Invinity Energy Systems (IES) Competitors

GBX 22.40 -0.10 (-0.44%)

As of 05/15/2026 12:39 PM Eastern

IES vs. DFS, MCB, SHG, FIF, and RM

Should you buy Invinity Energy Systems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Invinity Energy Systems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Invinity Energy Systems include DFS Furniture (DFS), McBride (MCB), Shanta Gold (SHG), Finsbury Food Group (FIF), and RM (RM). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to DFS Furniture?

Invinity Energy Systems (LON:IES) and DFS Furniture (LON:DFS) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

Invinity Energy Systems presently has a consensus target price of GBX 33, indicating a potential upside of 47.32%. DFS Furniture has a consensus target price of GBX 222.50, indicating a potential upside of 85.42%. Given DFS Furniture's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe DFS Furniture is more favorable than Invinity Energy Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Invinity Energy Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
DFS Furniture	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

DFS Furniture has higher revenue and earnings than Invinity Energy Systems. Invinity Energy Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DFS Furniture, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Invinity Energy Systems	£3.63M	35.06	-£37.71M	-£4.40	N/A
DFS Furniture	£1.07B	0.26	-£4.30M	£15.00	8.00

DFS Furniture has a net margin of 3.27% compared to Invinity Energy Systems' net margin of -595.51%. DFS Furniture's return on equity of 13.23% beat Invinity Energy Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Invinity Energy Systems	-595.51%	-35.65%	-18.76%
DFS Furniture	3.27%	13.23%	3.00%

Invinity Energy Systems has a beta of 0.926, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DFS Furniture has a beta of 1.471, indicating that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

19.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.6% of DFS Furniture shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 38.9% of DFS Furniture shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Invinity Energy Systems had 57 more articles in the media than DFS Furniture. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Invinity Energy Systems and 0 mentions for DFS Furniture. Invinity Energy Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat DFS Furniture's score of 0.00 indicating that Invinity Energy Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Invinity Energy Systems	Very Positive
DFS Furniture	Neutral

Summary

DFS Furniture beats Invinity Energy Systems on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to McBride?

Invinity Energy Systems (LON:IES) and McBride (LON:MCB) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

McBride has a net margin of 3.20% compared to Invinity Energy Systems' net margin of -595.51%. McBride's return on equity of 30.98% beat Invinity Energy Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Invinity Energy Systems	-595.51%	-35.65%	-18.76%
McBride	3.20%	30.98%	8.54%

In the previous week, Invinity Energy Systems had 49 more articles in the media than McBride. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Invinity Energy Systems and 8 mentions for McBride. Invinity Energy Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat McBride's score of -0.11 indicating that Invinity Energy Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Invinity Energy Systems	51 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
McBride	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Invinity Energy Systems has a beta of 0.926, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McBride has a beta of 1.446, meaning that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

McBride has higher revenue and earnings than Invinity Energy Systems. Invinity Energy Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McBride, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Invinity Energy Systems	£3.63M	35.06	-£37.71M	-£4.40	N/A
McBride	£930.30M	0.29	£33.16M	£16.90	9.28

19.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.7% of McBride shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.8% of McBride shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Invinity Energy Systems currently has a consensus target price of GBX 33, suggesting a potential upside of 47.32%. McBride has a consensus target price of GBX 190, suggesting a potential upside of 21.17%. Given Invinity Energy Systems' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Invinity Energy Systems is more favorable than McBride.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Invinity Energy Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
McBride	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

McBride beats Invinity Energy Systems on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to Shanta Gold?

Invinity Energy Systems (LON:IES) and Shanta Gold (LON:SHG) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Shanta Gold has a net margin of 8.96% compared to Invinity Energy Systems' net margin of -595.51%. Shanta Gold's return on equity of 8.47% beat Invinity Energy Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Invinity Energy Systems	-595.51%	-35.65%	-18.76%
Shanta Gold	8.96%	8.47%	7.61%

In the previous week, Invinity Energy Systems had 57 more articles in the media than Shanta Gold. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Invinity Energy Systems and 0 mentions for Shanta Gold. Invinity Energy Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Shanta Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Invinity Energy Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Invinity Energy Systems	Very Positive
Shanta Gold	Neutral

Invinity Energy Systems has a beta of 0.926, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shanta Gold has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Shanta Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Invinity Energy Systems. Invinity Energy Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shanta Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Invinity Energy Systems	£3.63M	35.06	-£37.71M	-£4.40	N/A
Shanta Gold	£150.50M	0.00	£13.48M	£0.01	N/A

19.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Shanta Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.2% of Shanta Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Invinity Energy Systems currently has a consensus target price of GBX 33, suggesting a potential upside of 47.32%. Given Invinity Energy Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Invinity Energy Systems is more favorable than Shanta Gold.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Invinity Energy Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Shanta Gold	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Shanta Gold beats Invinity Energy Systems on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to Finsbury Food Group?

