Go Pro
→ Why acquisitions are reshaping the gold mining sector right now (From Golden Portfolio) (Ad)tc pixel Free INPP Stock Alerts

International Public Partnerships (INPP) Competitors

International Public Partnerships logo
GBX 139.60 -0.60 (-0.43%)
As of 08/14/2026 11:57 AM Eastern
Compare

INPP vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, PSH, and FCIT

Should you buy International Public Partnerships stock or one of its competitors? International Public Partnerships's main competitors and comparable companies include Schroders (SDR), M&G (MNG), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), Pershing Square (PSH), and F&C Investment Trust (FCIT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to Schroders?

Schroders (LON:SDR) and International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Schroders currently has a consensus price target of GBX 453.33, suggesting a potential downside of 22.24%. Given Schroders' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Schroders is more favorable than International Public Partnerships.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Schroders
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
International Public Partnerships
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Schroders had 7 more articles in the media than International Public Partnerships. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Schroders and 0 mentions for International Public Partnerships. Schroders' average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat International Public Partnerships' score of 0.00 indicating that Schroders is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroders Positive
International Public Partnerships Neutral

16.9% of Schroders shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Schroders shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroders has a beta of 1.081, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54338694, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroders£3.51B2.59£355.50M£43.5013.40
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.33£43.53M£14.289.78

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to Schroders' net margin of 19.94%. Schroders' return on equity of 15.55% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroders19.94% 15.55% 1.86%
International Public Partnerships 97.32%9.61%0.63%

Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Schroders pays out 49.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Schroders beats International Public Partnerships on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to M&G?

M&G (LON:MNG) and International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

M&G has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. International Public Partnerships is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
M&G£21.71B0.39£166.98M£12.3029.08
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.33£43.53M£14.289.78

M&G has a beta of 0.953, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54338694, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. International Public Partnerships' return on equity of 9.61% beat M&G's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
M&G1.73% 9.49% 0.40%
International Public Partnerships 97.32%9.61%0.63%

M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. M&G pays out 164.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Public Partnerships is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

37.1% of M&G shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of M&G shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, M&G had 1 more articles in the media than International Public Partnerships. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for M&G and 0 mentions for International Public Partnerships. M&G's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat International Public Partnerships' score of 0.00 indicating that M&G is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
M&G Positive
International Public Partnerships Neutral

M&G currently has a consensus target price of GBX 677.86, suggesting a potential upside of 89.50%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe M&G is more favorable than International Public Partnerships.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
M&G
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
International Public Partnerships
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

M&G beats International Public Partnerships on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 249.53% compared to International Public Partnerships' net margin of 97.32%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 55.87% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships97.32% 9.61% 0.63%
Polar Capital Technology Trust 249.53%55.87%20.70%

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.33£43.53M£14.289.78
Polar Capital Technology Trust£3.76B1.99£1.20B£330.422.04

In the previous week, Polar Capital Technology Trust had 1 more articles in the media than International Public Partnerships. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust and 0 mentions for International Public Partnerships. Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat International Public Partnerships' score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Capital Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships Neutral
Polar Capital Technology Trust Positive

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54338694, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.737, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Polar Capital Technology Trust beats International Public Partnerships on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to Pershing Square?

Pershing Square (LON:PSH) and International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

International Public Partnerships has a net margin of 97.32% compared to Pershing Square's net margin of 94.13%. Pershing Square's return on equity of 16.97% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pershing Square94.13% 16.97% 11.83%
International Public Partnerships 97.32%9.61%0.63%

5.8% of Pershing Square shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Pershing Square had 1 more articles in the media than International Public Partnerships. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pershing Square and 0 mentions for International Public Partnerships. Pershing Square's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat International Public Partnerships' score of 0.00 indicating that Pershing Square is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pershing Square Positive
International Public Partnerships Neutral

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pershing Square£2.57B2.68£2.71B£1.41 thousand2.80
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.33£43.53M£14.289.78

Pershing Square has a beta of 0.8576274, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54338694, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pershing Square beats International Public Partnerships on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does International Public Partnerships compare to F&C Investment Trust?

International Public Partnerships (LON:INPP) and F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

F&C Investment Trust has a net margin of 103.67% compared to International Public Partnerships' net margin of 97.32%. F&C Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.14% beat International Public Partnerships' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Public Partnerships97.32% 9.61% 0.63%
F&C Investment Trust 103.67%22.14%10.80%

International Public Partnerships has a beta of 0.54338694, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.749, indicating that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than International Public Partnerships. F&C Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Public Partnerships, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Public Partnerships£267.76M9.33£43.53M£14.289.78
F&C Investment Trust£683.36M9.49£935.32M£75.804.54

In the previous week, International Public Partnerships' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled F&C Investment Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
International Public Partnerships Neutral
F&C Investment Trust Neutral

31.7% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Public Partnerships shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

International Public Partnerships pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. International Public Partnerships pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. F&C Investment Trust pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

F&C Investment Trust beats International Public Partnerships on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get International Public Partnerships News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for INPP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding INPP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

INPP vs. The Competition

Export
MetricInternational Public PartnershipsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.50B£5.73B£13.87B£2.52B
Dividend Yield6.18%7.38%5.87%6.10%
P/E Ratio9.7838.2529.40368.50
Price / Sales9.331,208.86507.2283,338.67
Price / Cash12.7148.2837.2627.89
Price / Book0.943.692.817.18
Net Income£43.53M£417.15M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.65%0.60%0.77%0.91%
1 Month Performance-0.99%1.18%1.43%2.92%
1 Year Performance15.31%6.64%12.06%64.34%

International Public Partnerships Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
INPP
International Public Partnerships
N/AGBX 139.60
-0.4%		N/A+15.3%£2.50B£267.76M9.78N/A
SDR
Schroders
1.9303 of 5 stars		GBX 584
+0.2%		GBX 453.33
-22.4%		+47.3%£9.08B£3.51B13.436,438
MNG
M&G
3.8177 of 5 stars		GBX 353.40
+0.6%		GBX 677.86
+91.8%		+34.4%£8.44B£21.71B28.736,101
PCT
Polar Capital Technology Trust
N/AGBX 685
+1.2%		N/A+67.9%£7.34B£3.76B2.07120
PSH
Pershing Square
N/AGBX 3,868
-0.7%		N/A-6.1%£6.77B£2.57B2.75N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:INPP) was last updated on 8/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Man who Predicted Trump 2016 Win: “Prepare for Mid-Term Meltdown”
In 2016, major election models gave Hillary Clinton a 99% chance of winning - but former CIA and Pentagon advi...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy These Stocks Before August 31st
Keith Kaplan has invested $17 million into his own AI research platform, now used by 180,000 investors worldwi...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
This tiny launch company operates next to SpaceX and Blue Origin
A small publicly traded company operates a specialized launch vehicle fleet inside the secure perimeter of Ken...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ray Dalio: Buy Gold. Get Paid.
Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, is urging investors to hold 15% of their portfolio in gold and c...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel