-0.4%		GBX 677.86
+114.9%		+27.0%£7.52B£21.71B25.656,101
PCT
Polar Capital Technology Trust
N/AGBX 665
+1.7%		N/A+112.7%£7.40B£2.14B3.53120
PSH
Pershing Square
N/AGBX 3,863.69
+0.1%		N/A+0.5%£6.76B£2.57B2.74N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:INPP) was last updated on 6/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
VWAV: The Defense Tech Story Going Unnoticed!
As global defense spending accelerates, VisionWave Holdings (NASDAQ: VWAV) is developing a full-stack intellig...
Equiscreen | Sponsoredtc pixel
DOJ Admits It In Court—Your Cash Can Be Seized Without Warning
The Department of Justice recently argued in court that cash may not be legally your property - raising concer...
Priority Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
This Could Be the Biggest Monetary Shift in 50 Years
Tucked inside U.S. Code Title 31, Section 5117 is a provision allowing the Treasury to reprice America's gold ...
Americas Gold Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX IPO hides a much bigger story
The SpaceX IPO could be the biggest in history at $1.75 trillion - but the real story isn't the IPO itself. ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
A 3M Oz. Historical Gold Resource And A Market That Hasn't Caught Up
One Canadian junior explorer controls a gold and copper system in British Columbia's Kootenay Golden Arc - a d...
Wall Street Logic | Sponsoredtc pixel
How to play the Biggest IPO in stock market history!
SpaceX is eyeing a near-$2 trillion IPO valuation, and retail investors are already lining up - but early insi...
InvestPub | Sponsoredtc pixel
Rickards Predicts: Trump to buy tiny $2 stock?
Jim Rickards believes the Trump administration is about to take a direct stake in a $2 stock sitting on the la...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
"You'll own nothing and be happy" (it's not a theory anymore)
Since 1913, the evidence is clear… Once they force everyone onto CBDCs, there will be no escape. Every tran...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel