Free Trial

HICL Infrastructure (HICL) Competitors

HICL Infrastructure logo
GBX 123.60 -1.20 (-0.96%)
As of 05/15/2026 12:39 PM Eastern

HICL vs. SDR, PCT, MNG, PSH, and ICP

Should you buy HICL Infrastructure stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares HICL Infrastructure with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with HICL Infrastructure include Schroders (SDR), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), M&G (MNG), Pershing Square (PSH), and Intermediate Capital Group (ICP). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does HICL Infrastructure compare to Schroders?

HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) and Schroders (LON:SDR) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. HICL Infrastructure pays out 133.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Schroders pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.442, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroders has a beta of 1.075, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Schroders has a consensus price target of GBX 453.33, suggesting a potential downside of 22.02%. Given Schroders' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Schroders is more favorable than HICL Infrastructure.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HICL Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Schroders
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

28.7% of HICL Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.1% of Schroders shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Schroders shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, HICL Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Schroders. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for HICL Infrastructure and 3 mentions for Schroders. Schroders' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat HICL Infrastructure's score of 1.09 indicating that Schroders is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
HICL Infrastructure
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Schroders
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

HICL Infrastructure has a net margin of 43.50% compared to Schroders' net margin of 16.44%. Schroders' return on equity of 12.35% beat HICL Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HICL Infrastructure43.50% 3.99% 0.58%
Schroders 16.44%12.35%1.86%

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than HICL Infrastructure. Schroders is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HICL Infrastructure£125.10M18.63£101.36M£6.2019.94
Schroders£3.25B2.79£355.50M£33.6017.30

Summary

Schroders beats HICL Infrastructure on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HICL Infrastructure compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) and Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and dividends.

28.7% of HICL Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.442, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.91290385, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, HICL Infrastructure had 3 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for HICL Infrastructure and 1 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust. Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat HICL Infrastructure's score of 1.09 indicating that Polar Capital Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
HICL Infrastructure
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Polar Capital Technology Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than HICL Infrastructure. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HICL Infrastructure£125.10M18.63£101.36M£6.2019.94
Polar Capital Technology Trust£2.14B3.49£1.20B£188.583.56

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 294.06% compared to HICL Infrastructure's net margin of 43.50%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 43.14% beat HICL Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HICL Infrastructure43.50% 3.99% 0.58%
Polar Capital Technology Trust 294.06%43.14%20.70%

Summary

Polar Capital Technology Trust beats HICL Infrastructure on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HICL Infrastructure compare to M&G?

HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) and M&G (LON:MNG) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and dividends.

28.7% of HICL Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.2% of M&G shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of M&G shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.442, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, M&G has a beta of 0.967, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, HICL Infrastructure had 2 more articles in the media than M&G. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for HICL Infrastructure and 2 mentions for M&G. HICL Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat M&G's score of 0.78 indicating that HICL Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
HICL Infrastructure
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
M&G
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. HICL Infrastructure pays out 133.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. M&G pays out 164.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. HICL Infrastructure is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

M&G has a consensus price target of GBX 297.57, suggesting a potential downside of 2.94%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe M&G is more favorable than HICL Infrastructure.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HICL Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
M&G
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

M&G has higher revenue and earnings than HICL Infrastructure. HICL Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HICL Infrastructure£125.10M18.63£101.36M£6.2019.94
M&G£21.71B0.34£166.98M£12.3024.93

HICL Infrastructure has a net margin of 43.50% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. M&G's return on equity of 9.49% beat HICL Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HICL Infrastructure43.50% 3.99% 0.58%
M&G 1.73%9.49%0.40%

Summary

M&G beats HICL Infrastructure on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HICL Infrastructure compare to Pershing Square?

Pershing Square (LON:PSH) and HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

5.9% of Pershing Square shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HICL Infrastructure pays out 133.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Pershing Square has a beta of 0.85510576, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.442, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than HICL Infrastructure. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pershing Square£2.57B2.75£2.71B£1.41 thousand2.87
HICL Infrastructure£125.10M18.63£101.36M£6.2019.94

In the previous week, HICL Infrastructure had 4 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for HICL Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Pershing Square. HICL Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Pershing Square's score of 0.00 indicating that HICL Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pershing Square Neutral
HICL Infrastructure Positive

Pershing Square has a net margin of 94.13% compared to HICL Infrastructure's net margin of 43.50%. Pershing Square's return on equity of 16.97% beat HICL Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pershing Square94.13% 16.97% 11.83%
HICL Infrastructure 43.50%3.99%0.58%

Summary

Pershing Square beats HICL Infrastructure on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HICL Infrastructure compare to Intermediate Capital Group?

Intermediate Capital Group (LON:ICP) and HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Intermediate Capital Group has a beta of 1.9, suggesting that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.442, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Intermediate Capital Group has higher revenue and earnings than HICL Infrastructure. Intermediate Capital Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intermediate Capital Group£831.60M0.00£409.10M£0.77N/A
HICL Infrastructure£125.10M18.63£101.36M£6.2019.94

70.4% of Intermediate Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Intermediate Capital Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, HICL Infrastructure had 4 more articles in the media than Intermediate Capital Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for HICL Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Intermediate Capital Group. HICL Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Intermediate Capital Group's score of 0.00 indicating that HICL Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intermediate Capital Group Neutral
HICL Infrastructure Positive

Intermediate Capital Group has a net margin of 56.78% compared to HICL Infrastructure's net margin of 43.50%. Intermediate Capital Group's return on equity of 20.09% beat HICL Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intermediate Capital Group56.78% 20.09% 4.57%
HICL Infrastructure 43.50%3.99%0.58%

Intermediate Capital Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 78 per share. HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Intermediate Capital Group pays out 10,129.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. HICL Infrastructure pays out 133.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. HICL Infrastructure is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Intermediate Capital Group beats HICL Infrastructure on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get HICL Infrastructure News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HICL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HICL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HICL vs. The Competition

MetricHICL InfrastructureAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.33B£2.35B£5.16B£2.60B
Dividend Yield6.76%5.97%5.25%6.15%
P/E Ratio19.9425.1415.93365.91
Price / Sales18.632,063.581,023.0988,030.08
Price / Cash1,644.0060.1791.0127.89
Price / Book0.791.356.597.74
Net Income£101.36M£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.38%-0.71%-0.26%0.21%
1 Month Performance-3.31%1.69%1.19%1.56%
1 Year Performance7.48%12.04%18.11%77.95%

HICL Infrastructure Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HICL
HICL Infrastructure
N/AGBX 123.60
-1.0%
N/A+9.0%£2.33B£125.10M19.94N/A
SDR
Schroders
1.8477 of 5 stars
GBX 581.50
-0.3%
GBX 453.33
-22.0%
+67.1%£9.07B£3.25B17.316,438
PCT
Polar Capital Technology Trust
N/AGBX 676.50
-1.3%
N/A+102.6%£7.54B£2.14B3.59120
MNG
M&G
1.7156 of 5 stars
GBX 306.20
-0.8%
GBX 297.57
-2.8%
+40.1%£7.29B£21.71B24.896,101
PSH
Pershing Square
N/AGBX 4,042.70
-0.4%
N/A+8.1%£7.08B£2.57B2.87N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:HICL) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners