Burford Capital (BUR) Competitors

Burford Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trustpilot Group. Burford Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trustpilot Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

27.5% of Burford Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.0% of Trustpilot Group shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of Burford Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.6% of Trustpilot Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Trustpilot Group had 2 more articles in the media than Burford Capital. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trustpilot Group and 0 mentions for Burford Capital. Trustpilot Group's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Burford Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Trustpilot Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Burford Capital has a beta of 1.235, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trustpilot Group has a beta of 0.494, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Burford Capital has a net margin of 17.12% compared to Trustpilot Group's net margin of 2.97%. Trustpilot Group's return on equity of 64.11% beat Burford Capital's return on equity.

Burford Capital presently has a consensus price target of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 41.60%. Trustpilot Group has a consensus price target of GBX 321, suggesting a potential upside of 31.69%. Given Burford Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Burford Capital is more favorable than Trustpilot Group.

Baltic Classifieds Group has a net margin of 57.67% compared to Burford Capital's net margin of 17.12%. Baltic Classifieds Group's return on equity of 13.93% beat Burford Capital's return on equity.

27.5% of Burford Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.0% of Baltic Classifieds Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.8% of Burford Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of Baltic Classifieds Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Burford Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Baltic Classifieds Group. Burford Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baltic Classifieds Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Baltic Classifieds Group had 3 more articles in the media than Burford Capital. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Baltic Classifieds Group and 0 mentions for Burford Capital. Baltic Classifieds Group's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Burford Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Baltic Classifieds Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Burford Capital presently has a consensus price target of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 41.60%. Baltic Classifieds Group has a consensus price target of GBX 309, indicating a potential upside of 65.59%. Given Baltic Classifieds Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Baltic Classifieds Group is more favorable than Burford Capital.

Burford Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Baltic Classifieds Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Burford Capital pays out 44.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baltic Classifieds Group pays out 36.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Burford Capital has a beta of 1.235, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baltic Classifieds Group has a beta of 1.081, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Burford Capital has a net margin of 17.12% compared to DFS Furniture's net margin of 3.27%. DFS Furniture's return on equity of 13.23% beat Burford Capital's return on equity.

Burford Capital has a beta of 1.235, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DFS Furniture has a beta of 1.456, indicating that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

Burford Capital currently has a consensus price target of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 41.60%. DFS Furniture has a consensus price target of GBX 222.50, suggesting a potential upside of 85.42%. Given DFS Furniture's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe DFS Furniture is more favorable than Burford Capital.

In the previous week, Burford Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled DFS Furniture'saverage media sentiment score.

27.5% of Burford Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.6% of DFS Furniture shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of Burford Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 38.9% of DFS Furniture shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Burford Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DFS Furniture. DFS Furniture is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Burford Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Burford Capital has a net margin of 17.12% compared to McBride's net margin of 3.20%. McBride's return on equity of 30.98% beat Burford Capital's return on equity.

McBride currently has a consensus price target of GBX 190, indicating a potential upside of 16.42%. Burford Capital has a consensus price target of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 41.60%. Given Burford Capital's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Burford Capital is more favorable than McBride.

McBride has a beta of 1.446, meaning that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Burford Capital has a beta of 1.235, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Burford Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than McBride. McBride is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Burford Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, McBride had 18 more articles in the media than Burford Capital. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for McBride and 0 mentions for Burford Capital. McBride's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Burford Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that McBride is being referred to more favorably in the media.

18.7% of McBride shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.5% of Burford Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 28.8% of McBride shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.8% of Burford Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

McBride pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Burford Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. McBride pays out 17.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Burford Capital pays out 44.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.