Invinity Energy Systems (LON:IES) and Finsbury Food Group (LON:FIF) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Finsbury Food Group has a net margin of 2.60% compared to Invinity Energy Systems' net margin of -595.51%. Finsbury Food Group's return on equity of 9.29% beat Invinity Energy Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Invinity Energy Systems	-595.51%	-35.65%	-18.76%
Finsbury Food Group	2.60%	9.29%	5.12%

Finsbury Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Invinity Energy Systems. Invinity Energy Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Finsbury Food Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Invinity Energy Systems	£3.63M	35.06	-£37.71M	-£4.40	N/A
Finsbury Food Group	£413.74M	0.00	£10.77M	£0.08	N/A

Invinity Energy Systems presently has a consensus price target of GBX 33, indicating a potential upside of 47.32%. Given Invinity Energy Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Invinity Energy Systems is more favorable than Finsbury Food Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Invinity Energy Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Finsbury Food Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

19.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.7% of Finsbury Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.5% of Finsbury Food Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Invinity Energy Systems had 57 more articles in the media than Finsbury Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Invinity Energy Systems and 0 mentions for Finsbury Food Group. Invinity Energy Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Finsbury Food Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Invinity Energy Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Invinity Energy Systems	Very Positive
Finsbury Food Group	Neutral

Invinity Energy Systems has a beta of 0.926, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Finsbury Food Group has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Finsbury Food Group beats Invinity Energy Systems on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to RM?

RM (LON:RM) and Invinity Energy Systems (LON:IES) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

RM has a net margin of 1.35% compared to Invinity Energy Systems' net margin of -595.51%. RM's return on equity of 10.33% beat Invinity Energy Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
RM	1.35%	10.33%	-1.51%
Invinity Energy Systems	-595.51%	-35.65%	-18.76%

Invinity Energy Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RM. Invinity Energy Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
RM	£189.50M	0.44	-£47.32M	-£55.02	N/A
Invinity Energy Systems	£3.63M	35.06	-£37.71M	-£4.40	N/A

Invinity Energy Systems has a consensus price target of GBX 33, indicating a potential upside of 47.32%. Given Invinity Energy Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Invinity Energy Systems is more favorable than RM.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
RM	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Invinity Energy Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

63.5% of RM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.1% of RM shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Invinity Energy Systems had 56 more articles in the media than RM. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Invinity Energy Systems and 1 mentions for RM. Invinity Energy Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat RM's score of 0.00 indicating that Invinity Energy Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
RM	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Invinity Energy Systems	51 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

RM has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Invinity Energy Systems has a beta of 0.926, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

RM and Invinity Energy Systems tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Invinity Energy Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

IES vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Invinity Energy Systems	Utilities Industry	Utilities Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£127.40M	£2.03B	£19.05B	£2.60B
Dividend Yield	N/A	4.98%	3.83%	6.15%
P/E Ratio	-5.09	28.96	22.14	365.91
Price / Sales	35.06	262.90	48.80	88,030.08
Price / Cash	1.98	40.40	19.47	27.89
Price / Book	0.70	1.61	2.31	7.74
Net Income	-£37.71M	£267.05M	£777.56M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	31.63%	0.56%	-1.21%	0.21%
1 Month Performance	25.14%	-0.51%	-2.34%	1.56%
1 Year Performance	75.69%	40.94%	19.26%	77.95%

Invinity Energy Systems Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
IES Invinity Energy Systems	2.6949 of 5 stars	GBX 22.40 -0.4%	GBX 33 +47.3%	+73.0%	£127.40M	£3.63M	N/A	140	Trending News Gap Up High Trading Volume
DFS DFS Furniture	3.5642 of 5 stars	GBX 126.43 -1.2%	GBX 222.50 +76.0%	-27.9%	£292.16M	£1.07B	8.43	20,200	Gap Up
MCB McBride	2.3927 of 5 stars	GBX 157.40 +1.8%	GBX 190 +20.7%	+3.4%	£270.25M	£930.30M	9.31	240	Gap Up
SHG Shanta Gold	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£154.98M	£150.50M	1,476.00	190	High Trading Volume
FIF Finsbury Food Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£143.42M	£413.74M	1,375.00	206

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:IES) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Invinity Energy Systems (IES) Competitors

IES vs. DFS, MCB, SHG, FIF, and RM

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to DFS Furniture?

Summary

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to McBride?

Summary

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to Shanta Gold?

Summary

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to Finsbury Food Group?

Summary

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to RM?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

IES vs. The Competition

Invinity Energy Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Invinity Energy Systems (IES) Competitors

IES vs. DFS, MCB, SHG, FIF, and RM

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to DFS Furniture?

Do analysts rate IES or DFS?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, IES or DFS?

Is IES or DFS more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, IES or DFS?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in IES or DFS?

Does the media prefer IES or DFS?

Summary

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to McBride?

Is IES or MCB more profitable?

Does the media favor IES or MCB?

Which has more volatility and risk, IES or MCB?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, IES or MCB?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in IES or MCB?

Do analysts prefer IES or MCB?

Summary

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to Shanta Gold?

Is IES or SHG more profitable?

Does the media favor IES or SHG?

Which has more volatility and risk, IES or SHG?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, IES or SHG?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in IES or SHG?

Do analysts prefer IES or SHG?

Summary

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to Finsbury Food Group?

Is IES or FIF more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, IES or FIF?

Do analysts rate IES or FIF?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in IES or FIF?

Does the media favor IES or FIF?

Which has more volatility and risk, IES or FIF?

Summary

How does Invinity Energy Systems compare to RM?

Is RM or IES more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, RM or IES?

Do analysts rate RM or IES?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in RM or IES?

Does the media favor RM or IES?

Which has more risk and volatility, RM or IES?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

IES vs. The Competition

Invinity Energy Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools