Free Trial

HICL Infrastructure (HICL) Competitors

HICL Infrastructure logo
GBX 131.40 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 03:19 AM Eastern

HICL vs. SDR, PCT, MNG, FCIT, and PSH

Should you buy HICL Infrastructure stock or one of its competitors? HICL Infrastructure's main competitors and comparable companies include Schroders (SDR), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), M&G (MNG), F&C Investment Trust (FCIT), and Pershing Square (PSH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does HICL Infrastructure compare to Schroders?

Schroders (LON:SDR) and HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Schroders has a beta of 1.076, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than HICL Infrastructure. HICL Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroders£3.51B2.62£355.50M£43.5013.54
HICL Infrastructure£277.40M8.81£101.36M£13.809.52

HICL Infrastructure has a net margin of 88.60% compared to Schroders' net margin of 20.13%. Schroders' return on equity of 15.55% beat HICL Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroders20.13% 15.55% 1.86%
HICL Infrastructure 88.60%8.82%0.58%

16.9% of Schroders shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.0% of HICL Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Schroders shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Schroders pays out 49.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HICL Infrastructure pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Schroders had 3 more articles in the media than HICL Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Schroders and 1 mentions for HICL Infrastructure. HICL Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.01 beat Schroders' score of 0.00 indicating that HICL Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Schroders
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
HICL Infrastructure
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Schroders currently has a consensus price target of GBX 460, suggesting a potential downside of 21.89%. Given Schroders' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Schroders is more favorable than HICL Infrastructure.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Schroders
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
HICL Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Schroders beats HICL Infrastructure on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HICL Infrastructure compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) and HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than HICL Infrastructure. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Technology Trust£3.76B2.12£1.20B£330.422.18
HICL Infrastructure£277.40M8.81£101.36M£13.809.52

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Polar Capital Technology Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
HICL Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 249.53% compared to HICL Infrastructure's net margin of 88.60%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 55.87% beat HICL Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Technology Trust249.53% 55.87% 20.70%
HICL Infrastructure 88.60%8.82%0.58%

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.739, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

87.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.0% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Polar Capital Technology Trust had 1 more articles in the media than HICL Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust and 1 mentions for HICL Infrastructure. Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat HICL Infrastructure's score of 0.01 indicating that Polar Capital Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Technology Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
HICL Infrastructure
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Polar Capital Technology Trust beats HICL Infrastructure on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HICL Infrastructure compare to M&G?

M&G (LON:MNG) and HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

42.9% of M&G shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.0% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of M&G shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

HICL Infrastructure has a net margin of 88.60% compared to M&G's net margin of -0.44%. HICL Infrastructure's return on equity of 8.82% beat M&G's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
M&G-0.44% -3.86% 0.40%
HICL Infrastructure 88.60%8.82%0.58%

M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. M&G pays out -427.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HICL Infrastructure pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. M&G is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

M&G currently has a consensus target price of GBX 685, suggesting a potential upside of 119.62%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe M&G is more favorable than HICL Infrastructure.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
M&G
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
HICL Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, M&G had 2 more articles in the media than HICL Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for M&G and 1 mentions for HICL Infrastructure. M&G's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat HICL Infrastructure's score of 0.01 indicating that M&G is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
M&G
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
HICL Infrastructure
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

M&G has a beta of 0.949, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

M&G has higher revenue and earnings than HICL Infrastructure. M&G is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
M&G£24.97B0.30£166.98M-£4.80N/A
HICL Infrastructure£277.40M8.81£101.36M£13.809.52

Summary

M&G beats HICL Infrastructure on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HICL Infrastructure compare to F&C Investment Trust?

F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) and HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.0% of HICL Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.736, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. F&C Investment Trust pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HICL Infrastructure pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

F&C Investment Trust has a net margin of 103.67% compared to HICL Infrastructure's net margin of 88.60%. F&C Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.14% beat HICL Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
F&C Investment Trust103.67% 22.14% 10.80%
HICL Infrastructure 88.60%8.82%0.58%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
F&C Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
HICL Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, HICL Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than F&C Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for HICL Infrastructure and 0 mentions for F&C Investment Trust. HICL Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.01 beat F&C Investment Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that HICL Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
F&C Investment Trust Neutral
HICL Infrastructure Neutral

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than HICL Infrastructure. F&C Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
F&C Investment Trust£1.46B4.48£935.32M£75.804.62
HICL Infrastructure£277.40M8.81£101.36M£13.809.52

Summary

F&C Investment Trust beats HICL Infrastructure on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does HICL Infrastructure compare to Pershing Square?

HICL Infrastructure (LON:HICL) and Pershing Square (LON:PSH) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

HICL Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 69.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. HICL Infrastructure pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pershing Square pays out -9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HICL Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Pershing Square
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Pershing Square has a net margin of 97.16% compared to HICL Infrastructure's net margin of 88.60%. HICL Infrastructure's return on equity of 8.82% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HICL Infrastructure88.60% 8.82% 0.58%
Pershing Square 97.16%-2.59%11.83%

In the previous week, HICL Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for HICL Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Pershing Square. HICL Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.01 beat Pershing Square's score of 0.00 indicating that HICL Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
HICL Infrastructure Neutral
Pershing Square Neutral

HICL Infrastructure has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pershing Square has a beta of 0.842, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Pershing Square has lower revenue, but higher earnings than HICL Infrastructure. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HICL Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HICL Infrastructure£277.40M8.81£101.36M£13.809.52
Pershing Square-£1.26B-5.15£2.71B-£752.00N/A

28.0% of HICL Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Pershing Square shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of HICL Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

HICL Infrastructure beats Pershing Square on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get HICL Infrastructure News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HICL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HICL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HICL vs. The Competition

MetricHICL InfrastructureCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.44B£5.13B£13.34B£2.81B
Dividend Yield6.46%7.56%6.03%6.26%
P/E Ratio9.5229.4824.43366.69
Price / Sales8.811,188.74497.0489,148.58
Price / Cash1,644.0047.6729.4627.89
Price / Book0.843.492.716.98
Net Income£101.36M£415.67M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.50%-0.26%-0.28%-0.67%
1 Month Performance-2.81%-2.78%-3.21%-1.14%
1 Year Performance8.23%10.84%11.16%23.00%

HICL Infrastructure Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HICL
HICL Infrastructure
1.1777 of 5 stars
GBX 131.40
flat
N/A+7.0%£2.44B£277.40M9.52N/A
SDR
Schroders
1.3652 of 5 stars
GBX 588.94
0.0%
GBX 453.33
-23.0%
+49.6%£9.18B£3.51B13.546,438
PCT
Polar Capital Technology Trust
N/AGBX 718.50
+3.2%
N/A+59.5%£7.95B£3.76B2.17120
MNG
M&G
2.5527 of 5 stars
GBX 311
+0.1%
GBX 685
+120.3%
+25.3%£7.41B£24.97BN/A6,101
FCIT
F&C Investment Trust
N/AGBX 347.40
+1.1%
N/A+14.8%£6.51B£1.46B4.58N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:HICL) was last updated on 10/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners