Free Trial

Invinity Energy Systems (IES) Competitors

Invinity Energy Systems logo
GBX 39 -0.40 (-1.02%)
As of 12:25 PM Eastern

IES vs. DFS, MCB, SHG, FIF, and RM

Should you buy Invinity Energy Systems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Invinity Energy Systems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Invinity Energy Systems include DFS Furniture (DFS), McBride (MCB), Shanta Gold (SHG), Finsbury Food Group (FIF), and RM (RM). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to DFS Furniture?

DFS Furniture (LON:DFS) and Invinity Energy Systems (LON:IES) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

DFS Furniture has a net margin of 3.27% compared to Invinity Energy Systems' net margin of -595.51%. DFS Furniture's return on equity of 13.23% beat Invinity Energy Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DFS Furniture3.27% 13.23% 3.00%
Invinity Energy Systems -595.51%-35.43%-18.76%

In the previous week, Invinity Energy Systems had 25 more articles in the media than DFS Furniture. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Invinity Energy Systems and 0 mentions for DFS Furniture. Invinity Energy Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat DFS Furniture's score of 0.00 indicating that Invinity Energy Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
DFS Furniture Neutral
Invinity Energy Systems Very Positive

DFS Furniture has higher revenue and earnings than Invinity Energy Systems. Invinity Energy Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DFS Furniture, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DFS Furniture£1.07B0.26-£4.30M£15.008.07
Invinity Energy Systems£8.18M27.11-£37.71M-£4.40N/A

DFS Furniture presently has a consensus price target of GBX 222.50, suggesting a potential upside of 83.88%. Invinity Energy Systems has a consensus price target of GBX 35, suggesting a potential downside of 10.26%. Given DFS Furniture's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe DFS Furniture is more favorable than Invinity Energy Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DFS Furniture
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Invinity Energy Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

DFS Furniture has a beta of 1.456, suggesting that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Invinity Energy Systems has a beta of 1.056, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

66.6% of DFS Furniture shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 38.9% of DFS Furniture shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

DFS Furniture beats Invinity Energy Systems on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to McBride?

McBride (LON:MCB) and Invinity Energy Systems (LON:IES) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

McBride has higher revenue and earnings than Invinity Energy Systems. Invinity Energy Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McBride, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McBride£930.30M0.30£33.16M£16.909.67
Invinity Energy Systems£8.18M27.11-£37.71M-£4.40N/A

McBride presently has a consensus target price of GBX 190, suggesting a potential upside of 16.28%. Invinity Energy Systems has a consensus target price of GBX 35, suggesting a potential downside of 10.26%. Given McBride's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe McBride is more favorable than Invinity Energy Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McBride
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Invinity Energy Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

McBride has a net margin of 3.20% compared to Invinity Energy Systems' net margin of -595.51%. McBride's return on equity of 30.98% beat Invinity Energy Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McBride3.20% 30.98% 8.54%
Invinity Energy Systems -595.51%-35.43%-18.76%

In the previous week, Invinity Energy Systems had 10 more articles in the media than McBride. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Invinity Energy Systems and 15 mentions for McBride. Invinity Energy Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat McBride's score of 0.47 indicating that Invinity Energy Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
McBride
3 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Invinity Energy Systems
21 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

18.7% of McBride shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 28.8% of McBride shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

McBride has a beta of 1.446, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Invinity Energy Systems has a beta of 1.056, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

McBride beats Invinity Energy Systems on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to Shanta Gold?

Shanta Gold (LON:SHG) and Invinity Energy Systems (LON:IES) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, Invinity Energy Systems had 25 more articles in the media than Shanta Gold. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Invinity Energy Systems and 0 mentions for Shanta Gold. Invinity Energy Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Shanta Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Invinity Energy Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shanta Gold Neutral
Invinity Energy Systems Very Positive

Shanta Gold has a net margin of 8.96% compared to Invinity Energy Systems' net margin of -595.51%. Shanta Gold's return on equity of 8.47% beat Invinity Energy Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shanta Gold8.96% 8.47% 7.61%
Invinity Energy Systems -595.51%-35.43%-18.76%

Invinity Energy Systems has a consensus price target of GBX 35, suggesting a potential downside of 10.26%. Given Shanta Gold's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Shanta Gold is more favorable than Invinity Energy Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Shanta Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Invinity Energy Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

80.4% of Shanta Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.2% of Shanta Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Shanta Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Invinity Energy Systems. Invinity Energy Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shanta Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shanta Gold£150.50M0.00£13.48M£0.01N/A
Invinity Energy Systems£8.18M27.11-£37.71M-£4.40N/A

Shanta Gold has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Invinity Energy Systems has a beta of 1.056, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Shanta Gold beats Invinity Energy Systems on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to Finsbury Food Group?

Invinity Energy Systems (LON:IES) and Finsbury Food Group (LON:FIF) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Invinity Energy Systems has a beta of 1.056, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Finsbury Food Group has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Finsbury Food Group has a net margin of 2.60% compared to Invinity Energy Systems' net margin of -595.51%. Finsbury Food Group's return on equity of 9.29% beat Invinity Energy Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Invinity Energy Systems-595.51% -35.43% -18.76%
Finsbury Food Group 2.60%9.29%5.12%

Invinity Energy Systems currently has a consensus price target of GBX 35, suggesting a potential downside of 10.26%. Given Finsbury Food Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Finsbury Food Group is more favorable than Invinity Energy Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Invinity Energy Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Finsbury Food Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Finsbury Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Invinity Energy Systems. Invinity Energy Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Finsbury Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Invinity Energy Systems£8.18M27.11-£37.71M-£4.40N/A
Finsbury Food Group£413.74M0.00£10.77M£0.08N/A

19.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.7% of Finsbury Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.5% of Finsbury Food Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Invinity Energy Systems had 25 more articles in the media than Finsbury Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Invinity Energy Systems and 0 mentions for Finsbury Food Group. Invinity Energy Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Finsbury Food Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Invinity Energy Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Invinity Energy Systems Very Positive
Finsbury Food Group Neutral

Summary

Finsbury Food Group beats Invinity Energy Systems on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to RM?

RM (LON:RM) and Invinity Energy Systems (LON:IES) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

63.5% of RM shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 20.1% of RM shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Invinity Energy Systems had 19 more articles in the media than RM. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Invinity Energy Systems and 6 mentions for RM. Invinity Energy Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat RM's score of -0.08 indicating that Invinity Energy Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
RM
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Invinity Energy Systems
21 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Invinity Energy Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RM. Invinity Energy Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RM£189.50M0.47-£47.32M-£55.02N/A
Invinity Energy Systems£8.18M27.11-£37.71M-£4.40N/A

RM has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Invinity Energy Systems has a beta of 1.056, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

RM has a net margin of 1.35% compared to Invinity Energy Systems' net margin of -595.51%. RM's return on equity of 10.33% beat Invinity Energy Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RM1.35% 10.33% -1.51%
Invinity Energy Systems -595.51%-35.43%-18.76%

Invinity Energy Systems has a consensus target price of GBX 35, indicating a potential downside of 10.26%. Given Invinity Energy Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Invinity Energy Systems is more favorable than RM.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RM
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Invinity Energy Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

RM and Invinity Energy Systems tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Invinity Energy Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IES and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IES and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IES vs. The Competition

MetricInvinity Energy SystemsUtilities IndustryUtilities SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£221.82M£4.48B£18.70B£2.77B
Dividend YieldN/A4.93%3.95%6.12%
P/E Ratio-8.8613.7020.36365.21
Price / Sales27.11209.9045.1787,168.39
Price / Cash1.9840.4119.3027.85
Price / Book1.231.602.477.68
Net Income-£37.71M£267.05M£785.75M£5.89B
7 Day Performance11.43%1.32%-0.51%-0.55%
1 Month Performance129.41%3.79%-1.05%3.15%
1 Year Performance142.31%34.69%17.67%73.57%

Invinity Energy Systems Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IES
Invinity Energy Systems
0.9027 of 5 stars
GBX 39
-1.0%
GBX 35
-10.3%
+145.1%£221.82M£8.18MN/A140
DFS
DFS Furniture
3.6425 of 5 stars
GBX 121.50
-2.4%
GBX 222.50
+83.1%
-26.3%£281.29M£1.07B8.1020,200
MCB
McBride
2.3763 of 5 stars
GBX 162.80
+1.6%
GBX 190
+16.7%
+6.9%£279.13M£930.30M9.63240
SHG
Shanta Gold
N/AN/AN/AN/A£154.98M£150.50M1,476.00190
FIF
Finsbury Food Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£143.42M£413.74M1,375.00206

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:IES) was last updated on 6/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners