Burford Capital (BUR) Competitors

Burford Capital has a net margin of 17.12% compared to Trustpilot Group's net margin of 2.97%. Trustpilot Group's return on equity of 64.11% beat Burford Capital's return on equity.

Burford Capital has a beta of 1.062, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trustpilot Group has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Burford Capital currently has a consensus target price of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 42.50%. Trustpilot Group has a consensus target price of GBX 351.25, indicating a potential upside of 47.42%. Given Trustpilot Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Trustpilot Group is more favorable than Burford Capital.

23.5% of Burford Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.5% of Trustpilot Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Burford Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.5% of Trustpilot Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Burford Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trustpilot Group. Burford Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trustpilot Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Trustpilot Group's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Burford Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Trustpilot Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Baltic Classifieds Group has a net margin of 57.67% compared to Burford Capital's net margin of 17.12%. Baltic Classifieds Group's return on equity of 13.93% beat Burford Capital's return on equity.

59.0% of Baltic Classifieds Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.5% of Burford Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.5% of Baltic Classifieds Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Burford Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Baltic Classifieds Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 308.75, indicating a potential upside of 62.33%. Burford Capital has a consensus target price of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 42.50%. Given Baltic Classifieds Group's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Baltic Classifieds Group is more favorable than Burford Capital.

Baltic Classifieds Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Burford Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Baltic Classifieds Group pays out 36.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Burford Capital pays out -1.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Burford Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Burford Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Baltic Classifieds Group. Burford Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baltic Classifieds Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Burford Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Baltic Classifieds Group's score of -1.00 indicating that Burford Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Baltic Classifieds Group has a beta of 1.064, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Burford Capital has a beta of 1.062, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, DFS Furniture had 1 more articles in the media than Burford Capital. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for DFS Furniture and 0 mentions for Burford Capital. Burford Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled DFS Furniture'saverage media sentiment score.

23.5% of Burford Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.3% of DFS Furniture shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Burford Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.9% of DFS Furniture shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Burford Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DFS Furniture. Burford Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DFS Furniture, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Burford Capital has a net margin of 17.12% compared to DFS Furniture's net margin of 3.27%. DFS Furniture's return on equity of 13.23% beat Burford Capital's return on equity.

Burford Capital has a beta of 1.062, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DFS Furniture has a beta of 1.444, meaning that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

Burford Capital presently has a consensus price target of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 42.50%. DFS Furniture has a consensus price target of GBX 222.50, indicating a potential upside of 64.81%. Given DFS Furniture's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe DFS Furniture is more favorable than Burford Capital.

Burford Capital currently has a consensus target price of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 42.50%. McBride has a consensus target price of GBX 190, suggesting a potential upside of 29.08%. Given Burford Capital's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Burford Capital is more favorable than McBride.

Burford Capital has a net margin of 17.12% compared to McBride's net margin of 3.20%. McBride's return on equity of 30.98% beat Burford Capital's return on equity.

23.5% of Burford Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.7% of McBride shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Burford Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.1% of McBride shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Burford Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than McBride. Burford Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McBride, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Burford Capital has a beta of 1.062, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McBride has a beta of 1.471, indicating that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, McBride had 7 more articles in the media than Burford Capital. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for McBride and 0 mentions for Burford Capital. McBride's average media sentiment score of 0.03 beat Burford Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that McBride is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Burford Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. McBride pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Burford Capital pays out -1.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. McBride pays out 17.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Burford Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.